Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of injuries patterns produced by a 9mm P.A.K “rubber ball” blank firing weapon: porcine model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of less lethal weapons aims to mitigate civilian casualties caused by firearm use. However, due to numerous cases in which these weapons caused serious injuries, even lethal injuries, both legislation and the forensic field are interested in characterizing and regulating them better. In the forensic field, there is a lack of strong research about injury patterns of these weapons which makes it difficult to identify the type of weapon employed. In this study, the main objective was to characterize the injury pattern produced by the impact of the 9 mm P.A.K. projectile. A porcine model was used. Four different distances were studied: firm contact, 10 cm, 60 cm and 110 cm, using 3 of the more representative anatomical sites: the head, the hind leg and the ribs. The average measurement of the entrance orifice varied according to the anatomical site, being 6.67 mm wide and 6.25 mm long in the thorax, 7.3 mm wide and 8.8 mm long in the hind legs, and 7.62 mm wide and 7.54 mm long in the head. The variation in width and length measurements was not found to be directly related to the shot distance. The gunshot residues had similar characteristics to those of conventional lead projectiles, however there was more unburned powder deposit near the wounds, with a less dense soot and more dense powder tattoo. Depth varied widely regardless of tissue and firing distance, although loss of penetrating power and injury is observed as one moves away from the target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Geneva, Academy (2018) Geneva guidelines on Less-Lethal weapons and Related Equipment in Law Enforcement. Text for consultation

  2. Wyant RT, Burns T, Allgire J (2014) Risk management of less lethal options. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16847

  3. Haar RJ, Iacopino V, Ranadive N, Dandu M, Weiser SD (2017) Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd-control settings: a systematic review. BMJ Open 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Millar R, Rutherford WH, Johnston S, Malhotra VJ (1975) Injuries caused by rubber bullets: a report on 90 patients. Br J Surg 62:480–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800620613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hiss J, Hellman FN, Kahana T (1997) Rubber and Plastic Ammunition Lethal injuries: the Israeli experience. Med Sci Law 37:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/002580249703700209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kobayashi M, Mellen PF (2009) Rubber bullet injury: case report with autopsy observation and literature review. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 30:262–267. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e318187dfa8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beatty JA, Stopyra JP, Slish JH, Bozeman WP (2020) Injury patterns of less lethal kinetic impact projectiles used by law enforcement officers. J Forensic Leg Med 69:101892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank M, Peters D, Klemm W, Grossjohann R, Ekkernkamp A, Bockholdt B, Seifert J (2017) Penetrating chest trauma caused by a blank cartridge actuated rubber ball projectile: case presentation and ballistic investigation of an uncommon weapon type. Int J Legal Med 131:1307–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1606-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogunc GI, Ozer MT, Coskun K, Uzar AI (2009) Modified blank ammunition injuries. Forensic Sci Int 193:112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pircher R, Große Perdekamp M, Thierauf-Emberger A, Kramer L, Pollak S, Geisenberger D (2017) Wound morphology in contact shots from blank cartridge handguns: a study on composite models. Int J Legal Med 131:1333–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1650-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DiMaio V (2015) Gunshot wounds. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367805715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sinha JK (2014) Forensic investigation of unusual firearms: ballistic and medico-legal evidence. CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17679

  13. Humphrey C, Kumaratilake J (2016) Ballistics and anatomical modelling – a review. Leg Med 23:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miles KL, Finaughty DA, Gibbon VE (2020) A review of experimental design in forensic taphonomy: moving towards forensic realism. Forensic Sci Res 5:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2020.1792631

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J (1998) Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology 139:663–670. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.139.2.5751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fragkouli K, Al Hakeem E, Bulut O, Simmons T (2018) The effect of range and ammunition type on fracture patterns in porcine postcranial flat bones. J Forensic Leg Med 53:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Breeze J, Carr DJ, Mabbott A, Beckett S, Clasper JC (2015) Refrigeration and freezing of porcine tissue does not affect the retardation of fragment simulating projectiles. J Forensic Leg Med 32:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.03.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. ZSR, ZSR-Katalog (2023) 68. https://www.zsrpatlayici.com/files/ZSR-Katalog.pdf (accessed April 15, 2023)

  19. Cohen H, Kugel C, May H, Medlej B, Stein D, Slon V, Hershkovitz I, Brosh T (2016) The impact velocity and bone fracture pattern: forensic perspective. Forensic Sci Int 266:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carlucci DE, Jacobson SS (2018) Ballistics. Third edition. | Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press; 2018. 282, 601. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351678674

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the personnel of the ballistics laboratory of the National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences of the basic unit Cali, who helped to set up the experiment and carry out the shooting. Also, we thank professors from the Department of Public Health and Epidemiology of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali, who supported the whole process of experimental design and statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Castillo Moreno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreno, N.C., Zambrano, J.P., Dorado, L.F. et al. Assessment of injuries patterns produced by a 9mm P.A.K “rubber ball” blank firing weapon: porcine model. Int J Legal Med (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03238-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03238-8

Keywords

Navigation