Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Limitations of U25 CKiD and CKD-EPI eGFR formulae in patients 2–20 years of age with measured GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2—a cross-sectional study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

When applying Pierce U25 formula for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), we observed a higher proportion of eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2). We compared agreement and accuracy of the Pierce U25 (ages 2–25), Pottel (ages 2–100), and CKD-EPI (ages 18–100) formulae to GFR measurements.

Methods

Post hoc analysis of the three eGFRs compared to 367 99m technetium-diethylene-triamine penta-acetic acid (99Tc DTPA) GFR measurements (240 patients) using 3 sampling points and Brockner/Mørtensen correction (body surface area calculation based on ideal weight) on simultaneous serum creatinine and cystatin C measurements.

Results

Overall, the U25 formula performed well with a Spearman r of 0.8102 (95% confidence interval 0.7706 to 0.8435, p < 0.0001) while diagnostic accuracy was low in patients with normal mGFR. The U25 formula reclassified 29.5% of patients with normal mGFR as CKD stage 2; whereas the average of the modified Schwartz formula based on serum creatinine and the Filler formula based on cystatin C, only over-diagnosed CKD stage 2 in 8.5%, 24.5% within 10% and 62.7% within 30%. We therefore combined both. The average Schwartz/Filler eGFR had 36.5% of results within 10%, 84.7% within 30%, and normal mGFR accuracy was 26.8%, 63.9% for 10% and 30%, respectively, outperforming the CKD-EPI and Pottel formulae.

Conclusions

The Pierce U25 formula results correlated well with mGFR < 75 mL/min/1.73 m2. Over the entire GFR range, accuracy was better for patients with a higher mGFR, when averaging the combined Schwartz/Filler formulae. More work is needed to prospectively confirm our findings in other centers.

Graphical abstract

A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Anonymized data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Filler G, Yasin A, Medeiros M (2014) Methods of assessing renal function. Pediatr Nephrol 29:183–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CM Jr, Spitzer A (1976) A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics 58:259–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz GJ, Munoz A, Schneider MF, Mak RH, Kaskel F, Warady BA, Furth SL (2009) New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:629–637

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Filler G, Lee M (2018) Educational review: measurement of GFR in special populations. Pediatr Nephrol 33:2037–2046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierce CB, Munoz A, Ng DK, Warady BA, Furth SL, Schwartz GJ (2021) Age- and sex-dependent clinical equations to estimate glomerular filtration rates in children and young adults with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 99:948–956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng DK, Pierce CB (2021) Kidney disease progression in children and young adults with pediatric CKD: epidemiologic perspectives and clinical applications. Semin Nephrol 41:405–415

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang SH, Sharma AP, Yasin A, Lindsay RM, Clark WF, Filler G (2011) Hyperfiltration affects accuracy of creatinine eGFR measurement. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:274–280

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pottel H, Adebayo OC, Nkoy AB, Delanaye P (2023) Glomerular hyperfiltration: part 1 - defining the threshold - is the sky the limit? Pediatr Nephrol 38:2523–2527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150:604–612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Webster-Clark M, Jaeger B, Zhong Y, Filler G, Alvarez-Elias A, Franceschini N, Diaz-Gonzalez de Ferris ME (2018) Low agreement between modified-Schwartz and CKD-EPI eGFR in young adults: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study. BMC Nephrol 19:194

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Selistre L, Rabilloud M, Cochat P, de Souza V, Iwaz J, Lemoine S, Beyerle F, Poli-de-Figueiredo CE, Dubourg L (2016) Comparison of the Schwartz and CKD-EPI equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in children, adolescents, and adults: a retrospective cross-sectional study. PLoS Med 13:e1001979

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schellekens P, Verjans M, Janssens P, Dachy A, De Rechter S, Breysem L, Allegaert K, Bammens B, Vennekens R, Vermeersch P, Pottel H, Mekahli D (2023) Low agreement between various eGFR formulae in pediatric and young adult ADPKD patients. Pediatr Nephrol 38:3043–3053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma AP, Yasin A, Garg AX, Filler G (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C–based eGFR equations at different GFR levels in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:1599–1608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pottel H, Hoste L, Dubourg L, Ebert N, Schaeffner E, Eriksen BO, Melsom T, Lamb EJ, Rule AD, Turner ST, Glassock RJ, De Souza V, Selistre L, Mariat C, Martens F, Delanaye P (2016) An estimated glomerular filtration rate equation for the full age spectrum. Nephrol Dial Transplant 31:798–806

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Filler G, Lepage N (2003) Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? Pediatr Nephrol 18:981–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma AP, Yasin A, Garg AX, Filler G (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C-based eGFR equations at different GFR levels in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:1599–1608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mosteller RD (1987) Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med 317:1098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Filler G, Ferris M, Gattineni J (2021) Assessment of kidney function in children, adolescents, and young adults. In: Emma F, Goldstein S, Bagga A, Bates CM, Shroff R (eds) Pediatric Nephrology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27843-3_87-1

  19. CDC Growth Charts (2006). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/growthcharts/zscore/zscore.htm. (Accessed 23 June 2006)

  20. Grubb A, Horio M, Hansson LO, Bjork J, Nyman U, Flodin M, Larsson A, Bokenkamp A, Yasuda Y, Blufpand H, Lindstrom V, Zegers I, Althaus H, Blirup-Jensen S, Itoh Y, Sjostrom P, Nordin G, Christensson A, Klima H, Sunde K, Hjort-Christensen P, Armbruster D, Ferrero C (2014) Generation of a new cystatin C-based estimating equation for glomerular filtration rate by use of 7 assays standardized to the international calibrator. Clin Chem 60:974–986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. K/DOQI (2002) Clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39:S1-266

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Traub SL, Kichen L (1983) Estimating ideal body mass in children. Am J Hosp Pharm 40:107–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Delgado C, Baweja M, Crews DC, Eneanya ND, Gadegbeku CA, Inker LA, Mendu ML, Miller WG, Moxey-Mims MM, Roberts GV, St Peter WL, Warfield C, Powe NR (2022) A unifying approach for GFR estimation: recommendations of the NKF-ASN task force on reassessing the inclusion of race in diagnosing kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 79(268–288):e261

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartz GJ, Schneider MF, Maier PS, Moxey-Mims M, Dharnidharka VR, Warady BA, Furth SL, Munoz A (2012) Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int 82:445–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Inker LA, Tighiouart H, Coresh J, Foster MC, Anderson AH, Beck GJ, Contreras G, Greene T, Karger AB, Kusek JW, Lash J, Lewis J, Schelling JR, Navaneethan SD, Sondheimer J, Shafi T, Levey AS (2016) GFR estimation using beta-trace protein and beta2-microglobulin in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 67:40–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Filler G, Alvarez-Elias AC, Westreich KD, Huang SS, Lindsay RM (2016) Can the new CKD-EPI BTP-B2M formula be applied in children? Pediatr Nephrol 31:2175–2177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nyman U, Bjork J, Berg U, Bokenkamp A, Dubourg L, Goffin K, Grubb A, Hansson M, Larsson A, Littmann K, Asling-Monemi K, Pottel H, Delanaye P (2022) The modified CKiD study estimated GFR equations for children and young adults under 25 years of age: performance in a European multicenter cohort. Am J Kidney Dis 80:807–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zheng K, Gong M, Qin Y, Song H, Shi X, Wu Y, Li F, Li X (2017) Validation of glomerular filtration rate-estimating equations in Chinese children. PLoS One 12:e0180565

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Filler G, Foster J, Acker A, Lepage N, Akbari A, Ehrich JHH (2005) The Cockcroft-Gault formula should not be used in children. Kidney Int 67:2321–2324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ismail OZ, Bhayana V, Kadour M, Lepage N, Gowrishankar M, Filler G (2017) Improving the translation of novel biomarkers to clinical practice: the story of cystatin C implementation in Canada: a professional practice column. Clin Biochem 50:380–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Inker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J, Tighiouart H, Wang D, Sang Y, Crews DC, Doria A, Estrella MM, Froissart M, Grams ME, Greene T, Grubb A, Gudnason V, Gutiérrez OM, Kalil R, Karger AB, Mauer M, Navis G, Nelson RG, Poggio ED, Rodby R, Rossing P, Rule AD, Selvin E, Seegmiller JC, Shlipak MG, Torres VE, Yang W, Ballew SH, Couture SJ, Powe NR, Levey AS (2021) New creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without race. N Engl J Med 385:1737–1749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Alvarez-Elías AC, Filler G (2022) Including race in pediatric estimated GFR equations: is this a genuine need? Am J Kidney Dis 80:161–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Filler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Graphical abstract (PPTX 48 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filler, G., Ahmad, F., Bhayana, V. et al. Limitations of U25 CKiD and CKD-EPI eGFR formulae in patients 2–20 years of age with measured GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2—a cross-sectional study. Pediatr Nephrol 39, 1169–1176 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-023-06185-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-023-06185-5

Keywords

Navigation