Abstract
Purpose
Studies have examined infection rates following spine surgery and their relationship to post-operative complications and increased length of stay. Few studies, however, have investigated predictors of infection, specifically in the setting of operative intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). This study aims to identify the incidence and factors predictive of infection amongst this cohort.
Methods
This study performed a retrospective review of the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients included those treated surgically for CSM (ICD-9 code 721.1) from 2010 to 2012. Patient demographics and surgical data were collected with outcome variables including the occurrence of one of the following surgical site infections (SSIs) within 30 days of index operation: superficial SSI, deep incisional SSI, and organ/space SSI.
Results
3057 patients were included in this analysis. Overall infection rate was 1.15 % (35/3057), of which 54.3 % (19/35) were superficial SSIs, 28.6 % (10/35) were deep incisional SSI, and 20 % (7/35) were peri-spinal SSI. Logistic regression revealed factors associated with SSI included: higher BMI [OR 1.162 (CI 1.269–1.064), p = 0.001] and operative time ≥208 min [OR 4.769 (CI 20.220–1.125), p = 0.034].
Conclusions
The overall SSI rate for the examined CSM cohort was 1.15 %. This study identified increased BMI and operative time ≥208 min as predictors of infection in surgical CSM patients. This information should be carefully considered in delivering patient education and future efforts to optimize risk in CSM patients indicated for surgical intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gok B, McLoughlin GS, Sciubba DM et al (2009) Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminectomy and instrumented fusion. Neurol Res 31:1097–1101. doi:10.1179/174313209X383277
Lad SP, Patil CG, Berta S et al (2009) National trends in spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 71:66–69. doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2008.02.045 (discussion 69)
Boakye M, Patil CG, Santarelli J et al (2008) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: complications and outcomes after spinal fusion. Neurosurgery 62:455–461. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000316013.97926.4c
Bachy M, Bouyer B, Vialle R (2012) Infections after spinal correction and fusion for spinal deformities in childhood and adolescence. Int Orthop 36:465–469. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1439-8
Lall RR, Wong AP, Lall RR et al (2015) Evidence-based management of deep wound infection after spinal instrumentation. J Clin Neurosci 22:238–242. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2014.07.010
Olsen MA, Mayfield J, Lauryssen C et al (2003) Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg 98:149–155
McGirt MJ, Godil SS (2013) Reduction of surgical site infection in spine surgery: an opportunity for quality improvement and cost reduction. Spine J 13:1030–1031. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.003
Radcliff KE, Neusner AD, Millhouse PW et al (2015) What is new in the diagnosis and prevention of spine surgical site infections. Spine J 15:336–347. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.022
Baron EM, Young WF (2007) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a brief review of its pathophysiology, clinical course, and diagnosis. Neurosurgery 60:S35–S41. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000215383.64386.82
Klineberg E (2010) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of the evidence. Orthop Clin North Am 41:193–202. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2009.12.010
Fehlings MG, Jha NK, Hewson SM et al (2012) Is surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy cost-effective? A cost-utility analysis based on data from the AOSpine North America prospective CSM study. J Neurosurg Spine 17:89–93. doi:10.3171/2012.6.AOSPINE111069
American College of Surgeons (2013) ACS NSQIP user guide. In: Natl Surg Qual Improv Progr. http://site.acsnsqip.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/ACSNSQIP.PUF_.UserGuide.2012.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015
Basques BA, Fu MC, Buerba RA et al (2014) Using the ACS-NSQIP to identify factors affecting hospital length of stay after elective posterior lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:497–502. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000184
Arnold PM, Rice LR, Anderson KK et al (2011) Factors affecting hospital length of stay following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Evid Based Spine Care J 2:11–18. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1267108
Abu Hamdeh S, Lytsy B, Ronne-Engström E (2014) Surgical site infections in standard neurosurgery procedures—a study of incidence, impact and potential risk factors. Br J Neurosurg 28:270–275. doi:10.3109/02688697.2013.835376
Lim S, Edelstein AI, Patel AA et al (2014) Risk factors for postoperative infections following single level lumbar fusion surgery. Spine. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000608
Kwon BK, Fisher CG, Boyd MC et al (2007) A prospective randomized controlled trial of anterior compared with posterior stabilization for unilateral facet injuries of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 7:1–12. doi:10.3171/SPI-07/07/001
Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA et al (2011) Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:556–563. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eadd41
Fehlings MG, Smith JS, Kopjar B et al (2012) Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study. J Neurosurg Spine 16:425–432. doi:10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11467
David Kaye I, Marascalchi BJ, Macagno AE et al (2015) Predictors of morbidity and mortality among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically. Eur Spine J 24:2910–2917. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4010-2
Perencevich EN, Sands KE, Cosgrove SE et al (2003) Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis 9:196–203. doi:10.3201/eid0902.020232
Hur JWJW (2012) Unusual fatal infections after anterior cervical spine surgeries. Korean J Spine 9:304. doi:10.14245/kjs.2012.9.3.304
Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP (2000) Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 13:422–426. doi:10.1097/00002517-200010000-00009
Urban JA (2006) Cost analysis of surgical site infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 7(Suppl 1):S19–S22. doi:10.1089/sur.2006.7.s1-19
de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V et al (2009) Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 37:387–397. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010
Kim DH, Spencer M, Davidson SM et al (2010) Institutional prescreening for detection and eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1820–1826. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.01050
Tomov M, Mitsunaga L, Durbin-Johnson B et al (2015) Reducing surgical site infection in spinal surgery with betadine irrigation and intra-wound vancomycin powder. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000789
Kang DG, Holekamp TF, Wagner SC, Lehman RA (2015) Intrasite vancomycin powder for the prevention of surgical site infection in spine surgery: a systematic literature review. Spine J. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.030
Caroom C, Tullar JM, Benton EG et al (2013) Intrawound vancomycin powder reduces surgical site infections in posterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1183–1187. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828fcfb5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jalai, C.M., Worley, N., Poorman, G.W. et al. Surgical site infections following operative management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prevalence, predictors of occurence, and influence on peri-operative outcomes. Eur Spine J 25, 1891–1896 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4501-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4501-9