Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differences between the alpha angles measured manually and digitally from paediatric hip ultrasonograms

  • Original Article • HIP - PAEDIATRICS
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to reveal whether a meaningful difference is caused by measuring the alpha angle in hip ultrasonography manually or digitally to help the early diagnosis and treatment of DDH and observe the treatment implications of any such difference. All ultrasound images were obtained by same orthopaedist, and each hip was measured twice by two investigators with different levels of experience. Standard images were taken, and a printout of the standard images were obtained. The alpha angle was measured digitally by using the sonography device. The alpha angle was also measured by pencil, ruler and goniometer on the printout after 2 days. One hundred and two hips of 51 babies, at a mean age of 14 weeks, were assessed. The mean alpha angle measured manually with a goniometer was 64.4° (±1.6°), while that measured on the ultrasonography device was 65.3° (±0.9°). This difference was found to be statistically different (p = 0.016). Typology changes occurred in a total of 10 hips out of 102 as a result of manual and digital measurements. However, this study showed reduction in alpha angle variation and considerable advantages for manual alpha angle measurement with pencil and goniometer on a printout compared to computer-based measurement; future studies are needed to understand these differences caused by each measurement method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tschauner C, Furntrath F, Saba Y, Berghold A, Radl R (2011) Developmental dysplasia of the hip: impact of sonographic newborn hip screening on the outcome of early treated decentered hip joints-a single center retrospective comparative cohort study based on Graf’s method of hip ultrasonography. J Child Orthop 5(6):415–424

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Puhan MA, Woolacott N, Kleijnen J, Steurer J (2003) Observational studies on ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns—a systematic review. Ultraschall Med 24(6):377–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Graf R (2006) Hip sonography: diagnosis and management of infant hip dysplasia. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herring JA ( 2013) Tachdjian's Pediatric Orthopedics. Dallas, Texas, USA

  5. Copuroglu C, Ozcan M, Aykac B, Tuncer B, Saridogan K (2011) Reliability of ultrasonographic measurements in suspected patients of developmental dysplasia of the hip and correlation with the acetabular index. Indian J Orthop 45(6):553–557

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guille JT, Pizzutillo PD, MacEwen GD (2000) Development dysplasia of the hip from birth to six months. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8(4):232–242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan A, McCaul KA, Cundy PJ, Haan EA, Byron-Scott R (1997) Perinatal risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 76(2):F94–F100

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barlow TG (1963) Early diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. Proc R Soc Med 56:804–806

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barlow TG (1975) Neonatal hip dysplasia–treatment, results and complications. Proc R Soc Med 68(8):475

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. von Rosen S (1962) Diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip joint in the new-born. J Bone Joint Surg Br 44:284–291

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graf R (1981) The ultrasonic image of the acetabular rim in infants An experimental and clinical investigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 99(1):35–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Graf R (1983) New possibilities for the diagnosis of congenital hip joint dislocation by ultrasonography. J Pediatr Orthop 3(3):354–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Omeroglu H, Bicimoglu A, Koparal S, Seber S (2001) Assessment of variations in the measurement of hip ultrasonography by the Graf method in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B 10(2):89–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterlein CD, Schuttler KF, Timmesfeld N et al (2012) Measurement on printed paper strips or on the ultrasound device with computer assistance—which technique is more accurate in paediatric hip ultrasound? Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie 150(2):163–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerim Sariyilmaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sariyilmaz, K., Saglam, Y., Ozkunt, O. et al. Differences between the alpha angles measured manually and digitally from paediatric hip ultrasonograms. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25, 885–888 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1630-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1630-5

Keywords

Navigation