Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: reflections after more than 2400 cases performed

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The minimally invasive video-assisted approach was developed for primary hyperparathyroidism in 1997 and the year after for thyroid disease. Since then, the technique has been adopted worldwide, and indications moved from the initial benign disease to low-risk and intermediate-risk carcinoma, demonstrating a level of oncologic radicality comparable to the conventional open approach when inclusion criteria are strictly respected.

Methods

Between 1998 and 2014, 2412 minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomies (MIVAT) were performed in our department. The indication for surgery in 825 patients (34.3 %) was a malignant tumor, in particular, a papillary carcinoma in 800 patients. Among them, 528 patients operated on between 2000 and 2009 had a mean complete follow-up of 7.5 (standard deviation, 2.3) years.

Results

A total thyroidectomy was performed in 1788 patients (74.1 %) and a hemithyroidectomy in 564 (23.4 %). Also performed was central compartment lymphadenectomy in 31 patients (1.3 %) and parathyroidectomy for the presence of a solitary parathyroid adenoma in 29 (1.2 %). Mean duration of the procedure was 41 (standard deviation, 14) minutes. After a mean follow-up of 7. 5 years, 528 patients who underwent MIVAT for low-risk or intermediate-risk papillary carcinoma presented a cure rate of 85 % (undetectable thyroglobulin), comparable with the 80 % rate reported in patients who had undergone open thyroidectomy during the same period.

Conclusions

After a long experience and a considerable number of procedures performed in a single center, MIVAT is confirmed as a safe operation, with a complication rate comparable with open thyroidectomy. MIVAT offers a cure rate for the treatment of low-risk and intermediate-risk malignancies that is comparable with an open procedure when inclusion criteria are strictly respected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gagner M (1996) Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy via a lateral neck incision. Br J Surg 83:875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miccoli P, Pinchera A, Cecchini G et al (1997) Minimally invasive video assisted parathyroid surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. J Endocrinol Invest 20:429–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M, Bendinelli C, Marcocci C (1999) Minimally invasive surgery for thyroid small nodules: preliminary report. J Endocrinol Invest 22(11):849–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikeda Y, Takami H, Niimi M, Kan S, Sasaki Y, Takayama J (2001) Endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. Surg Endosc 15:362–364

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ohgami M, Ishii S, Arisawa Y et al (2000) Scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach for better cosmesis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:1–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimizu K, Akira S, Tanaka S (1998) Video assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of benign thyroid tumor aiming at scarless surgery on the neck. J Surg Oncol 69:178–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Terris D, Angelos P, Steward D, Simental A (2008) Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy: a multi-institutional North American experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:81–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Terris DJ, Seybt MW (2011) Modifications of Miccoli minimally invasive thyroidectomy for the low-volume surgeon. Am J Otolaryngol 32(5):392–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miccoli P, Minuto MN, Ugolini C, Pisano R, Fosso A, Berti P (2008) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for benign thyroid diseases: an evidence-based review. World J Surg 32:13333–13340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai SY, Walvekar RR, Ferris RL (2008) Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy: expanded indications and oncologic completeness. Head Neck 30:1403–1407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Miccoli P, Elisei R, Materazzi G et al (2002) Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy for papillary carcinoma: a prospective study of its completeness. Surgery 132:1070–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miccoli P, Pinchera A, Materazzi G, Biagini A, Berti P, Faviana P, Molinaro E, Viola D, Elisei R (2009) Surgical treatment of low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer with minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(5):1618–1622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miccoli P, Berti P, Frustaci GL, Ambrosini CE, Materazzi G (2006) Video assisted thyroidectomy: indications and results. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 391:68–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fík Z, Astl J, Zábrodský M, Lukeš P, Merunka I, Betka J, Chovanec M (2014) Minimally invasive video-assisted versus minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy. Biomed Res Int 2014:450170. doi:10.1155/2014/450170

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Billmann F, Bokor-Bilmann T, Lapshyn H, Burnett C, Hopt UT, Kiffner E (2014) Minimal-access video-assisted thyroidectomy for benign disease: a retrospective analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications. Int J Surg 12:1306–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruggeri M, Straniero A, Genderini M, D’ Armiento M, Fumarola A, Trimboli P, Gargiulo P (2007) The size criteria in a minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy. BMC Surg 7:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, De Crea C, Sessa L, Rampulla V, Bellantone R (2012) Video-assisted versus conventional total thyroidectomy and central compartment neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg 36(6):1225–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miccoli P, Elisei R, Donatini G, Materazzi G, Berti P (2007) Video-assisted central compartment lymphadenectomy in a patient with a positive RET oncogene: initial experience. Surg Endosc 21:120–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pisanu A, Podda M, Reccia I, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A (2013) Systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and conventional thyroidectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:1057–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hegazy MA, Khater AA, Setit AE, Amin MA, Kotb SZ, El Shafei MA, Yousef TF, Hussein O, Shabana YK, Dayem OT (2007) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for small follicular thyroid nodules. World J Surg 31(9):1743–1750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gal I, Solymosi T, Szabo Z, Balint A, Bolgar G (2008) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 22:2445–2449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. El-Labban GM (2009) Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. J Minim Access Surg 5:97–102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fan Y, Guo S, Kang J, Wu B, Zhang P, Zheng Q (2010) Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy: experience of 300 cases. Surg Endosc 24:2393–2400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dobrinja C, Trevisan G, Makovac P, Liguori G (2009) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy compared with conventional thyroidectomy in a general surgery department. Surg Endosc 23:2263–2267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shen X, Miao ZM, Lu W, Gu DL, Yang D, Shen H, Geng F (2013) Clinical experience with modified Miccoli’s endoscopic thyroidectomy for treatment of thyroid carcinoma in 86 cases. Eur J Med Res 18:51

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pons Y, Vérillaud B, Blancal JP, Sauvaget E, Cloutier T, Le Clerc N, Herman P, Kania R (2013) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: learning curve in terms of mean operative time and conversion and complication rates. Head Neck 35:1078–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Del Rio P, Sommaruga L, Cataldo S, Robuschi G, Arcuri MF, Sianesi M (2008) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: the learning curve. Eur Surg Res 41:33–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Miccoli P, Rago R, Massi M et al (2010) Standard versus video assisted thyroidectomy: objective postoperative pain evaluation. Surg Endosc 10:2415–2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Del Rio P, Berti M, Sommaruga L, Arcuri MF, Cataldo S, Sianesi M (2008) Pain after minimally invasive videoassisted and after minimally invasive open thyroidectomy: results of a prospective outcome study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:271–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perigli G, Cortesini C, Lenzi E, Boni D, Cianchi F (2008) Benefits and limits of minimally invasive techniques in thyroid surgery. Chir Ital 60:213–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sgourakis G, Sotiropoulos C, Neuhäuser M, Musholt J, Karaliotas C, Lang H (2008) Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: is there any evidence based information? Thyroid 18:721–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miccoli P, Materazzi G, Baggiani A, Miccoli M (2011) Mini-invasive video-assisted surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid glands: a 2011 update. J Endocrinol Invest 34:473–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mamais C, Charaklias N, Pothula VB, Dias A, Hawthorne M, Nirmal Kumar B (2011) Introduction of a new surgical technique: minimally invasive video-assisted thyroid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 36(1):51–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Radford PD, Ferguson MS, Magill JC, Karthikesalingham AP, Alusi G (2011) Meta-analysis of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope 121(8):1675–1681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sahm M, Schwarz B, Schmidt S, Pross M, Lippert H (2011) Long-term cosmetic results after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 25(10):3202–3208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Materazzi G, Fregoli L, Manzini G, Baggiani A, Miccoli M, Miccoli P (2014) Cosmetic result and overall satisfaction after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) versus robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT): a prospective randomized study. World J Surg 38(6):1282–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Byrd JK, Nguyen SA, Ketcham A, Hornig J, Gillespie MB, Lentsch E (2010) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: a cost-effective analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143(6):789–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Duke WS, White JR, Waller JL, Terris DJ (2014) Endoscopic thyroidectomy is safe in patients with a high body mass index. Thyroid 24:1146–1450

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Prof. Miccoli, Dr. Biricotti, Dr. Matteucci, Dr. Ambrosini, Dr. Wu, Prof. Materazzi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. E. Ambrosini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miccoli, P., Biricotti, M., Matteucci, V. et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: reflections after more than 2400 cases performed. Surg Endosc 30, 2489–2495 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4503-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4503-4

Keywords

Navigation