Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO)

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has evolved as a safe and effective alternative to conventional open liver resection (OLR) for malignant lesions. However, LLR in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. This study analyzed the perioperative and oncological outcomes of LLR for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cirrhosis compared with OLR using propensity score matching.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective analysis of records of patients who underwent limited liver resection for HCC and were histologically diagnosed with liver cirrhosis between January 2009 and December 2017 in the eight institutions belonging to the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: the LLR and OLR groups. After propensity score matching, we compared clinicopathological features and outcomes.

Results

In total 256 patients with histological liver cirrhosis who underwent limited liver resection for HCC were included in this study; 58 patients had undergone LLR, and the remaining 198 patients OLR. The number of tumors was higher, tumor size was larger, and difficulty score was significantly higher in the OLR group before propensity matching. After the matching, the data of the well-matched 58 patients in each group were evaluated; the intraoperative blood loss was lower in the LLR group (p = 0.004), and incidence of the postoperative complications was significantly higher in the OLR group (p = 0.019). The duration of the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LLR group (p < 0.001). There were no differences between two groups in overall survival and recurrent-free survival.

Conclusions

LLR decreased the incidences of postoperative complications, shortened the duration of postoperative hospital stay. Thus, LLR is a safe and feasible procedure even in patients with cirrhosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zaydfudim VM, Vachharajani N, Klintmalm GB et al (2016) Liver resection and transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond milan criteria. Ann Surg 264(4):650–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yao FY, Bass NM, Nikolai B et al (2002) Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list. Liver Transpl 8(10):873–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hackl C, Schlitt HJ, Renner P, Lang SA (2016) Liver surgery in cirrhosis and portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 22(9):2725–2735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen X, Zhai J, Cai X et al (2012) Severity of portal hypertension and prediction of postoperative liver failure after liver resection in patients with Child-Pugh grade A cirrhosis. Br J Surg 99(12):1701–1710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boleslawski E, Petrovai G, Truant S et al (2012) Hepatic venous pressure gradient in the assessment of portal hypertension before liver resection in patients with cirrhosis. Br J Surg 99(6):855–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawano Y, Sasaki A, Kai S et al (2008) Short- and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with concomitant esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg Oncol 15(6):1670–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Witowski J, Rubinkiewicz M, Mizera M et al (2019) Meta-analysis of short- and long-term outcomes after pure laparoscopic versus open liver surgery in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Surg Endosc 33(5):1491–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung TT, Poon RT, Yuen WK et al (2013) Long-term survival analysis of pure laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 257(3):506–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc 24(5):1170–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaillard M, Tranchart H, Dagher I (2014) Laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: current role and limitations. World J Gastroenterol 20(17):4892–4899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T et al (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepato-Bil Pan Sci 22(10):721–727

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu X, Huang Z, Lau WY et al (2018) Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with well-preserved liver function and cirrhotic background: a propensity score matching study. Surg Endosc 33:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu HW, Liu F, Li HY, Wei YG, Li B (2018) Outcomes following laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 32(2):712–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Noda T, Eguchi H, Iwagami Y et al (2018) Minimally invasive liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma of patients with liver damage B: a propensity score-based analysis. Hepatol Res 48(7):539–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Memeo R, deAngelis N, Compagnon P et al (2014) Laparoscopic vs. open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma of cirrhotic liver: a case–control study. World J Surg 38(11):2919–2926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Otsubo T, Kobayashi S, Sano K et al (2017) Safety-related outcomes of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery board certification system for expert surgeons. J Hepato-Bil Pan Sci 24(5):252–261

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ichida F, Tsuji T, Omata M et al (1996) New Inuyama classification; new criteria for histological assessment of chronic hepatitis. Int Hepatol Commun 6(2):112–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Makuuchi M, Kosuge T, Takayama T et al (1993) Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol 9(4):298–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepato-Bil Pan Surg 12(5):351–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H et al (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepato-Bil Pan Sci 21(10):745–753

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149(5):713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Itamoto T, Nakahara H, Tashiro H et al (2005) Indications of partial hepatectomy for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma with compensated cirrhosis. Am J Surg 189(2):167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Itamoto T, Nakahara H, Amano H et al (2007) Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 141(5):589–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F et al (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors. Surg Endosc 17(1):23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Morino M, Morra I, Rosso E, Miglietta C, Garrone C (2003) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 17(12):1914–1918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nanashima A, Abo T, Hamasaki K et al (2013) Predictors of intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Surg Today 43(5):485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tranchart H, O’Rourke N, Van Dam R et al (2015) Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature. J Hepato-Bil Pan Sci 22(5):371–378

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C et al (2006) Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives. Ann Surg 243(4):499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoon YI, Kim KH, Kang SH et al (2017) Pure laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score matched analysis. Ann Surg 265(5):856–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All authors performed this procedure. This study was not funded by any grants. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuyoshi Kobayashi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Masateru Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi, Akihiko Oshita, Tomoyuki Abe, Toshihiko Kohashi, Takashi Onoe, Saburo Fukuda, Ichiro Omori, Yasuhiro Imaoka, Naruhiko Honmyo, and Hideki Ohdan have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamamoto, M., Kobayashi, T., Oshita, A. et al. Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO). Surg Endosc 34, 5055–5061 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07302-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07302-y

Keywords

Navigation