Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does HER2 status influence in the benefit of ramucirumab and paclitaxel as second line treatment of advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to compare ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy in second-line (2L) advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) based on HER2 status and analyze prognostic factors.

Methods

The study includes patients from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry with aGEC and known HER2 status who received 2L between 2016 and 2021. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and multivariable Cox regression analysis was done to adjust for confounding variables.

Results

Of the 552 patients who met the selection criteria, 149 (26.9%) had HER2-positive aGEC, 89 were treated with chemotherapy, and 60 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel, and 403 had an HER2-negative aGEC, 259 were treated with chemotherapy, and 144 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel.

In the whole sample, 2L PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.8–3.2), 2L OS, 5.7 months (5.2–6.3), and ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was associated with increased PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.78, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR 0.68, 0.55–0.83, p = 0.0002). Median PFS of ramucirumab- paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 3.5 vs 2.8 months (HR 0.67, 0.54–0.83, p = 0.0004) in HER2-negative, and 4.7 vs 2.7 months (HR 0.57, 0.40–0.82, p = 0.0031) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. Median OS for ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 6.6 vs 5 months (HR 0.67, 0.53–0.85, p = 0.0007) in HER2-negative, and 7.4 vs 5.6 months (HR 0.70, 0.53–1.04, p = 0.083) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. ECOG-PS, tumor burden, Lauren subtype, and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio were prognostic factors.

Conclusions

In patients with an aGEC from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, 2L treatment with ramucirumab-paclitaxel was superior to chemotherapy in PFS, OS and response rate, independent of HER2 status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available upon request to the authors.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

AGAMENON registry is part of the Evaluation of Results and Clinical Practice Section included in the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM); we are grateful to them for their logistical support of this project. Priscilla Chase Duran for editing the manuscript. Natalia Cateriano, Miguel Vaquero, and IRICOM S.A. for supporting the registry website. We are indebted to all patients, as well as to AGAMENON centers and investigators who participated in this research and made it possible.

Funding

AGAMENON-SEOM registry has received previous financial support from BMS and Servier with other investigational purposes, and from Lilly for this analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SV, JG, ACB and PJF, developed the project, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. The other authors recruited patients and provided clinical information, comments, and improvements to the manuscript. All authors participated in the interpretation and discussion of data, and the critical review of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sena Valcarcel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

JG declares he has received honoraria for advisory consulting and speaking role from Lilly, Servier and BMS. PJF declares she has received honoraria for advisory consulting and speaking from Lilly, MSD and BMS. VA declares she has received honoraria for advisory consulting and speaking role from Lilly, MSD and BMS. AFM declares she has received honoraria for advisory consulting and speaking role from Lilly, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Merck, MSD and BMS. RVT declares she has received honoraria for advisory consulting and speaking from Amgen, Merck, Sanofi, Servier, Bristol-MS, Bayer and Roche and has received support for educational, scientific activities and travel from Amgen, Roche, Lilly, Sanofi, Bristol-MS, Pierre-Fabre and Servier. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the scope of this article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or a substitute for it was obtained from all patients before they were included in the study. Ethics committee Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer approved the study (C.P.AGAMENON-C.I.EST:30/14, 26 November 2014).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valcarcel, S., Gallego, J., Jimenez-Fonseca, P. et al. Does HER2 status influence in the benefit of ramucirumab and paclitaxel as second line treatment of advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 4077–4089 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04294-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04294-6

Keywords

Navigation