Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Potential presence of metals in patients treated with metal–metal coupling prostheses for hip arthroplasty at 7 and 10 years of follow-up

  • Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Beginning in 2008, metal-on-metal prostheses have been in the spotlight owing to much higher revision rates than expected. Adverse local tissue reactions have been well described in the literature as potential complications.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2013, 13 patients with metal-on-metal total hip replacements were evaluated clinically and radiologically and with laboratory samples. The same tests were repeated between 2015 and 2016 on eight patients to assess any changes. In the laboratory assessment, we searched for chromium, cobalt, molybdenum, and nickel in blood and urine samples over 24 h.

Results

Clinical assessment has shown good score in all patients except one. On a second examination, between 2015 and 2016, all patients obtained results similar to those obtained in the first assessment, except a patient, who reported a recent fall. In the radiological assessment between 2012 and 2013, results were optimal, apart from a case of aseptic mobilization. The patients reassessed 3 years after the first examination showed radiological results similar to those previously obtained, apart from a patient, who showed signals of mobilization. Metal levels found in their blood decreased in most cases after 3 years. Urine levels of nickel increased in five subjects, and chromium levels increased in four, but levels of cobalt and molybdenum decreased in four patients.

Conclusion

It could be hypothesized that the decreasing trend of metal ion levels is associated with a stable wear status. On the contrary, a progressive increase in metal ion levels must be considered as early proof of implant loosening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MOM:

Metal on metal

THA:

Total hip arthroplasty

ALTRs:

Adverse local tissue reactions

ICP-MS:

Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry

SCENIHR:

Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks

References

  1. Rieker CB (2017) Tribology of total hip arthroplasty prostheses: What an orthopaedic surgeon should know. EFORT Open Rev 1(2):52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zahiri CA, Schmalzreid RK, Embranzahed E (1999) Lesson learned from loosening of the McKee-Farar metal on metal total Hip replacement. J Arthroplast 14:326–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Drummond J, Tran P, Fary C (2015) Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. a review of adverse reactions and patient management. J Funct Biomater 6(3):486–499

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee YK, Yoon BH, Choi YS et al (2016) Metal on metal or ceramic on ceramic for cementless total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 31(11):2637–2645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Migaud H, Putman S, Combes A et al (2012) Metal-on-metal bearing: is this the end of the line? We do not think so. HSS J 8(3):262–269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Macpherson GJ, Breusch SJ (2011) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(1):101–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnott L, McShane MA (2011) Perspectives in managing an implant recall: revision of 94 Durom Metasul acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(17):e100(1–5)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maurer-Ertl W, Friesenbichler J, Holzer LA et al (2017) Recall of the ASR XL head and hip resurfacing systems. Orthopedics 40(2):e340–e347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schon L, Zuckerman JD (1988) Hip pain in the elderly: evaluation and diagnosis. Geriatrics 43(1):48–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tijssen M, van Cingel RE, de Visser E et al (2017) Hip joint pathology: relationship between patient history, physical tests, and arthroscopy findings in clinical practice. Scand J Med Sci Sports 27(3):342–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. d’Aubigné RM, Postel M (2009) The classic: functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):7–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lothian A, Roberts BR (2016) Standards for Quantitative Metalloproteomic Analysis Using Size Exclusion ICP-MS. J Vis Exp (110):53737

  13. Choi HJ, Lim SJ, Park YS et al (2015) Simple and robust ICP-MS method for simultaneous determination of serum Co and Cr in routine clinical practice. Clin Chim Acta 439:91–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Y, Yan Y, Su Y et al (2017) Release of metal ions from nano CoCrMo wear debris generated from tribo-corrosion processes in artificial hip implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 68:124–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Pasquale D, Stea S, Squarzoni S et al (2014) Metal-on-metal hip prostheses: correlation between debris in the synovial fluid and levels of cobalt and chromium ions in the bloodstream. Int Orthop 38(3):469–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pei KL, Kinniburgh DW, Butlin L et al (2012) An ORS-ICP-MS method for monitoring trace levels of cobalt and chromium in whole blood samples from hip arthroplasty patients with metal-on-metal prostheses. Clin Biochem 45(10–11):806–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bocca B, Mattei D, Pino A et al (2010) Italian network for human biomonitoring of metals: preliminary results from two regions. Ann Ist Super Sanita 46(3):259–265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liow MHL, Kwon YM (2017) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: risk factors for pseudotumours and clinical systematic evaluation. Int Orthop 41(5):885–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson DJ, Lee S, Marks P et al (2017) Ultrasound screening for adverse local tissue reaction after hip arthroplasty. Ultrasound Med Biol 43(7):1549–1556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwon YM, Liow MH, Dimitriou D et al (2016) What is the natural history of “asymptomatic” pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty? Minimum 4-year metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging longitudinal study. J Arthroplast 31(9 Suppl):121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koper MC, Mathijssen NM, Witt F et al (2016) Clinical and wear analyses of 9 large metal-on-metal total hip prostheses. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0163438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Günther KP, Lützner J, Hannemann F et al (2013) Update on metal-on-metal hip joints. Orthop 42(5):373–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartmann A, Hannemann F, Lützner J et al (2013) Metal ion concentrations in body fluids after implantation of hip replacements with metal-on-metal bearing-systematic review of clinical and epidemiological studies. PLoS ONE 8(8):e70359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. The safety of Metal-on-Metal joint replacements with a particular focus on hip implants. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. SCENIHR adopted this Opinion at the 7th plenary of 24-25 September 2014. ISBN 978-92-79-30135-3

  25. Munro JT, Masri BA, Duncan CP et al (2014) High complication rate after revision of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(2):523–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C et al (2009) Six-year results of a prospective study of metal ion levels in young patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(2):176–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. deSouza RM, Parsons NR, Oni T et al (2010) Metal ion levels following resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: serial results over a ten-year period. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(12):1642–1647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Der Straeten C, Van Quickenborne D, De Roest B et al (2013) Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years. Bone Joint J 95-B(10):1332–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Savarino L, Cadossi M, Chiarello E, et al (2014) How do metal ion levels change over time in hip resurfacing patients? A cohort study. Sci World J 2014:291925

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Testa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Each author certifies that he/she has no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sessa, G., Testa, G., Gioitta Iachino, S. et al. Potential presence of metals in patients treated with metal–metal coupling prostheses for hip arthroplasty at 7 and 10 years of follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28, 637–643 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2129-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2129-7

Keywords

Navigation