Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder children exhibit an impaired accommodative response

  • Pediatrics
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common paediatric neurobehavioural disorders causing multiple functional impairments in children. Based on the relationship between the neural system that controls attention and ocular dynamics, the present study compares the magnitude and variability of accommodation between a group of non-medicated ADHD children and an age-matched control group.

Methods

The magnitude and variability of the accommodative response were objectively measured in 36 children using the WAM-5500 autorefractometer for 90 consecutive seconds at three static viewing distances (500, 40, and 20 cm). Participants were divided into ADHD (n = 18) or control (n = 18) groups based on clinically validated criteria.

Results

Children with ADHD exhibited higher lags of accommodation (p = 0.024), increasing at closer viewing distances, in comparison to the control group. Marginal statistical differences were found for the variability of accommodation (p = 0.066), with the ADHD group showing a trend towards higher variability. Our analysis showed that the magnitude and variability of accommodation did not vary over time between groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that children with ADHD have a less accurate accommodative response. These results provide a new ocular index that could help to clarify the relationship between accommodative response and attentional deficits, which could have a direct impact on the academic, cognitive, and visual performance of ADHD children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barkley RA (2014) Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Fourth edition. A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edn). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Polanczyk G, de LMS, Horta BL et al (2007) The worlwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry 164:942–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tannock R, Brown TE (2000) Attention-deficit disorders with learning disorders in children and adolescents. In: Brown T (ed). Attention-Deficit Disord Comorbidities Child Adolesc Adults Arlington, VA Am Psychiatr Publ 231–296

  5. Loe IM, Feldman HM (2007) Academic and educational outcomes of children with ADHD. J Pediatr Psychol 32:643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ambp.2006.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoogman M, Bralten J, Hibar DP et al (2017) Subcortical brain volume differences in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adults: a cross-sectional mega-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 4:310–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Stasi LL, Renner R, Catena A et al (2012) Towards a driver fatigue test based on the saccadic main sequence: a partial validation by subjective report data. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 21:122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2011.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vera J, Jiménez R, García JA, Cárdenas D (2017) Intraocular pressure is sensitive to cumulative and instantaneous mental workload. Appl Ergon 60:313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Puig M, Zapata L, Puigcerver L, Iglesias NE (2015) Attention-related eye vergence measured in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. PLoS One:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145281

  10. Granet DB, Gomi CF, Ventura RE, Miller-Scholte A (2005) The relationship between convergence insufficiency and ADHD. Strabismus 13:163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rouse M, Borsting E, Mitchell G et al (2009) Academic behaviors n children with convergence insufficiency with and without parent-reported ADHD. Optom Vis Sci 86:1169–1177. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181baad13.Academic

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Poltavski DV, Biberdorf D, Petros TV (2012) Accommodative response and cortical activity during sustained attention. Vis Res 63:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiménez R, Gonzalez MD, Peréz MA, García JA (2003) Evolution of accommodative function and development of ocular movements in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 23:97–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Molina-Carballo A, Checa-ros A, Muñoz-hoyos A (2016) Treatments and compositions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder : a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2016.1182989

  15. Millodot M (2014) Dictionary of optometry and visual science. 7th Edition. Elsevier Health Sciences

  16. McClelland JF, Parkes J, Hill N et al (2006) Accommodative dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: a population-based study. Investig Opthalmol Vis Sci 47:1824–1830. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chase C, Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH (2009) Visual discomfort and objective measures of static accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 86:883–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheppard AL, Davies LN (2010) Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 30:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00701.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH, Chase C (2009) Accommodation response and visual discomfort. 3rd Edition. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 29:625–633. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00687.x

  20. Charman WN, Heron G (2015) Microfluctuations in accommodation: an update on their characteristics and possible role. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 35:476–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wallman J, Winawer J (2004) Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron 43:447–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harb E, Thorn F, Troilo D (2006) Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes. Vis Res 46:2581–2592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Borsting E, Rouse M, Chu R (2005) Measuring ADHD behaviors in children with symptomatic accommodative dysfunction or convergence insufficiency : a preliminary study. Optometry 76:588–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Conlon EG, Lovegrove WJ, Chekaluk E, Pattison PE (1999) Measuring visual discomfort. Vis Cogn 6:637–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062899394885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Momeni-Moghaddam H, McAlinden C, Azimi A et al (2014) Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252:509–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2480-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin W, Lin M, Chen YCH (2016) Effects of near addition lenses and prisms. Optom Vis Sci 93

  27. Vera J, Diaz-Piedra C, Jiménez R et al (2016) Driving time modulates accommodative response and intraocular pressure. Physiol Behav 164:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.05.043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiménez R, Martínez-Almeida L, Salas C, Ortíz C (2011) Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:925–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1570-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Atchison D, Varnas S (2017) Accommodation stimulus and response determinations with autorefractors. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 37:96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Steinmetz NA, Moore T (2014) Article eye movement preparation modulates neuronal responses in area V4 when dissociated from attentional demands. Neuron 83:496–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Iribarren R, Fornaciari A, Hung GK (2002) Effect of cumulative nearwork on accommodative facility and asthenopia. Int Ophtalmol 24:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Loh S, Lamond N, Dorrian J, et al. (2004) The validity of psychomotor vigilance tasks of less than 10-minute duration. 36:339–346

  33. Epstein JN, Erkanli A, Conners CK et al (2003) Relations between continuous performance test performance measures and ADHD behaviors. J Abnorm Child Psychol 31:543–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Siegenthaler E, Costela FM, Mccamy MB et al (2014) Task difficulty in mental arithmetic affects microsaccadic rates and magnitudes. Eur J Neurosci 39:287–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schneider WRMS (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. detection, search, and attention. Phycol. Rev. 84

  36. Winn B, Gilmartin B (1992) Current perspective on microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthal Physiol Opt 12:252–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Brace L, Kraev I, Rostron C et al (2015) Altered visual processing in a roedent model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuroscience 303:364–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Suzuki Y (2007) The near response: the contributions of Kenji Ohtsuka, MD. J Neuroophthalmol 27:138–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Overton PG (2008) Collicular dysfunction in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. q Med Hipotheses:1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2007.11.016

  40. Hafed ZM, Goffart L, Krauzlis RJ (2009) A neural mechanism for microsaccade generation in the primate superior colliculus. Science 323(80):940–943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Muñoz DP, Armstrong IT, Hampton KA, Moore KD (2003) Altered control of visual fixation and saccadic eye movements in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Neurophysiol 90:503–514. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00192.2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Braddick O, Atkinson J (2011) Development of human visual function. Vis Res 51:1588–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hoffman DM, Girshick AR, Banks MS (2008) Vergence—accommodation con flicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J Vis 8:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.3.33.Introduction

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Borsting E, Mitchell G, Kulp MT et al (2012) Improvement in academic behaviors following successful treatment of convergence insufficiency. Optom Vis Sci 89:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318238ffc3.Improvement

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. DeCarlo DK, Swanson M, McGwin G et al (2016) ADHD and vision problems in the National Survey of Children’s Health. Optom Vis Sci 93:459–465

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Anderson HA, Glasser A, Manny RE, Stuebing KK (2010) Age-related changes in accommodative dynamics from preschool to adulthood. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:614–622. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-3653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Michael R, Bron AJ (2011) The ageing lens and cataract : a model of normal and pathological ageing. R Soc:1278–1292. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0300

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beatriz Redondo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (name the institution/committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Redondo, B., Vera, J., Molina, R. et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder children exhibit an impaired accommodative response. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256, 1023–1030 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3948-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3948-2

Keywords

Navigation