Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Preliminary results of the transanal approach for low rectal cancer suggest better oncological outcomes than the conventional laparoscopic approach. We currently report the functional results.

Methods

From 2008 to 2012, 100 patients with low rectal cancer and suitable for sphincter-saving resection were randomized between transanal and laparoscopic low rectal dissection. Patients derived from this randomized trial were enrolled for functional assessment. End points were bowel function (LARS bowel and Wexner continence scores) and urogenital function (IPSS, IIEF-5 and FSFI-6 scores) obtained by questionnaires sent to patients with a follow-up more than 12 months.

Results

Overall, 76 patients were eligible and 72 responded to the questionnaire: 38 in the transanal group and 34 in the laparoscopic group. The bowel function did not differ between the transanal and the laparoscopic groups: LARS 36 versus 37 (p = 0.941) and Wexner 9 versus 10 (p = 0.786). The urologic function was also similar between the two groups: IPSS 5.5 versus 3.5 (p = 0.821). Among sexually active patients before surgery, 20 of 28 (71 %) patients in the transanal group and 9 of 23 (39 %) in the laparoscopic group maintained an activity after surgery (p = 0.02). Erectile function was also better in men after transanal compared to laparoscopic low rectal dissection: IIEF 17 versus 7 (p = 0.119).

Conclusion

Transanal approach for low rectal cancer did not change bowel and urologic functions compared to the conventional laparoscopic approach. However, there was a trend to a better erectile function with a significantly higher rate of sexual activity in the transanal group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 133:894–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumors. Br J Surg 81:1376–1378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASSIC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wutrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E (2009) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg 250:54–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Park JS, Choi GS, Jun SH, Hasegawa S, Sakai Y (2011) Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg 254:941–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y et al (2009) Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery 146:483–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Denost Q, Adam JP, Rullier A, Buscail E, Laurent C, Rullier E (2014) Perineal transanal approach: a new standard laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial. Ann Surg 260:993–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M (1997) Per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer: the ultimate sphincter-preserving operation. Dis Colon Rectum 40(10 Suppl):S43–S47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Watanabe M, Teramoto T, Hasegawa H et al (2000) Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection combined with per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection for lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43(10 Suppl):S94–S97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uchikoshi F, Nishida T, Ueshima S, Nakahara M, Matsuda H (2006) Laparoscope-assisted anal sphincter-preserving operation preceded by transanal procedure. Tech Coloproctol 10:5–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Funahashi K, Koike J, Teramoto T, Saito N, Shiokawa H, Kurihara A (2009) Transanal rectal dissection: a procedure to assist achievement of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for bulky tumor in the narrow pelvis. Am J Surg 197:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Funahashi K, Shiokawa K, Teramoto T, Koike J, Kaneko H (2011) Clinical outcome of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection combined with transanal rectal dissection for T3 low rectal cancer in patients with a narrow pelvis. Int J Surg Oncol 2011:901574. doi:10.1155/2011/901574

  15. Portier G (2007) Recommendations for clinical practice. Therapeutic choices for rectal cancer. How should neoadjuvant therapies be chosen? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 31:55–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bretagnol F (2007) Recommendations for clinical practice. Therapeutic choices for rectal cancer. What role should local treatment play in rectal cancer? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 31(1):1S63-74–1S97-100

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gérard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Bouché O, Chapet O, Ducreux M et al (2006) Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3–4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol 1(24):4620–4625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:922–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, Espin E, Jimenez LM, Matzel KE et al (2014) International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg 259:728–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M, Zerbib F, Rullier E (2011) Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:963–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dumont F, Goéré D, Honoré C, Elias D (2012) Transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision combined with single-port laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 55:996–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sylla P, Bordeianou LG, Berger D, Han KS, Lauwers GY, Sahani DV et al (2013) A pilot study of natural orifice transanal mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27:3396–3405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, Tasende MM, Fernandez M, Delgado S et al (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)—short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27:3165–3172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, De Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, et al (2015) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc

  26. Del Río C, Sánchez-Santos R, Oreja V, De Oca J, Biondo S, Parés D et al (2004) Long-term urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 6:198–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92:1124–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stephens RJ, Thompson LC, Quirke P (2010) Impact of short-course preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer on patients’ quality of life: data from the Medical Research Council CR07/National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group C016 randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 20(28):4233–4239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hendren SK, O’Connor BI, Liu M, Asano T, Cohen Z, Swallow CJ et al (2005) Prevalence of male and female sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 242:212–223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tekkis PP, Cornish JA, Remzi FH, Tilney HS, Strong SA, Church JM et al (2009) Measuring sexual and urinary outcomes in women after rectal cancer excision. Dis Colon Rectum 52:46–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Traa MJ, De Vries J, Roukema JA, Den Oudsten BL (2012) The preoperative sexual functioning and quality of sexual life in colorectal cancer: a study among patients and their partners. J Sex Med 9:3247–3254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Segelman J, Martling A, Machado M, Holm T, Bergmark K, Radestad AF (2013) Preoperative sexual function in women with rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:1079–1086

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lange MM, Marijnen CA, Maas CP, Putter H, Rutten HJ, Stiggelbout AM et al (2009) Risk factors for sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer 45:1578–1588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Denost Q, Adam JP, Pontallier A, Celerier B, Laurent C, Rullier E (2015) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 261:138–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 56:408–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fernández-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A et al (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tuech JJ, Karoui M, Lelong B et al (2015) A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 261:228–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kneist W, Wachter N, Paschold M, Kauff DW, Rink AD, Lang H et al (2016) Midterm functional results of taTME with neuromapping for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 20:41–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pocard M, Zinzindohue F, Haab F, Caplin S, Parc R, Tiret E (2002) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 131:368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nishizawa Y, Ito M, Saito N, Suzuki T, Sugito M, Tanaka T (2011) Male sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1541–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Moriya Y (2006) Function preservation in rectal cancer surgery. Int J Clin Oncol 11:339–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM (1999) Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 11:319–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Baser RE, Li Y, Carter J (2012) Psychometric validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in cancer survivors. Cancer 15(118):4606–4618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, Martinez C, Berindoague R, Gich I et al (2008) Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg 247:642–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ (2004) Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 94:1071–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CHU Bordeaux, Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint André Hospital, University of Bordeaux, 1 rue Jean Burguet, 33075, Bordeaux Cedex, France

    Arnaud Pontallier, Quentin Denost, Bart Van Geluwe, Jean-Philippe Adam, Bertrand Celerier & Eric Rullier

  2. Université Bordeaux Segalen, 33076, Bordeaux, France

    Arnaud Pontallier, Quentin Denost, Bart Van Geluwe, Jean-Philippe Adam, Bertrand Celerier & Eric Rullier

Authors
  1. Arnaud Pontallier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Quentin Denost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bart Van Geluwe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jean-Philippe Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bertrand Celerier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eric Rullier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quentin Denost.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Arnaud Pontallier, Dr. Quentin Denost, Dr. Bart van Geluwe, Dr. Jean-Philippe Adam, Dr. Bertrand Celerier, and Pr. Eric Rullier have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pontallier, A., Denost, Q., Van Geluwe, B. et al. Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision. Surg Endosc 30, 4924–4933 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4833-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4833-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation