Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Full consistency method (FUCOM) and weighted sum under fuzzy information for evaluating the sustainability of farm tourism sites

  • Application of soft computing
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Farm tourism is an emerging agenda within the rural tourism literature due to its potential in diversifying income on farms. Despite such potential, issues associated with sustainability became a direct consequence of its growth. However, developing an overarching sustainability evaluation framework is scarce in the domain literature, with an exemption from a recently reported work proposing fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to generate a composite performance score. This work augments the previous computational framework by reducing the mental workload of stakeholders and decision-makers in eliciting judgments required in the evaluation process. It integrates the fuzzy full consistency method (FUCOM) and fuzzy weighted sum method (WSM) into a holistic platform that assigns an aggregate sustainability performance of farm tourism sites. The fuzzy FUCOM assigns the priority weights of sustainable tourism indicators, while the fuzzy WSM generates the composite score. Integrating fuzzy set theory in the evaluation platform addresses the vagueness and uncertainty in the decision-making process. Five farm tourism sites in the Philippines are evaluated to demonstrate the proposed methodology. Findings show that the indicators associated with capability training of local tourism personnel, employment opportunities for the locals, development of an integrated tourism and development plan, and curbing waste generation are deemed the most crucial sustainability indicators. The application of the proposed framework generates the composite sustainability indices for all sites, which can be used for comparing various sites’ performance, identifying hotspots, and benchmarking for best practices. Policy insights for these findings are discussed. Finally, a comparative analysis shows that the proposed method is comparable to other time-consuming MCDM methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

  • Absalon JAT, Blasabas DKC, Capinpin EMA, Daclan MD, Yamagishi KD, Ocampo LA (2021) Impact assessment of farm tourism sites using a hybrid MADM-based composite sustainability index. Curr Issue Tour. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.2005547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agyeiwaah E, McKercher B, Suntikul W (2017) Identifying core indicators of sustainable tourism: a path forward? Tour Manag Perspect 24:26–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfaro Navarro JL, Andrés Martínez ME, Mondéjar Jiménez JA (2020) An approach to measuring sustainable tourism at the local level in Europe. Curr Issue Tour 23(4):423–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliani H, BabaieKafaky S, Saffari A, Monavari SM (2017) Land evaluation for ecotourism development—an integrated approach based on FUZZY, WLC, and ANP methods. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14(9):1999–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir AF, Abd Ghapar A, Jamal SA, Ahmad KN (2015) Sustainable tourism development: a study on community resilience for rural tourism in Malaysia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 168:116–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Andria J, di Tollo G, Pesenti R (2021) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an entropy-based approach to assess tourism sustainability. Tour Econ 27(1):168–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri C (2013) Assessing the sustainability of agritourism in the US: a comparison between agritourism and other farm entrepreneurial ventures. J Sustain Tour 21(2):252–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagojević A, Kasalica S, Stević Ž, Tričković G, Pavelkić V (2021) Evaluation of safety degree at railway crossings in order to achieve sustainable traffic management: a novel integrated fuzzy MCDM model. Sustainability 13(2):832

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancas FJ, González M, Lozano-Oyola M, Pérez F (2010) The assessment of sustainable tourism: application to Spanish coastal destinations. Ecol Ind 10(2):484–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancas FJ, Lozano-Oyola M, González M (2015) A European sustainable tourism labels proposal using a composite indicator. Environ Impact Assess Rev 54:39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Böyükaslan A, Ecer F (2021) Determination of drivers for investing in cryptocurrencies through a fuzzy full consistency method-Bonferroni (FUCOM-F’B) framework. Technol Soc 67:101745

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgass MJ, Halpern BS, Nicholson E, Milner-Gulland EJ (2017) Navigating uncertainty in environmental composite indicators. Ecol Ind 75:268–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler RW (1991) Tourism, environment, and sustainable development. Environ Conserv 18(3):201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo M, Jorge JM (2017) Multidimensional analysis of regional tourism sustainability in Spain. Ecol Econ 140:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaco C (1995) Tourism in Portugal: diversity, diffusion, and regional and local development. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 86(1):64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Chávez-Cortés M, Maya JAA (2010) Identifying and structuring values to guide the choice of sustainability indicators for tourism development. Sustainability 2(9):3074–3099

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH, Hsieh CH (2000) Representation, ranking, distance, and similarity of LR type fuzzy number and application. Aust J Intell Process Syst 6(4):217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi HC, Sirakaya E (2006) Sustainability indicators for managing community tourism. Tour Manage 27(6):1274–1289

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW, Ackoff RL (1954) An approximate measure of value. J Oper Res Soc Am 2(2):172–187

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cuong BC, Kreinovich V (2014) Picture fuzzy sets. J Comput Sci Cybern 30(4):409–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschrijver G, Kerre EE (2003) On the relationship between some extensions of fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 133(2):227–235

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Balteiro L, González-Pachón J, Romero C (2017) Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: a critical review. Eur J Oper Res 258(2):607–616

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dinis I, Simões O, Cruz C, Teodoro A (2019) Understanding the impact of intentions in the adoption of local development practices by rural tourism hosts in Portugal. J Rural Stud 72:92–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorobantu MR, Nistoreanu P (2012) Rural tourism and ecotourism—the main priorities in sustainable development orientations of rural local communities in Romania. Econ Transdiscip Cogn 15(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1978) Operations on fuzzy numbers. Int J Syst Sci 9(6):613–626

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • El Gibari S, Gómez T, Ruiz F (2019) Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: a review. J Bus Econ 89(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis S, Sheridan L (2014) A critical reflection on the role of stakeholders in sustainable tourism development in least-developed countries. Tour Plan Dev 11(4):467–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Falatooni E, Selen W, Kerr D (2016) A new framework for selecting composite indicators to assess sustainability of a destination. Athens J Tour 3(1):7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández JIP, Rivero MS (2009) Measuring tourism sustainability: proposal for a composite index. Tour Econ 15(2):277–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer A, Tchetchik A (2005) Does rural tourism benefit from agriculture? Tour Manage 26(4):493–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbord M, Schermer M, Grießmair K (2012) Stability and variety—products, organization and institutionalization in farm tourism. Tour Manage 33(4):895–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Forleo MB, Giaccio V, Giannelli A, Mastronardi L, Palmieri N (2017) Socio-economic drivers, land cover changes and the dynamics of rural settlements: Mt. Matese Area (Italy). Eur Countrys 9(3):435–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Wu B (2017) Revitalizing traditional villages through rural tourism: a case study of Yuanjia Village, Shaanxi Province, China. Tour Manage 63:223–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparini ML, Mariotti A (2021) Sustainable tourism indicators as policy making tools: lessons from ETIS implementation at destination level. J Sustain Tour. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1968880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaviglio A, Bertocchi M, Demartini E (2017) A tool for the sustainability assessment of farms: selection, adaptation and use of indicators for an Italian case study. Resources 6(4):60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoochani OM, Ghanian M, Khosravipour B, Crotts JC (2020) Sustainable tourism development performance in the wetland areas: a proposed composite index. Tour Rev 75(5):745–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaccio V, Giannelli A, Mastronardi L (2018) Explaining determinants of agri-tourism income: evidence from Italy. Tour Rev 73(2):216–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant D, Sharpley R (2005) The law and tourism. In: Pender L, Sharpley R (eds) The management of tourism. SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 150–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Ishizaka A, Tasiou M, Torrisi G (2019) On the methodological framework of composite indices: a review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Soc Indic Res 141(1):61–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo S, Zhao H (2017) Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowl-Based Syst 121:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelrigg GA (2019) A note on the weighted sum method. J Mech Des 141(10):100301

    Google Scholar 

  • He J, Huang Z, Mishra AR, Alrasheedi M (2021) Developing a new framework for conceptualizing the emerging sustainable community-based tourism using an extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-MULTIMOORA. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 171:120955

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggart K, Buller H (1995) Retired British home owners in rural France. Ageing Soc 15(3):325–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle U (1996) On the fundamentals of fuzzy set theory. J Math Anal Appl 201(3):786–826

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Coelho VR (2017) Sustainability performance assessment focusing on coral reef protection by the tourism industry in the Coral Triangle region. Tour Manage 59:510–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibănescu BC, Stoleriu OM, Munteanu A, Iaţu C (2018) The impact of tourism on sustainable development of rural areas: evidence from Romania. Sustainability 10(10):3529

    Google Scholar 

  • Idziak W, Majewski J, Zmyślony P (2015) Community participation in sustainable rural tourism experience creation: a long-term appraisal and lessons from a thematic villages project in Poland. J Sustain Tour 23(8–9):1341–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Research Centre-European Commission (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Öztayşi B, Çevik Onar S (2016) A comprehensive literature review of 50 years of fuzzy set theory. Int J Comput Intell Syst 9(sup1):3–24

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keršuliene V, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z (2010) Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). J Bus Econ Manag 11(2):243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Kožić I, Mikulić J (2011) Possibilities of implementing an indicator system for evaluating and monitoring the sustainability of tourism in Croatia. Privredna Kretanja i Ekonomska Politika 21(127):57–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsdóttir KR, Ólafsdóttir R, Ragnarsdóttir KV (2018) Reviewing integrated sustainability indicators for tourism. J Sustain Tour 26(4):583–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Krylovas A, Kosareva N, Zavadskas EK (2018) WEBIRA-comparative analysis of weight balancing method. Int J Comput Commun Control 12(2):238–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane B (1994) What is rural tourism? J Sustain Tour 2(1–2):7–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TH, Hsieh HP (2016) Indicators of sustainable tourism: a case study from a Taiwan’s wetland. Ecol Ind 67:779–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TH, Jan FH, Liu JT (2021) Developing an indicator framework for assessing sustainable tourism: evidence from a Taiwan ecological resort. Ecol Ind 125:107596

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JJ, Ali F, Kim WG (2015) Reexamination of the role of destination image in tourism: an updated literature review. E-Rev Tour Res 12(3/4):191–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CL (2020) Establishing environment sustentation strategies for urban and rural/town tourism based on a hybrid MCDM approach. Curr Issue Tour 23(19):2360–2395

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou TS, Wang MJJ (1992) Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets Syst 50(3):247–255

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lisiak M, Borowiak K, Muńko E (2017) The concept of sustainable tourism development in rural areas—a case study of Zbąszyń commune. J Water Land Dev 2017(32):63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CR, Lin WR, Wang YC, Chen SP (2019) Sustainability indicators for festival tourism: a multi-stakeholder perspective. J Qual Assur Hosp Tour 20(3):296–316

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon KR (1968) Decision making among multiple-attribute alternatives: a survey and consolidated approach. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzo-Navarro M, Pedraja-Iglesias M, Vinzón L (2015) Sustainability indicators of rural tourism from the perspective of the residents. Tour Geogr 17(4):586–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarrita-Cascante D (2017) Moving the amenity migration literature forward: understanding community-level factors associated with positive outcomes after amenity-driven change. J Rural Stud 53:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehdiabadi A, Wanke PF, Khorshid S, Spulbar C, Birau R (2021) A new hybrid fuzzy model: satisfaction of residents in touristic areas toward tourism development. Math Probl Eng 2021:6650735

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulić J, Kožić I, Krešić D (2015) Weighting indicators of tourism sustainability: a critical note. Ecol Ind 48:312–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscardo G (2008) Sustainable tourism innovation: challenging basic assumptions. Tour Hosp Res 8(1):4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (2005) “Measuring sustainability”: a multi-criterion framework. Environ Dev Sustain 7(1):117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Nematpour M, Khodadadi M (2021) Farm tourism as a driving force for socioeconomic development: a benefits viewpoint from Iran. Curr Issue Tour 24(2):247–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P, Vreeker R (2000) Sustainability assessment of development scenarios: methodology and application to Thailand. Ecol Econ 33(1):7–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson PÅ (2002) Staying on farms: an ideological background. Ann Tour Res 29(1):7–24

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nistoreanu P (2006) Ecoturism si turism rural. ASE Publishing House, Bucure ti

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo LA, Abad GKM, Cabusas KGL, Padon MLA, Sevilla NC (2018a) Recent approaches to supplier selection: a review of literature within 2006–2016. Int J Integr Supply Manag 12(1–2):22–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo L, Ebisa JA, Ombe J, Escoto MG (2018b) Sustainable ecotourism indicators with fuzzy Delphi method—a Philippine perspective. Ecol Ind 93:874–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkaya G, Erdin C (2020) Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities through a hybrid MCDM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS technique. Heliyon 6(10):e05052

    Google Scholar 

  • Palme U, Tillman AM (2008) Sustainable development indicators: how are they used in Swedish water utilities? J Clean Prod 16(13):1346–1357

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamučar D, Stević Ž, Sremac S (2018) A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry 10(9):393

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamucar D, Deveci M, Canıtez F, Bozanic D (2020) A fuzzy Full Consistency Method-Dombi-Bonferroni model for prioritizing transportation demand management measures. Appl Soft Comput 87:105952

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamucar D, Ecer F, Deveci M (2021) Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology. Sci Total Environ 788:147763

    Google Scholar 

  • Park DB, Yoon YS (2011) Developing sustainable rural tourism evaluation indicators. Int J Tour Res 13(5):401–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez V, Guerrero F, González M, Pérez F, Caballero R (2013) Composite indicator for the assessment of sustainability: the case of Cuban nature-based tourism destinations. Ecol Ind 29:316–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasoolimanesh SM, Ramakrishna S, Hall CM, Esfandiar K, Seyfi S (2020) A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals. J Sustain Tour. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1775621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards G (1996) Production and consumption of European cultural tourism. Ann Tour Res 23(2):261–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts L, Hall D (eds) (2001) Rural tourism and recreation: principles to practice. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosalina PD, Dupre K, Wang Y (2021) Rural tourism: a systematic literature review on definitions and challenges. J Hosp Tour Manag 47:134–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Roxas FMY, Rivera JPR, Gutierrez ELM (2020) Mapping stakeholders’ roles in governing sustainable tourism destinations. J Hosp Tour Manag 45:387–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A (2007) Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Soc Indic Res 81(1):65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvati L, Carlucci M (2014) A composite index of sustainable development at the local scale: Italy as a case study. Ecol Ind 43:162–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Schianetz K, Kavanagh L, Lockington D (2007) Concepts and tools for comprehensive sustainability assessments for tourism destinations: a comparative review. J Sustain Tour 15(4):369–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Senapati T, Yager RR (2020) Fermatean fuzzy sets. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11(2):663–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevastjanov P, Dymova L, Kaczmarek K (2021) On the neutrosophic, Pythagorean and some other novel fuzzy sets theories used in decision making: invitation to discuss. Entropy 23(11):1485

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley R, Vass A (2006) Tourism, farming and diversification: an attitudinal study. Tour Manage 27(5):1040–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Shores JN (1992, February) The challenge of ecotourism: a call for higher standards. In: 4th world congress on national parks and protected areas. Caracas, Venezuela, February, pp. 10–21

  • Simić MJ, Stević Ž, Zavadskas EK, Bogdanović V, Subotić M, Mardani A (2020) A novel CRITIC-Fuzzy FUCOM-DEA-Fuzzy MARCOS model for safety evaluation of road sections based on geometric parameters of road. Symmetry 12(12):2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2007) Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry. Ecol Ind 7(3):565–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2009) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind 9(2):189–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F (1999) A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, Rehoboth, Rehoboth

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F (2005) Neutrosophic set—a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. Int J Pure Appl Math 24(3):287–297

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (2017) Farm tourism seen as path to inclusive, sustainable agriculture. www.searca.org/press/farm-tourismseen-as-path-to-inclusive-sustainableagriculture

  • Stanković JJ, Marjanović I, Papathanasiou J, Drezgić S (2021) Social, economic and environmental sustainability of port regions: MCDM approach in composite index creation. J Mar Sci Eng 9(1):74

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanujkic D, Magdalinovic N, Jovanovic R (2013) A multi-attribute decision making model based on distance from decision maker’s preferences. Informatica 24(1):103–118

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stanujkic D, Zavadskas EK, Karabasevic D, Smarandache F, Turskis Z (2017) The use of the pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment method for determining the weights of criteria. Roman J Econ Forecast 20(4):116–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Streimikiene D, Svagzdiene B, Jasinskas E, Simanavicius A (2021) Sustainable tourism development and competitiveness: the systematic literature review. Sustain Dev 29(1):259–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarbrooke J (1999) Sustainable tourism management. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian C, Peng J, Zhang W, Zhang S, Wang J (2020) Tourism environmental impact assessment based on improved AHP and picture fuzzy PROMETHEE II methods. Technol Econ Dev Econ 26(2):355–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Delgado A, Palomeque FL (2014) Measuring sustainable tourism at the municipal level. Annals Tour Res 49:122–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Delgado A, Palomeque FL (2018) The ISOST index: a tool for studying sustainable tourism. J Destin Mark Manag 8:281–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Delgado A, Saarinen J (2014) Using indicators to assess sustainable tourism development: a review. Tour Geogr 16(1):31–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E, Mann SH (1989) An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: a decision-making paradox. Decis Support Syst 5(3):303–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsaur SH, Lin YC, Lin JH (2006) Evaluating ecotourism sustainability from the integrated perspective of resource, community and tourism. Tour Manage 27(4):640–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuzon TP, Hilao LJA, Marana IRD, Villalobos KN, Garcia E, Medallon MC (2014) Transformation to eco-agri tourism: the case of Casile, Cabuyao City, Laguna, Philippines. In: SHS web of conferences, vol 12, p 01048. EDP Sciences

  • UNWTO (2004) Indicators of sustainable development for tourism destinations: a guidebook. World Tourism Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNWTO (2013) Sustainable tourism for development guidebook. World Tourism Organization, European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Vukasović D, Gligović D, Terzić S, Stević Ž, Macura P (2021) A novel fuzzy MCDM model for inventory management in order to increase business efficiency. Technol Econ Dev Econ 27(2):386–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Waligo VM, Clarke J, Hawkins R (2015) Embedding stakeholders in sustainable tourism strategies. Ann Tour Res 55:90–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SH, Lee MT, Château PA, Chang YC (2016) Performance indicator framework for evaluation of sustainable tourism in the Taiwan coastal zone. Sustainability 8(7):652

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Ren J, Dong L, Yang Y (2020) Portfolio selection of renewable energy-powered desalination systems with sustainability perspective: a novel MADM-based framework under data uncertainties. J Clean Prod 275:124114

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2013, June 24–28) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Proceedings of the 2013 joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), Edmonton, AB, Canada, pp 57–61

  • Yamagishi K, Gantalao C, Ocampo L (2021) The future of farm tourism in the Philippines: challenges, strategies and insights. J Tour Futures. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-06-2020-0101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi K, Gantalao C, Tiu AM, Tanaid RA, Medalla ME, Abellana DP, Selerio E Jr, Ocampo L (2022) Evaluating the destination management performance of small islands with the fuzzy best-worst method and fuzzy simple additive weighting. Curr Issue Tour. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2054404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L (2012) Impacts and challenges in agritourism development in Yunnan, China. Tour Plan Dev 9(4):369–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JJ, Lo HW, Chao CS, Shen CC, Yang CC (2020) Establishing a sustainable sports tourism evaluation framework with a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model to explore potential sports tourism attractions in Taiwan. Sustainability 12(4):1673

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Spencer DM (2021) Motivations, challenges, and self-transformations of farmers engaged in farm tourism on a tropical island. J Herit Tour 16(2):164–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu GF, Li DF, Liang DC, Li GX (2021) An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-objective goal programming approach to portfolio selection. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 20(5):1477–1497

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabihi H, Alizadeh M, Wolf ID, Karami M, Ahmad A, Salamian H (2020) A GIS-based fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) for ecotourism suitability decision making: a case study of Babol in Iran. Tour Manag Perspect 36:100726

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J, Zakarevicius A (2012) Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika 122(6):3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ (2010) Fuzzy set theory. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Comput Stat 2(3):317–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolfani SH, Sedaghat M, Maknoon R, Zavadskas EK (2015) Sustainable tourism: a comprehensive literature review on frameworks and applications. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1):1–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank the DOT Regional Office 7 for supporting the study. He also extends his gratitude to the operators of the five farm tourism sites for their enthusiasm in extending help to make this project successful. This study is funded by the Department of Tourism (Republic of the Philippines) under the Tourism Research Grant 2018. Finally, he is grateful to his previous research assistants, Miriam Bongo, Shirley Ann Caballes, and Dharyll Prince Abellana, for their support in writing the project proposal. Some notes and data for this paper were prepared by undergraduate students Judy Alyssa Absalon, Dorwyn Kate Blasabas, Esehl May Capinpin, and Maryanne Daclan.

Funding

This study is funded by the Department of Tourism (Republic of the Philippines) under the Tourism Research Grant 2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Cebu Technological University, Corner M.J. Cuenco Ave. & R. Palma St., 6000, Cebu City, Philippines

    Lanndon Ocampo

  2. Center for Applied Mathematics and Operations Research, Cebu Technological University, Corner M.J. Cuenco Ave. & R. Palma St., 6000, Cebu City, Philippines

    Lanndon Ocampo

Authors
  1. Lanndon Ocampo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lanndon Ocampo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

L. Ocampo declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Table 8.

Table 8 Performance evaluation of the farm tourism sites in various metrics
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ocampo, L. Full consistency method (FUCOM) and weighted sum under fuzzy information for evaluating the sustainability of farm tourism sites. Soft Comput 26, 12481–12508 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07184-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07184-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation