Abstract
Background
In the last 20 years, intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) has been explored as a modality for the management of peritoneal metastases of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and primary peritoneal tumors. Direct delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the peritoneal cavity space has proved superior to systemic chemotherapy when evaluating characteristics such as drug concentration reached in the peritoneal space, penetration into peritoneal metastases, and chemotherapy-related toxicity. Traditionally, IPC is delivered by peritoneal lavage with a liquid solution. This form of delivery has limitations, including inhomogeneous intraperitoneal distribution and limited ability to penetrate tissues and metastatic nodules. An alternative mode of delivery is so-called pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Within this context, the present study sought to identify the pattern of spatial distribution of therapeutic solutions aerosolized into the peritoneal space using a single-port PIPAC device and ascertain whether the aerosolized method is superior to the traditional (liquid) mode of IPC delivery.
Methods
Analysis of the rate of intra-abdominal staining with aerosolized 2% silver nitrate in five porcine models.
Results
Assessment of differences in stain impregnation between the upper, middle, and lower abdomen did not reveal significant differences (p = 0.42). The median sum scores were 1 for the upper abdomen and 3 for the middle and lower abdomen.
Conclusions
Aerosolization does not reach all regions of the abdomen homogeneously. However, adequate exposure of the upper abdomen, mid-abdomen, and lower abdomen to chemotherapeutic agents can be achieved with PIPAC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Markman M (2003) Intraperitoneal antineoplastic drug delivery: rationale and results. Lancet Oncol 4(5):277–283
Solass W, Hetzel A, Nadiradze G, Sagynaliev E, Reymond MA (2012) Description of a novel approach for intraperitoneal drug delivery and the related device. Surg Endosc 26(7):1849–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2148-0
Reymond MA, Hu B, Garcia A, Reck T, Kockerling F, Hess J, Morel P (2000) Feasibility of therapeutic pneumoperitoneum in a large animal model using a microvaporisator. Surg Endosc 14(1):51–55
Alyami M, Gagniere J, Sgarbura O, Cabelguenne D, Villeneuve L, Pezet D, Quenet F, Glehen O, Bakrin N, Passot G (2017) Multicentric initial experience with the use of the pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the management of unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(11):2178–2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.09.010
Demtroder C, Solass W, Zieren J, Strumberg D, Giger-Pabst U, Reymond MA (2016) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis. Colorectal Dis 18(4):364–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13130
Tempfer CB, Rezniczek GA, Ende P, Solass W, Reymond MA (2015) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin in women with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a cohort study. Anticancer Res 35(12):6723–6729
Khosrawipour T, Khosrawipour V, Giger-Pabst U (2017) Pressurized intra peritoneal aerosol chemotherapy in patients suffering from peritoneal carcinomatosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 12(10):e0186709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186709
Seitenfus R, Ferreira PRW, Santos GOD, Alves RJV, Kalil AN, Barros ED, Glehen O, Casagrande TAC, Bonin EA, Silva Junior EMD (2017) A prototype single-port device for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Technical feasibility and local drug distribution. Acta Cir Bras 32(12):1056–1063. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020170120000007
Sampson JA (1931) Implantation peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian origin. Am J Pathol 7(5):423–444 (439)
Flessner MF (1996) Small-solute transport across specific peritoneal tissue surfaces in the rat. J Am Soc Nephrol 7(2):225–233
Khosrawipour V, Khosrawipour T, Diaz-Carballo D, Forster E, Zieren J, Giger-Pabst U (2016) Exploring the spatial drug distribution pattern of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Ann Surg Oncol 23(4):1220–1224. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4954-9
Rubin BK (2010) Air and soul: the science and application of aerosol therapy. Respir Care 55(7):911–921
Gohler D, Khosrawipour V, Khosrawipour T, Diaz-Carballo D, Falkenstein TA, Zieren J, Stintz M, Giger-Pabst U (2017) Technical description of the microinjection pump (MIP((R))) and granulometric characterization of the aerosol applied for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Surg Endosc 31(4):1778–1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5174-5
Bellendorf A, Khosrawipour V, Khosrawipour T, Siebigteroth S, Cohnen J, Diaz-Carballo D, Bockisch A, Zieren J, Giger-Pabst U (2018) Scintigraphic peritoneography reveals a non-uniform (99 m)Tc-Pertechnetat aerosol distribution pattern for pressurized intra-peritoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a swine model. Surg Endosc 32(1):166–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5652-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Drs. Seitenfus, Kalil, Barros, Glehen, and Mr. Ferreira hold patents on the BhioQap device used in this study. Mr. Ferreira is employed by Bhiosupply, which manufactures and distributes the device. The other authors (Drs. Zettler, dos Santos and Cereser Junior) report no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seitenfus, R., Kalil, A.N., de Barros, E.D. et al. Assessment of the aerosol distribution pattern of a single-port device for intraperitoneal administration of therapeutic substances. Surg Endosc 33, 3503–3510 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07043-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07043-y