Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, a concise review of the current literature on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) is given. In contrast to conventional total hip arthroplasty, older age, female sex and small femoral head sizes predispose to failure. Neck fracture and metal wear-related complications account for the most frequent reasons for re-operations. Although the long-term consequences of metal ion release remain unknown, the increasing prevalence of soft tissue related problems with potentially devastating functional consequences in this younger patient group are of concern. Outcome after revision for metal wear related failure of MoMHR is poor. In our opinion, patients with this device should be managed in dedicated centers with facilities for data collection and monitoring. The majority of proposed advantages of MoMHR cannot be supported by the published evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amarasekera HW, Costa ML, Foguet P, Krikler SJ, Prakash U, Griffin DR (2008) The blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction during resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparison of two approaches using laser doppler flowmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(4):442–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ (2004) Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1874–1877

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ (2006) Background of metal-on-metal resurfacing. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220:85–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ (2008) Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 23(6 Suppl 1):36–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Harvey N, Hoberg M (2008) Improved survivorship of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with second-generation techniques for Crowe-I and II developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):12–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amstutz HC, Wisk LE, Le Duff MJ (2010) Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.033

  7. Antoniou J, Zukor DJ, Mwale F, Minarik W, Petit A, Huk OL (2008) Metal ion levels in the blood of patients after hip resurfacing: a comparison between twenty-eight and thirty-six-millimeter-head metal-on-metal prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):142–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A (2005) Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(3):324–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC (2007) Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:735–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC (2004) Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:87–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beaulé PE, Lee JL, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E (2004) Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2015–2021

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beckmann J, Goldapp C, Ringleff K, Schaumburger J, Grifka J, Perlick L (2009) Cementing technique in femoral resurfacing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(10):1317–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bengs BC, Sangiorgio SN, Ebramzadeh E (2008) Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs. Acta Orthop 79(6):755–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bitsch RG, Loidolt T, Heisel C, Schmalzried TP (2008) Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development of a laboratory model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):102–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bitsch RG, Loidolt T, Heisel C, Schmalzried TP (2010) Cementing techniques for hip resurfacing arthroplasty: in vitro study of pressure and temperature hip resurfacing: pressure and temperature. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.10.011

  16. Buergi ML, Walter WL (2007) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience. J Arthroplasty 22(7 Suppl 3):61–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell P, Beaulé PE, Ebramzadeh E, Le Duff M, De Smet K, Lu Z, Amstutz HC (2006) A study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:35–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Catelas I, Campbell PA, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Huk OL (2006) Wear particles from metal-on-metal total hip replacements: effects of implant design and implantation time. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220:195–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corten K, MacDonald SJ (2010) Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries. What do they tell us? What do they not tell us? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:351–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cossey AJ, Back DL, Shimmin A, Young D, Spriggins AJ (2005) The nonoperative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham hip resurfacing procedure. J Arthroplasty 20(3):358–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Crawford JR, Palmer SJ, Wimhurst JA, Villar RN (2005) Bone loss at hip resurfacing: a comparison with total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 15:195–198

    Google Scholar 

  22. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2004) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:177–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C, McMinn DJ (2009) Six-year results of a prospective study of metal ion levels in young patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(2):176–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA, Learmonth ID, Case CP (2005) An unusual lymphocyte perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:18–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Davis ET, Gallie P, Macgroarty K, Waddell JP, Schemitsch E (2007) The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:557–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis ET, Olsen M, Zdero R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH (2008) Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(11):1522–1527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS, Murray DW, Campbell PA, De Smet K (2008) Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(10):1291–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Della Valle CJ, Nunley RM, Raterman SJ, Barrack RL (2009) Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):72–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Smet KA (2005) Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36:203–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Smet K, Campbell PA, Gill HS (2010) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: A consensus from the advanced hip resurfacing course, Ghent, June 2009. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):335–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. De Smet K, De Haan R, Calistri A, Campbell PA, Ebramzadeh E, Pattyn C, Gill HS (2008) Metal ion measurements as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):202–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dunstan E, Ladon D, Whittingham-Jones P, Carrington R, Briggs TW (2008) Chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients with metal-on-metal hip bearings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(3):517–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eswaramoorthy VK, Biant LC, Field RE (2009) Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(11):1454–1458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fisher NE, Killampalli VV, Kundra RK, Jagodzinski NA, Mathur K, Reading AD (2010) Sporting and physical activity following hip resurfacing. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1053-1

  35. Ganapathi M, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Günther KP (2009) Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(5):1341–1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2010) The John Charnley Award: metal-on-metal resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):318–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gill HS, Campbell PA, Murray DW, De Smet KA (2007) Reduction of the potential for thermal damage during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(1):16–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(12):1566–1574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Grammatopolous G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Gill HS (2009) Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(8):1019–1102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Grübl A, Marker M, Brodner W, Giurea A, Heinze G, Meisinger V, Zehetgruber H, Kotz R (2007) Long-term follow-up of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J Orthop Res 25(7):841–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hall D, Srikantharajah D, Anakwe R, Gaston P, Howie C (2009) Patient-reported outcome following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip and total hip replacement. Hip Int 19(2):245–250

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hart AJ, Buddhdev P, Winship P, Faria N, Powell JJ, Skinner JA (2008) Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int 18(3):212–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J, Lewis A, Cobb J, Sampson B, Mitchell A, Skinner JA (2009) The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(6):738–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ (2008) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(9):1137–1142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hing CB, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Bailey M, Back DL, Shimmin AJ (2007) Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1019–1024

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hungerford DS (2005) Metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty: no way under the sun!—in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 20(4 Suppl 2):68–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hur CI, Yoon TR, Cho SG, Song EK, Seon JK (2008) Serum ion level after metal-on-metal THA in patients with renal failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(3):696–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jacobs MA, Goytia RN, Bhargava T (2008) Hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach. Surgical description and early review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jameson S, Langton D, Natu S, Nargol TVF (2008) The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing, an independent center analysis. J Arthroplasty 23(6):50–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Joyce TJ, Langton DJ, Lord J, Grigg H, Jameson SS, Cooke N, Tulloch C, Logishetty R, Meek D, Nargol AVF (2010) Explant analysis of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip components retrieved following adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010

  51. Keegan GM, Learmonth ID, Case CP (2007) Orthopaedic metals and their potential toxicity in the arthroplasty patient: a review of current knowledge and future strategies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:567–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Khan M, Kuiper JH, Edwards D, Robinson E, Richardson JB (2009) Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results. J Arthroplasty 24(7):1044–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Khan M, Kuiper J-H, Richardson JB (2008) The exercise-related rise in plasma cobalt levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(9):1152–1157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Khan A, Yates P, Lovering A, Bannister GC, Spencer RF (2007) The effect of surgical approach on blood flow to the femoral head during resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:21–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kluess D, Zietz C, Lindner T, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz K-P, Bader R (2008) Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Acta Orthop 79(6):748–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kwon YM, Glyn-Jones S, Simpson DJ, Kamali A, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW (2010) Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):356–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ladon D, Doherty A, Newson R, Turner J, Bhamra M, Case CP (2004) Changes in metal levels and chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(8 Suppl 3):78–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Nargol AVF (2010) Asymptomatic patients with increased blood metal ion levels following metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Is failure imminent? In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010

  59. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AVF (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):38–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Langton DJ, Sprowson AP, Joyce TJ, Reed M, Carluke I, Partington P, Nargol AV (2009) Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(10):1287–1295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Van Oursouw M, De Smet K, Nargol AVF (2010) Suggested safe zone for cup placement for the reduction of blood metal ion concentrations following hip resurfacing. British Hip Society Annual Scientific Meeting. 25 February 2010

  62. Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R, Leunig M (2004) Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lingard EA, Muthumayandi K, Holland JP (2009) Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(12):1550–1554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Little JP, Gray HA, Murray DW, Beard DJ, Gill HS (2008) Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 23(3):454–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Murray DW, Athanasou NA (2005) Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(3):320–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Long JP, Bartel DL (2006) Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:115–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. MacDonald SJ (2004) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: the concerns. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:86–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Mahendra G, Pandit H, Kliskey K, Murray D, Gill HS, Athanasou N (2009) Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 80(6):653–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Malviya A, Holland JP (2009) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: 10-year Newcastle experience. Acta Orthop Belg 75(4):477–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, Delanois RE, Ulrich SD, Mont MA (2007) Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 22(7 Suppl 3):66–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Mcbryde CW, Theivendran K, Thomas AM, Treacy RBC, Pynsent PB (2010) The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(1):105–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. McGrath MS, Desser DR, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Mont MA (2008) Total hip resurfacing in patients who are sixty years of age or older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. McMinn DJW, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C (2008) Results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: a six- to 9.6-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:715–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. MHRA (2010) Medical Device Alert Ref: MDA/2010/044. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/. Accessed on 5th July 2010

  75. MHRA (2010) Medical Device Alert Ref: MDA/2010/033. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/. Accessed on 5th July 2010

  76. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, Ulrich SD, McGrath MS (2009) Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):66–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Mont MA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Delanois RE (2008) Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformities or implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Zustin J, Hahn M, Rüther W, Amling M (2008) Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Rüther W, Delling G, Hahn M (2006) Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220(2):333–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Myers GJ, Morgan D, McBryde CW, O’Dwyer K (2009) Does surgical approach influence component positioning with Birmingham hip resurfacing? Int Orthop 33(1):59–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. National Joint Replacement Registry, Australian Orthopaedic Association, Annual Report 2008. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/. Accessed on 5th July 2010

  82. National Joint Replacement Registry, Australian Orthopaedic Association, Annual Report 2009: http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/publications.jsp?section=reports2009

  83. National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2010) Sixth Annual Report.http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/. Accessed on 5th July 2010

  84. Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Takao M, Koyama T, Yoshikawa H (2007) Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients. J Arthroplasty 22(2):176–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Nork SE, Schär M, Pfander G, Beck M, Djonov V, Ganz R, Leunig M (2005) Anatomic considerations for the choice of surgical approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36(2):163–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Nunley RM, Della Valle CJ, Barrack RL (2009) Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):56–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ollivere B, Darrah C, Barker T, Nolan J, Porteous MJ (2009) Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(8):1025–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ollivere B, Duckett S, August A, Porteous M (2010) The Birmingham hip resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a district general hospital. Int Orthop 34(5):631–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill HS, Murray DW (2008) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):847–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Papavasiliou AV, Villar RN (2008) Quality of life in different age groups after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Hip Int 18(4):307–312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Patntirapong S, Habibovic P, Hauschka PV (2009) Effects of soluble cobalt and cobalt incorporated into calcium phosphate layers on osteoclast differentiation and activation. Biomaterials 30(4):548–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC (2006) Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(5):592–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Prosser GH, Yates PJ, Wood DJ, Graves SE, de Steiger RN, Miller LN (2010) Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision. Acta Orthop 81(1):66–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Revell MP, McBryde CW, Bhatnagar S, Pynsent PB, Treacy RB (2006) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 3):98–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Richards CJ, Giannitsios D, Huk OL, Zukor DJ, Steffen T, Antoniou J (2008) Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Ring PA (1989) Press-fit prosthesis clinical experience. In: Freeman MAR, Reynolds DA (eds) Osteoarthritis and the young adult hip. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 220–232

    Google Scholar 

  97. Romanowski JR, Swank ML (2008) Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Schmalzried TP, Shepherd EF, Dorey FJ, Jackson WO, dela Rosa M, Fa’vae F, McKellop HA, McClung CD, Martell J, Moreland JR, Amstutz HC (2000) The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time. Clin Orthop Relat Res 381:36–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Seyler TM, Lai LP, Sprinkle DI, Ward WG, Jinnah RH (2008) Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):71–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Shears E, McBryde CW, Pynsnet PB (2010) Outcome of revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010

  101. Shimmin AJ, Back D (2005) Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:463–464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Shimmin A, Beaulé PE, Campbell P (2008) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(3):637–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Shimmin AJ, Walter WL, Esposito C (2010) The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(4):469–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Spencer S, Carter R, Murray H, Meek R (2008) Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 23(8):1105–1109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Steffen RT, Athanasou NA, Gill HS, Murray DW (2010) Avascular necrosis associated with fracture of the femoral neck after hip resurfacing: histological assessment of femoral bone from retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(6):787–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Steffen RT, Foguet PR, Krikler SJ, Gundle R, Beard DJ, Murray DW (2009) Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 24(4):614–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Steffen RT, O’Rourke K, Gill HS, Murray DW (2007) The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1293–1298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, Beard DJ, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW, Gill HS (2008) The five-year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(4):436–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Stulberg BN, Fitts SM, Bowen AR, Zadilka JD (2009) Early return to function after hip resurfacing is it better than contemporary total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.034

  110. Stulberg BN, Trier KK, Naughton M, Zadzilka JD (2008) Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):21–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Toms AP, Marshall TJ, Cahir J, Darrah C, Nolan J, Donell ST, Barker T, Tucker JK (2008) MRI of early symptomatic metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective review of radiological findings in 20 hips. Clin Radiol 63(1):49–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Treacy RBC, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB (2005) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:167–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Underwood RJ, Cann PM, Ilo K, Wagner CR, Skinner J, Cobb J, Porter M, Muirhead-Allwood S, Hart A (2010) What is the incidence and common characteristics of high wearing explanted metal-on-metal hips. In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010

  114. Vail TP, Glisson RR, Dominguez DE, Kitaoka K, Ottaviano D (2008) Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(9):1951–1960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Girard J, Roy AG (2006) A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:997–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Visuri TI, Pukkala E, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P (2006) Cancer incidence and causes of death among total hip replacement patients: a review based on Nordic cohorts with a special emphasis on metal-on-metal bearings. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220(2):399–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Wik TS, Østbyhaug PO, Klaksvik J, Aamodt A (2010) Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):461–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Williams D, Royle M, Norton M (2009) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement. J Arthroplasty 24(1):144–1451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Witjes S, Smolders JM, Beaulé PE, Pasker P, Van Susante JL (2009) Learning from the learning curve in total hip resurfacing: a radiographic analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(10):1293–1299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Witzleb WC, Hanisch U, Ziegler J, Guenther KP (2009) In vivo wear rate of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of 10 retrieved components. J Arthroplasty 24(6):951–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Wynn Jones H, Wimhurst J, Macnair R, Derbishire B, Chirodian N, Toms A, Cahir J (2010) High early failure rate with large head metal-on-metal hip replacement: The importance of MRI imaging. In: British Hip Society annual scientific meeting. 25th February 2010

  122. Xu WD, Li J, Zhou ZH, Wu YS, Li M (2008) Results of hip resurfacing for developmental dysplasia of the hip of Crowe type I and II. Chin Med J 121(15):1379–1383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Ziaee H, Daniel J, Datta AK, Blunt S, McMinn DJ (2007) Transplacental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:301–305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Zustin J, Krause M, Breer S, Hahn M, von Domarus C, Rüther W, Sauter G, Morlock MM, Amling M (2010) Morphologic analysis of periprosthetic fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(2):404–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and have not received any outside funding or grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen J. Breusch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macpherson, G.J., Breusch, S.J. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131, 101–110 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1153-9

Keywords

Navigation