Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To define reference parameters for analyzing sagittal balance of the cervical spine in asymptomatic volunteers.

Methods

Prospective study after Bioethics Committee approval. Imaging performed using a low-dose radiographic system (EOS Imaging, Paris, France). The absence of pain was assessed using the Oswestry Questionnaire and VAS. 106 subjects were included of whom 55.66 % were men. The parameters measured were: pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, thoracic and lumbar curvature, C7 plumb line position and the spino-sacral angle. The C7 slope and new parameters were measured: cranial incidence, defined in relation to the McGregor line and the sella turcica allowing to define cranial slope and tilt, and the spino-cranial angle (SCA).

Results

This study demonstrated a close correlation between the C7 slope and the cranio-cervical system. Economic sagittal balance in the asymptomatic population was defined by a constant SCA angle of 83° ± 9°. To maintain this balance, a spine with a marked C7 slope will present lordosis and vice versa. Cranial incidence is an anatomical parameter characteristic of the cranio-cervical system which makes it possible to analyze the spatial positioning of the head and to predict the desired value of cervical lordosis which is closely correlated to cranial slope.

Conclusion

The C7 slope has a predictive value of the shape of the cervical spine in the sagittal plane. One-third of the asymptomatic population had cervical kyphosis. Our results could be used to study sagittal balance before and after arthrodesis, or cervical prosthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Le Huec JC, Roussouly P (2011) Sagittal spino-pelvic balance is a crucial analysis for normal and degenerative spine. Eur Spine J 20:556–557. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1943-y

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20:609–618. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akcam MO, Koklu A (2004) Investigation of natural head posture in different head types. J Oral Sci 46:15–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hellsing E, Reigo T, Mcwilliam J, Spangfort E (1987) Cervical and lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis in 8, 11 and 15-year-old children. Eur J Orthod 9:129–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zepa I, Hurmerinta K, Kovero O, Nissinen M, Kononen M, Huggare J (2000) Associations between thoracic kyphosis, head posture, and craniofacial morphology in young adults. Acta Odontol Scand 58:237–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hellsing E, Mcwilliam J, Reigo T, Spangfort E (1987) The relationship between craniofacial morphology, head posture and spinal curvature in 8, 11 and 15-year-old children. Eur J Orthod 9:254–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. Eur Spine J 20:578–585

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2003) Geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: proposed classification. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89:632–639

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E et al (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J et al (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:9–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D Jr, Peloza J, Schwender JD, Carreon L (2006) MOS short form 36 and oswestry disability index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J 6:21–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morvan G, Mathieu P, Vuillemin V, Guerini H, Bossard P, Zeitoun F, Wybier M (2011) Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance. Eur Spine J 20:602–608. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1927-y

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gheno R, Nectoux E, Herbaux B, Baldisserotto M, Glock L, Cotten A, Boutry N (2012) Three-dimensional measurements of the lower extremity in children and adolescents using a low-dose biplanar X-ray device. Eur Radiol 22:765–771. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2308-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gille O, Champain N, Benchikh-El-Fegoun A, Vital JM, Skalli W (2007) Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients. Spine 32:568–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 31:320–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vital JM, Senegas J (1986) Anatomical bases of the study of the constraints to which the cervical spine is subject in the sagittal plane. A study of the center of gravity of the head. Surg Radiol Anatom 8:169–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moussellard H (2009) Ostéosynthèse du rachis cervical supérieur. In: Masson (ed) Conférence d’enseignement, pp 364–383

  19. Kuntz C, Shaffrey CI, Ondra SL, Durrani AA, Mummaneni PV, Levin LS, Pettigrew DB (2008) Spinal deformity: a new classification derived from neutral upright spinal alignment measurements in asymptomatic juvenile, adolescent, adult, and geriatric individuals. Neurosurgery 63:25–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cobb JR (1948) Outlines for the study of scoliosis. In: Edwards (ed) Instructional course lecture of American academy of orthopedic surgeons, pp 261–275

  21. Lee CS, Noh H, Lee DH, Hwang CJ, Kim H, Cho SK (2012) Analysis of sagittal Spinal alignment in 181 asymptomatic children. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:259–263. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318261f346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SH, Kim KT, Seo EM, Suk KS, Kwack YH, Son ES (2012) The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:41–47. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182396301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fineman S, Borrelli FJ, Rtubinstein BM, Epstein H, Jacobson HC (1963) The cervical spine: transformation of the normal lordotic pattern into a linear pattern in the neutral posture. A roentgenographic demonstration. J Bone Joint Surg 45:1179–1183

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gum JL, Glassman SD, Douglas LR, Carreon LY (2012) Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Am J Orthop 41:81–84

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service Ortho Rachis 2, Pôle chirurgie, CHU Pellegrin, Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France

    J. C. Le Huec, H. Demezon & S. Aunoble

Authors
  1. J. C. Le Huec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Demezon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Aunoble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Le Huec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Le Huec, J.C., Demezon, H. & Aunoble, S. Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Spine J 24, 63–71 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3632-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3632-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation