Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of the combination of abdominal peripheral nerve block and neuromuscular blockade on the surgical space during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 11 March 2024

Abstract

Purpose

The impact of the combination of abdominal peripheral nerve block (PNB) and the depth of neuromuscular blockade on the surgical field were assessed.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients undergoing elective robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) were randomized into two groups: a PNB group (moderate neuromuscular block [train-of-four 1–3 twitches] with abdominal PNB) and a non-PNB group (deep neuromuscular block [post-tetanic count 0–2 twitches] without abdominal PNB). The primary outcome was the change in the depth of the abdominal cavity relaxation assessed by the change in the distance (Δdistance) between the umbilicus port and peritoneum upon pneumoperitoneal pressure increase from 8 to 12 mmHg. The secondary outcomes were the CO2 usage for the pneumoperitoneal pressure increase and the subjective differences in the Surgical Rating Score (SRS) during surgery.

Results

The Δdistance and the CO2 usage from 8 to 12 mmHg did not differ significantly between the non-PNB and PNB groups (1.34 ± 0.65 vs. 1.28 ± 0.61 cm, p = 0.763 and 3.64 ± 1.68 vs. 4.34 ± 1.44 L, p = 0.180, respectively). There was also no significant difference in SRS. Comparisons of the Δdistance values for pressure increases from 6 to 8 mmHg, 6 to 10 mmHg and 6 to 12 mmHg between the non-PNB and PNB groups also showed no between-group differences, despite significant intra-group differences (p < 0.001) by pressure increment.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that moderate neuromuscular block with abdominal PNB maintained an adequate surgical space for RARP, with no significant difference from the space achieved by deep neuromuscular block.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Humphreys MR, Gettman MT, Chow GK, Zincke H, Blute ML. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:1169–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:498–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koo BW, Oh AY, Seo KS, Han JW, Han HS, Yoon YS. Randomized clinical trial of moderate versus deep neuromuscular block for low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2016;40:2898–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schleich CL. Schmerzlose operationen. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer; 1899. p. 240–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noguchi S, Saito J, Nakai K, Kitayama M, Hirota K. Efficacy of abdominal peripheral nerve block and caudal block during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective clinical study. J Anesth. 2019;33:103–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulier J, Dillemans B, Crombach M, Missant C, Sels A. On the abdominal pressure volume relationship. Internet J Anesthesiol. 2009;21:892.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindekaer AL, Halvor Springborg H, Istre O. Deep neuromuscular blockade leads to a larger intraabdominal volume during laparoscopy. J Vis Exp. 2013;76:50045.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Madsen MV, Gätke MR, Springborg HH, Rosenberg J, Lund J, Istre O. Optimising abdominal space with deep neuromuscular blockade in gynaecologic laparoscopy—a randomised, blinded crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59:441–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knotkova H, Fine PG, Portenoy RK. Opioid rotation: the science and the limitations of the equianalgesic dose table. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2009;38:426–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barrio J, Errando CL, San Miguel G, Salas BI, Raga J, Carrión JL, García-Ramón J, Gallego J. Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal A, Pandey R, Dhiraaj S, Singh PK, Raza M, Pandey CK, Gupta D, Choudhury A, Singh U. The effect of epidural bupivacaine on induction and maintenance doses of propofol (evaluated by bispectral index) and maintenance doses of fentanyl and vecuronium. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1684–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park SK, Son YG, Yoo S, Lim T, Kim WH, Kim JT. Deep vs moderate neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:867–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kokulu S, Bakı ED, Kaçar E, Bal A, Şenay H, Üstün KD, Yılmaz S, Ela Y, Sıvacı RG. Effect of transversus abdominis plane block on cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy anesthesia. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:2783–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have no sources of funding to declare for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoko Noguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noguchi, S., Saito, J., Nakai, K. et al. Impact of the combination of abdominal peripheral nerve block and neuromuscular blockade on the surgical space during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Anesth 38, 321–329 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03309-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03309-5

Keywords

Navigation