Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term cosmetic results after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has been performed in the authors’ department since 2004. Many authors have described some of its advantages over conventional surgery in terms of cosmetic results. The published literature on this topic variously describes the average central incision as 1 to 3 cm. The end point of the cosmetic results (e.g. the question of keloids) cannot be documented during the inpatient stay. This report describes the long-term cosmetic results for this method and analyzes the subjective and objective outcomes after MIVAT.

Methods

From January 2004 until March 2010, 116 patients underwent MIVAT in the authors’ department. The authors included 96 patients in their subsequent examination, with a follow-up period of 22.4 months (range, 1–64 months).

Results

The measurable cervical scar length was 1.9 cm (range, 1–3 cm). The measurable wideness of the cervical scar was 0.17 cm (range, 0.05–1.5 cm). Keloids in 10 female patients (10.4%) had diverse proliferation. Of the 116 patients, 93 (96.8%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the cosmetic result. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale score was 9.7, and of the Observer Scar Assessment Scale score was 8.1.

Conclusion

In terms of long-term results, MIVAT appears to provide excellent cosmetic outcomes. The problem with the development of keloids in the region of the cervical incision, especially in female patients, remains unresolved. The satisfaction of patients with the long-term outcome of MIVAT is high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimizu K, Akira S, Tanaka S (1998) Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of benign thyroid tumor aiming at scarless surgery on the neck. J Surg Oncol 69:178–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shimizu K, Akira S, Jasmi AY, Kitamura Y, Kitagawa W, Akasu H, Tanaka S (1999) Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of thyroid tumors with a very minimal neck wound. J Am Coll Surg 188:697–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Materazzi G, Baldacci S, Rossi G (2001) Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 130:1039–1043

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miccoli P, Rago R, Massi M, Panicucci E, Metelli MR, Berti P, Minuto MN (2010) Standard versus video-assisted thyroidectomy: objective postoperative pain evaluation. Surg Endosc 24:2415–2417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miccoli P, Berti P, Frustaci GL, Ambrosini CE, Materazzi G (2006) Video-assisted thyroidectomy: indications and results. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:68–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan Y, Guo B, Guo S, Kang J, Wu B, Zhang P, Zheng Q (2010) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: experience of 300 cases. Surg Endosc 24:2393–2400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Istvan G, Tamas S, Alexander B, Peter A, Gyorgy B (2006) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT). Magy Seb 59:369–374

    Google Scholar 

  8. Musella M, Lombardi S, Caiazzo P, Milone F, Di Palma R, de Franciscis S, Jovino R (2003) Video-assisted surgery of the thyroid: outlines of the technique and analysis of the results. Ann Ital Chir 74:3–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walz MK, Lederbogen S, Limmer JC, Peitgen K, Mann K (2001) Video-assisted hemithyroidectomy: surgical technique and early results. Chirurg 72:1054–1057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cavicchi O, Piccin O, Ceroni AR, Caliceti U (2006) Minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:744–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barlehner E, Benhidjeb T (2008) Cervical scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: axillo-bilateral-breast approach (ABBA). Surg Endosc 22:154–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Benhidjeb T, Wilhelm T, Harlaar J, Kleinrensink GJ, Schneider TA, Stark M (2009) Natural orifice surgery on thyroid gland: totally transoral video-assisted thyroidectomy (TOVAT): report of first experimental results of a new surgical method. Surg Endosc 23:1119–1120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takami H, Ikeda Y (2003) Total endoscopic thyroidectomy. Asian J Surg 26:82–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Choe JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, Han W, Noh DY, Oh SK, Youn YK (2007) Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg 31:601–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang YL, Zhang GY, Wang L, Wang KX, Hu SY (2009) Endoscopic thyroidectomy by a modified anterior chest approach: a single institution’s 5-year experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 18:297–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan CT, Cheah WK, Delbridge L (2008) “Scarless” (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy (SET): an evidence-based review of published techniques. World J Surg 32:1349–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilhelm T, Metzig A (2010) Endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy: first clinical experience. Surg Endosc 24:1757–1758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP (2004) The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1960–1965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Bossola M, Boscherini M, De Crea C, Alesina PF, Traini E (2002) Video-assisted vs conventional thyroid lobectomy: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 137:301–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Connell DA, Diamond C, Seikaly H, Harris JR (2008) Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Böhm B, Minner S, Engelhardt T, Rodiger H (2005) Long-term cosmetic results following thyroid resection. Chirurg 76:54–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baum CL, Arpey CJ (2005) Normal cutaneous wound healing: clinical correlation with cellular and molecular events. Dermatol Surg 31:674–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Juckett G, Hartman-Adams H (2009) Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Am Fam Physician 80:253–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dustan HP (1995) Does keloid pathogenesis hold the key to understanding black/white differences in hypertension severity? Hypertension 26:858–862

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Datubo-Brown DD (1990) Keloids: a review of the literature. Br J Plast Surg 43:70–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Maik Sahm, Beate Schwarz, Sybille Schmidt, Matthias Pross, and Hans Lippert have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maik Sahm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahm, M., Schwarz, B., Schmidt, S. et al. Long-term cosmetic results after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 25, 3202–3208 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1693-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1693-2

Keywords

Navigation