Abstract
Background
Cancer patients suffer in part because some health professionals prescribe or administer amounts of analgesics, namely opioids, which are too small or too widely spaced to be fully effective. Patients’ reluctance to use opioids for pain treatment is often mentioned as a reason not to apply the official guidelines, but very few studies have been conducted on people’s attitudes about opioid use to relieve cancer pain.
Methods
One hundred twenty lay participants and 30 health professionals (7 physicians and 23 nurses) were presented with a set of vignettes describing a terminally ill woman with cancer who is in pain. The vignettes were composed according to a four within-subject factor design: (a) level of pain reported by the patient, (b) patient’s explicit request for additional administration of analgesics, (c) the physicians’ final decision (e.g., to use a stronger analgesic combining paracetamol and codeine), and (d) the way the decision was made (collectively or not). Participants were asked to assess the extent to which the physician’s decision was, in their view, acceptable.
Results
Seven qualitatively different positions were found among participants. They were called as follows: tend to disagree with any decision (9%), increase the strength of the painkiller in any case (16%), give morphine preferentially (9%), partly depends on pain level (23%), fully depends on pain level (6%), depends on decision process and on pain level (22%), and tend not to disagree with any collective decision (25%).
Conclusions
Overall, 91% of participants agreed with the use of morphine in terminally ill cancer patients when the pain level was high (score of 7) and the decision to increase the strength of the painkiller was taken collectively. This percentage dropped to 69% when the team was not involved in the decision and to 40% when the pain level was lower (score of 4). If opposition to the use of morphine exists, it is not opposition to morphine itself but opposition to the circumstances of its use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pargeon KL, Hailey BJ (1999) Barriers to effective cancer pain management: a review of the literature. J Pain Sympt Manag 18(5):358–368
Bauwens S, Distelmans W, Storme G, Kaufman L (2001) Attitudes and knowledge about cancer pain in Flanders. The educational effect of workshops regarding pain and symptom control. Palliat Med 15(3):181–190
Jacobsen R, Sjøgren P, Møldrup C, Christrup L (2007) Physician-related barriers to cancer pain management with opioid analgesics: a systematic review. J Opioid Manag 3(4):207–214
Deandrea S, Montanari M, Moja L, Apolone G (2008) Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain: a review of published literature. Ann Oncol 19(12):1985–1991
Bandieri E, Chirarolanza A, Luppi M, Magrini N, Marata AM, Ripamonti C (2009) Prescribtion op opioids in Italy: everything but the morphine. Ann Oncol (Letters to the editor) 20(9):961–962
Covington EC (2000) Opiophobia, Opiophilia, Opioagnosia. Pain Med 1(3):217–223
Larue F, Colleau SM, Fontaine A, Brasseur L (1995) Oncologists and primary care physicians' attitudes toward pain control and morphine prescribing in France. Cancer 76(11):2375–2382
Mas C, Albaret MC, Sorum PC, Mullet E (2010) French general practitioners vary in their attitudes toward treating terminally-ill patients. Palliat Med 24(1):60–67
Chou R, Fanciillo GJ, Fine PG, Adler JA, Ballantyne JC, for the American Pain Society-American Academy of Pain Medicine Opioids Guidelines Panel et al (2009) Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. J Pain 10(2):113–130
Center for Disease Control (2016) Guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain accessed on 4 August 2016Available at http://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/guidelines_factsheet-a.pdf
OPEN Minds (2005) The white paper on opioids and pain: A pan-European challenge.
World Health Organization (1996) Cancer pain relief with a guide to opioid availability. World Health Organization, Geneva
World Health Organization (2011) Ensuring balance in national policies on controlled substances. World Health Organization, Geneva
Tech PJ, Camm CF (2012) NICE opioids in palliative care (clinical guideline 140)—A guideline summary. Ann Med Surg 1(1):44–48
Radbruch L, Junger S, Payne S, Scholten W (eds) (2014) Access to opioid medication in Europe: final report and recommendations to the ministries of health. Pallia Med Verlag, Bonn
Larue F, Fontaine A, Brasseur L (1999) Evolution of the French public's knowledge and attitudes regarding postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 89(3):659–664
Colak D, Oguz A, Yazilitas D, Goksen Imamoglu I, Altinbas M (2014) Morphine: patient knowledge and attitudes in the central anatolia part of Turkey. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 15(12):4983–4988
Grant M, Ugalde A, Vafiadis P, Philip J (2015) Exploring the myths of morphine in cancer: views of the general practice population. Support Care Cancer 23(2):483–489
Peretti-Watel P, Bendiane MK, Galinier A, Lapiana JM, Favre R, Pegliasco V, Obadia Y, the south-eastern France palliative care group (2004) Opinions toward pain management and palliative care: comparison between HIV specialists and oncologists. AIDS Care 16(5):619–627
Mazoyer J, Munoz Sastre MT, Sorum PC, Mullet E (2016) French laypeople’s and health professionals’ views on the acceptability of terminal sedation. J Med Ethics 42:627–631
Fishman SM, Young HM, Arwood EL et al (2013) Core competencies for pain management: results of an interprofessional consensus summit. Pain Med 14(7):971–981
Anderson NH (2008) Unified social cognition. Psychology Press, New York
Anderson NH (2013) Unified psychology based on three laws of information integration. Rev Gen Psychol 17(1):125–132
Code de déontologie des psychologues. Retrieved at http://www.sfpsy.org/Code-de-deontolgie-des.html
Hofmans J, Mullet E (2013) Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: a clustering-based approach. Qual Quant 47(1):555–564
Schepers J, Hofmans J (2009) TwoMP: a MATLAB graphical user interface for two-mode partitioning. Behav Res Meth 41(2):507–514
Eid T, Manias E, Bucknall T, Almazrooa A (2014) Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pain in Saudi Arabia. Pain Manag Nurs 15:e25–e36. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2014.05.014
Kamble S, Ahmed R, Sorum PC, Mullet E (2014) The acceptability among young Hindus and Muslims of actively ending the lives of newborns with genetic defects. J Med Ethics 40(3):186–191
Johnston Conover P, Searing DD, Crewe IM (2002) The deliberative potential of political discussion. Br J Polit Sci 32(1):21–62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors declare that this research has not been funded by any organization. The authors declare that they have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazoyer, J., Sastre, M.T.M., Sorum, P.C. et al. Mapping French people and health professionals’ positions regarding the circumstances of morphine use to relieve cancer pain. Support Care Cancer 25, 2723–2731 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3682-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3682-z