Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of outcomes of transmural EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: systematic review with proportion meta-analysis and meta-regression

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Transmural EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been increasingly used in the treatment of gallbladder diseases. Aims of the study were to provide a comprehensive meta-analysis and meta-regression of features and outcomes of this procedure.

Methods

MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane databases were searched for literature pertinent to transmural EUS-GBD up to May 2021. Random-effect meta-analysis of proportions and meta-regression of potential modifiers of outcome measures considered were applied. Outcome measures were technical success rate, overall clinical success, and procedure-related adverse events (AEs).

Results

Twenty-seven articles were identified including 1004 patients enrolled between February 2009 and February 2020. Acute cholecystitis was present in 98.7% of cases. Pooled technical success was 98.0% (95% CI 96.3, 99.3; heterogeneity: 23.6%), the overall clinical success was 95.4% (95% CI 92.8, 97.5; heterogeneity: 35.3%), and procedure-related AEs occurred in 14.8% (95% CI 8.8, 21.8; heterogeneity: 82.4%), being stent malfunction/dislodgement the most frequent (3.5%). Procedural-related mortality was 1‰. Meta-regression showed that center experience proxied to > 10 cases/year increased the technical success rate (odds ratio [OR]: 2.84; 95% CI 1.06, 7.59) and the overall clinical success (OR: 3.52; 95% CI 1.33, 9.33). The use of anti-migrating devices also increased the overall clinical success (OR: 2.16; 95% CI 1.07, 4.36) while reducing procedure-related AEs (OR: 0.36; 95% CI 0.14, 0.98).

Conclusion

Physicians’ experience and anti-migrating devices are the main determinants of main clinical outcomes after EUS-GBD, suggesting that treatment in expert centers would optimize results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Podboy A, Yuan J, Stave CD, Chan SM, Hwang JH, Teoh AYB (2021) Comparison of EUS-guided endoscopic transpapillary and percutaneous gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 93(4):797-804.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T (2002) Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med 21(4):589–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283(15):2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 29(372):n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 28(366):l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Joanna Briggs Institute (2017) Checklist for case-series. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

  7. Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M (2014) Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health 72(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3258-72-39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 19(14):135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lisotti A, Linguerri R, Bacchilega I, Cominardi A, Marocchi G, Fusaroli P (2021) EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis-procedure outcomes and evaluation of mortality predictors. Surg Endosc 28:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08318-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Teoh AYB, Kitano M, Itoi T, Pérez-Miranda M, Ogura T, Chan SM, Serna-Higuera C, Omoto S, Torres-Yuste R, Tsuichiya T, Wong KT, Leung CH, Chiu PWY, Ng EKW, Lau JYW (2020) Endosonography-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy in very high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: an international randomised multicentre controlled superiority trial (DRAC 1). Gut 69(6):1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho SH, Oh D, Song TJ, Park DH, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Lee YN, Moon JH, Lee SS (2020) Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of lumen-apposing metal stents and anti-migrating tubular self-expandable metal stents for EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc 91(3):543–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.09.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogura T, Nishioka N, Yamada M, Yamada T, Higuchi K (2021) EUS-guided gallbladder drainage using an improved self-expandable covered metal stent with anti-stent migration system (with video). Dig Dis 39(2):150–155. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sagami R, Hayasaka K, Ujihara T, Nakahara R, Murakami D, Iwaki T, Katsuyama Y, Harada H, Tsuji H, Sato T, Nishikiori H, Murakami K, Amano Y (2020) Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Ann Gastroenterol 33(4):391–397. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yakira ND, Kadded G, Dixon RE, Confer B, Shah RN, Khara HS et al (2020) Endoscopic ultrasound guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) in patients with acute cholecystitis has excellent long-term outcomes: a large, multicenter us study. Gastrointestinal Endosc 91:AB298–AB299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Teoh AY, Perez-Miranda M, Kunda R, Lee SS, Irani S, Yeaton P, Sun S, Baron TH, Moon JH, Holt B, Khor CJL, Rerknimitr R, Bapaye A, Chan SM, Choi HJ, James TW, Kongkam P, Lee YN, Parekh P, Ridtitid W, Serna-Higuera C, Tan DMY, Torres-Yuste R (2019) Outcomes of an international multicenter registry on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in patients at high risk for cholecystectomy. Endosc Int Open 7(8):E964–E973. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0915-2098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh D, Song TJ, Cho DH, Park DH, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Lee SS (2019) EUS-guided cholecystostomy versus endoscopic transpapillary cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. Gastrointest Endosc 89(2):289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanno Y, Kozakai F, Koshita S, Ogawa T, Kusunose H, Masu K, Sakai T, Murabayashİ T, Ito K (2019) Technical issues stemming from endoscopic-ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: a single center experience. Turk J Gastroenterol 30(12):1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2019.181032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. James TW, Krafft M, Croglio M, Nasr J, Baron T (2019) EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in patients with cirrhosis: results of a multicenter retrospective study. Endosc Int Open 7(9):E1099–E1104. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0965-6662

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kozakai F, Kanno Y, Ito K, Koshita S, Ogawa T, Kusunose H, Masu K, Sakai T, Murabayashi T, Yonamine K, Kawakami Y, Fujii Y, Miyamoto K, Noda Y (2019) Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage as a treatment option for acute cholecystitis after metal stent placement in malignant biliary strictures. Clin Endosc 52(3):262–268. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Teeratorn N, WiriyapornRidtitid W, Piyachaturawat P, Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R (2019) 1029 Outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: transpapillary approach versus endoscopic ultrasoud-guided transmural approach. Gastrointest Endosc 89:AB132–AB133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed O, Ogura T, Eldahrouty A, Khalaf H, Mohammed E, Okasha H, Sameer A, Abdelaal U, Higuchi K (2018) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: Results of long-term follow-up. Saudi J Gastroenterol 24(3):183–188. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_506_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderloni A, Attili F, Sferrazza A, Rimbaș M, Costamagna G, Repici A, Larghi A (2017) EUS-guided gallbladder drainage using a lumen-apposing self-expandable metal stent in patients with coagulopathy or anticoagulation therapy: a case series. Endosc Int Open 5(11):E1100–E1103. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118828

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sowier S, Sowier A, Wiechowska-Kozłowska A, Białecki J, Pyda P (2019) Initial experience with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 14(2):195–202. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2018.79528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vozzo CF, Simons-Linares CR, Abou Saleh M, Stevens T, Chahal P (2020) Safety of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage using a lumen-apposing metal stent in patients requiring anticoagulation. VideoGIE 5(10):500-503.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vgie.2020.07.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Dollhopf M, Larghi A, Will U, Rimbaş M, Anderloni A, Sanchez-Yague A, Teoh AYB, Kunda R (2017) EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis and high surgical risk using an electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent device. Gastrointest Endosc 86(4):636–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Teoh AYB, Serna C, Penas I, Chong CCN, Perez-Miranda M, Ng EKW, Lau JYW (2017) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage reduces adverse events compared with percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients who are unfit for cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 49(2):130–138. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-119036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Irani S, Ngamruengphong S, Teoh A, Will U, Nieto J, Abu Dayyeh BK, Gan SI, Larsen M, Yip HC, Topazian MD, Levy MJ, Thompson CC, Storm AC, Hajiyeva G, Ismail A, Chen YI, Bukhari M, Chavez YH, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA (2017) Similar efficacies of endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent versus percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(5):738–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Manta R, Zulli C, Zullo A, Forti E, Tringali A, Dioscoridi L, Zito F, Bertani H, Conigliaro R, Mutignani M (2017) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with a silicone-covered nitinol short bilaterally flared stent: a case series. Endosc Int Open 5(11):E1111–E1115. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118659.Erratum.In:EndoscIntOpen.2017Nov;5(11):C3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Choi JH, Kim HW, Lee JC, Paik KH, Seong NJ, Yoon CJ, Hwang JH, Kim J (2017) Percutaneous transhepatic versus EUS-guided gallbladder drainage for malignant cystic duct obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 85(2):357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kamata K, Takenaka M, Kitano M, Omoto S, Miyata T, Minaga K, Yamao K, Imai H, Sakurai T, Watanabe T, Nishida N, Kudo M (2017) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: long-term outcomes after removal of a self-expandable metal stent. World J Gastroenterol 23(4):661–667. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.661

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kahaleh M, Perez-Miranda M, Artifon EL, Sharaiha RZ, Kedia P, Peñas I, De la Serna C, Kumta NA, Marson F, Gaidhane M, Boumitri C, Parra V, RondonClavo CM, Giovannini M (2016) International collaborative study on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: Are we ready for prime time? Dig Liver Dis 48(9):1054–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.05.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Takagi W, Ogura T, Sano T, Onda S, Okuda A, Masuda D, Imoto A, Takeuchi T, Fukunishi S, Higuchi K (2016) EUS-guided cholecystoduodenostomy for acute cholecystitis with an anti-stent migration and anti-food impaction system; a pilot study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 9(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X15609285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi JH, Lee SS, Choi JH, Park DH, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH (2014) Long-term outcomes after endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Endoscopy 46(8):656–661. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1365720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. de la Serna-Higuera C, Pérez-Miranda M, Gil-Simón P, Ruiz-Zorrilla R, Diez-Redondo P, Alcaide N, Sancho-del Val L, Nuñez-Rodriguez H (2013) EUS-guided transenteric gallbladder drainage with a new fistula-forming, lumen-apposing metal stent. Gastrointest Endosc 77(2):303–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jang JW, Lee SS, Park DH, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH (2011) Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided transgastric/transduodenal gallbladder drainage with single-step placement of a modified covered self-expandable metal stent in patients unsuitable for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 74(1):176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T et al (2018) Tokyo guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25(1):55–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Anderloni A, Buda A, Vieceli F et al (2016) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural stenting for gallbladder drainage in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc 30:5200–5208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kalva NR, Vanar V, Forcione D, Bechtold ML, Puli SR (2018) Efficacy and safety of lumen apposing self-expandable metal stents for EUS guided cholecystostomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(2018):7070961. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7070961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Manta R, Mutignani M, Galloro G, Conigliaro R, Zullo A (2018) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a systematic review of case series. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 30(7):695–698. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000001112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jain D, Bhandari BS, Agrawal N, Singhal S (2018) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage using a lumen-apposing metal stent for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review. Clin Endosc 51(5):450–462. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71(3):446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tyberg A, Jha K, Shah S, Kedia P, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M (2020) EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: a learning curve modified by technical progress. Endosc Int Open 8(1):E92–E96

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Rücker G, Schumacher M (2008) Simpson’s paradox visualized: the example of the rosiglitazone meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 30(8):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CF conceived the hypothesis, planned the study and wrote the manuscript; CB, MS and ED collected data, helped in interpreting results and in manuscript preparation; CC provided quality assessment and final data check for inclusion in the analysis. GE and AA helped in manuscript writing providing important intellectual contents. AC coordinated the study and performed statistical analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cecilia Binda.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Carlo Fabbri is a consultant for Boston Scientific; Andrea Anderloni is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Olympus. Cecilia Binda, Monica Sbrancia, Elton Dajti, Chiara Coluccio, Giorgio Ercolani, and Alessandro Cucchetti have no financial ties to disclose. The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 54 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fabbri, C., Binda, C., Sbrancia, M. et al. Determinants of outcomes of transmural EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: systematic review with proportion meta-analysis and meta-regression. Surg Endosc 36, 7974–7985 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09339-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09339-y

Keywords

Navigation