Skip to main content
Log in

The role of the action context in object affordance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioral and neuroscience studies have shown that observation of objects automatically evokes potential actions to interact with those objects. In this study, the left and right hand key presses were facilitated when they corresponded with the task-irrelevant handle orientation of household objects, which is termed the affordance effect. The present study investigated how the affordance effect is affected by the action context when other agents are observed acting on a neutral or dangerous object. Participants were shown a series of pictures in which an actor grasped a neutral or dangerous object and moved it away from or toward the participant. The participants were required to press different keys to identify a symbol which was presented above the last picture. The results showed that affordance effect of a neutral object was modulated by the direction of object movement. When the neutral object moved away from the participant, an affordance effect was observed if the perceived action was congruent with handle orientation, whereas the affordance effect emerged if the perceived action was incongruent with handle orientation when the object was moved toward the participant. However, for the dangerous object, the affordance effect was obtained regardless of object movement direction or congruency between perceived action and handle orientation. This result suggests that the processing of objects involves a sophisticated integration of body behavior with the object.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anelli, F., Nicoletti, R., Bolzani, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2013). Keep away from danger: Dangerous objects in dynamic and static situations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 344.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz-Zadeh, L., Koski, L., Zaidel, E., Mazziotta, J., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Lateralization of the human mirror neuron system. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2964–2970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, P., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2011). The predictive mirror: Interactions of mirror and affordance processes during action observation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 171–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A., & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A, 53, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertenthal, B. I., Longo, M. R., & Kosobud, A. (2006). Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 32, 210–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106, 3–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2006). Gestural knowledge evoked by objects as part of conceptual representations. Aphasiology, 20, 1112–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buccino, G., Vogt, S., Ritzl, A., Fink, G. R., Zilles, K., Freund, H. J., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 42, 323–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. G., Humphreys, G. W., & Castiello, U. (2003). Motor facilitation following action observation: A behavioral study in prehensile action. Brain and Cognition, 53, 495–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., Swabey, D., Bridgeman, J., May, B., Tucker, M., & Hyne, A. (2013). Bodies and other visual objects: The dialectics of reaching toward objects. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 77, 31–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzola, V., Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Keysers, C. (2006). Empathy and the somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans. Current Biology, 16, 1824–1829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzola, V., Rizzolatti, G., Wicker, B., & Keysers, C. (2007). The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. NeuroImage, 35, 1674–1684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Girardi, G., Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 36, 330–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, S., Eimer, M., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2001). Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: Convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 462–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koski, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Woods, R. P., & Mazziotta, J. C. (2003). Modulation of cortical activity during different imitative behaviors. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 460–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liepelt, R., Prinz, W., & Brass, M. (2010). When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions. Cognition, 115, 426–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, O., Stenneken, P., van Schie, H. T., & Bekkering, H. (2006). Semantic activation in action planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 32, 633–643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2010). Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: The effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2190–2201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, L., Cavallo, A., Bucchioni, G., & Castiello, U. (2011). Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 557–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, L., Cavallo, A., Bucchioni, G., & Castiello, U. (2012). From simulation to reciprocity: the case of complementary actions. Social Neuroscience, 7, 146–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satori, L., Bucchioni, G., & Castiello, U. (2013). When emulation becomes reciprocity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 662–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stürmer, B., Ascherschleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2000). Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1746–1759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2005). Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition, 12, 1337–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2007). Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psychologica, 124, 238–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). Micro-affordance of grasp type in a visual categorisation task. Visual Cognition, 8, 769–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vainio, L., Symes, E., Ellis, R., Tucker, M., & Ottoboni, G. (2008). On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition, 108, 444–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L. (2017). Separate pathways for the processing of affordance of neutral and dangerous object. Current Psychology, 36, 833–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Grant from Humanity and Social Science Youth foundation of Ministry of Education of China (17XJC190011), Shaanxi philosophy and Social Sciences fund (2017P016), and Shaanxi Education Science “13th Five-Year” program (SGH17H273).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Committee on Publication Ethics’ International Standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L. The role of the action context in object affordance. Psychological Research 83, 227–234 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1002-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1002-y

Navigation