Skip to main content
Log in

Intraoperative bacterial contamination in total hip and knee arthroplasty is associated with operative duration and peeling of the iodine-containing drape from skin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) and periprosthetic joint infection are the most important problems after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to examine the risk factors for intraoperative bacterial contamination in THA and TKA.

Methods

One hundred and seven hips underwent THA, while 74 knees underwent TKA. After the implant was placed, a swab sample for bacterial culture was collected around the skin incision. At the time of specimen collection, patients were separated into two groups based on whether the iodine-containing drape remained adhered to the skin (group DR) or the iodine-containing drape was peeled off (group ND). Patient characteristics, including age, height, body weight, body mass index, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, surgical procedures, and condition of the iodine-containing drape, were compared between patients with positive and negative bacterial cultures.

Results

In THA, which had a shorter operative duration than TKA (p < 0.001), there was one case of bacterial contamination. In TKA, there were ten cases of positive bacterial contamination, all in group ND. Postoperative SSI occurred in one case. The binomial logistic regression analyses confirmed that TKA [OR 16.562 (95% CI 2.071 to 132.430), p < 0.01] was a high risk factor of bacterial contamination compared to THA and the group ND [OR 0.000 (95% CI 0.000), p < 0.001] had a low risk of bacterial contamination compared to the group DR. In TKAs, operative duration was the risk factor of bacterial contamination [OR 1.026 (95% CI 1.000 to 1.054), p < 0.01].

Conclusions

Intraoperative bacterial contamination increases in procedures with long operating time and may be suppressed by proper use of an iodine-containing drape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kapadia BH, Berg RA, Daley JA, Fritz J, Bhave A, Mont MA (2016) Periprosthetic joint infection. Lancet 23(387):386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61798-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dale H, Hallan G, Hallan G, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB (2009) Increasing risk of revision due to deep infection after hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 80:639–645. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670903506658

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J (2008) Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 23:984–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zmistowski B, Restrepo C, Hess J, Adibi D, Cangoz S, Parvizi J (2013) Unplanned readmission after total joint arthroplasty: rates, reasons, and risk factors. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95:1869–1876. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ilchmann T, Zimmerli W, Bolliger L, Graber P, Clauss M (2016) Risk of infection in primary, elective total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach or lateral transgluteal approach: a prospective cohort study of 1104 hips. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:471. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1332-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bengtson S, Knutson K (1991) The infected knee arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 62:301–311. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679108994458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrie RS, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Ilstrup D (1998) Metal-backed patellar component failure in total knee arthroplasty: a possible risk for late infection. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 27:172–176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shahi A, Parvizi J (2015) Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection. Arch Bone Jt Surg 3:72–81

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hagihara M, Suwa M, Ito Y, Muramatsu Y, Kato Y, Yamagishi Y, Mikamo H (2012) Preventing surgical-site infections after colorectal surgery. J Infect Chemother 18:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-011-0298-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery (2009) Safe surgery saves lives. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK143243/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK143243.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2019

  11. Brown NM, Cipriano CA, Moric M, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ (2012) Dilute betadine lavage before closure for the prevention of acute postoperative deep periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 27:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haeri GB (1983) The efficacy of adhesive plastic incise drapes in preventing wound contamination. Int Surg 68:31–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marples RR, Kligman AM (1969) Growth of bacteria under adhesive tapes. Arch Dermatol 99:107–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Falk-Brynhildsen K, Friberg O, Söderquist B, Nilsson UG (2013) Bacterial colonization of the skin following aseptic preoperative preparation and impact of the use of plastic adhesive drapes. Biol Res Nurs 15:242–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800411430381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexander JW, Aerni S, Plettner JP (1985) Development of a safe and effective one-minute preoperative skin preparation. Arch Surg 120:1357–1361. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390360023006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiu KY, Lau SK, Fung B, Ng KH, Chow SP (1993) Plastic adhesive drapes and wound infection after hip fracture surgery. Aust N Z J Surg 63:798–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00343.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bejko J, Tarzia V, Carrozzini M, Gallo M, Bortolussi G, Comisso M, Testolin L, Guglielmi C, De Franceschi M, Bianco R, Gerosa G, Bottio T (2015) Comparison of efficacy and cost of iodine impregnated drape vs. standard drape in cardiac surgery: study in 5100 patients. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 8:431–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-015-9653-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Webster J, Alghamdi A (2015) Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006353.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis DA, Leaper DJ, Speller DC (1984) Prevention of bacterial colonization of wounds at operation: comparison of iodine-impregnated (‘Ioban’) drapes with conventional methods. J Hosp Infect 5:431–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(84)90013-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petherick ES, Dalton JE, Moore PJ, Cullum N (2006) Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 6:170. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-170

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gibbons C, Bruce J, Carpenter J, Wilson AP, Wilson J, Pearson A, Lamping DL, Krukowski ZH, Reeves BC (2011) Identification of risk factors by systematic review and development of risk-adjusted models for surgical site infection. Health Technol Assess 15(1–156):iii–iv. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta15300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moreno Elola-Olaso A, Davenport DL, Hundley JC, Daily MF, Gedaly R (2012) Predictors of surgical site infection after liver resection: a multicentre analysis using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. HPB (Oxford) 14:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00417.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Korol E, Johnston K, Waser N, Sifakis F, Jafri HS, Lo M, Kyaw MH (2013) A systematic review of risk factors associated with surgical site infections among surgical patients. PLoS ONE 8:e83743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kurmann A, Vorburger SA, Candinas D, Beldi G (2011) Operation time and body mass index are significant risk factors for surgical site infection in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 25:3531–3534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1753-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Willis-Owen CA, Konyves A, Martin DK (2010) Factors affecting the incidence of infection in hip and knee replacement: an analysis of 5277 cases. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92:1128–1133. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B8.24333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kourbatova EV, Halvosa JS, King MD, Ray SM, White N, Blumberg HM (2005) Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as a cause of health care-associated infections among patients with prosthetic joint infections. Am J Infect Control 33:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2005.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ogihara S, Yamazaki T, Maruyama T, Oka H, Miyoshi K, Azuma S, Yamada T, Murakami M, Kawamura N, Hara N, Terayama S, Morii J, Kato S, Tanaka S (2015) Prospective multicenter surveillance and risk factor analysis of deep surgical site infection after posterior thoracic and/or lumbar spinal surgery in adults. J Orthop Sci 20:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0669-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ritter MA, Campbell ED (1988) Retrospective evaluation of an iodophor-incorporated antimicrobial plastic adhesive wound drape. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:307–308

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fairclough JA, Johnson D, Mackie I (1986) The prevention of wound contamination by skin organisms by the pre-operative application of an iodophor impregnated plastic adhesive drape. J Int Med Res 14:105–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605860140021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Milandt N, Nymark T, Jørn Kolmos H, Emmeluth C, Overgaard S (2016) Iodine-impregnated incision drape and bacterial recolonization in simulated total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 87(4):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1180577

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rezapoor M, Tan TL, Maltenfort MG, Parvizi J (2018) Incise draping reduces the rate of contamination of the surgical site during hip surgery: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 33(6):1891–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuru Hanada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanada, M., Hotta, K., Furuhashi, H. et al. Intraoperative bacterial contamination in total hip and knee arthroplasty is associated with operative duration and peeling of the iodine-containing drape from skin. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 30, 917–921 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02653-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02653-y

Keywords

Navigation