Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient production of cellobionic acid using whole-cell biocatalyst of genetically modified Pseudomonas taetrolens

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pseudomonas taetrolens has previously been shown to convert cellobiose to cellobionic acid (CBA), which can potentially be used in cosmetics, food, and pharmaceutical industries. The cellobiose-oxidizing activity of the P. taetrolens strain, which expressed the homologous quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase (GDH), was increased by approximately 50.8% compared to the original strain. Whole-cell biocatalyst (WCB) of the genetically modified P. taetrolens strain [pDSK-GDH] was prepared simply by fermentation and washing processes. Reaction conditions for the proper use of WCB, such as reaction temperature, cell density to be added, and cell harvest time for preparing WCB, were investigated. The highest CBA productivity (18.2 g/L/h) was achieved when WCB prepared in the late-exponential phase of cell culture was used at 35 °C with cell density of 10 at OD600nm. Under these conditions, 200 g/L of cellobiose was all converted to CBA in 11 h, and the WCB of P. taetrolens [pDSK-GDH] maintained the maximum catalytic activity during at least six cycles without a significant decline in the productivity. Our results suggest that the manufacture of WCB based on genetically engineered P. taetrolens and its optimized use could be further developed as an economically viable option for the large-scale production of CBA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CBA:

Cellobionic acid

GDH:

Quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase

WCBs:

Whole-cell biocatalysts

References

  1. Kiryu T et al (2015) Lactobionic and cellobionic acid production profiles of the resting cells of acetic acid bacteria. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 79(10):1712–1718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hildebrand A et al (2015) Engineering Neurospora crassa for improved cellobiose and cellobionate production. Appl Environ Microbiol 81(2):597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oh Y-R, Eom GT (2021) Identification of a lactose-oxidizing enzyme in Escherichia coli and improvement of lactobionic acid production by recombinant expression of a quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas taetrolens. Enzym Microb Technol 148:109828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Desai SH et al (2015) Isobutanol production from cellobionic acid in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact 14(1):52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiryu T et al (2019) Identifying membrane-bound quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase from acetic acid bacteria that produce lactobionic and cellobionic acids. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 83(6):1171–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mao S et al (2018) Efficient production of sugar-derived aldonic acids by Pseudomonas fragi TCCC11892. RSC Adv 8(70):39897–39901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alonso S, Rendueles M, Díaz M (2013) Bio-production of lactobionic acid: current status, applications and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 31(8):1275–1291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim J-H et al (2020) High-level production and high-yield recovery of lactobionic acid by the control of pH and temperature in fermentation of Pseudomonas taetrolens. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 43(5):937–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oh YR et al (2020) Enhancement of lactobionic acid productivity by homologous expression of quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase in Pseudomonas taetrolens. J Agric Food Chem 68(44):12336–12344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oh Y-R, Eom GT (2022) Efficient production of cellobionic acid from cellobiose by genetically modified Pseudomonas taetrolens. Biochem Eng J 178:108282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin B, Tao Y (2017) Whole-cell biocatalysts by design. Microb Cell Fact 16(1):106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leong YK et al (2020) High-level l-lysine bioconversion into cadaverine with enhanced productivity using engineered Escherichia coli whole-cell biocatalyst. Biochem Eng J 157:107547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heyland J et al (2010) Simple enzymatic procedure for L-carnosine synthesis: whole-cell biocatalysis and efficient biocatalyst recycling. Microb Biotechnol 3(1):74–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao H et al (2015) Repeated production of l-xylulose by an immobilized whole-cell biocatalyst harboring l-arabinitol dehydrogenase coupled with an NAD+ regeneration system. Biochem Eng J 96:23–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh Y-R et al (2020) Efficient production of lactobionic acid using genetically engineered Pseudomonas taetrolens as a whole-cell biocatalyst. Enzym Microb Technol 141:109668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang R et al (2020) Improving whole-cell biocatalysis for helicid benzoylation by the addition of ionic liquids. Biochem Eng J 161:107695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Keen NT et al (1988) Improved broad-host-range plasmids for DNA cloning in gram-negative bacteria. Gene 70(1):191–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Oh YR et al (2020) High-level production of maltobionic acid from high-maltose corn syrup by genetically engineered Pseudomonas taetrolens. Biotechnol Rep (Amst) 28:e00558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi KH, Kumar A, Schweizer HP (2006) A 10-min method for preparation of highly electrocompetent Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: application for DNA fragment transfer between chromosomes and plasmid transformation. J Microbiol Methods 64(3):391–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baminger U et al (1999) A simple assay for measuring cellobiose dehydrogenase activity in the presence of laccase. J Microbiol Methods 35(3):253–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oh Y-R et al (2020) Purification and characterization of a malate: quinone oxidoreductase from Pseudomonas taetrolens capable of producing valuable lactobionic acid. J Agric Food Chem 68(47):13770–13778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1):248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Doig SD et al (2003) Characterization of a recombinant Escherichia coli TOP10 [pQR239] whole-cell biocatalyst for stereoselective Baeyer-Villiger oxidations. Enzym Microb Technol 32(3):347–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fontanille P, Larroche C (2003) Optimization of isonovalal production from α-pinene oxide using permeabilized cells of Pseudomonas rhodesiae CIP 107491. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 60(5):534–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ni Y, Reye J, Chen RR (2007) lpp deletion as a permeabilization method. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(6):1347–1356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ni Y, Chen RR (2004) Accelerating whole-cell biocatalysis by reducing outer membrane permeability barrier. Biotechnol Bioeng 87(6):804–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Carra S et al (2020) High lactobionic acid production by immobilized Zymomonas mobilis cells: a great step for large-scale process. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02323-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by the R&D program of MOTIE/KEIT (10077291), the R&D program of KRICT (SS2142-10, BSF21-505), and the R&D program of Ulsan-KRICT (US21-12, US21-12-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YRO: Investigation, validation, data curation, and writing—original draft. JKS: Data curation, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. GTE: Conceptualization, project administration, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, and resources.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyeong Tae Eom.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, YR., Song, J.K. & Eom, G.T. Efficient production of cellobionic acid using whole-cell biocatalyst of genetically modified Pseudomonas taetrolens. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 45, 1057–1064 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-022-02725-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-022-02725-9

Keywords

Navigation