Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence of anatomical variations according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and their coincidence with radiological sings of opacification

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The endonasal access to the frontal recess and sinus may be complicated by a variety of anatomical variations. Previous classifications of these variants were characterized by proper names or position information without anatomical reference. The IFAC is intended to simplify the classification of anatomical variations of the frontoethmoidal complex. The aim of this study was to analyse a representative number of sinus CT scans to assess the incidence of anatomical variations according to the IFAC and to compare the results with previous classifications. In addition, the coincidence of complex anatomical variations and radiological sings of opacification was investigated.

Methodology/principal

Two hundred and forty-nine sinus CT scans were analysed in multiplanar reconstructions. Exclusion criteria were previous operations on the paranasal sinuses, malignant diseases, and an insufficient image quality. All anatomical variants were analysed according to the IFAC criteria. In addition, the coincidence of radiological sings of opacification and the presence of anatomical variations of the frontal recess and sinus were investigated.

Results

The analysis revealed Agger nasi cells in 95% of the CT scans. Supra agger cells (SACs) were detected in 49% and Supra agger frontal cells (SAFCs) in 25% of the data sets. Suprabulla cells (SBCs) were detected in 89% and Supra bulla frontal cells (SBFCs) in 27% of the scans. Supraorbital ethmoid cells (SECs) were detectable in 9% and interfrontal septal cells in 28% of the scans. Despite a partially strong narrowing of the frontal recess, no increased occurrence of radiological sings of opacification could be detected (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Anatomical variations in the frontoethmoidal area are very common. According to the IFAC criteria, in 43% of the patients, cells could be detected with pneumatization to or into the frontal sinus. The IFAC is structured more clearly compared to previous classifications due to the anatomical aspect. It represents the most consistent classification regarding surgical planning. Further studies will demonstrate the scientific and clinical value of this classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wormald P-J, Hoseman W, Callejas C, Weber RK, Kennedy DW, Citardi MJ et al (2016) The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and Classification of the Extent of Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery (EFSS). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:677–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stammberger H, Hosemann W, Draf W (1997) Anatomische terminologie und nomenklatur für die nasennebenhöhlenchirurgie. Laryngorhinootologie 76:435–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wormald PJ, Chan SZX (2003) Surgical techniques for the removal of frontal recess cells obstructing the frontal ostium. Am J Rhinol 17(4):221–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Alyea O (1941) Frontal cells: an anatomic study of these cells with consideration of their clinical significance. Arch Otolaryngol 34:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Fokkens WJ, Beale T, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Eloy P et al (2014) European position paper on the anatomical terminology of the internal nose and paranasal sinuses. Rhinol Suppl 24:1–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhn FA (1996) Chronic frontal sinusitis: the endoscopic frontalrecess approach. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 7:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee WT, Kuhn FA, Citardi MJ (2004) 3D computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy in patients without frontal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(3):164–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pianta L, Ferrari M, Schreiber A, Mattavelli D, Lancini D, Bottazzoli M et al (2016) Agger-bullar classification (ABC) of the frontal sinus drainage pathway: validation in a preclinical setting. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:981–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keros P (1962) Über die praktische Bedeutung der Niveauunterschiede der Lamina cribrosa des Ethmoids. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 41:808–813

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lund V, Kennedy D (1997) Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117(3):S35–S40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lien CF, Weng HH, Chang YC, Lin YC, Wang WH (2010) Computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy and its effect on the development of frontal sinusitis. Laryngoscope 120(12):2521–2527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park SS, Yoon BN, Cho KS, Roh HJ (2010) Pneumatization pattern of the frontal recess: relationship of the anterior-to-posterior length of frontal isthmus and/or frontal recess with the volume of agger nasi cell. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 3(2):76–83

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubota K, Takeno S, Hirakawa K (2015) Frontal recess anatomy in Japanese subjects and its effect on the development of frontal sinusitis: computed tomography analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 44(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang L, Han D, Ge W, Tao J, Wang X, Li Y (2007) Computed tomographic and endoscopic analysis of supraorbital ethmoid cells. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:562–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gu N (2017) Computed tomographic analysis : the effects of frontal recess morphology and the presence of anatomical variations on frontal sinus pneumatization. J Craniofac Surg 28(1):256–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leunig A, Betz CS, Sommer B, Sommer F (2008) Anatomische varianten der nasennebenhöhlen; multiplanare CT-analyse an 641 patienten. Laryngorhinootologie 87(7):482–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leunig A, Sommer B, Betz CS, Sommer F (2008) Surgical anatomy of the frontal recess—is there a benefit in multiplanar CT-reconstruction? Rhinology 46(3):188–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Sommer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No one of the above-mentioned authors has a conflict of interest regarding this publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sommer, F., Hoffmann, T.K., Harter, L. et al. Incidence of anatomical variations according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and their coincidence with radiological sings of opacification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 3139–3146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05612-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05612-4

Keywords

Navigation