Abstract
Introduction
The treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones remains controversial with debate between endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and CBD exploration. A recent meta-analysis has shown no significant difference between these approaches; however, there is a trend in the literature to favour a single-stage procedure in the form of laparoscopic CBD exploration. We report our experience over a 15-year period.
Methods
All cases of CBD exploration were identified from 2000 to 2015 and analysed retrospectively from a large NHS Foundation Trust in Northumbria. There were no exclusions. The mean clinical follow-up was 6 months (range 3–36 months).
Results
A total of 296 patients were included who underwent laparoscopic CBD exploration: 203 were female and 93 were male. The mean age was 60 years (range 16–84 years). A total of 231 procedures were performed electively and 65 as an emergency. Ten procedures were successfully performed as day cases. Eleven procedures were converted to an open procedure due to adhesions or a difficult dissection (4 %). Sixty-three procedures were performed with a transcystic approach with a mean post-op stay of 2 days (range 0–7). A total of 233 procedures were performed with a choledocotomy with a mean post-op stay of 6 days (range 3–14 days). Stone clearance was successful in 255 patients (86 %). Three patients died over the study period. Two were for medical complications and one for abdominal sepsis. Three patients returned to theatre for early post-operative bleeding (1 %). Sixteen patients had persistent bile leaks following a choledocotomy (6.8 %). No patients had a bile leak following transcystic exploration. Fourteen patients were followed up following failed stone removal. Nine had a successful ERCP, three had no stone seen on MRCP, and one patient required re-operation following a failed ERCP.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic bile duct exploration can be performed successfully in both the emergency and elective settings. Day-case surgery is feasible in selected patients. A transcystic approach should be favoured where possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kenny R, Richardson J, McGlone ER, Reddy M, Khan OA (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus pre or post-operative ERCP for common bile duct stones in patients undergoing cholecystectomy: is there any difference? Int J Surg 12(9):989–993
Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Cox MRJ (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive techniques for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(12):896–901
Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, Kilambi R, Kumar S, Krishna A, Kumar A, Pandav CS, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Garg PK (2014) Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 28(3):875–885
Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, Diamond T, Taylor MA (2013) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:12
Ding G, Cai W, Qin M (2014) Single-stage vs. two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg 18(5):947–951
Lee HM, Min SK, Lee HK (2014) Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center. Ann Surg Treat Res 86(1):1–6
Mattila A, Luhtala J, Mrena J, Kautiainen H, Kellokumpu I (2014) An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland. Surg Endosc 28(12):3451–3454
Chan DS, Jain PA, Khalifa A, Hughes R, Baker AL (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Br J Surg 101(11):1448–1452
Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL et al (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:139–147
Zhang HW, Chen YJ, Wu CH, Li WD (2014) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective analysis and comparison with conventional T-tube drainage. Am Surg 80(2):178–181
Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 21:6
Chen XM, Zhang Y, Cai HH, Sun DL, Liu SY, Duan YF, Yang C, Jiang Y, Wu HR (2013) Transcystic approach with micro-incision of the cystic duct and its confluence part in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 23(12):977–981
Noble H, Whitley E, Norton S, Thompson M (2011) A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 5:130–139
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Yousif Aawsaj, Duncan Light and Liam Horgan declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aawsaj, Y., Light, D. & Horgan, L. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: 15-year experience in a district general hospital. Surg Endosc 30, 2563–2566 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4523-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4523-0