Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Varying Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Pulse Duration on Swallowing Kinematics in Healthy Adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research in swallowing physiology has suggested that using submental transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) with short pulse duration (PD) (300 μs) may enhance the impact on deep extrinsic tongue muscles, thereby pulling the tongue down during swallowing. However, it was unclear whether that same TES protocol could have a differential impact on hyolaryngeal kinematics and timing. This study aimed to compare the effect of submental TES with varying PDs on anterior and superior hyolaryngeal kinematics and timing both at rest and during swallowing in healthy adults. Twenty-four healthy adults between the ages of 22 and 77 participated in this study. Anterior and superior hyolaryngeal excursion magnitude and duration measures were collected using videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Each subject swallowed three 10 ml pudding trials under three conditions: no TES, TES with short PD (300 μs), and TES with long PD (700 μs). TES was delivered using two-channel surface electrodes in the submental area. In both short and long PD conditions, TES amplitude was gradually increased until participants reached their maximum tolerance level. Videofluoroscopic data were analyzed using VideoPad Video Editor and Image J programs. One-way repeated measure ANOVAs were conducted to identify within-subject effect of TES condition. For hyoid movement, TES with short PD selectively placed the hyoid bone on a more anterior position at rest and reduced anterior hyoid excursion during swallowing compared with the no TES condition. Regarding laryngeal movement, both TES protocols resulted in the larynx taking on a more anterior position at rest and reduced anterior laryngeal excursions during swallowing when compared with the no TES condition. Varying PDs had no significant effect on the superior hyoid and laryngeal movements at rest and during swallowing. Both TES protocols induced shorter hyoid elevation duration during swallowing Findings suggest that though both TES protocols demonstrated a comparable impact on reducing anterior laryngeal excursions, the TES protocol with short PD had an enhanced effect on reducing anterior hyoid excursion during swallowing. This reduced range of motion may result from stimulating the deep submental muscles, which primarily place the hyoid and larynx into a more forward position before swallowing onset. Overall, the TES protocol with short PD may have an increased benefit in facilitating swallowing in patients with dysphagia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacob P, Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA, Shah V, Ha T. Upper esophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowing. Gastroenterology. 1989;97(6):1469–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(89)90391-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cock C, Jones CA, Hammer MJ, Omari TI, McCulloch TM. Modulation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation and opening during volume swallowing. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):216–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9744-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steele CM, Bailey GL, Chau T, Molfenter SM, Oshalla M, Waito AA, Zoratto DCBH. The relationship between hyoid and laryngeal displacement and swallowing impairment. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011;36(1):30–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02219.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim Y, McCullough GH. Maximum hyoid displacement in normal swallowing. Dysphagia. 2008;23(3):274–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-007-9135-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Logemann JA, Rademaker A, Pauloski BR, Kelly A, Stangl-McBreen C, Antinoja J, Grande B, Farquharson J, Kern M, Easterling C, Shaker R. A randomized study comparing the shaker exercise with traditional therapy: a preliminary study. Dysphagia. 2009;24(4):403–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9217-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. McCullough GH, Kim Y. Effects of the mendelsohn maneuver on extent of hyoid movement and UES opening post-stroke. Dysphagia. 2013;28(4):511–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9461-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jang HJ, Leigh JH, Seo HG, Han TR, Oh BM. Effortful swallow enhances vertical hyolaryngeal movement and prolongs duration after maximal excursion. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42(10):765–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. White KT, Easterling C, Roberts N, Wertsch J, Shaker R. Fatigue analysis before and after shaker exercise: physiologic tool for exercise design. Dysphagia. 2008;23(4):385–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9155-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ding R, Larson CR, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW. Surface electromyographic and electroglottographic studies in normal subjects under two swallow conditions: normal and during the Mendelsohn manuever. Dysphagia. 2002;17(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-001-0095-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Groher ME, Crary MA. Dysphagia: clinical management in adults and children. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park JW, Oh JC, Lee HJ, Park SJ, Yoon TS, Kwon BS. Effortful swallowing training coupled with electrical stimulation leads to an increase in hyoid elevation during swallowing. Dysphagia. 2009;24(3):296–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9205-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park JW, Kim Y, Oh JC, Lee HJ. Effortful swallowing training combined with electrical stimulation in post-stroke dysphagia: a randomized controlled study. Dysphagia. 2012;27(4):521–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9403-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park JS, Oh DH, Hwang NK, Lee JH. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with effortful swallowing on post-stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: a randomised controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(6):426–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park JS, Hwang NK, Kim HH, Lee G, Jung YJ. Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with effortful swallowing using electromyographic biofeedback on oropharyngeal swallowing function in stroke patients with dysphagia a pilot study. Medicine. 2019;98(44):e17702. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Park J, Kim Y, Lee H. Effortful swallow with resistive electrical stimulation training improved pharyngeal propulsion in post-stroke dysphagia. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:180–180.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim H, Park JW, Nam K. Effortful swallow with resistive electrical stimulation training improves pharyngeal constriction in patients post-stroke with dysphagia. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(10):763–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Crary MA, Carnaby GD. Adoption into clinical practice of two therapies to manage swallowing disorders: exercise-based swallowing rehabilitation and electrical stimulation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;22(3):172–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Barikroo A. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation and dysphagia rehabilitation: a narrative review. Rehabil Res Pract. 2020;2020:4865614. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4865614.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Humbert IA, Poletto CJ, Saxon KG, Kearney PR, Crujido L, Wright-Harp W, Payne J, Jeffries N, Sonies BC, Ludlow CL. The effect of surface electrical stimulation on hyolaryngeal movement in normal individuals at rest and during swallowing. J Appl Physiol. 2006;101(6):1657–63. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00348.2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludlow CL, Humbert I, Saxon K, Poletto C, Sonies B, Crujido L. Effects of surface electrical stimulation both at rest and during swallowing in chronic pharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2007;22(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-006-9029-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Serel Arslan S, Azola A, Sunday K, Vose A, Plowman E, Tabor L, Singer M, Robison R, Humbert IA. Effects of submental surface electrical stimulation on swallowing kinematics in healthy adults: an error-based learning paradigm. Am J Speech-lang Pathol. 2018;27(4):1375–84. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Adams GR, Harris RT, Woodard D, Dudley GA. Mapping of electrical muscle stimulation using MRI. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74(2):532–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alon G, Allin J, Inbar GF. Optimization of pulse duration and pulse charge during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Aust J Physiother. 1983;29(6):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60670-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grill WM Jr, Mortimer JT. The effect of stimulus pulse duration on selectivity of neural stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996;43(2):161–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.481985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barikroo A, Carnaby G, Bolser D, Rozensky R, Crary M. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation on the anterior neck region: the impact of pulse duration and frequency on maximum amplitude tolerance and perceived discomfort. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(6):436–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12625.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Barikroo A, Hegland K, Carnaby G, Bolser D, Manini T, Crary M. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation on the submental area: the relations of biopsychological factors with maximum amplitude tolerance and perceived discomfort level. Dysphagia. 2020;35(2):301–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10029-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Barikroo A, Hegland K, Carnaby G, Bolser D, Manini T, Crary M. The effects of electrical stimulation pulse duration on lingual palatal pressure measures during swallowing in healthy older adults. Dysphagia. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-09991-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cichero JAY, Lam P, Steele CM, Hanson B, Chen JS, Dantas RO, Duivestein J, Kayashita J, Lecko C, Murray J, Pillay M, Riquelme L, Stanschus S. Development of international terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods and thickened fluids used in dysphagia management: the IDDSI framework. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):293–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9758-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rasband W. ImageJ. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 1997–2009.

  30. Seimert W. Adobe premiere pro CS5. Heidelberg: Hüthig Jehle Rehm; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pearson WG Jr, Langmore SE, Yu LB, Zumwalt AC. Structural analysis of muscles elevating the hyolaryngeal complex. Dysphagia. 2012;27(4):445–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9392-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Heck FM, Doeltgen SH, Huckabee ML. Effects of submental neuromuscular electrical stimulation on pharyngeal pressure generation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(11):2000–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Suiter DM, Leder SB, Ruark JL. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on submental muscle activity. Dysphagia. 2006;21(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-005-9010-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Baijens LWJ, Speyer R, Passos VL, Pilz W, Roodenburg N, Clave P. The effect of surface electrical stimulation on swallowing in dysphagic parkinson patients. Dysphagia. 2012;27(4):528–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9387-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee HY, Hong JS, Lee KC, Shin YK, Cho SR. Changes in hyolaryngeal movement and swallowing function after neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with dysphagia. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39(2):199–209. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.2.199.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Restivo DA, Hamdy S. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation device for the treatment of neurogenic dysphagia: technology update. Med Devices (Auckl). 2018;11:21–6. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S122287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by start-up funding from the Kent State University to PI Ali Barikroo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Barikroo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barikroo, A., Clark, A.L. Effects of Varying Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Pulse Duration on Swallowing Kinematics in Healthy Adults. Dysphagia 37, 277–285 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10276-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10276-6

Keywords

Navigation