Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging to identify parathyroid glands

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive high-resolution imaging technique that permits characterization of microarchitectural features in real time. Previous ex vivo studies have shown that the technique is capable of distinguishing between parathyroid tissue, thyroid tissue, lymph nodes, and adipose tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the practicality of OCT during open and minimally invasive parathyroid and thyroid surgery.

Methods

During parathyroid and thyroid surgery, OCT images were generated from parathyroid glands, thyroid tissue, lymph nodes, and adipose tissue. The images were immediately assessed by the operating team using the previously defined criteria. Second, the OCT images were blinded with respect to their origin and analyzed by two investigators. Whenever possible the OCT findings were matched to the corresponding histology.

Results

A total of 227 OCT images from 27 patients undergoing open or minimally invasive thyroid or parathyroid surgery were analyzed. Parathyroid glands were correctly identified in 69.2 %, thyroid tissue in 74.5 %, lymph nodes in 37.5 %, and adipose tissue in 69.2 %. 43 OCT images (18.9 %) could not be allocated to one of the tissue types (Table 2). Sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing parathyroid tissue from the other entities were 69 % (63 true positive, 13 false negative findings, 15 images where an allocation was not possible) and 66 %, respectively (71 true negative, 9 false positive, 28 images where an assessment was not possible).

Conclusion

OCT is capable of distinguishing between parathyroid, thyroid, and adipose tissue. An accurate differentiation between parathyroid tissue and lymph nodes was not possible. The disappointing results compared to the previous ex vivo study are related to problems handling the endoscopic probe intraoperatively. However, further refinement of this new technology may lead to OCT systems with higher resolution and intraoperative probes that are easier to handle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergenfelz AO, Jansson SK, Wallin GK, Martensson HG, Rasmussen L, Eriksson HL, Reihner EI (2009) Impact of modern techniques on short-term outcome after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: a multicenter study comprising 2,708 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(5):851–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mihai R, Simon D, Hellman P (2009) Imaging for primary hyperparathyroidism–an evidence-based analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(5):765–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilat H, Cohen M, Feinmesser R, Benzion J, Shvero J, Segal K, Ulanovsky D, Shpitzer T (2005) Minimally invasive procedure for resection of a parathyroid adenoma: the role of preoperative high-resolution ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 33(6):283–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akerstrom G, Malmaeus J, Bergstrom R (1984) Surgical anatomy of human parathyroid glands. Surgery 95(1):14–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson NW, Eckhauser FE, Harness JK (1982) The anatomy of primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 92(5):814–821

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen H, Mack E, Starling JR (2003) Radioguided parathyroidectomy is equally effective for both adenomatous and hyperplastic glands. Ann Surg 238(3):332–337

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Flynn MB, Bumpous JM, Schill K, McMasters KM (2000) Minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 191(1):24–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein RE, Blevins L, Delbeke D, Martin WH (2000) Effect of minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy on efficacy, length of stay, and costs in the management of primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg 231(5):732–742

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikeda Y, Takayama J, Takami H (2010) Minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy for hyperparathyroidism. Ann Nucl Med 24(4):233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cassinello N, Ortega J, Lledo S (2009) Intraoperative real-time (99 m)Tc-sestamibi scintigraphy with miniature gamma camera allows minimally invasive parathyroidectomy without ioPTH determination in primary hyperparathyroidism. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(5):869–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Han N, Bumpous JM, Goldstein RE, Fleming MM, Flynn MB (2007) Intra-operative parathyroid identification using methylene blue in parathyroid surgery. Am Surg 73(8):820–823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prosst RL, Weiss J, Hupp L, Willeke F, Post S (2010) Fluorescence-guided minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: clinical experience with a novel intraoperative detection technique for parathyroid glands. World J Surg 34(9):2217–2222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki T, Numata T, Shibuya M (2011) Intraoperative photodynamic detection of normal parathyroid glands using 5-aminolevulinic acid. Laryngoscope 121(7):1462–1466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel HP, Chadwick DR, Harrison BJ, Balasubramanian SP (2012) Systematic review of intravenous methylene blue in parathyroid surgery. Br J Surg 99(10):1345–1351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujimoto JG, Pitris C, Boppart SA, Brezinski ME (2000) Optical coherence tomography: an emerging technology for biomedical imaging and optical biopsy. Neoplasia 2(1–2):9–25

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zysk AM, Nguyen FT, Oldenburg AL, Marks DL, Boppart SA (2007) Optical coherence tomography: a review of clinical development from bench to bedside. J Biomed Opt 12:051403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mirza RG, Johnson MW, Jampol LM (2007) Optical coherence tomography use in evaluation of the vitreoretinal interface: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 52(4):397–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drexler W (2007) Cellular and functional optical coherence tomography of the human retina: the Cogan lecture. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:5339–5351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sergeev A, Gelikonov V, Gelikonov G, Feldchtein F, Kuranov R, Gladkova N, Shakhova N, Snopova L, Shakhov A, Kuznetzova I et al (1997) In vivo endoscopic OCT imaging of precancer and cancer states of human mucosa. Opt Express 1(13):432–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johansson A, Kromer K, Sroka R, Stepp H (2006) Clinical optical diagnostics—status and perspectives. Med Laser Appl 23:155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crow P, Stone N, Kendall CA, Persad RA, Wright MP (2003) Optical diagnostics in urology: current applications and future prospects. BJU Int 92:400–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gallwas JK, Turk L, Stepp H, Mueller S, Ochsenkuehn R, Friese K, Dannecker C (2011) Optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lasers Surg Med 43(3):206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ladurner R, Hallfeldt KK, Al Arabi N, Stepp H, Mueller S, Gallwas JK (2013) Optical coherence tomography as a method to identify parathyroid glands. Lasers Surg Med 45(10):654–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubinstein M, Armstrong WB, Naemi K, Keel SB, Wong BJF, Kim JH (2010) Intraoperative use of OCT in endocrine surgery. AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting Sep 26–29, Boston, unpublished data

  25. Conti de Freitas LC(1), Phelan E, Liu L, Gardecki J, Namati E, Warger WC, Tearney GJ, Randolph GW (2013) Optical coherence tomography imaging during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a novel system of tissue identification and differentiation to obviate tissue resection and frozen section. Head Neck. doi:10.1002/hed.23452. [Epub ahead of print]

  26. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Malpica A, Matisic JP, Niekirk DV, Crum CP, Staerkel GA, Yamal JM, Guillaud MH, Cox DD, Atkinson EN, Adler-Storthz K (2005) Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1,790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues. Gynecol Oncol 99(3 Suppl 1):S38–S52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Grants of the non-profit foundations “Friedrich-Baur-Stiftung” and “Muenchener Medizinische Wochenschrift Stiftung.”

Disclosures

The grants of “Friedrich-Baur-Stiftung” and “Muenchener Medizinische Wochenschrift Stiftung” were allocated to Dr. Gallwas. Imalux Corporation provided the OCT-system free of charge to Dr. Gallwas and Dr. Stepp. Drs. Sommerey, Al Arabi, Ladurner, Chiapponi, and Hallfeldt have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus K. J. Hallfeldt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sommerey, S., Al Arabi, N., Ladurner, R. et al. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging to identify parathyroid glands. Surg Endosc 29, 2698–2704 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3992-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3992-x

Keywords

Navigation