Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery using the cumulative sum method

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is no clear evidence on the number of cases required to master the techniques required in robot-assisted surgery for different surgical fields and techniques. The purpose of this study was to clarify the learning curve of robot-assisted rectal surgery for malignant disease by surgical process.

Method

The study retrospectively analyzed robot-assisted rectal surgeries performed between April 2014 and July 2020 for which the operating time per process was measurable. The following learning curves were created using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method: (1) console time required for total mesorectal excision (CUSUM tTME), (2) time from peritoneal incision to inferior mesenteric artery dissection (CUSUM tIMA), (3) time required to mobilize the descending and sigmoid colon (CUSUM tCM), and (4) time required to mobilize the rectum (CUSUM tRM). Each learning curve was classified into phases 1–3 and evaluated. A fifth learning curve was evaluated for robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection (CUSUM tLLND).

Results

This study included 149 cases. Phase 1 consisted of 32 cases for CUSUM tTME, 30 for CUSUM tIMA, 21 for CUSUM tCM, and 30 for CUSUM tRM; the respective numbers were 54, 48, 45, and 61 in phase 2 and 63, 71, 83, and 58 in phase 3. There was no significant difference in the number of cases in each phase. Lateral lymph node dissection was initiated in the 76th case where robot-assisted rectal surgery was performed. For CUSUM tLLND, there were 12 cases in phase 1, 6 in phase 2, and 7 cases in phase 3.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery is the same for all surgical processes. Surgeons who already have adequate experience in robot-assisted surgery may be able to acquire stable technique in a smaller number of cases when they start to learn other techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison–open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubeshter B, Angel C, Toy E, Thomas S, Glantz JC (2013) Current role of robotic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 29:174–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L, Teloken P, Dunglison N, Williams S, Lavin MF, Gardiner RA (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 19:1051–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Galata C, Vassilev G, Haas F, Kienle P, Büttner S, Reißfelder C, Hardt J (2019) Clinical, oncological, and functional outcomes of Da Vinci (Xi)-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a prospective, controlled cohort study of 51 consecutive cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 34:1907–1914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kestin IG (1995) A statistical approach to measuring the competence of anaesthetic trainees at practical procedures. Br J Anaesth 75:805–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavill I (1971) Quality control in routine haemoglobinometry. J Clin Pathol 24:701–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Sato S, Yamakawa Y, Kagawa H, Tomioka H, Mori K (2015) Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29:1679–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B, Francon D, Turrini O, Guiramand J, Francon D, Mokart D, Houvenaeghel G, Giovannini M, Delpero JR (2010) The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution’s experience. Ann Surg 251:249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiménez-rodríguez RM, Díaz-pavón JM, de Juan FDLP, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:815–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasseri Y, Stettler I, Shen W, Zhu R, Alizadeh A, Lee A, Cohen J, Barnajian M (2021) Learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery. J Robot Surg 15:489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parisi A, Scrucca L, Desiderio J, Gemini A, Guarino S, Ricci F, Cirocchi R, Palazzini G, D’Andrea V, Minelli L, Trastulli S (2017) Robotic right hemicolectomy: analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve. Surg Oncol 26:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS, Baik SH, Kim DW, Min BS, Lee KY, Kim NK (2014) Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 3-phase learning process comparison. Surg Endosc 28:2821–2831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kagawa H, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Tomohiro Yamaguchi T, Tsukamoto S, Tomioka H, Yamakawa Y, Sato S (2015) Robotic-assisted lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in 50 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 29:995–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2014) Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: short-term outcomes for 113 consecutive patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:1105–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Y, Liu S, Han Y, Xiang J, Cerfolio RJ, Li H (2019) Robotic anatomical segmentectomy: an analysis of the learning curve. Ann Thorac Surg 107:1515–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Foo CC, Law WL (2016) The learning curve of robotic-assisted low rectal resection of a novice rectal surgeon. World J Surg 40:456–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 9:1066–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuo LJ, Lin YK, Chang CC, Tai CJ, Chiou JF, Chang YJ (2014) Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy and multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robotic surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sammon J, Perry A, Beaule L, Kinkead T, Clark D, Hansen M (2010) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning rate analysis as an objective measure of the acquisition of surgical skill. BJU Int 106:855–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Davis JW, Kreaden US, Gabbert J, Thomas R (2014) Learning curve assessment of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open-surgery controls from the premier perspective database. J Endourol 28:560–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Galfano A, Secco S, Dell’Oglio P, Rha K, Eden C, Fransis K, Sooriakumaran P, De La Muela PS, Kowalczyk K, Miyagawa T, Assenmacher C, Matsubara A, Chiu KY, Boylu U, Lee H, Bocciardi AM (2021) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: early learning curve experience in three continents. BJU Int 127:412–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, Carlson MJ, Valmadre S, Phillips GS, Cohn DE (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114:162–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schreuder HWR, Zweemer RP, Van Baal WM, Van De Lande J, Dijkstra JC, Verheijen RHM (2010) From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve. Gynecol Surg 7:253–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall JB (2013) The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 121:1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou J, Shi Y, Qian F, Tang B, Hao Y, Zhao Y, Yu P (2015) Cumulative summation analysis of learning curve for robot-assisted gastrectomy in gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 111:760–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ, Kim HI, Han SU, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Park S (2021) Comprehensive learning curve of robotic surgery discovery from a multicenter prospective trial of robotic gastrectomy. Ann Surg 273:949–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu J, Zheng HL, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Huang CM, Zheng CH (2018) A propensity score-matched comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: oncological, cost, and surgical stress analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 22:1152–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, Choudry HA, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy : an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB 17:580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE (2018) Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine 97:e13000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chao YK, Wen YW, Chuang WY, Cerfolio RJ (2020) Transition from video-assisted thoracoscopic to robotic esophagectomy: a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Esophagus 33:doz33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hernandez JM, Dimou F, Weber J, Almhanna K, Hoffe S, Shridhar R, Karl R, Meredith K (2013) Defining the learning curve for robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1346–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang H, Chen L, Wang Z, Zheng Y, Geng Y, Wang F, Liu D, He A, Ma L, Yuan Y, Wang Y (2018) The learning curve for robotic mckeown esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 105:1024–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu P, Liao W, Ding ZY, Chen L, Zhang WG, Zhang BX, Chen XP (2019) Learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg 23:1778–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Gao YX, Lau WY, Liu R (2019) The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center. Surg Endosc 33:2927–2933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2016) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:721–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Lee HJ, Woo IT, Park IK (2018) Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 32:2466–2473

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan

    Tetsuo Sugishita, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Jun Imaizumi, Yasuyuki Takamizawa, Manabu Inoue, Konosuke Moritani & Yukihide Kanemitsu

  2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

    Yusuke Kinugasa

Authors
  1. Tetsuo Sugishita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shunsuke Tsukamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Imaizumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yasuyuki Takamizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Manabu Inoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Konosuke Moritani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yusuke Kinugasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yukihide Kanemitsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shunsuke Tsukamoto.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Tetsuo Sugishita, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Jun Imaizumi, Yasuyuki Takamizawa, Manabu Inoue, Konosuke Moritani, Yusuke Kinugasa, and Yukihide Kanemitsu have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugishita, T., Tsukamoto, S., Imaizumi, J. et al. Evaluation of the learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery using the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 36, 5947–5955 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08960-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08960-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation