Abstract
Blastocystis is a ubiquitous, widely distributed protist inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract of humans and other animals. The organism is genetically diverse, and so far, at least 28 subtypes (STs) have been identified with ST1–ST9 being the most common in humans. The pathogenicity of Blastocystis is controversial. Several routes of transmission have been proposed including fecal–oral (e.g., zoonotic, anthroponotic) and waterborne. Research on the latter has gained traction in the last few years with the organism having been identified in various bodies of water, tap water, and rainwater collection containers including water that has been previously filtered and/or chlorinated. Herein, we assessed the resistance of 11 strains maintained in culture, spanning ST1–ST9 to various chlorine and hydrogen peroxide concentrations for 24 h, and performed recovery assays along with re-exposure. Following the treatment with both compounds, all subtypes showed increased resistance, and viability could be visualized at the cellular level. These results are hinting at the presence of mechanism of resistance to both chlorine and hydrogen peroxide. As such, this pilot study can be the platform for developing guidelines for water treatment processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Blastocystis is one of the most commonly encountered microbial eukaryotes in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and a wide range of other animals (Alfellani et al. 2013b; Tsaousis et al. 2020). The organism is distributed globally having been identified in both developed and developing countries in rural and urban settings (Scanlan et al. 2014; Udonsom et al. 2018).
Blastocystis exhibits remarkable genetic diversity, and at least 28 subtypes (STs, ST1-ST17, ST21, ST23–32) – arguably species – have been identified in humans, other mammals, and birds, based on genetic heterogeneity across the small subunit rRNA (SSU rRNA) gene (Maloney et al. 2020; Stensvold and Clark 2020; Higuera et al. 2021). Of these subtypes, ST1–ST9, ST10, ST12, ST14, ST16, and ST23 have been found in humans, with ST1–ST3 being the three most prevalent and globally distributed (Yoshikawa et al. 2004; Meloni et al. 2011; Forsell et al. 2012; Khaled et al. 2020; Jinatham et al. 2021; Osorio-pulgarin et al. 2021). However, these subtypes have also been found in several other hosts, indicating the lack of host specificity of Blastocystis (Stensvold and Clark 2016), at least at subtype level. The exception appears to be ST9, which has so far been exclusively isolated from humans. Zoonotic transmission of the organism has been suggested (Abe et al. 2003; Stensvold et al. 2009).
It has been speculated that Blastocystis can remain in the intestine for weeks, months, or even years though this has yet to be conclusively demonstrated (Scanlan et al. 2014). Nonetheless, its pathogenicity remains unclear. Blastocystis infection has been linked to gastrointestinal symptoms, the main ones being watery or loose stools, diarrhea, excessive gas, abdominal pain, anal itching, and weight loss (Booroom et al. 2008; Stensvold et al. 2011). Links to irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease have also been postulated though not conclusively established (Domínguez-márquez et al. 2009; Roberts et al. 2013; Salvador et al. 2016; Peña et al. 2020; Shirvani et al. 2020). However, Blastocystis is also very common in the gut of people with no gastrointestinal symptoms (Nagel et al. 2012; Scanlan et al. 2015; Yowang et al. 2018; Jinatham et al. 2021). Hence, it is possible that Blastocystis colonization in general is not harmful, but rather specific subtypes or strains within subtypes might be the ones potentially causing symptomology.
Although the transmission dynamics of Blastocystis remain blurry, it is widely understood that the organism enters the host via the fecal–oral route (Tan 2004). The precise contribution of the various forms (i.e., cyst, granular, vacuolar and amoeboid) of the organism to transmission and colonization/infection is unknown. Several factors have been linked with increased occurrence of Blastocystis with waterborne transmission featuring prominently (Anuar et al. 2013; Deng et al. 2020; Salazar-Sanchez et al. 2021). Blastocystis has been detected in drinking water (Leelayoova et al. 2008), tap water (Eroglu and Koltas 2010; Jinatham et al. 2022), rainwater tanks (Waters et al. 2019; Jinatham et al. 2021), bodies of freshwater (Khalifa et al. 2014), drinking water treatment facilities (Richard et al. 2016; Freudenthal et al. 2022), and wastewater (Stensvold et al. 2020) worldwide.
Chlorine is one of the most widely used reagents for disinfection of water. A single study showed the potential of Blastocystis to resist chlorine; however, this study preceded the implementation of the subtyping system (Zaki et al. 1996). Hence, it is unknown whether chlorine resistance might be subtype- or strain-specific. The longevity of the organism in the environment and how it deals with oxidative stress has also been subject to investigation. Previous studies have shown that Blastocystis has mechanisms to withstand oxidative stress; however, these were based on in silico predictions or were performed experimentally in a limited number of strains (Tsaousis et al. 2012; Eme et al. 2017; Gentekaki et al. 2017). In this pilot study, a resazurin-based assay was used to test the resistance of eleven Blastocystis isolates representing ST1 through ST9 to chlorine and hydrogen peroxide.
Materials and methods
Blastocystis spp. isolates
Eleven different Blastocystis isolates from nine subtypes (Table 1) were used to test resistance to chlorine and hydrogen peroxide. Both xenic and axenic cultures were used. Xenic refers to mono-eukaryotic (containing only Blastocystis) cultures with bacteria, while axenic refers to cultures that only contain Blastocystis.
Blastocystis spp. cell culturing
Blastocystis isolates were cultured in an anaerobic chamber at 37 °C in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Media (IMDM) (Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (hiHS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cultures were maintained in sterile 14-mL round-bottom polystyrene tubes (Thermo Scientific) in a GasPak™ EZ Anaerobe Container System (GasPak™ jar crystal with GasPak™ Anaerobe sachets) (Ho et al. 1993; Clark and Diamond 2002).
Cells were maintained by passages – 1-mL gently homogenized culture to 9-mL fresh medium – every 4 to 7 days, depending on their growth. Fresh medium was de-gassed and warmed to 37 °C a minimum of 48 h before the cultures were passaged. Cultures were routinely evaluated using light microscopy for growth, morphology, and contaminants. For the assays described below, cultures at the logarithmic phase were used (primarily vacuolar and secondarily granular forms).
Exposure to chlorine and hydrogen peroxide and resazurin-based viability assays
Resistance of Blastocystis to chlorine and hydrogen peroxide was assessed using 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plates by seeding 5 × 105 Blastocystis cells/well and after addition of the reagents to be tested in 200 µL/well volumes in IMDM supplemented with 10% (v/v) hiHS under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C. Cell concentration was determined quantitatively by the trypan blue dye exclusion method (Roberts et al. 2015; Mokhtar et al. 2019), using an automatic cell counter (EVE, NanoEntek). Chlorine and hydrogen peroxide were serially diluted to reach final concentrations ranging from 5000 to 2 mg/L (ppm) and from 10 to 0.001% (w/w) in plates, respectively. The source of chlorine was a sodium hypochlorite (NaoCl) solution containing 10% of the elemental compound. Blanks (containing only phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]), negative (containing only culture medium), and positive (untreated cells) growth controls were also included. A 30% commercially available hydrogen peroxide solution was used (ACROS organics). After 24 h of incubation, 20 µL of a 0.125-mg/mL resazurin sodium salt solution (Sigma-Aldrich) was added into each well with subsequent anaerobic incubation for further 3–5 h at 37 °C (Mirza et al. 2011; Yason et al. 2018). Finally, 20 µL of 20% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was added, and after 20 min, cell viability was assessed by fluorescence measurements at 544/590 nm (ex/em) wavelengths using a FLUOstar® Omega microplate reader.
Relative fluorescence units (RFU) were converted into viability percentages: negative control values, which are taken as 0% growth, were subtracted from the rest of the fluorescence values; later, viability percentages were calculated with respect to positive controls, which are taken as 100% growth. These viability percentages were used to perform nonlinear regression analyses using GraphPad Prism 6 to determine the IC50, IC90, and IC99 values, i.e., the concentrations required to result in 50%, 90%, and 99% growth inhibition. Experimental minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were also determined. Each reagent concentration was tested in triplicate in three separate determinations.
Recovery assays
Recovery of Blastocystis to chlorine and hydrogen peroxide was assessed using 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plates by seeding 5 × 105 Blastocystis cells/well after addition of the reagents to be tested in 200-µL/well volumes in IMDM supplemented with 10% (v/v) hiHS under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C. Chlorine and hydrogen peroxide were serially prepared as described above. Blanks, negative, and positive (untreated) growth controls were also included.
After a 24-h incubation, plates were centrifuged at 1,200 × g for 5 min and carefully washed three times with 200-μL/well volume pre-warmed IMDM, followed by a 24-h incubation without reagent treatments in IMDM supplemented with 10% (v/v) hiHS under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C. Finally, cell viability was determined by fluorescence measurements as described above (Mirza et al. 2011; Yason et al. 2018). IC50, IC90, and IC99 values were determined, as well as experimental minimum lethal concentrations (MLCs) (Roberts et al. 2015). Each reagent concentration was tested in triplicate in three separate determinations.
Fluorescence live-cell imaging
To provide representative images of Blastocystis, random microscopic fields were captured from untreated and treated cultures of Blastocystis S1 (ST4, xenic), WR1 (ST4, axenic), H (ST7, axenic), and B (ST7, axenic). In short, Blastocystis STs were seeded at 1 × 106 cells/well in 12-well plates after the addition of the reagents at the IC50 final concentrations in 2-mL volumes in IMDM supplemented with 10% (v/v) hiHS under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C. Untreated cultures were also included. After a 24-h incubation, cells were centrifuged at 800 × g for 10 min, carefully washed three times with PBS, and resuspended in PBS containing 200-nM MitoTracker™ Red CMXRos, a mitochondrion-specific stain that has been used previously on Blastocystis (Stensvold et al. 2007; Tsaousis et al. 2012). Finally, Blastocystis cells were incubated anaerobically for 40 min in the dark, and images were taken through bright and red filters using the JuLI™ Stage System for live-cell imaging. The same software was used to automatically count the fluorescent cells versus the total number of cells.
Results
Chlorine resistance assays
Figure 1 shows the dose–response curves, and Table 2 summarizes the IC and MIC values for each Blastocystis isolate against chlorine after 24 h of treatment and recovery. After 24 h of treatment, all isolates showed IC50 concentrations (≥ 7.4 ppm) higher than the chlorine concentrations used to disinfect water (up to 5 ppm) (Zaki et al. 1996; Yang et al. 2018; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020; Karim et al. 2020). With regard to disinfection, the IC99 concentrations are the relevant ones, with values considerably higher (≥ 140 ppm) for all the isolates tested. When MIC concentrations are considered, these values increased to higher than 300-ppm chlorine after 24 h of treatment. Notably, ST8 showed the highest sensitivity to chlorine, with an IC99 value of 140.3 ppm. In contrast, ST1 showed the highest resistance to chlorine, showing an IC99 value of 1,268 ppm, followed by ST7 strain B at 1,079 ppm.
Recovery assays were performed to determine the static or cidal activity of chlorine against Blastocystis. All isolates showed recovery after 24 h of incubation without chlorine treatment (Fig. 1), suggesting that resistance forms (cysts) are developed during treatment and subsequently allow Blastocystis recovery. Concentrations ranging from 178 to higher than 2,857 ppm were required to completely eliminate any chance of recovery (Table 2, 24-h recovery) of the studied strains. Similar to the treatment assays, ST1 and ST7 showed the highest resistance to chlorine with IC99 at 1,817 ppm and 2,857 ppm, respectively.
Hydrogen peroxide resistance assays
Figure 2 shows the dose–response curves, and Table 3 summarizes the IC and MLC values for each Blastocystis isolate against hydrogen peroxide after 24 h of treatment and recovery. All isolates exhibited IC50 concentrations ranging from 8.5 ppm to 113.8 ppm after 24 h of treatment and IC99 disinfectant concentrations ranging from 72.8 to 946.6 ppm. The MLC concentrations ranged from 156 to 1250 ppm. Of note, ST5 showed the highest sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide, with an IC99 of 72.8 ppm. In contrast, ST9 was the strain that was most resistant to hydrogen peroxide, showing an IC99 of 946.6 ppm, followed by ST6 at 650.9 ppm and ST1 at 641.9 ppm.
Recovery after 24 h of incubation without hydrogen peroxide treatment exhibited higher IC values than that of those corresponding to the 24-h treatment assay, suggesting that resistance forms (cysts) are also developed during hydrogen peroxide treatment (Fig. 2). Hence, the effective hydrogen peroxide concentrations are even higher than those previously indicated (Table 3, 24-h recovery). All Blastocystis isolates showed resistance to hydrogen peroxide, with concentrations ranging from 103 ppm to 3,338 ppm for 24 h to completely eliminate any chance of recovery (Table 3, 24-h recovery). Herein, both ST8 and ST9 showed the highest resistance to hydrogen peroxide.
Fluorescence live-cell imaging
To visualize the effect of these treatments at the cellular level, we randomly generated and collected microscopic images of Blastocystis treated at IC50 concentrations of chlorine and hydrogen peroxide for 24 h (Fig. 3). Live Blastocystis cells were stained with MitoTrackerTM Red CMXRos. Images showed that both the number of total cells and the percentage of live (stained) cells were lower in the treated cultures than in the control (untreated) cultures for all isolates tested.
Discussion
Water is a common vehicle for transmission of many pathogenic and nonpathogenic organisms, including Blastocystis (Jinatham et al. 2021, 2022). Chlorine is one of the most widely used reagents for water disinfection. Concentrations of 0.2–1.0 ppm (0.2–1.0 mg/L) of chlorine are effective for eradicating most pathogens, while levels up to 5.0 ppm are considered safe in drinking water (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020). In instances of over chlorination (8.0–10.0 ppm), the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends implementation of dechlorination treatment to make it suitable for human consumption (Zaki et al. 1996). In this respect, countries treat drinking water with chlorine up to 0.2–5.0 ppm, depending on local drinking water regulations (Karim et al. 2020). In swimming pools, chlorine levels are regulated to be within the range of 0.3–5.0 ppm in several countries (Yang et al. 2018). However, health institutions and agencies, including the WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), report that chlorination is not as effective against protozoa and fungi (WHO. World Health Organization 1982; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2022). Thus, higher concentrations of chlorine than those considered safe for human consumption should be used in order to eradicate them. In this regard, it would be interesting to investigate whether the approved levels of chlorination affect Blastocystis viability.
Low concentrations of chlorine (< 5 ppm) have a biocidal effect on a number of bacteria – 25 ppm on Mycoplasma, 100 ppm on Bacillus atrophaeus spores, 200 ppm on a number of viruses, and 500 ppm on Candida spp.; higher concentrations are required to eliminate Mycobacterium tuberculosis (1,000 ppm) or inactivate Clostridium difficile spores (5,000 ppm) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID) 2016). In this study, we demonstrated that all Blastocystis isolates included were highly resistant to chlorine, requiring concentrations ranging from 175 ppm to higher than 1,800 ppm to eliminate any chance of recovery. Among the nine Blastocystis subtypes investigated herein, ST1 (strain NUH9) and ST7 (strain B) were the most resistant to chlorine during treatment and recovery. Notably, ST1 is among the most prevalent and widely distributed subtype in humans globally, while ST7 is common in poultry and quite common in some human populations (Alfellani et al. 2013a). Previous findings suggesting water as a prominent transmission route of Blastocystis along with the chlorine resistance identified in the present study might help explain how these two subtypes persist in the environment. Moreover, among the rest of the subtypes, all, except ST6, show elevated resistance post recovery suggesting the presence of a resistance mechanism against chlorine in the genus. It is worth noting that most of the cultures are xenic, and while the values could be associated with the overall culture microbiome, we have not observed any consistent differences between xenic versus axenic subtypes.
In parallel, hydrogen peroxide has biocidal effect against a wide range of viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and fungi. Hydrogen peroxide at 5,000 ppm has virucidal and fungicidal effects after 5 min of exposure and a broad bactericidal effect after 60 min. A concentration of 30,000 ppm eliminates Bacillus spp. spores after 150 min of exposure. However, the same concentration is ineffective against vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Acanthamoeba cysts after 120 min of exposure (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID) 2016). In this study, we demonstrated that all Blastocystis isolates studied were slightly resistant to hydrogen peroxide, requiring concentrations ranging from 103.3 ppm to 3,338.0 ppm for 24 h to eliminate any chance of recovery. These results suggest that hydrogen peroxide at concentrations usually used for disinfection against many other microorganisms is more than adequate for the effective treatment of surfaces, tools, or fabrics against Blastocystis. At the level of subtypes, ST9, ST6, and ST1 showed the highest resistance to the reagent. In our previous study, using hydrogen peroxide exposure in ST1 (strain NandII), we showed similar findings along with upregulation of genes related to oxygen stress (Tsaousis et al. 2012). At the genomic level resistance to oxygen stress has been predicted in silico in various subtypes (Denoeud et al. 2011; Eme et al. 2017; Gentekaki et al. 2017).
Future studies should focus on investigating the molecular mechanisms of additional subtypes and strains within subtypes in developing resistance to both chlorine and hydrogen peroxide but also on the strategies that Blastocystis cells have evolved to initiate both encystation and excystation and how these do affect the transmission of the organism. Moreover, the use of additional contact times and incubation in different temperatures (e.g., ambient temperature) should also be considered in the future. One limitation of the study herein is the lack of information regarding the amount of cyst forms in each condition, but this is due to the unavailability of markers to confirm this stage.
Collectively, the biochemical and cell biological results herein suggest that other water treatment processes, either chemical or physical, should be applied to eliminate Blastocystis in water. For instance, prechlorination treatment stages such as sedimentation, coagulation, flocculation, and filtration should be used in the water disinfection procedure. In rural areas, where it is often not possible to include these necessary treatment stages, Blastocystis remains in the water maintaining transmission cycles.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abe N, Wu Z, Yoshikawa H (2003) Zoonotic genotypes of Blastocystis hominis detected in cattle and pigs by PCR with diagnostic primers and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene. Parasitol Res 90:124–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-002-0821-2
Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR, Vidal-lapiedra A et al (2013) Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop 126:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.011
Alfellani MA, Taner-mulla D, Jacob AS et al (2013) Genetic diversity of Blastocystis in livestock and zoo animals. Protist 164:497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2013.05.003
Anuar TS, Ghani MKA, Azrenn SN et al (2013) Blastocystis infection in Malaysia: evidence of waterborne and human-to-human transmissions among the Proto-Malay, Negrito and Senoi tribes of Oreng Asli. Parasit Vectors 6:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-40
Booroom KF, Smith H, Nimri L et al (2008) Oh my aching gut: irritable bowel syndrome, Blastocystis and asymptomatic infection. Parasit Vectors 1:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-1-40
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020) National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases (DFWED). https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/drinking/public/water_disinfection.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2022
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022) National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases at CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/safewater/chlorination.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2022
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID) D of HQP (DHQP) (2016) Chemical Disinfectants. Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/disinfection/disinfection-methods/chemical.html#Chlorine. Accessed 15 Feb 2022
Clark CG, Diamond LS (2002) Methods for cultivation of luminal parasitic protists of clinical importance. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:329–341. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.15.3.329
Chen XQ, Singh M, Ho LC, Moe KT, Tan SW, Yap EH (1997) A survey of Blastocystis sp. in Rodents. Lab Anim Sci 47 (1):91–94
Deng Y, Zhang S, Ning C et al (2020) Molecular epidemiology and risk factors of Blastocystis sp. infections among general populations in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 13:1791–1801. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S269664
Denoeud F, Roussel M, Noel B et al (2011) Genome sequence of the stramenopile Blastocystis, a human anaerobic parasite. Genome Biol 12:R29. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r29
Domínguez-Márquez MV, Guna R, Muñoz C et al (2009) High prevalence of subtype 4 among isolates of Blastocystis hominis from symptomatic patients of a health district of Valencia (Spain). Parasitol Res 105:949–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1485-y
El Safadi D, Gaayeb L, Meloni D, et al (2014) Children of Senegal river basin show the highest prevalence of Blastocystis sp. ever observed worldwide. BMC Infect Dis 14:164. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-164
Eme L, Gentekaki E, Curtis B et al (2017) Lateral gene transfer in the adaptation of the anaerobic parasite Blastocystis to the gut. Curr Biol 27:807–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.003
Eroglu F, Koltas IS (2010) Evaluation of the transmission mode of B. hominis by using PCR method. Parasitol Res 841–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1937-4
Forsell J, Granlund M, Stensvold CR (2012) Subtype analysis of Blastocystis isolates in Swedish patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1416-6
Freudenthal J, Ju F, Bürgmann H, Dumack K (2022) Microeukaryotic gut parasites in wastewater treatment plants: diversity, activity, and removal. Microbiome 10:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01225-y
Gentekaki E, Curtis BA, Stairs CW et al (2017) Extreme genome diversity in the hyperprevalent parasitic eukaryote Blastocystis. PLOS Biol 15:e2003769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003769
Higuera A, Herrera G, Jimenez P et al (2021) Identification of multiple Blastocystis subtypes in domestic animals from Colombia Using amplicon-based next generation sequencing. Front Vet Sci 8:732129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.732129
Ho LC, Singh M, Suresh G et al (1993) Axenic culture of Blastocystis hominis in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium. Parasitol Res 79:614–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932249
Ho LC, Singh M, Suresh K, Ng GC, Yap EH (1994) A study of the karyotypic patterns of Blastocystis hominis by pulsed-field gradient electrophoresis. Parasitol Res 80:620–622
Jinatham V, Maxamhud S, Popluechai S et al (2021) Blastocystis One Health Approach in a rural community of Northern Thailand: prevalence, subtypes and novel transmission routes. Front Microbiol 12:746340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.746340
Jinatham V, Nonebudsri C, Wandee T et al (2022) Parasitology International Blastocystis in tap water of a community in northern Thailand. Parasitol Int 91:102624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2022.102624
Karim K, Guha S, Beni R (2020) Comparative Analysis of chemical, physical and biological contaminants in drinking water in various developed countries around the world. J Water Resour Prot 12:714–728. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2020.128043
Khaled S, Gantois N, Ly AT, et al (2020) Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Senegalese School Children. Microorganisms 8(9):1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091408
Khalifa RMA, Ahmad AK, Abdel-Hafeez EH, Mosllem FA (2014) Present status of protozoan pathogens causing water-borne disease in northern part of El-Minia Governorate. Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 44:559–566. https://doi.org/10.12816/0007860
Leelayoova S, SiripattanapipongThathaisong S et al (2008) Drinking water: a possible source of Blastocystis spp. subtype 1 infection in schoolchildren of a rural community in Central Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 79:401–406. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401
Maloney JG, Molokin A, Júlia M et al (2020) Blastocystis subtype distribution in domestic and captive wild bird species from Brazil using next generation amplicon sequencing. Parasite Epidemiol Control 9:e00138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2020.e00138
Meloni D, Sanciu G, Poirier P et al (2011) Molecular subtyping of Blastocystis sp. isolates from symptomatic patients in Italy. Parasitol Res 109:613–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2294-7
Mirza H, Teo JDW, Upcroft J, Tan KSW (2011) A rapid, high-throughput viability assay for Blastocystis spp. reveals metronidazole resistance and extensive subtype-dependent variations in drug susceptibilities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:637–648. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00900-10
Mokhtar AB, Ahmed SA, Eltamany EE, Karanis P (2019) Anti-Blastocystis activity in vitro of Egyptian herbal extracts (Family: Asteraceae) with Emphasis on Artemisia judaica. Int J Environ Res Publich Heal 16:1555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091555
Nagel R, Cuttell L, Stensvold CR et al (2012) Blastocystis subtypes in symptomatic and asymptomatic family members and pets and response to therapy. Intern Med J 42:1187–1195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02626.x
Osorio-pulgarin MI, Higuera A, Beltran-Álzate JC et al (2021) Epidemiological and molecular characterization of blastocystis infection in children attending daycare centers in Medellín. Colombia Biology (basel) 10:669. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070669
Peña S, Carrasco G, Rojas P, et al (2020) Determination of subtypes of Blastocystis sp . in Chilean patients with and without in flammatory bowel syndrome , A preliminary report. Parasite Epidemiol Control 8:e00125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00125
Richard RL, Ithoi I, Azlan M et al (2016) Monitoring of waterborne parasites in two drinking water treatment plants: a study in Sarawak, Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Publich Heal 13:641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13070641
Roberts T, Stark D, Harkness J, Ellis J (2013) Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates identified in a Sydney population and pathogenic potential of Blastocystis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32:335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1746-z
Roberts T, Bush S, Ellis J et al (2015) In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Blastocystis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4417–4423. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.04832-14
Salazar-Sanchez RS, Ascuna-Durand K, Ballon-Echegaray J et al (2021) Socio-demographic determinants associated with Blastocystis infection in Arequipa, Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg 104:700–707. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0631
Salvador F, Sulleiro E, Sánchez-montalvá A, et al (2016) Epidemiological and clinical profile of adult patients with Blastocystis sp. infection in Barcelona, Spain. Parasit Vectors 9(1):548. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1827-4
Scanlan PD, Stensvold CR, Rajilić-Stojanović M et al (2014) The microbial eukaryote Blastocystis is a prevalent and diverse member of the healthy human gut microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 90:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12396
Scanlan PD, Stensvold CR, Cotter PD (2015) Development and application of a blastocystis subtype-specific pcr assay reveals that mixed-subtype infections are common in a healthy human population. Appl Enviromental Microbiol 81:4071–4076. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00520-15
Shirvani G, Fasihi-Harandi M, Raiesi O et al (2020) Prevalence and molecular subtyping of blastocystis from patients with irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease and chronic urticaria in Iran. Acta Parasitol 65:90–96. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-019-00131-y
Stensvold CR, Clark CG (2016) Current status of Blastocystis: a personal view. Parasitol Int 65:763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2016.05.015
Stensvold CR, Clark CG (2020) Pre-empting Pandora’s Box: Blastocystis subtypes revisited. Trends Parasitol 36:229–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.009
Stensvold CR, Suresh GK, Tan KSW et al (2007) Terminology for Blastocystis subtypes – a consensus. Trends Parasitol 23:93–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2007.01.004
Stensvold CR, Alfellani MA, Nørskov-lauritsen S et al (2009) Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates from synanthropic and zoo animals and identification of a new subtype. Int J Parasitol 39:473–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.07.006
Stensvold CR, Christiansen DB, Olsen KEP et al (2011) Blastocystis sp. subtype 4 is common in Danish Blastocystis-positive patients presenting with acute diarrhea. Am J Trop Med Hyg 84:883–885. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2011.11-0005
Stensvold CR, Lebbad M, Hansen A et al (2020) Differentiation of Blastocystis and parasitic archamoebids encountered in untreated wastewater samples by amplicon-based next-generation sequencing. Parasite Epidemiol Control 9:e00131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00131
Tan KSW (2004) Blastocystis in humans and animals: new insights using modern methodologies. Vet Parasitol 126:121–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.09.017
Tan KS (2008) New insights on classification, identification, and clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Clin Microbiol Rev 21(4):639–65. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00022-08
Tsaousis AD, Ollagnier de Ollagnier S, Gentekaki E et al (2012) Evolution of Fe/S cluster biogenesis in the anaerobic parasite Blastocystis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:1426–1431. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116067109
Tsaousis AD, Betts EL, Mccain A, et al (2020) Exploring the biology and evolution of Blastocystis and its role in the microbiome. In: Eukaryome impact on human intestine homeostasis and mucosal immunology. Springer International Publishing, p 14
Udonsom R, Prasertbun R, Mahittikorn A et al (2018) Infection, genetics and evolution Blastocystis infection and subtype distribution in humans, cattle, goats, and pigs in central and western Thailand. Infect Genet Evol 65:107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.07.007
Waters E, Ahmed W, Hamilton KA et al (2019) Protozoan pathogens Blastocystis and Giardia spp. in roof-harvested rainwater: the need to investigate the role of the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) and other potential sources of zoonotic transmission. J Water, Sanit Hyg Dev 9:780–785. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2019.064
WHO. World Health Organization (1982) Chlorine and hydrogen chloride. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241540818. Accessed 14 Feb 2022
Wong KHS, Ng GC, Lin RTP, Yoshikawa H, Taylor MB, Tan KSW (2008) Predominance of subtype 3 among blastocystis isolates from a major hospital in Singapore. Parasitol Res 102:663–670
Yang L, Chen X, She Q et al (2018) Regulation, formation, exposure, and treatment of disinfection by-products (DBPs) in swimming pool waters: A critical review. Environ Int 121:1039–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.024
Yason JA, Koh KARP, Tan KSW (2018) Viability screen of LOPAC 1280 reveals phosphorylation inhibitor auranofin as a potent inhibitor of Blastocystis subtype 1, 4, and 7 Isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00208-e218. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00208-18
Yoshikawa H, Abe N, Iwasawa M, Kitano S, Nagano I, Wu Z, Takahashi Y (2000) Genomic analysis of blastocystis hominis strains isolated from two long-term health care facilities. J Clin Microbiol 38 (4):1324–1330
Yoshikawa H, Abe N, Wu Z (2004) PCR-based identification of zoonotic isolates of Blastocystis from mammals and birds. Microbiology 150:1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26899-0
Yoshikawa H, Nagano I, Wu Z, Yap EH, Singh M, Takahashi Y (1998) Genomic polymorphism among Blastocystis hominis strains and development of subtype-specific diagnostic primers. Mol Cell Probes 12(3):153–9
Yoshikawa H, Wu Z, Nagano I, Takahashi Y (2003) Molecular comparative studies among Blastocystis isolates obtained from humans and animals. J Parasitol 89(3):585–594
Yowang A, Tsaousis AD, Chumphonsuk T et al (2018) Infection, genetics and evolution high diversity of Blastocystis subtypes isolated from asymptomatic adults living in Chiang Rai, Thailand. Infect Genet Evol 65:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.08.010
Zaki M, Zaman V, Sheikh NA (1996) Resistance of Blastocystis hominis cysts to chlorine. J Pak Med Assoc 46:178–179
Funding
RME is grateful for a fellowship from the Alfonso Martín Escudero Foundation. We are thankful to the International Blastocystis Network for putting this collaboration together and to the COST Action network grant (CA21105 – Blastocystis under One Health). The JuLI™ Stage System was purchased by ADT’s laboratory under the EU Interreg-2-seas H4DC grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RME performed all of the experiments and analyses and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. GCN, KWST, and CRS provided materials and methodologies for the main work. ADT provided supervision and guidance. EG and ADT wrote the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors have read the final version of the manuscript and have consented for its publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Julia Walochnik
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Martín-Escolano, R., Ng, G.C., Tan, K.S.W. et al. Resistance of Blastocystis to chlorine and hydrogen peroxide. Parasitol Res 122, 167–176 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07713-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07713-2