Skip to main content
Log in

Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Competition and resource availability influence invasions into native perennial grasslands by non-native annual grasses such as Bromus tectorum. In two greenhouse experiments we examined the influence of competition, water availability, and elevated nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability on growth and reproduction of the invasive annual grass B. tectorum and two native perennial grasses (Elymus elymoides, Pascopyrum smithii). Bromus tectorum aboveground biomass and seed production were significantly reduced when grown with one or more established native perennial grasses. Conversely, average seed weight and germination were significantly lower in the B. tectorum monoculture than in competition native perennial grasses. Intraspecific competition reduced per-plant production of both established native grasses, whereas interspecific competition from B. tectorum increased production. Established native perennial grasses were highly competitive against B. tectorum, regardless of water, N, or P availability. Bromus tectorum reproductive potential (viable seed production) was not significantly influenced by any experimental manipulation, except for competition with P. smithii. In all cases, B. tectorum per-plant production of viable seeds exceeded parental replacement. Our results show that established plants of Elymus elymoides and Pascopyrum smithii compete successfully against B. tectorum over a wide range of soil resource availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams H, Kolb T (2005) Tree growth response to drought and temperature in a mountain landscape in northern Arizona, USA. J Biogeogr 32:1629–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen P, Meyer S, Beckstead J (1995) Patterns of seed after-ripening in Bromus tectorum L. J Exp Bot 46:1737–1744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arredondo J, Jones T, Johnson D (1998) Seedling growth of intermountain perennial and weedy grasses. J Range Manag 51:584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckstead J, Augspurger C (2004) An experimental test of resistance to cheatgrass invasion: limiting resources at different life stages. Biol Invasions 6:417–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap J, Phillips S (2001) Soil biota in an ungrazed grassland: response to annual grass (Bromus tectorum) invasion. Ecol Appl 11:1261–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank R, Abraham L, Young J (1994) Soil heating, nitrogen, cheatgrass, and seedbed microsites. J Range Manag 47:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton H Jr, Smith J, Link S (1993) Soil microbial biomass and activity of a disturbed and undisturbed shrub-steppe ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 25:545–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth M, Caldwell M, Stark J (2003) Overlapping resource use in three Great Basin species: implications for community invasibility and vegetation dynamics. J Ecol 91:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford J, Lauenroth W (2006) Controls over invasion of Bromus tectorum: the importance of climate, soil, disturbance and seed availability. J Veg Sci 17:693–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley B, Mustard J (2005) Indentifying land cover variability distinct from land cover change: Cheatgrass in the Great Basin. Remote Sens Environ 94:204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt C, Rickard W (1994) Alien taxa in the North American shrub-steppe four decades after cessation of livestock grazing and cultivation agriculture. Biol Conserv 68:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks M, D’Antonio C, Richardson D, Grace J, Keeley J, DiTomaso J, Hobbs R, Pellant M, Pyke D (2004) Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 54:677–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers J, Roundy B, Blank R, Meyer S, Whittaker A (2007) What makes Great Basin sagebrush ecosystems invasible by Bromus tectorum? Ecol Monogr 77:117–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cline J, Uresk D, Rickard W (1977) Comparison of soil water used by a sagebrush-bunchgrass and a cheatgrass community. J Range Manag 30:199–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio C, Meyerson L (2002) Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Restor Ecol 10:703–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, Grime J, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deWit C (1960) On competition. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Elser J, Bracken M, Cleland E, Gruner D, Harpole W, Hillebrand H, Ngai J, Seabloom E, Shurin J, Smith J (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Going B, Hillerislambers J, Levine J (2009) Abiotic and biotic resistance to grass invasion in serpentine annual plant communities. Oecologia 159:839–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey L, Schupp E (2004) Competition as a barrier to establishment of a native perennial grass (Elymus elymoides) in alien annual grass (Bromus tectorum) communities. J Arid Environ 58:405–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe P (2000) The replacement series. J Ecol 88:371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp P (1996) Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) dominance in the Great Basin Desert: history, persistence, and influences to human activities. Glob Environ Chang 6:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin D, Fulé P (2008) Wildfire effects on understory plant communities in two fire-prone forests. Can J For Res 38:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leger E (2008) The adaptive value of remnant native plants in invaded communities: an example from the Great Basin. Ecol Appl 18:1226–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J, Vila M, D’Antonio C, Dukes J, Grigulis K, Lavorel S (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc Lon Ser B 270:775–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link S, Bolton H Jr, Thiede M, Rickard W (1995) Responses of downy brome to nitrogen and water. J Range Manag 48:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe P, Lauenroth W, Burke I (2003) Effects of nitrogen availability on competition between Bromus tectorum and Bouteloua gracilis. Plant Ecol 167:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlone C, Springer J, Laughlin D (2009) Can pine forest restoration promote a diverse and abundant understory and simultaneously resist nonnative invasion? For Ecol Manag 258:2638–2646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGlone C, Sieg C, Kolb T (2011) Invasion resistance and persistence: established plants win, even with disturbance and high propagule pressure. Biol Invasions 13:291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller M, Belnap J, Beatty S, Reynolds R (2006) Performance of Bromus tectorum L. in relation to soil properties, water additions, and chemical amendments in calcareous soils of southeastern Utah, USA. Plant Soil 288:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco T, Johnson D, Norton J, Jones T, Connors K, Norton J, Redinbaugh M (2003) Contrasting responses of Intermountain West grasses to soil nitrogen. J Range Manag 56:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson E, Mack R (1990) The population biology of Bromus tectorum in forests: distinguishing the opportunity for dispersal from environmental restriction. Oecologia 84:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees M, Condit R, Crawley M, Pacala S, Tilman D (2001) Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science 293:650–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (2008) JMP Version 8.0, Statistical Analysis Software. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder C, Caldwell M (2002) Effects of perennial neighbors and nitrogen pulses on growth and nitrogen uptake by Bromus tectorum. Plant Ecol 158:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young K, Mangold J (2008) Medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) outperforms squirreltail (Elymus elymoides) through interference and growth rate. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. The authors wish to thank the USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station in Flagstaff, AZ and the staff and students at the Ecological Restoration Institute for their support in conducting this study. P. Fulé and J. Belnap gave excellent advice during the establishment of this study and reviewed early drafts of this manuscript. We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher M. McGlone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGlone, C.M., Sieg, C.H., Kolb, T.E. et al. Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability. Plant Ecol 213, 445–457 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9992-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9992-1

Keywords

Navigation