Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the 3-year results of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using the big-bubble technique in keratoconus patients with previous corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) treatment.
Methods
Twenty eyes of 20 keratoconus patients who underwent DALK surgery using the big-bubble technique after CXL treatment between January 2011 and September 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients completed 3 years follow-up. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), maximum keratometry, keratometric astigmatism and endothelial cell density (ECD) were analysed.
Results
The mean interval between CXL and DALK surgery was 47.5 ± 24.0 months (mean ± SD). DALK was completed in all eyes. Big-bubble was successfully achieved in 16 eyes (80%), and manual dissection was performed in four eyes (20%). Microperforation occurred in three eyes (15%). Postoperatively, persistent epithelial defect occurred in three eyes (15%). The mean UCVA and mean BSCVA values were significantly improved preoperatively to all postoperative visits (p < 0.001). UCVA was 20/100 or lower in all eyes preoperatively and 20/100 or better in 18 eyes (80%) at 3 years; BSCVA was 20/40 or better in all eyes (100%) and 20/20 or better in three eyes (15%), and keratometric astigmatism was lower than 4 dioptres in 14 eyes (70%) at 3 years. The mean ECD loss was 6.3 ± 4.4% at 1 year, 9.0 ± 6.3% at 2 years and 11.2 ± 7.4% at 3 years.
Conclusion
Previous CXL treatment in keratoconus patients did not cause a negative impact on the visual, refractive and surgical outcomes of DALK surgery using the big-bubble technique. DALK surgery seems to be a safe and effective surgical approach in these patients.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00417-019-04587-6/MediaObjects/417_2019_4587_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parker JS, van Dijk K, Melles GR (2015) Treatment options for advanced keratoconus: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 60:459–480
Wollensak G, Iomdina E (2009) Biomechanical and histological changes after corneal crosslinking with and without epithelial debridement. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:540–546
Keating A, Pineda R 2nd, Colby K (2010) Corneal cross linking for keratoconus. Semin Ophthalmol 25:249–255
Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S et al (2010) Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol 149:585–593
Reinhart WJ, Musch DC, Jacobs DS et al (2011) Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 118:209–218
Romano V, Iovieno A, Parente G et al (2015) Long-term clinical outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 159:505–511
Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Baiocchi S et al (2008) Corneal healing after riboflavin ultraviolet-A collagen cross-linking determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo: early and late modifications. Am J Ophthalmol 146:527–533
Mazzotta C, Balestrazzi A, Traversi C et al (2007) Treatment of progressive keratoconus by riboflavin-UVA-induced crosslinking of corneal collagen: ultrasctructural analysis by Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II in vivo confocal microscopy in humans. Cornea 26:390–397
Dias J, Diakonis VF, Lorenzo M et al (2015) Corneal stromal elasticity and viscoelasticity assessed by atomic force microscopy after different cross linking protocols. Exp Eye Res 138:1–5
Knappe S, Stachs O, Zhivov A et al (2011) Results of confocal microscopy examinations after collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and UVA light in patients with progressive keratoconus. Ophthalmologica 225:95–104
Iovieno A, Moramarco A, Coassin M et al (2013) Big bubble DALK after CXL in keratoconic patients. J Refract Surg 29:801
Scorcia V, Busin M, Lucisano A et al (2013) Anterior segment opticacoherence tomography-guided big-bubble technique. Ophthalmology 120:471–476
Schaub F, Enders P, Bachmann BO et al (2017) Effect of corneal collagen crosslinking on subsequent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in keratoconus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255:811–816
World Medical Association (2013) Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310:2191–2194
Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T (2003) Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 135:620–627
Blackburn BJ, Jenkins MW, Rollins AM et al (2019) A review of structural and biomechanical changes in the cornea in aging, disease, and photochemical crosslinking. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 29:7–66
Han DC, Mehta JS, Por YM et al (2009) Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 148:744–751
Fogla R, Padmanabham P (2006) Results of deep lamellar keratoplasty using the big bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 141:254–259
Fontana L, Parente G, Tassınari G (2007) Clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 143:117–124
Kubaloglu A, Sari ES, Unal M et al (2011) Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 151:760–767
Hovakimyan M, Guthoff R, Knappe S et al (2011) Short-term corneal response to cross-linking in rabbit eyes assessed by in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy and histology. Cornea 30:196–203
Thorsrud A, Nicolaissen B, Drolsum L (2012) Corneal collagen crosslinking in vitro: inhibited regeneration of human limbal epithelial cells after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A exposure. J Cataract Refract Sur 38:1072–1076.24
Vimalin J, Gupta N, Jambulingam M et al (2012) The effect of riboflavin-UV-A treatment on corneal limbal epithelial cells--a study on human cadaver eyes. Cornea 31:1052–1059
Krumeich JH, Brand-Saberi B, Chankiewitz V et al (2014) Induction of neoplasia after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in a CXL-treated cornea. Cornea 33:313–316
Mashor RS, Rootman DB, Bahar I et al (2011) Outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus intralase enabled penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Can J Ophthalmol 46:403–407
Feizi S, Javadi F, Javadi MA (2014) Graft epithelial defects after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 33:1145–1148
Koçluk Y, Alyamaç Sukgen E, Burcu A (2017) Comparison of outcomes in patients who underwent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and those converted to penetrating keratoplasty. Turk J Ophthalmol 47:63–67
Sarnicola V, Toro P, Gentile D et al (2010) Descemetic DALK and predescemetic DALK: outcomes in 236 cases of keratoconus. Cornea 29:53–59
Van Dooren BT, Mulder PG, Nieuwendaal CP et al (2004) Endothelial cell density after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (Melles technique). Am J Ophthalmol 137:397–400
Acknowledgements
This study is the author’s own work. None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. All the authors gave written permission to the corresponding author to be acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kubaloglu, A., Sari, E.S. & Koytak, A. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in eyes previously treated with collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258, 821–827 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04587-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04587-6