Abstract
Background
The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) is introduced to simplify the classification of different frontal cell variants based on their topographical structures. The objectives of our study were to determine the prevalence of the frontal cell variants according to IFAC and their association with the development of frontal sinusitis.
Methodology
A retrospective chart review on computed tomography paranasal sinus (CTPNS) was conducted. A total of 200 patients who had clinical and endoscopic findings of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and undergone CTPNS were reviewed. The CTPNS was evaluated for the presence of frontal cell variants according to IFAC and mucosal changes consistent with frontal sinus involvement.
Result
A total of 400 sides of the CTPNS were analyzed. The agger nasi cells (ANCs) were the most common (95.5%) followed by supra bulla cells (SBCs) (60.8%), supra bulla frontal cells (SBFCs) (53.0%), supra agger cells (SACs) (50.0%), supra agger frontal cells (SAFCs) (36.0%), frontal septal cells (FSCs) (8.3%), and supraorbital ethmoidal cells SOECs (5.5%). There was significant association between SOEC (p = 0.001) and FSC (p = 0.044) with the development of frontal sinusitis.
Conclusions
Apart from ANCs, the posterior-based cells (SBCs and SBFCs) have higher prevalence than the anterior-based cells (SACs and SAFCs). Despite being the least, both SOECs and FSCs are significantly associated with frontal sinusitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Valdes CJ, Bogado M, Samaha M (2014) Causes of failure in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4:502–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21307
Wormald PJ (2005) Surgery of the frontal recess and frontal sinus. Rhinology 43:82–85
van Alyea OE (1941) Frontal cells: an anatomic study of these cells with consideration of their clinical significance. Arch Otolaryngol 34:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1941.00660040021003
Bent JP, Cuilty-Siller C, Kuhn FA (1994) The frontal cell as a cause of frontal sinus obstruction. Am J Rhinol 8:185–192. https://doi.org/10.2500/105065894781874278
Wormald PJ, Hoseman W, Callejas C et al (2016) The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and Classification of the Extent of Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery (EFSS). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:677–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21738
Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C et al (2020) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology 58:1–464. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin20.600
Lund VJ, Mackay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 31:183–184
Villarreal R, Wrobel BB, Macias-Valle LF et al (2019) International assessment of inter- and intrarater reliability of the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification system. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22200
Choby G, Thamboo A, Won TB et al (2018) Computed tomography analysis of frontal cell prevalence according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 8:825–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22105
Tran LV, Ngo NH, Psaltis AJ (2019) A radiological study assessing the prevalence of frontal recess cells and the most common frontal sinus drainage pathways. Am J Rhinol Allergy 33:323–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1945892419826228
Sommer F, Hoffmann TK, Harter L et al (2019) Incidence of anatomical variations according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and their coincidence with radiological signs of opacification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:3139–3146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05612-4
Sagar GR, Jha BC, Meghanadh KR (2013) A study of anatomy of frontal recess in patients suffering from ‘chronic frontal sinus disease.’ Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65:435–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-013-0653-7
Johari HH, Mohamad I, Sachlin IS et al (2018) A computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess cells in association with the development of frontal sinusitis. Auris Nasus Larynx 45:1183–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2018.04.010
Eweiss AZ, Khalil HS (2013) The prevalence of frontal cells and their relation to frontal sinusitis: a radiological study of the frontal recess area. ISRN Otolaryngol 2013:687582. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/687582
Seth N, Kumar J, Garg A, Singh I, Meher R (2020) Computed tomographic analysis of the prevalence of International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification cells and their association with frontal sinusitis. J Laryngol Otol. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215120002066
DelGaudio JM, Hudgins PA, Venkatraman G, Beningfield A (2005) Multiplanar computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess cells: effect on frontal isthmus size and frontal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:230–235. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.3.230
Lien CF, Weng HH, Chang YC et al (2010) Computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy and its effect on the development of frontal sinusitis. Laryngoscope 120:2521–2527. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20977
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Human Research Ethical Review Board (JEPeM Code: USM/JEPeM/18120778) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not obtained from all patients.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fawzi, N.E.A., Lazim, N.M., Aziz, M.E. et al. The prevalence of frontal cell variants according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification and their associations with frontal sinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 765–771 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06843-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06843-0