Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of cervical sagittal alignment variations after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe imbalance: study of 59 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate postoperative changes within the cervical alignment following surgical lumbar correction by pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in patients affected with sagittal global malalignment disease.

Methods

This was a monocentric, radiographic, and prospective study. 79 patients, who underwent sagittal correction by PSO, performed an EOS imaging pre- and postoperatively between January 2008 and December 2013 at the University Hospital of Bordeaux. Inclusion criteria were a performed pre- and postoperative EOS imaging and a preoperative C7SVA > 5 cm. Were excluded patients who did not allow EOS with a viewable cervical spine due to hyperkyphosis. The study involved the analysis of pelvic, lumbar, thoracic, cervical, and cranial parameters before and after the surgery.

Results

59 patients met the criteria. Mean follow-up was 38 months. The lumbar PSO significantly improved sagittal alignment including L1S1 lordosis, T1T12 kyphosis, and C7SVA (p < 0.001). We did not reported a significant change within cervical parameters after PSO (C2C7 lordosis 22.7°–21.5° p = 0.64, C1C7 lordosis 50.6°–48.8° p = 0.56, C1C2 angle 28.2°–27.9° p = 0.82, C7 slope stayed constant 32.3°–30.5° p = 0.47, OC2 angle 15.54°–15.56° p = 0.99). However, cranial slope decreased significantly (p < 0.05). We did not find correlation between lumbar lordosis and cervical lordosis variations (R = 0.265). Cervical lordosis was highly correlated with the C7 slope (R = 0.597) and with the Spino Cranial Angle (R = − 0.867).

Conclusion

Reciprocal changes in cervical spine after PSO are difficult to approach. Maintaining a horizontal gaze involves locoregional mechanisms of compensation adapting to the slope of C7. The cranial system by decreasing the cranial slope allows the gaze alignment and is the first compensation mechanism to get involved after a loss of lumbar lordosis. Restoring optimal C7SVA is necessary to prevent the development of secondary cervical painful symptomatology when the cranial compensation is outdated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klineberg E, Schwab F, Smith JS, Gupta MC, Lafage V, Bess S (2013) Sagittal spinal pelvic alignment. Neurosurg Clin N Am 24(2):157–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J-P (2011) Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment. Spine 36(13):1037–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey P-M, Ondra S et al (2008) Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine 33(14):1572–1578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lafage V, Ames C, Schwab F, Klineberg E, Akbarnia B, Smith J et al (2012) Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis. Spine 37(3):E180–E187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Blondel B, Schwab F, Hostin R et al (2012) Spontaneous improvement of cervical alignment after correction of global sagittal balance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 17(4):300–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ha Y, Schwab F, Lafage V, Mundis G, Shaffrey C, Smith J et al (2014) Reciprocal changes in cervical spine alignment after corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23(3):552–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, Schwab FJ, Le Huec JC, Massicotte EM et al (2013) Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine 38(22 Suppl 1):S149–S160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blondel B, Schwab F, Bess S, Ames C, Mummaneni PV, Hart R et al (2013) Posterior global malalignment after osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity: it happens and here is why. Spine 38(7):E394–E401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwab FJ, Patel A, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Farcy J-P, Boachie-Adjei O et al (2012) Sagittal realignment failures following pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery: are we doing enough?: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 16(6):539–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moal B, Bronsard N, Kebaish K, Oheneba B-A, Obeid I, Schwab F et al (2013) Chirurgie de révision après une Ostéotomie TransPédiculaire (OTP) pour 335 adultes atteints de déformation rachidiennes. Rev Chir Orthopédique Traumatol 99(7):S306–S307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Villavicencio AT, Babuska JM, Ashton A, Busch E, Roeca C, Nelson EL et al (2011) Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment. Neurosurgery 68(5):1309–1316 (discussion 1316)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang JAB, Scheer JKB, Smith JS, Deviren V, Bess S, Hart RA et al (2012) The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 71(3):662–669 ([Miscellaneous Article])

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amabile C, Le Huec JC, Skalli W (2016) Invariance of head-pelvis alignment and compensatory mechanisms for asymptomatic adults older than 49 years. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4830-8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morvan G, Mathieu P, Vuillemin V, Guerini H, Bossard P, Zeitoun F et al (2011) Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):602–608

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instructional course lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Ann Arbor 5:261 (JW Edwards)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McGREGER M (1948) The significance of certain measurements of the skull in the diagnosis of basilar impression. Br J Radiol 21(244):171–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Le Huec JC, Demezon H, Aunoble S (2015) Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J 24(1):63–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16(9):1459–1467

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30(3):346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gille O, Champain N, Benchikh-El-Fegoun A, Vital J-M, Skalli W (2007) Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients. Spine 32(5):568–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vital JM, Senegas J (1986) Anatomical bases of the study of the constraints to which the cervical spine is subject in the sagittal plane. A study of the center of gravity of the head. Surg Radiol Anat 8(3):169–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsung T-C, Lo J, Li T-S, Cheung L-K (2014) Recording of natural head position using stereophotogrammetry: a new technique and reliability study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 72(11):2256–2261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, Aunoble S (2011) Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):669–680

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):578–585

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Duval-Beaupère G, Schmidt C, Cosson P (1992) A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20(4):451–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7(2):99–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL Jr, Protopsaltis TS, Blondel B, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Deviren V, Lafage V, Schwab F, Ames CP, International Spine Study Group (2013) Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 19(2):141–159. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.4.spine12838 (Epub 2013 Jun 14. Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim K-T, Lee S-H, Suk K-S, Lee J-H, Jeong B-O (2012) Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies: a retrospective review of 140 patients. Spine 37(19):1667–1675 ([Miscellaneous Article])

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim K-T, Suk K-S, Cho Y-J, Hong G-P, Park B-J (2002) Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity. Spine 27(6):612–618 ([Miscellaneous Article])

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Le Huec J-C, Aunoble S (2012) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for sagittal imbalance. Eur Spine J 21(9):1896–1897

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnson GM (1998) The correlation between surface measurement of head and neck posture and the anatomic position of the upper cervical vertebrae. Spine 23(8):921–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cooke MS, Wei SH (1988) Intersex differences in craniocervical morphology and posture in southern Chinese and British Caucasians. Am J Phys Anthropol 77(1):43–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fjellvang H, Solow B (1986) Craniocervical postural relations and craniofacial morphology in 30 blind subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod Its Const Soc Am Board Orthod 90(4):327–334

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Solow B, Tallgren A (1971) Natural head position in standing subjects. Acta Odontol Scand 29(5):591–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ajello M, Marengo N, Pilloni G, Penner F, Vercelli G, Pecoraro F et al (2017) Is it possible to evaluate the ideal cervical alignment for each patient needing surgery? An easy rule to determine the appropriate cervical lordosis in preoperative planning. World Neurosurg 97:471–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee S-H, Kim K-T, Seo E-M, Suk K-S, Kwack Y-H, Son E-S (2012) The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(2):E41–E47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kuntz C, Shaffrey CI, Ondra SL, Durrani AA, Mummaneni PV, Levin LS et al (2008) Spinal deformity: a new classification derived from neutral upright spinal alignment measurements in asymptomatic juvenile, adolescent, adult, and geriatric individuals. Neurosurgery 63(3 Suppl):25–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Matsunaga S, Onishi T, Sakou T (2001) Significance of occipitoaxial angle in subaxial lesion after occipitocervical fusion. Spine 26(2):161–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Santaguida PL, Keshavarz H, Carlesso LC, Lomotan M, Gross A, MacDermid JC et al (2013) A description of the methodology used in an overview of reviews to evaluate evidence on the treatment, harms, diagnosis/classification, prognosis and outcomes used in the management of neck pain. Open Orthop J 7:461–472

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM, Murray MP (1987) Neck pain: a long-term follow-up of 205 patients. Spine. 12(1):1–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surgical Research Lab, Orthospine Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, CHU Pellegrin, Orthorachis 2, 33076, Bordeaux, France

    W. Thompson, A. Cogniet, M. Challali, R. Saddiki, J. Rigal & Jean Charles Le Huec

Authors
  1. W. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Cogniet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Challali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Saddiki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Rigal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jean Charles Le Huec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Charles Le Huec.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thompson, W., Cogniet, A., Challali, M. et al. Analysis of cervical sagittal alignment variations after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe imbalance: study of 59 cases. Eur Spine J 27 (Suppl 1), 16–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5482-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5482-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation