Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contemporary Strategies to Prevent Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

  • Hot Topics
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a serious concern in lower limb arthroplasty. Despite the significant consequences of PJI, the assessment of the safety and efficacy of preventative measures is challenging due to a low event rate. Notwithstanding, enormous efforts have been made in this arena, and prevention strategies continue to evolve. This review provides an update on contemporary literature (published within the last 5 years) pertaining to infection prevention in primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

Recent Findings

Patient optimization has been highlighted as a critical preoperative factor in mitigating PJI risk. Recent evidence emphasizes the importance of preoperative glycaemic control, nutritional status, weight optimization and smoking cessation prior to hip and knee arthroplasty. Perioperatively, attention to detail in terms of surgical skin preparation agent and technique as well as prophylactic antibiotic agent, spectrum, dose and timing is important with statistically and clinically significant differences seen between differing strategies. Intraosseous regional antibiotic administration is an emerging technique with promising preclinical data. Dilute betadine lavage also shows promise. Data supporting bundled interventions continues to grow.

Summary

A multimodal approach is required in PJI prevention, and attention to detail is important with each element. Patient optimization is critical, as is the execution of the planned perioperative infection prevention strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Shohat N, Muhsen K, Gilat R, Rondon AJ, Chen AF, Parvizi J. Inadequate glycemic control is associated with increased surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(7):2312–21.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancienne JM, Werner BC, Browne JA. Is there a threshold value of hemoglobin A1c that predicts risk of infection following primary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplast. 2017;32(9):S236–S40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tarabichi M, Shohat N, Kheir MM, Adelani M, Brigati D, Kearns SM, et al. Determining the threshold for HbA1c as a predictor for adverse outcomes after total joint arthroplasty: a multicenter, retrospective study. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(9):S263–S7.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shohat N, Tarabichi M, Tischler EH, Jabbour S, Parvizi J. Serum fructosamine: a simple and inexpensive test for assessing preoperative glycemic control. JBJS. 2017;99(22):1900–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. • Shohat N, Tarabichi M, Tan T, Goswami K, Kheir M, Malkani A et al. 2019 John Insall Award: Fructosamine is a better glycaemic marker compared with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) in predicting adverse outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study. Bone Joint J. 2019;101(7_Supple_C):3–9. A prospective multicentre study demonstrating that serum Fructosamine, an inexpensive and available test better predicts adverse outcomes in total knee arthroplasty as compared to HbA1c which has been traditionally used to assess perioperative glycaemic control.

  6. Courtney PM, Rozell JC, Melnic CM, Sheth N, Nelson C. Effect of malnutrition and morbid obesity on complication rates following primary total joint arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2016;25(2):99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blevins K, Aalirezaie A, Shohat N, Parvizi J. Malnutrition and the development of periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing primary elective total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(9):2971–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bohl DD, Shen MR, Kayupov E, Della Valle CJ. Hypoalbuminemia independently predicts surgical site infection, pneumonia, length of stay, and readmission after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(1):15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Golladay GJ, Satpathy J, Jiranek WA. Patient optimization—strategies that work: malnutrition. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(8):1631–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li S, Luo X, Sun H, Wang K, Zhang K, Sun X. Does prior bariatric surgery improve outcomes following total joint arthroplasty in the morbidly obese? A meta-analysis. J Arthroplast. 2019;34(3):577–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwarzkopf R, Lavery JA, Hooper J, Parikh M, Gold HT. Bariatric surgery and time to total joint arthroplasty: does it affect readmission and complication rates? Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gu A, Cohen JS, Malahias M-A, Lee D, Sculco PK, McLawhorn AS. The effect of bariatric surgery prior to lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. HSS J. 2019;1–11.

  13. • Richardson SS, Schairer WW, Sculco TP, Sculco PK. Comparison of infection risk with corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injection prior to total knee arthroplasty. JBJS. 2019;101(2):112–8. The first study to differentiate risk of PJI by the type of medication given with a pre-operative intra-articular injection. Both corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid injection <3 months of total knee arthroplasty increased the risk of periprosthetic joint infection.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cancienne JM, Werner BC, Luetkemeyer LM, Browne JA. Does timing of previous intra-articular steroid injection affect the post-operative rate of infection in total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplast. 2015;30(11):1879–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bedard NA, Pugely AJ, Elkins JM, Duchman KR, Westermann RW, Liu SS, et al. The John N. Insall Award: do intraarticular injections increase the risk of infection after TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(1):45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bedard NA, DeMik DE, Owens JM, Glass NA, DeBerg J, Callaghan JJ. Tobacco use and risk of wound complications and periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of primary TJA procedures. J Arthroplast. 2018.

  17. • Peel TN, Dowsey MM, Buising KL, Cheng AC, Choong PF. Chlorhexidine–alcohol versus iodine–alcohol for surgical site skin preparation in an elective arthroplasty (ACAISA) study: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(10):1239–45. A cluster randomised control trial including 780 patients comparing two differing surgical skin preparations in a lower limb arthroplasty specific population.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S, Kubilay NZ, Zayed B, Gomes SM, et al. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(12):e276–e87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrison TN, Chen AF, Taneja M, Küçükdurmaz F, Rothman RH, Parvizi J. Single vs repeat surgical skin preparations for reducing surgical site infection after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(6):1289–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Knoll PA, Browne JA. Prepping the knee in maximal flexion: getting into every nook, cranny, and fold. Arthroplast Today. 2017;3(2):99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown NM, Cipriano CA, Moric M, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ. Dilute betadine lavage before closure for the prevention of acute postoperative deep periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(1):27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Calkins TE, Culvern C, Nam D, Gerlinger TL, Levine BR, Sporer SM, et al. Dilute betadine lavage reduces the risk of acute postoperative periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic revision total knee and hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplast. 2019.

  23. Kim K, Zhu M, Munro JT, Young SW. Glove change to reduce the risk of surgical site infection or prosthetic joint infection in arthroplasty surgeries: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(9):1009–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Young SW, Zhu M, Shirley OC, Wu Q, Spangehl MJ. Do ‘surgical helmet systems’ or ‘body exhaust suits’ affect contamination and deep infection rates in arthroplasty? A systematic review. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(1):225–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vijaysegaran P, Knibbs LD, Morawska L, Crawford RW. Surgical space suits increase particle and microbiological emission rates in a simulated surgical environment. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(5):1524–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. • Wyles C, Hevesi M, Osmon D, Park M, Habermann EB, Lewallen D et al. 2019 John Charnley Award: Increased risk of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee and hip arthroplasty with the use of alternative antibiotics to cefazolin: the value of allergy testing for antibiotic prophylaxis. Bone Joint J. 2019;101(6_Supple_B):9–15. This study highlights that among patients with a potential allergy to Cephalosporins, in 96.8% of cases Cefazolin was deemed safe to use after formal allergy testing. This is important due to the higher efficacy of Cefazolin as compared to alternate prophylactic antibiotics.

  27. Burger JR, Hansen BJ, Leary EV, Aggarwal A, Keeney JA. Dual-agent antibiotic prophylaxis using a single preoperative vancomycin dose effectively reduces prosthetic joint infection rates with minimal renal toxicity risk. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(7):S213–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Courtney PM, Melnic CM, Zimmer Z, Anari J, Lee G-C. Addition of vancomycin to cefazolin prophylaxis is associated with acute kidney injury after primary joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(7):2197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kheir MM, Tan TL, Azboy I, Tan DD, Parvizi J. Vancomycin prophylaxis for total joint arthroplasty: incorrectly dosed and has a higher rate of periprosthetic infection than cefazolin. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(7):1767–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rondon AJ, Kheir MM, Tan TL, Shohat N, Greenky MR, Parvizi J. Cefazolin prophylaxis for total joint arthroplasty: obese patients are frequently underdosed and at increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(11):3551–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bosco JA, Tejada PRR, Catanzano AJ, Stachel AG, Phillips MS. Expanded gram-negative antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(3):616–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ryan SP, Kildow BJ, Tan TL, Parvizi J, Bolognesi MP, Seyler TM. Is there a difference in infection risk between single and multiple doses of prophylactic antibiotics? A Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019.

  33. Inabathula A, Dilley JE, Ziemba-Davis M, Warth LC, Azzam KA, Ireland PH, et al. Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk patients substantially reduces primary total hip and knee arthroplasty 90-day infection rate. JBJS. 2018;100(24):2103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Young SW, Roberts T, Johnson S, Dalton JP, Coleman B, Wiles S. Regional intraosseous administration of prophylactic antibiotics is more effective than systemic administration in a mouse model of TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(11):3573–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Young SW, Zhang M, Moore GA, Pitto RP, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ. The John N. Insall award: higher tissue concentrations of vancomycin achieved with intraosseous regional prophylaxis in revision TKA: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018;476(1):66, 74.

  36. Chin SJ, Moore GA, Zhang M, Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ, Young SW. The AAHKS clinical research award: intraosseous regional prophylaxis provides higher tissue concentrations in high BMI patients in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(7):S13–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Symonds T, Parkinson B, Hazratwala K, McEwen P, Wilkinson M, Grant A. Use of regional administration of prophylactic antibiotics in total knee arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(9):848–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Goswami K, Cho J, Foltz C, Manrique J, Tan TL, Fillingham Y, et al. Polymyxin and bacitracin in the irrigation solution provide no benefit for bacterial killing in vitro. JBJS. 2019;101(18):1689–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim KY, Anoushiravani AA, Long WJ, Vigdorchik JM, Fernandez-Madrid I, Schwarzkopf R. A meta-analysis and systematic review evaluating skin closure after total knee arthroplasty—what is the best method? J Arthroplast. 2017;32(9):2920–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Krishnan RJ, Crawford EJ, Syed I, Kim P, Rampersaud YR, Martin J. Is the risk of infection lower with sutures than with staples for skin closure after orthopaedic surgery? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(5):922–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Grosso MJ, Berg A, LaRussa S, Murtaugh T, Trofa DP, Geller JA. Silver-impregnated occlusive dressing reduces rates of acute periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(3):929–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cai J, Karam JA, Parvizi J, Smith EB, Sharkey PF. Aquacel surgical dressing reduces the rate of acute PJI following total joint arthroplasty: a case–control study. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(6):1098–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kuo F-C, Chen B, Lee MS, Yen S-H, Wang J-W. AQUACEL® Ag surgical dressing reduces surgical site infection and improves patient satisfaction in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ko LJM, Yoo JY, Maltenfort M, Hughes A, Smith EB, Sharkey PF. The effect of implementing a multimodal approach on the rates of periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(2):451–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bullock MW, Brown ML, Bracey DN, Langfitt MK, Shields JS, Lang JE. A bundle protocol to reduce the incidence of periprosthetic joint infections after total joint arthroplasty: a single-center experience. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(4):1067–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content and approved the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lachlan M. Batty.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

LB, not applicable. BL, personal fees from Smith & Nephew, Stryker, DePuy, Integra and Intellijoint and institutional support from Smith & Nephew, DePuy, Stryker and Zimmer, all outside the submitted work.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Batty, L.M., Lanting, B. Contemporary Strategies to Prevent Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 13, 400–408 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09653-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09653-9

Keywords

Navigation