Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A more realistic disc herniation model incorporating compression, flexion and facet-constrained shear: a mechanical and microstructural analysis. Part I: Low rate loading

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To date, the mechanisms of disc failure have been explored at a microstructural level in relatively simple postures. However, in vivo the disc is known to be subjected to complex loading in compression, bending and shear, and the influence of these factors on the mechanisms of disc failure is yet to be described at a microstructural level. The purpose of this study was to provide a microstructural analysis of the mechanisms of failure in healthy discs subjected to compression while held in a complex posture incorporating physiological amounts of flexion and facet-constrained shear.

Methods

30 motion segments from 10 healthy mature ovine lumbar spines were compressed in a complex posture intended to simulate the situation arising when bending and twisting while lifting a heavy object, and at a displacement rate of 40 mm/min. Nine of the 30 samples reached the predetermined displacement prior to a reduction in load and were classified as early-stage failures, providing insight into initial areas of disc disruption. Both groups of damaged discs were then analysed microstructurally using light microscopy.

Results

Complex postures significantly reduced the load required to cause disc failure than earlier described for flexed postures [8.42 kN (STD 1.22 kN) compared to 9.69 kN (STD 2.56 kN)] and resulted in a very different failure morphology to that observed in either simple flexion or direct compression, involving infiltration of nucleus material in a circuitous path to the annular periphery.

Conclusion

The complex posture as used in this study significantly reduced the load required to cause disc failure, providing further evidence that asymmetric postures while lifting should be avoided if possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farfan HF, Cossette JW, Robertson GH, Wells RV, Kraus H (1970) The effects of torsion on the lumbar intervertebral joints: the role of torsion in the production of disc degeneration. J Bone Jt Surg Am 52:468–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marras WS, Lavender SA, Leurgans SE, Rajulu SL, Allread WG, Fathallah FA, Ferguson SA (1993) The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders. The effects of workplace factors, trunk position, and trunk motion characteristics on risk of injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(5):617–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fathallah FA, Marras WS, Parnianpour M (1998) The role of complex, simultaneous trunk motions in the risk of occupation-related low back disorders. Spine 23(9):1035–1042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Qasim M, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GBJ (2012) Initiation and progression of mechanical damage in the intervertebral disc under cyclic loading using continuum damage mechanics methodology: a finite element study. J Biomech 45(11):1934–1940. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Casaroli G, Villa T, Bassani T, Berger-Roscher N, Wilke HJ, Galbusera F (2017) Numerical prediction of the mechanical failure of the intervertebral disc under complex loading conditions. Materials. doi:10.3390/ma10010031

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt H, Heuer F, Wilke HJ (2009) Dependency of disc degeneration on shear and tensile strains between annular fiber layers for complex loads. Med Eng Phys 31(6):642–649. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wade KR, Robertson PA, Thambyah A, Broom ND (2014) How healthy discs herniate: a biomechanical and microstructural study investigating the combined effects of compression rate and flexion. Spine 39(13):1018–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoganandan N, Maiman DJ, Pintar F, Ray G, Myklebust JB, Sances A Jr, Larson SJ (1988) Microtrauma in the lumbar spine: a cause of low back pain. Neurosurgery 23(2):162–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roaf R (1960) A study of the mechanics of spinal injuries. J Bone Jt Surg Br 42-B(4):810–823

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lundin O, Ekström L, Hellström M, Holm S, Swärd L (1998) Injuries in the adolescent porcine spine exposed to mechanical compression. Spine 23(23):2574–2579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adams MA (1995) Spine update: mechanical testing of the spine: an appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. Spine 20(19):2151–2156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adams MA, Hutton WC (1982) Prolapsed intervertebral disc: a hyperflexion injury. Spine 7(3):184–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wade KR, Robertson PA, Thambyah A, Broom ND (2015) ‘Surprise’ loading in flexion increases the risk of disc herniation due to annulus–endplate junction failure: a mechanical and microstructural investigation. Spine 40(12):891–901. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilke HJ, Kienle A, Maile S, Rasche V, Berger-Roscher N (2016) A new dynamic six degrees of freedom disc-loading simulator allows to provoke disc damage and herniation. Eur Spine J 25(5):1363–1372. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4416-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Berger-Roscher N, Casaroli G, Rasche V, Villa T, Galbusera F, Wilke HJ (2017) Influence of complex loading conditions on intervertebral disc failure. Spine 42(2):E78–E85. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Veres SP, Robertson PA, Broom ND (2009) The morphology of acute disc herniation: a clinically relevant model defining the role of flexion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(21):2288–2296. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a49d7e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Veres SP, Robertson PA, Broom ND (2010) ISSLS prize winner: how loading rate influences disc failure mechanics: a microstructural assessment of internal disruption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(21):1897–1908. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d9b69e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Veres SP, Robertson PA, Broom ND (2010) The influence of torsion on disc herniation when combined with flexion. Eur Spine J 19(9):1468–1478. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1383-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelsey JL, Githens PB, White AA (1984) An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 2(1):61–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reid JE, Meakin JR, Robins SP, Skakle JMS, Hukins DWL (2002) Sheep lumbar intervertebral discs as models for human discs. Clin Biomech 17(4):312–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Smit TH (2002) The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine—biomechanical considerations. Eur Spine J 11(2):137–144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Claes LE (1997) Are sheep spines a valid biomechanical model for human spines? Spine 22(20):2365–2374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Race A, Broom ND, Robertson P (2000) Effect of loading rate and hydration on the mechanical properties of the disc. Spine 25(6):662–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin HS, Liu YK, Adams KH (1978) Mechanical response of the lumbar intervertebral joint under physiological (complex) loading. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 60 A(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt H, Galbusera F, Rohlmann A, Shirazi-Adl A (2013) What have we learned from finite element model studies of lumbar intervertebral discs in the past four decades? J Biomech 46(14):2342–2355. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Broberg KB (1983) On the mechanical behaviour of intervertebral discs. Spine 8(2):151–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. van Heeswijk VM, Thambyah A, Robertson PA, Broom ND (2017) Posterolateral disc prolapse in flexion initiated by lateral inner annular failure: an investigation of the herniation pathway. Spine. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002181

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt H, Häußler K, Wilke HJ, Wolfram U (2015) Structural behavior of human lumbar intervertebral disc under direct shear. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 13(1):66–71. doi:10.5301/jabfm.5000176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Adams MA, Hutton WC (1985) Gradual disc prolapse. Spine 10(6):524–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stefanakis M, Luo J, Pollintine P, Dolan P, Adams MA (2014) ISSLS Prize winner: mechanical influences in progressive intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 39(17):1365–1372. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Green TP, Adams MA, Dolan P (1993) Tensile properties of the annulus fibrosus. II. Ultimate tensile strength and fatigue life. Eur Spine J 2(4):209–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Noguchi M, Gooyers CE, Karakolis T, Noguchi K, Callaghan JP (2016) Is intervertebral disc pressure linked to herniation?: An in vitro study using a porcine model. J Biomech 49(9):1824–1830. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.04.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rajasekaran S, Bajaj N, Tubaki V, Kanna RM, Shetty AP (2013) ISSLS prize winner: the anatomy of failure in lumbar disc herniation: an in vivo, multi-modal, prospective study of 181 subjects. Spine 38(17):1491–1500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from NuVasive and Medtronic (Australasia).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tissue Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Kelly R. Wade, Meredith L. Schollum, Ashvin Thambyah & Neil D. Broom

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

    Peter A. Robertson

Authors
  1. Kelly R. Wade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meredith L. Schollum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter A. Robertson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashvin Thambyah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Neil D. Broom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredith L. Schollum.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wade, K.R., Schollum, M.L., Robertson, P.A. et al. A more realistic disc herniation model incorporating compression, flexion and facet-constrained shear: a mechanical and microstructural analysis. Part I: Low rate loading. Eur Spine J 26, 2616–2628 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5252-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5252-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation