Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of loading rate and aeration on nitrogen removal and N2O emissions in intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors treating slaughterhouse wastewater at 11 °C

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to find optimal operation conditions for nitrogen removal from high strength slaughterhouse wastewater at 11 °C using the intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors (IASBRs) so as to provide an engineering control strategy for the IASBR technology. Two operational parameters were examined: (1) loading rates and (2) aeration rates. Both the two parameters affected variation of DO concentrations in the IASBR operation cycles. It was found that to achieve efficient nitrogen removal via partial nitrification–denitrification (PND), “DO elbow” point must appear at the end of the last aeration period. There was a correlation between the ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB)/nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) ratio and the average DO concentrations in the last aeration periods; when the average DO concentrations in the last aeration periods were lower than 4.86 mg/L, AOB became the dominant nitrifier population, which benefited nitrogen removal via PND. Both the nitrogen loading rate and the aeration rate influenced the population sizes of AOB and NOB. To accomplish efficient nitrogen removal via PND, the optimum aeration rate (A, L air/min) applied can be predicted according to the average organic loading rates based on mathematical equations developed in this study. The research shows that the amount of N2O generation in the aeration period was reduced with increasing the aeration rate; however, the highest N2O generation in the non-aeration period was observed at the optimum aeration rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2013) http://www.epa.ie/terminalfour/ippc/ippc-search.jsp?class-of-activity=Food+and+Drink&status=Licenced&county=%25&Submit=Search+by+Combination

  2. Commission European (2005) Integrated pollution prevention and control: reference document on best available techniques in the slaughterhouse and animal by-products industries. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nacheva PM, Pantoja MR, Serrano EAL (2011) Treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Water Sci Technol 63:878–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajakumar R, Meenambal T, Saravanan PM, Ananthanarayanan P (2012) Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor packed with pleated poly vinyl chloride rings. Bioresour Technol 103:116–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajakumar R, Meenambal T, Banu JR, Yeom IT (2010) Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in upflow anaerobic filter under low upflow velocity. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruiz I, Veiga MC, de Santiago P, BlazquezR (1997) Treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater in a UASB reactor and an anaerobic filter. Bioresour Technol 60: 251–258

  7. Borja R, Banks CJ, Wang A (1995) Effect of organic loading rate on anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater in a fluidized-bed reactor. Bioresour Technol 52:157–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saddoud A, Sayadi S (2007) Application of acidogenic fixed-bed reactor prior to anaerobic membrane bioreactor for sustainable slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater 149:700–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barber WP, Stuckey DC (2000) Nitrogen removal in a modified anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Water Res 34:2413–2422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cao W, Mehrvar M (2011) Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by combined anaerobic baffled reactor and UV/H2O2 processes. Chem Eng Res Design 89:1136–1143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhan X, Healy MG, Li J (2009) Nitrogen removal from slaughterhouse wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor under controlled low DO concentrations. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 32:607–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dytczak MA, Londry KL, Oleszkiewicz JA (2008) Activated sludge operational regime has significant impact on the type of nitrifying community and its nitrification rates. Water Res 42:2320–2328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang M, Lawlor PG, Li J, Zhan X (2012) Characteristics of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from intermittently-aerated sequencing batch reactors treating the separated liquid fraction of anaerobically digested pig manure. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:1973–1981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Elliott D, Nielsen M, Healy MG, Zhan X (2011) Long-term partial nitrification in an intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor (SBR) treating ammonium-rich wastewater under controlled oxygen-limited conditions. Biochem Eng J 55:215–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan M, Henry LG, Liu R, Huang X, Zhan X (2014) Nitrogen removal from slaughterhouse wastewater through partial nitrification followed by denitrification in intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors at 11 °C. Environ Technol 35:470–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. American Pubilc Health Association (APHA) (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu G, Rodgers M, Zhan X (2008) Nitrification in sequencing batch reactors with and without glucose addition at 11 °C. Biochem Eng J 40:373–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Quan X, Zhang M, Lawlor PG, Yang Z, Zhan X (2012) Nitrous oxide emission and nutrient removal in aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors. Water Res 46:4981–4990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Datta T, Liu Y, Goel R (2009) Evaluation of simultaneous nutrient removal and sludge reduction using laboratory scale sequencing batch reactors. Chemosphere 76:697–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krishna C, van Loosdrecht MCM (1999) Effect of temperature in storage polymers and settleability of activated sludge. Water Res 33:2374–2382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang X, Gui P, Qian Y (2001) Effect of sludge retention time on microbial behaviour in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem 36:1001–1006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Peng Y, Zhu G (2006) Biological nitrogen removal with nitrification and denitrification via nitrite pathway. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73:15–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tokutomi T (2004) Operation of a nitrite-type airlift reactor at low DO concentration. Water Sci Technol 49:81–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the financial support provided by the China Scholarship Council (CSC), the Department of Civil Engineering, NUI Galway, and National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA06A304).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rui Liu or Xinmin Zhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, M., Hu, Z., Liu, R. et al. Effects of loading rate and aeration on nitrogen removal and N2O emissions in intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors treating slaughterhouse wastewater at 11 °C. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38, 681–689 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1307-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1307-1

Keywords

Navigation