Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of modern techniques on short-term outcome after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: a multicenter study comprising 2,708 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Preoperative localization procedures and the use of intraoperative parathyroidism (iOPTH) have led to a shift of paradigm from bilateral neck exploration to focused parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). However, only a small number of randomized trials from specialized centers have been published. The main purpose of the study was to analyze the impact of localization procedures and iOPTH on short-term outcome after pHPT surgery in a multi-institutional setting.

Methods

An audit for quality assurance in pHPT surgery was performed in 23 Scandinavian departments in 2004–2008. Data were gathered prospectively in a database. Two thousand seven hundred and eight patients were registered and 78% were females. The median serum calcium level was 2.79 mmol/l.

Results

Localization procedures were performed in 1,831 patients (68%), (sestamibi in 54% and ultrasound in 41%) and iOPTH in 792 operations (29%). Bilateral exploration was performed in 61%, focused parathyroidectomy in 17%, and unilateral exploration in 22%. Histology showed parathyroid adenoma in 82%, with the median weight of 0.6 g. The alleviation of hypercalcemia at the first follow-up was 93% (94% for primary operation). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, iOPTH increased cure rate (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.14–2.53, p = 0.0092). The risk for postoperative medically treated hypocalcemia decreased with the use of localization procedures (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.43–0.78, p = 0.0004) and iOPTH (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39–0.90, p = 0.0015).

Conclusions

Localization procedures and iOPTH decreased the risk for hypocalcemia after pHPT surgery. Additionally, iOPTH influenced short-term cure rate favorably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang CA (1971) Surgery of the parathyroid glands. Adv Surg 5:109–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tibblin S, Bondeson AG, Ljungberg O (1982) Unilateral parathyroidectomy in hyperparathyroidism due to single adenoma. Ann Surg 195:245–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aarum S, Nordenstrom J, Reihner E, Zedenius J, Jacobsson H, Danielsson R, Backdahl M, Lindholm H, Wallin G, Hamberger B, Farnebo LO (2007) Operation for primary hyperparathyroidism: the new versus the old order. A randomised controlled trial of preoperative localisation. Scand J Surg 96:26–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gotthardt M, Lohmann B, Behr TM, Bauhofer A, Franzius C, Schipper ML, Wagner M, Hoffken H, Sitter H, Rothmund M, Joseph K, Nies C (2004) Clinical value of parathyroid scintigraphy with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile: discrepancies in clinical data and a systematic metaanalysis of the literature. World J Surg 28:100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barczynski M, Konturek A, Cichon S, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A, Golkowski F, Huszno B (2007) Intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay improves outcomes of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy mainly in patients with a presumed solitary parathyroid adenoma and missing concordance of preoperative imaging. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 66:878–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen H, Mack E, Starling JR (2005) A comprehensive evaluation of perioperative adjuncts during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: which is most reliable? Ann Surg 242:375–380 discussion 380–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Pasquale L, Gobatti D, Ravini ML, Barassi A, Porreca W, Melzi d'Eril GV, Bastagli A (2008) Intra-operative testing for parathyroid hormone: the Central Laboratory option. J Endocrinol Invest 31:62–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gil-Cardenas A, Gamino R, Reza A, Pantoja JP, Herrera MF (2007) Is intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay mandatory for the success of targeted parathyroidectomy? J Am Coll Surg 204:286–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Irvin GL 3rd, Solorzano CC, Carneiro DM (2004) Quick intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay: surgical adjunct to allow limited parathyroidectomy, improve success rate, and predict outcome. World J Surg 28:1287–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lew JI, Solorzano CC, Montano RE, Carneiro-Pla DM, Irvin GL 3rd (2008) Role of intraoperative parathormone monitoring during parathyroidectomy in patients with discordant localization studies. Surgery 144:299–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mihai R, Palazzo FF, Gleeson FV, Sadler GP (2007) Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy without intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg 94:42–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miura D, Wada N, Arici C, Morita E, Duh QY, Clark OH (2002) Does intraoperative quick parathyroid hormone assay improve the results of parathyroidectomy? World J Surg 26:926–930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mozzon M, Mortier PE, Jacob PM, Soudan B, Boersma AA, Proye CA (2004) Surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism: the case for giving up quick intraoperative PTH assay in favor of routine PTH measurement the morning after. Ann Surg 240:949–953 discussion 953–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Solorzano CC, Carneiro-Pla D, Irvin GL 3rd (2005) Surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism: the case for giving up quick intraoperative PTH assay in favor of routine measurement the morning after. Ann Surg 242:904 author reply 904–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stalberg P, Sidhu S, Sywak M, Robinson B, Wilkinson M, Delbridge L (2006) Intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: does it “value-add” to decision-making? J Am Coll Surg 203:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Westerdahl J, Bergenfelz A (2004) Sestamibi scan-directed parathyroid surgery: potentially high failure rate without measurement of intraoperative parathyroid hormone. World J Surg 28:1132–1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Genc H, Morita E, Perrier ND, Miura D, Ituarte P, Duh QY, Clark OH (2003) Differing histologic findings after bilateral and focused parathyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 196:535–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee NC, Norton JA (2002) Multiple-gland disease in primary hyperparathyroidism: a function of operative approach? Arch Surg 137:896–899 discussion 899–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Siperstein A, Berber E, Barbosa GF, Tsinberg M, Greene AB, Mitchell J, Milas M (2008) Predicting the success of limited exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism using ultrasound, sestamibi, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone: analysis of 1158 cases. Ann Surg 248:420–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barczynski M, Cichon S, Konturek A, Cichon W (2005) A randomised study on a new cost-effective algorithm of quick intraoperative intact parathyroid hormone assay in secondary hyperparathyroidism. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:121–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barczynski M, Cichon S, Konturek A, Cichon W (2006) Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy versus open minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for a solitary parathyroid adenoma: a prospective, randomized, blinded trial. World J Surg 30:721–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bergenfelz A, Kanngiesser V, Zielke A, Nies C, Rothmund M (2005) Conventional bilateral cervical exploration versus open minimally invasive parathyroidectomy under local anaesthesia for primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg 92:190–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bergenfelz A, Lindblom P, Tibblin S, Westerdahl J (2002) Unilateral versus bilateral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 236:543–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miccoli P, Barellini L, Monchik JM, Rago R, Berti PF (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing regional and general anaesthesia in minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy. Br J Surg 92:814–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Berti P, Vignali E, Pinchera A, Marcocci C (1999) Video-assisted versus conventional parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 126:1117–1121 discussion 1121–1112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, Ambrosini CE, Fregoli L, Donatini G (2008) Endoscopic bilateral neck exploration versus quick intraoperative parathormone assay (qPTHa) during endoscopic parathyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:398–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pintaric TS, Hocevar M, Jereb S, Casati A, Jankovic VN (2007) A prospective, randomized comparison between combined (deep and superficial) and superficial cervical plexus block with levobupivacaine for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Anesth Analg 105:1160–1163 table of contents

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Russell CF, Dolan SJ, Laird JD (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing scan-directed unilateral versus bilateral cervical exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism due to solitary adenoma. Br J Surg 93:418–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Slepavicius A, Beisa V, Janusonis V, Strupas K (2008) Focused versus conventional parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective, randomized, blinded trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:659–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Westerdahl J, Bergenfelz A (2007) Unilateral versus bilateral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism: five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:976–980 discussion 980–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rolighed L, Heickendorff L, Hessov I, Garne JP, Rodt SA, Christiansen P (2004) Primary hyperparathyroidism: intraoperative PTH-measurements. Scand J Surg 93:43–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sackett WR, Barraclough B, Reeve TS, Delbridge LW (2002) Worldwide trends in the surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism in the era of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Arch Surg 137:1055–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stawicki SP, El Chaar M, Baillie DR, Jaik NP, Estrada FP (2007) Correlations between biochemical testing, pathology findings and preoperative sestamibi scans: a retrospective study of the minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy (MIRP) approach. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur 10:82–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yip L, Pryma DA, Yim JH, Carty SE, Ogilvie JB (2008) Sestamibi SPECT intensity scoring system in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg 33(3):426–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mihai R, Weisters M, Stechman MJ, Gleeson F, Sadler G (2008) Cost-effectiveness of scan-directed parathyroidectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:739–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Berber E, Parikh RT, Ballem N, Garner CN, Milas M, Siperstein AE (2008) Factors contributing to negative parathyroid localization: an analysis of 1000 patients. Surgery 144:74–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Calva-Cerqueira D, Smith BJ, Hostetler ML, Lal G, Menda Y, O'Dorisio TM, Howe JR (2007) Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy and preoperative MIBI scans: correlation of gland weight and preoperative PTH. J Am Coll Surg 205:S38–S44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Erbil Y, Kapran Y, Issever H, Barbaros U, Adalet I, Dizdaroglu F, Bozbora A, Ozarmagan S, Tezelman S (2008) The positive effect of adenoma weight and oxyphil cell content on preoperative localization with 99mTc-sestamibi scanning for primary hyperparathyroidism. Am J Surg 195:34–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parikshak M, Castillo ED, Conrad MF, Talpos GB (2003) Impact of hypercalcemia and parathyroid hormone level on the sensitivity of preoperative sestamibi scanning for primary hyperparathyroidism. Am Surg 69:393–398 discussion 399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lavely WC, Goetze S, Friedman KP, Leal JP, Zhang Z, Garret-Mayer E, Dackiw AP, Tufano RP, Zeiger MA, Ziessman HA (2007) Comparison of SPECT/CT, SPECT, and planar imaging with single- and dual-phase (99m)Tc-sestamibi parathyroid scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 48:1084–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Khalid AN, Hollenbeak CS, Higginbotham BW, Stack BC Jr (2008) Accuracy and definitive interpretation of preoperative technetium 99m sestamibi imaging based on the discipline of the reader. Head Neck 31(5):576–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Siegel A, Mancuso M, Seltzer M (2007) The spectrum of positive scan patterns in parathyroid scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med 32:770–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tibblin S, Bondeson AG, Bondeson L, Ljungberg O (1984) Surgical strategy in hyperparathyroidism due to solitary adenoma. Ann Surg 200:776–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by grants from:

The European Union (Interreg. IIIA)

The Swedish Board of Health and Social Welfare

The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions

The following departments participated in this study:

Department of Surgery, Lund University Hospital

Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet

Department of Surgery, Central Hospital, Kristianstad

Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital

Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Uppsala

Center for Metabolism and Endocrinology, Karolinska University Hospital-Huddinge

Department of Surgery, Central Hospital, Halmstad

Department of Surgery, Falu Hospital

Department of Surgery, Växjö Central Hospital

Department of Surgery, Västerås Central Hospital

Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset

Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital

Department of Surgery, Sunderby Hospital

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital

Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Umeå

Center for Endocrine Neck Surgery, ENT Department F, Odense University Hospital

Department of Surgery, Norra Älvsborgs Länssjukhus

Department of Surgery, Jönköping Hospital Ryhov

Department of Surgery, Åhus University Hospital

Department of Surgery, Karlstad Central Hospital

Department of Surgery, Sundsvall Hospital

Department of Surgery, Kungälv Hospital

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders O. J. Bergenfelz.

Additional information

All authors are members of the Steering Committee of the Scandinavian Quality Register for Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergenfelz, A.O.J., Jansson, S.K.G., Wallin, G.K. et al. Impact of modern techniques on short-term outcome after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: a multicenter study comprising 2,708 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394, 851–860 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0540-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0540-6

Keywords

Navigation