Abstract
By altering the strength of intra- and interspecific competition, droughts may reshape plant communities. Furthermore, species may respond differently to drought when other influences, such as herbivory, are considered. To explore this relationship, we conducted a greenhouse experiment measuring responses to inter- and intraspecific competition for two grasses, Schedonorus arundinaceus and Paspalum dilatatum, while varying water availability and simulating herbivory via clipping. We then parameterized population growth models to examine the long-term outcome of competition under these conditions. Under drought, S. arundinaceus was less water stressed than P. dilatatum, which exhibited severe water stress; clipping alleviated this stress, increasing the competitive ability of P. dilatatum relative to S. arundinaceus. Although P. dilatatum competed weakly under drought, clipping reduced water stress in P. dilatatum, thereby enhancing its ability to compete with S. arundinaceus under drought. Supporting these observations, population growth models predicted that P. dilatatum would exclude S. arundinaceus when clipped under drought, while S. arundinaceus would exclude P. dilatatum when unclipped under drought. When the modeled environment varied temporally, environmental variation promoted niche differences that, though insufficient to maintain stable coexistence, prevented unconditional competitive exclusion by promoting priority effects. Our results suggest that it is important to consider how species respond not just to stable, but also to variable, environments. When species differ in their responses to drought, competition, and simulated herbivory, stable environments may promote competitive exclusion, while fluctuating environments may promote coexistence. These interactions are critical to understanding how species will respond to global change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler PB, HilleRisLambers J, Kyriakidis PC, Guan Q, Levine JM (2006) Climate variability has a stabilizing effect on the coexistence of prairie grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12793–12798. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600599103
Adler PB, Dalgleish HJ, Ellner SP (2012) Forecasting plant community impacts of climate variability and change: when do competitive interactions matter? J Ecol 100:478–487. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01930.x
Allan E, Crawley MJ (2011) Contrasting effects of insect and molluscan herbivores on plant diversity in a long-term field experiment. Ecol Lett 14:1246–1253. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01694.x
Angert AL, Huxman TE, Chesson P, Venable DL (2009) Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:11641–11645. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904512106
Antonovics J, Fowler NL (1985) Analysis of frequency and density effects on growth in mixtures of Salvia splendens and Linum grandiflorum using hexagonal fan designs. J Ecol 73:219–234
Arachevaleta M, Bacon CW, Hoveland CS, Radcliffe DE (1989) Effect of the tall fescue endophyte on plant response to environmental stress. Agron J 81:83–90. doi:10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100010015x
Bedel AP, Mote TL, Goodrick SL (2013) Climate change and associated fire potential for the south-eastern United States in the 21st century. Int J Wildland Fire 22:1034–1043. doi:10.1071/WF13018
Brion G, Brye KR, Haggard BE, West C, Brahana JV (2011) Land-use effects on water quality of a first-order stream in the Ozark Highlands, mid-southern United States. River Res Appl 27:772–790. doi:10.1002/rra.1394
Brooker R et al (2005) The importance of importance. Oikos 109:63–70. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13557.x
Bu Z-J, Zheng X-X, Rydin H, Moore T, Ma J (2013) Facilitation vs. competition: does interspecific interaction affect drought responses in Sphagnum? Basic Appl Ecol 14:574–584
Carlyle CN, Fraser LH, Turkington R (2010) Using three pairs of competitive indices to test for changes in plant competition under different resource and disturbance levels. J Veg Sci 21:1025–1034. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01207.x
Carroll IT, Cardinale BJ, Nisbet RM (2011) Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function. Ecology 92:1157–1165. doi:10.1890/10-0302.1
Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343
Chesson P, Huntly N (1997) The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am Nat 150:519–553. doi:10.1086/286080
Chesson P et al (2004) Resource pulses, species interactions, and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments. Oecologia 141:236–253. doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1551-1
Clay K (1987) Effects of fungal endophytes on the seed and seedling biology of Lolium perenne and Festuca arundinacea. Oecologia 73:358–362. doi:10.1007/BF00385251
Cornaglia PS, Schrauf GE, Deregibus VA (2009) Flooding and grazing promote germination and seedling establishment in the perennial grass Paspalum dilatatum. Aust Ecol 34:343–350. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.01935.x
Damour G, Vandame M, Urban L (2008) Long-term drought modifies the fundamental relationships between light exposure, leaf nitrogen content and photosynthetic capacity in leaves of the lychee tree (Litchi chinensis). J Plant Physiol 165:1370–1378. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2007.10.014
Dewi S, Chesson P (2003) The age-structured lottery model. Theor Popul Biol 64:331–343. doi:10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00094-7
Edwards EJ, Still CJ (2008) Climate, phylogeny and the ecological distribution of C4 grasses. Ecol Lett 11:266–276. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01144.x
Elmore MT, Brosnan JT, Mueller TC, Horvath BJ, Kopsell DA, Breeden GK (2013) Seasonal application timings affect dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum) control in tall fescue. Weed Technol 27:557–564. doi:10.1614/WT-D-13-00007.1
Emam Y, Shekoofa A, Salehi F, Jalali AH, Pessarakli M (2012) Drought stress effects on two common bean cultivars with contrasting growth habits. Arch Agron Soil Sci 58:527–534. doi:10.1080/03650340.2010.530256
Flexas J, Medrano H (2002) Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot 89:183–189. doi:10.1093/aob/mcf027
Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey TD (2004) Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol 6:269–279. doi:10.1055/s-2004-820867
Fowler N (1986) The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:89–110. doi:10.2307/2096990
Gao Y, Wang D, Ba L, Bai Y, Liu B (2008) Interactions between herbivory and resource availability on grazing tolerance of Leymus chinensis. Environ Exp Bot 63:113–122. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.030
Ghannoum O (2009) C4 photosynthesis and water stress. Ann Bot 103:635–644. doi:10.1093/aob/mcn093
Gibson D, Newman J (2001) Festuca arundinacea Schreber (F. elatior L. ssp. arundinacea (Schreber) Hackel). J Ecol 89:304–324. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00561.x
Goldberg D, Novoplansky A (1997) On the relative importance of competition in unproductive environments. J Ecol 85:409–418. doi:10.2307/2960565
Grace JB (1995) On the measurement of plant competition intensity. Ecology 76:305–308. doi:10.2307/1940651
Gravel D, Guichard F, Hochberg ME (2011) Species coexistence in a variable world. Ecol Lett 14:828–839. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01643.x
Grime JP (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature, UK 242:344–347
Grime JP (1985) Towards a functional description of vegetation. In: White J (ed) The population structure of vegetation, vol 3. Springer, the Netherlands, pp 503–514
Hawkes CV, Sullivan JJ (2001) The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 82:2045–2058. doi:10.2307/2680068
Holt RD (1985) Density-independent mortality, non-linear competitive interactions, and species coexistence. J Theor Biol 116:479–493. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(85)80084-9
Huntly N (1991) Herbivores and the dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:477–503. doi:10.2307/2097271
Huxman TE, Kimball S, Angert AL, Gremer JR, Barron-Gafford GA, Venable DL (2013) Understanding past, contemporary, and future dynamics of plants, populations, and communities using Sonoran Desert winter annuals. Am J Bot 100:1369–1380. doi:10.2307/23434490
Inouye BD (2001) Response surface experimental designs for investigating interspecific competition. Ecology 82:2696–2706. doi:10.2307/2679954
Jacobo E, Rodríguez A, Durand M, Deregibus V (2009) Sowing date and nitrogen supply determine the outcome of competition between dallisgrass (Paspalum dilatatum Poir.) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) in the Pampas region of Argentina. Grass Forage Sci 64:71–79. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2008.00669.x
Koyama A, Tsuyuzaki S (2013) Facilitation by tussock-forming species on seedling establishment collapses in an extreme drought year in a post-mined “Sphagnum” peatland. J Veg Sci 24:473–483. doi:10.2307/23466940
Lehtila K, Boalt E (2004) The use and usefulness of artificial herbivory in plant-herbivore studies. In: Weisser WW Siemann E (Eds.) Ecological Studies, vol 173. Insects and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkS, pp 257–275
Levine JM, Rees M (2004) Effects of temporal variability on rare plant persistence in annual systems. Am Nat 164:350–363. doi:10.1086/422859
Li FR, Zhao AF, Zhou HY, Zhang TH, Zhao X (2002) Effects of simulated grazing on growth and persistence of Artemisia frigida in a semiarid sandy rangeland. Grass Forage Sci 57:239–246. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2494.2002.00322.x
Li J, Xiao T, Zhang Q, Dong M (2013) Interactive effect of herbivory and competition on the invasive plant Mikania micrantha. PLoS One 8(5):e62608. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062608
López IF, Kemp PD, Dörner J, Descalzi CA, Balocchi OA, García S (2013) Competitive strategies and growth of neighbouring Bromus valdivianus Phil. and Lolium perenne L. plants under water restriction. J Agron Crop Sci 199:449–459. doi:10.1111/jac.12032
Luo G et al (2012) Moderate grazing can promote aboveground primary production of grassland under water stress. Ecol Complex 11:126–136. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2012.04.004
McGlone CM, Sieg CH, Kolb TE, Nietupsky T (2012) Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability. Plant Ecol 213:445–457. doi:10.2307/41429064
Nagabhyru P, Dinkins R, Wood C, Bacon C, Schardl C (2013) Tall fescue endophyte effects on tolerance to water-deficit stress. BMC Plant Biol 13:127. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-13-127
Nielsen SL, Enriquez S, Duarte CM, Sand-Jensen K (1996) Scaling maximum growth rates across photosynthetic organisms. Funct Ecol 10:167–175. doi:10.2307/2389840
Olff H, Ritchie ME (1998) Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:261–265. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01364-0
Pérez-Harguindeguy N et al (2013) New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61:167–234. doi:10.1071/BT12225
Rees M (2013) Competition on productivity gradients—what do we expect? Ecol Lett 16:291–298. doi:10.1111/ele.12037
Richardson MD, Hoveland CS, Bacon CW (1993) Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of symbiotic and nonsymbiotic tall fescue. Crop Sci 33:145–149. doi:10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300010026x
Rúa MA, McCulley RL, Mitchell CE (2013) Fungal endophyte infection and host genetic background jointly modulate host response to an aphid-transmitted viral pathogen. J Ecol 101:1007–1018. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12106
Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2002) Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. J Ecol 90:480–494. doi:10.2307/3072232
Schrauf GE, Cornaglia PS, Deregibus VA, Ríssola MG (1995) Improvement in germination behaviour of Paspalum dilatatum Poir. seeds under different pre-conditioning treatments. N Z J Agric Res 38:501–509. doi:10.1080/00288233.1995.9513152
Seager R, Tzanova A, Nakamura J (2009) Drought in the southeastern United States: causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydroclimate change. J Clim 22:5021–5045. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI2683.1
Stuedemann JA, Hoveland CS (1988) Fescue endophyte: history and impact on animal agriculture. J Prod Agric 1:39–44. doi:10.2134/jpa1988.0039
Taylor SH, Hulme SP, Rees M, Ripley BS, Ian Woodward F, Osborne CP (2010) Ecophysiological traits in C3 and C4 grasses: a phylogenetically controlled screening experiment. New Phytol 185:780–791. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03102.x
Taylor SH, Ripley BS, Woodward FI, Osborne CP (2011) Drought limitation of photosynthesis differs between C3 and C4 grass species in a comparative experiment. Plant, Cell Environ 34:65–75. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02226.x
Tilman D (1990) Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58:3–15. doi:10.2307/3565355
Tilman D (1994) Community diversity and succession: the roles of competition, dispersal, and habitat modification. In: Schulze E-D, Mooney H (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function, vol 99. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 327–344
Violle C, Pu Z, Jiang L (2010) Experimental demonstration of the importance of competition under disturbance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12925–12929. doi:10.1073/pnas.1000699107
Wang Y, Long SP, Zhu X-G (2014) Elements required for an efficient NADP-malic enzyme type C4 photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 164:2231–2246. doi:10.1104/pp.113.230284
Wetherald RT, Manabe S (2002) Simulation of hydrologic changes associated with global warming. J Geophys Res Atmos 107:4379. doi:10.1029/2001JD001195
Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2005) Beyond the compensatory continuum: environmental resource levels and plant tolerance of herbivory. Oikos 109:417–428. doi:10.2307/3548509
Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2007) Effects of resource availability on tolerance of herbivory: a review and assessment of three opposing models. Am Nat 169:443–454. doi:10.1086/512044
Zhu X-G, Long SP, Ort DR (2008) What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:153–159. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.004
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology (DBI-1202892) to E. A. M. and a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant to R. W. H. (DEB-1311289). We thank C. Mitchell and F. Halliday for discussions of experimental design, K. Gross for statistical advice, and R. Peet for helpful comments on an earlier draft. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author contribution statement
J. D. N. and R. W. H. conceived, designed, and performed the greenhouse experiment. J. D. N. and R. W. H. analyzed the data. J. D. N. and E. A. M. developed and ran the modeling simulations. J. D. N., R. W. H., and E. A. M. wrote the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with ethical standards
This experiment complies with the current laws of the USA, where the experiment was performed.
Additional information
Communicated by Truman Young.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Napier, J.D., Mordecai, E.A. & Heckman, R.W. The role of drought- and disturbance-mediated competition in shaping community responses to varied environments. Oecologia 181, 621–632 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3582-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3582-9