Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has been performed in the authors’ department since 2004. Many authors have described some of its advantages over conventional surgery in terms of cosmetic results. The published literature on this topic variously describes the average central incision as 1 to 3 cm. The end point of the cosmetic results (e.g. the question of keloids) cannot be documented during the inpatient stay. This report describes the long-term cosmetic results for this method and analyzes the subjective and objective outcomes after MIVAT.
Methods
From January 2004 until March 2010, 116 patients underwent MIVAT in the authors’ department. The authors included 96 patients in their subsequent examination, with a follow-up period of 22.4 months (range, 1–64 months).
Results
The measurable cervical scar length was 1.9 cm (range, 1–3 cm). The measurable wideness of the cervical scar was 0.17 cm (range, 0.05–1.5 cm). Keloids in 10 female patients (10.4%) had diverse proliferation. Of the 116 patients, 93 (96.8%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the cosmetic result. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale score was 9.7, and of the Observer Scar Assessment Scale score was 8.1.
Conclusion
In terms of long-term results, MIVAT appears to provide excellent cosmetic outcomes. The problem with the development of keloids in the region of the cervical incision, especially in female patients, remains unresolved. The satisfaction of patients with the long-term outcome of MIVAT is high.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shimizu K, Akira S, Tanaka S (1998) Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of benign thyroid tumor aiming at scarless surgery on the neck. J Surg Oncol 69:178–180
Shimizu K, Akira S, Jasmi AY, Kitamura Y, Kitagawa W, Akasu H, Tanaka S (1999) Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of thyroid tumors with a very minimal neck wound. J Am Coll Surg 188:697–703
Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Materazzi G, Baldacci S, Rossi G (2001) Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 130:1039–1043
Miccoli P, Rago R, Massi M, Panicucci E, Metelli MR, Berti P, Minuto MN (2010) Standard versus video-assisted thyroidectomy: objective postoperative pain evaluation. Surg Endosc 24:2415–2417
Miccoli P, Berti P, Frustaci GL, Ambrosini CE, Materazzi G (2006) Video-assisted thyroidectomy: indications and results. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:68–71
Fan Y, Guo B, Guo S, Kang J, Wu B, Zhang P, Zheng Q (2010) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: experience of 300 cases. Surg Endosc 24:2393–2400
Istvan G, Tamas S, Alexander B, Peter A, Gyorgy B (2006) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT). Magy Seb 59:369–374
Musella M, Lombardi S, Caiazzo P, Milone F, Di Palma R, de Franciscis S, Jovino R (2003) Video-assisted surgery of the thyroid: outlines of the technique and analysis of the results. Ann Ital Chir 74:3–5
Walz MK, Lederbogen S, Limmer JC, Peitgen K, Mann K (2001) Video-assisted hemithyroidectomy: surgical technique and early results. Chirurg 72:1054–1057
Cavicchi O, Piccin O, Ceroni AR, Caliceti U (2006) Minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:744–747
Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T (2008) Cervical scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: axillo-bilateral-breast approach (ABBA). Surg Endosc 22:154–157
Benhidjeb T, Wilhelm T, Harlaar J, Kleinrensink GJ, Schneider TA, Stark M (2009) Natural orifice surgery on thyroid gland: totally transoral video-assisted thyroidectomy (TOVAT): report of first experimental results of a new surgical method. Surg Endosc 23:1119–1120
Takami H, Ikeda Y (2003) Total endoscopic thyroidectomy. Asian J Surg 26:82–85
Choe JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, Han W, Noh DY, Oh SK, Youn YK (2007) Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg 31:601–606
Wang YL, Zhang GY, Wang L, Wang KX, Hu SY (2009) Endoscopic thyroidectomy by a modified anterior chest approach: a single institution’s 5-year experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 18:297–301
Tan CT, Cheah WK, Delbridge L (2008) “Scarless” (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy (SET): an evidence-based review of published techniques. World J Surg 32:1349–1357
Wilhelm T, Metzig A (2010) Endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy: first clinical experience. Surg Endosc 24:1757–1758
Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP (2004) The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1960–1965
Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Bossola M, Boscherini M, De Crea C, Alesina PF, Traini E (2002) Video-assisted vs conventional thyroid lobectomy: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 137:301–304
O’Connell DA, Diamond C, Seikaly H, Harris JR (2008) Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:85–93
Böhm B, Minner S, Engelhardt T, Rodiger H (2005) Long-term cosmetic results following thyroid resection. Chirurg 76:54–57
Baum CL, Arpey CJ (2005) Normal cutaneous wound healing: clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events. Dermatol Surg 31:674–686
Juckett G, Hartman-Adams H (2009) Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Am Fam Physician 80:253–260
Dustan HP (1995) Does keloid pathogenesis hold the key to understanding black/white differences in hypertension severity? Hypertension 26:858–862
Datubo-Brown DD (1990) Keloids: a review of the literature. Br J Plast Surg 43:70–77
Disclosures
Maik Sahm, Beate Schwarz, Sybille Schmidt, Matthias Pross, and Hans Lippert have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sahm, M., Schwarz, B., Schmidt, S. et al. Long-term cosmetic results after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 25, 3202–3208 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1693-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1693-2