Skip to main content
Log in

Fractional chaos maps with flower pollination algorithm for chaotic systems’ parameters identification

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Meta-heuristic optimization algorithms are the new gate in solving most of the complicated nonlinear systems. So, improving their robustness, reliability, and convergence speed is the main target to meet the requirements of various optimization problems. In the current work, three different fractional-order chaos maps (FC-maps), which have been introduced recently, are incorporated with the fundamental flower pollination algorithm to tune its parameters adaptively. These maps are fractional logistic map, fractional sine map, fractional tent map, and their integer-order versions. As a result, fractional chaotic FPA (FC-FPA) is proposed. The FC-FPA has been mathematically tested over 10-, 30-, 50-, and 100-dimensional CEC 2017 benchmark functions. Moreover, the influence of merging FC-maps with FPA is investigated in case of increasing the number of maximum evaluation functions based on the ten functions of CEC 2020. Additionally, to assess the superiority of the proposed FC-FPA algorithm for more complicated optimization problems, it has been tested to extract the parameters of different chaotic systems with and without added noise. In addition, it is tested on the identification of the corresponding parameters for the chaotic behavior in brush-less DC motor. The results of the fractional version of CFPA are compared with that of integer CFPA and standard FPA via an extensive statistical analysis. Furthermore, a nonparametric statistical test is employed to affirm the superiority of the proposed fractional variants of CFPA. It is evident that the performance of FPA is highly influenced by integrating the fractional-order chaos maps as the introduced FC-FPA variants provide a better accurate and more consistent results as well as a higher speed of convergence especially upon using the fractional sine map.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdeljawad T (2011) On riemann and caputo fractional differences. Comput Math Appl 62(3):1602–1611 (special issue on advances in fractional differential equations II)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdeljawad T, Baleanu D (2016) Discrete fractional differences with nonsingular discrete Mittag–Leffler kernels. Adv Differ Equ 2016(1):232

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdeljawad T, Baleanu D (2017) Monotonicity analysis of a nabla discrete fractional operator with discrete Mittag–Leffler kernel. Chaos Solitons Fractals 102:106–110

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdeljawad T, Baleanu D (2017) On fractional derivatives with exponential kernel and their discrete versions. Rep Math Phys 80(1):11–27

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Alatas B (2010) Chaotic bee colony algorithms for global numerical optimization. Expert Syst Appl 37(8):5682–5687

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alatas B, Akin E, Ozer AB (2009) Chaos embedded particle swarm optimization algorithms. Chaos Solitons Fractals 40(4):1715–1734

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Arora S, Anand P (2018) Chaotic grasshopper optimization algorithm for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 31:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  8. Atici F, Eloe P (2009) Initial value problems in discrete fractional calculus. Proc Am Math Soc 137(3):981–989

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Atici FM, Eloe PW (2007) A transform method in discrete fractional calculus. Int J Differ Equ 2(2):165–176

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Atıcı FM, Şengül S (2010) Modeling with fractional difference equations. J Math Anal Appl 369(1):1–9

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Brest J, Greiner S, Boskovic B, Mernik M, Zumer V (2006) Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: a comparative study on numerical benchmark problems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10(6):646–657

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bo A, Yue P, Price KV, Awar NH (2020) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2020 special session and competition on single objective bound constrained numerical optimization. National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan, PR China and Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, technical report

  13. Chirikov BV (1979) A universal instability of many-dimensional oscillator systems. Phys Rep 52(5):263–379

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Civicioglu P (2013) Backtracking search optimization algorithm for numerical optimization problems. Appl Math Comput 219(15):8121–8144

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Civicioglu P, Besdok E (2018) A+ evolutionary search algorithm and QR decomposition based rotation invariant crossover operator. Expert Syst Appl 103:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  16. Civicioglu P, Besdok E (2019) Bernstain-search differential evolution algorithm for numerical function optimization. Expert Syst Appl 138:112831

    Google Scholar 

  17. Derrac J, García S, Molina D, Herrera F (2011) A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 1(1):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  18. Derrac J, García S, Molina D, Herrera F (2011) A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 1(1):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deshpande A, Daftardar-Gejji V (2016) Chaos in discrete fractional difference equations. Pramana 87(4):49

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Gibbons JD, Chakraborti S (2011) Nonparametric statistical inference. In: Lovric M (ed) International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer, New York, pp 977–979

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ji Y, Lai L, Zhong S, Zhang L (2018) Bifurcation and chaos of a new discrete fractional-order logistic map. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 57:352–358

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamalapathi K, Priyadarshi N, Padmanaban S, Holm-Nielsen J, Azam F, Umayal C, Ramachandaramurthy V (2018) A hybrid moth-flame fuzzy logic controller based integrated CUK converter fed brushless DC motor for power factor correction. Electronics 7(11):288

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kohli M, Arora S (2018) Chaotic grey wolf optimization algorithm for constrained optimization problems. J Comput Des Eng 5(4):458–472

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar Y, Singh PK (2019) A chaotic teaching learning based optimization algorithm for clustering problems. Appl Intell 49(3):1036–1062

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20(2):130–141

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Luo S, Li S, Tajaddodianfar F, Hu J (2018) Anti-oscillation and chaos control of the fractional-order brushless DC motor system via adaptive echo state networks. J Frankl Inst 355(14):6435–6453

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. May RM (1976) Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261(5560):459

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH (2017) Chaotic gravitational constants for the gravitational search algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 53:407–419

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rizk-Allah RM, Hassanien AE, Bhattacharyya S (2018) Chaotic crow search algorithm for fractional optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput 71:1161–1175

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rössler OE (1976) An equation for continuous chaos. Phys Lett A 57(5):397–398

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun L (2017) A new method for sensorless control of brushless DC motor. Clust Comput 22:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Y, Cai Z, Zhang Q (2011) Differential evolution with composite trial vector generation strategies and control parameters. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 15(1):55–66

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Li H-X, Huang T, Li L (2014) Differential evolution based on covariance matrix learning and bimodal distribution parameter setting. Appl Soft Comput 18:232–247

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wu G, Mallipeddi R, Suganthan P (2017) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2017 competition on constrained real-parameter optimization. National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan, PR China and Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, technical report

  35. Wu G-C, Baleanu D (2014) Discrete fractional logistic map and its chaos. Nonlinear Dyn 75(1–2):283–287

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu G-C, Baleanu D (2015) Discrete chaos in fractional delayed logistic maps. Nonlinear Dyn 80(4):1697–1703

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu G-C, Baleanu D, Zeng S-D (2014) Discrete chaos in fractional sine and standard maps. Phys Lett A 378(5–6):484–487

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu S, Wang Y, Liu X (2017) Parameter estimation for chaotic systems via a hybrid flower pollination algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 30:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yang X-S (2012) Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. In: Stepney S, Verlan S (eds) Unconventional computation and natural computation. Springer, New York, pp 240–249

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yang X-S, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via lévy flights. In: 2009 world congress on nature & biologically inspired computing (NaBIC). IEEE, pp 210–214

  41. Yousri D, AbdelAty AM, Said LA, Elwakil AS, Maundy B, Radwan AG (2019) Chaotic flower pollination and grey wolf algorithms for parameter extraction of bio-impedance models. Appl Soft Comput 75:750–774

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yousri D, Allam D, Eteiba M (2018) Chaotic whale optimizer variants for parameters estimation of the chaotic behavior in permanent magnet synchronous motor. Appl Soft Comput 74:479–503

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yousri D, Allam D, Eteiba M, Suganthan PN (2019) Static and dynamic photovoltaic models’ parameters identification using chaotic heterogeneous comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer variants. Energy Convers Manag 182:546–563

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yousri D, Babu TS, Allam D, Ramachandaramurthy VK, Etiba MB (2019) A novel chaotic flower pollination algorithm for global maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions. IEEE Access 7:121432–121445

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang J, Sanderson AC (2009) JADE: adaptive differential evolution with optional external archive. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(5):945–958

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou Y, Zhao K, Liu D (2016) Chaotic dynamic analysis of brushless DC motor. J Math Inf 5:39–43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalia Yousri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest concerning the publication of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousri, D., Allam, D., Babu, T.S. et al. Fractional chaos maps with flower pollination algorithm for chaotic systems’ parameters identification. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 16291–16327 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04906-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04906-7

Keywords

Navigation