Abstract
Background
The endonasal access to the frontal recess and sinus may be complicated by a variety of anatomical variations. Previous classifications of these variants were characterized by proper names or position information without anatomical reference. The IFAC is intended to simplify the classification of anatomical variations of the frontoethmoidal complex. The aim of this study was to analyse a representative number of sinus CT scans to assess the incidence of anatomical variations according to the IFAC and to compare the results with previous classifications. In addition, the coincidence of complex anatomical variations and radiological sings of opacification was investigated.
Methodology/principal
Two hundred and forty-nine sinus CT scans were analysed in multiplanar reconstructions. Exclusion criteria were previous operations on the paranasal sinuses, malignant diseases, and an insufficient image quality. All anatomical variants were analysed according to the IFAC criteria. In addition, the coincidence of radiological sings of opacification and the presence of anatomical variations of the frontal recess and sinus were investigated.
Results
The analysis revealed Agger nasi cells in 95% of the CT scans. Supra agger cells (SACs) were detected in 49% and Supra agger frontal cells (SAFCs) in 25% of the data sets. Suprabulla cells (SBCs) were detected in 89% and Supra bulla frontal cells (SBFCs) in 27% of the scans. Supraorbital ethmoid cells (SECs) were detectable in 9% and interfrontal septal cells in 28% of the scans. Despite a partially strong narrowing of the frontal recess, no increased occurrence of radiological sings of opacification could be detected (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
Anatomical variations in the frontoethmoidal area are very common. According to the IFAC criteria, in 43% of the patients, cells could be detected with pneumatization to or into the frontal sinus. The IFAC is structured more clearly compared to previous classifications due to the anatomical aspect. It represents the most consistent classification regarding surgical planning. Further studies will demonstrate the scientific and clinical value of this classification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wormald P-J, Hoseman W, Callejas C, Weber RK, Kennedy DW, Citardi MJ et al (2016) The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and Classification of the Extent of Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery (EFSS). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:677–696
Stammberger H, Hosemann W, Draf W (1997) Anatomische terminologie und nomenklatur für die nasennebenhöhlenchirurgie. Laryngorhinootologie 76:435–449
Wormald PJ, Chan SZX (2003) Surgical techniques for the removal of frontal recess cells obstructing the frontal ostium. Am J Rhinol 17(4):221–226
van Alyea O (1941) Frontal cells: an anatomic study of these cells with consideration of their clinical significance. Arch Otolaryngol 34:11–23
Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Fokkens WJ, Beale T, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Eloy P et al (2014) European position paper on the anatomical terminology of the internal nose and paranasal sinuses. Rhinol Suppl 24:1–34
Kuhn FA (1996) Chronic frontal sinusitis: the endoscopic frontalrecess approach. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 7:222–229
Lee WT, Kuhn FA, Citardi MJ (2004) 3D computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy in patients without frontal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(3):164–173
Pianta L, Ferrari M, Schreiber A, Mattavelli D, Lancini D, Bottazzoli M et al (2016) Agger-bullar classification (ABC) of the frontal sinus drainage pathway: validation in a preclinical setting. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:981–989
Keros P (1962) Über die praktische Bedeutung der Niveauunterschiede der Lamina cribrosa des Ethmoids. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 41:808–813
Lund V, Kennedy D (1997) Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117(3):S35–S40
Lien CF, Weng HH, Chang YC, Lin YC, Wang WH (2010) Computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy and its effect on the development of frontal sinusitis. Laryngoscope 120(12):2521–2527
Park SS, Yoon BN, Cho KS, Roh HJ (2010) Pneumatization pattern of the frontal recess: relationship of the anterior-to-posterior length of frontal isthmus and/or frontal recess with the volume of agger nasi cell. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 3(2):76–83
Kubota K, Takeno S, Hirakawa K (2015) Frontal recess anatomy in Japanese subjects and its effect on the development of frontal sinusitis: computed tomography analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 44(1):1–6
Zhang L, Han D, Ge W, Tao J, Wang X, Li Y (2007) Computed tomographic and endoscopic analysis of supraorbital ethmoid cells. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:562–568
Gu N (2017) Computed tomographic analysis : the effects of frontal recess morphology and the presence of anatomical variations on frontal sinus pneumatization. J Craniofac Surg 28(1):256–261
Leunig A, Betz CS, Sommer B, Sommer F (2008) Anatomische varianten der nasennebenhöhlen; multiplanare CT-analyse an 641 patienten. Laryngorhinootologie 87(7):482–489
Leunig A, Sommer B, Betz CS, Sommer F (2008) Surgical anatomy of the frontal recess—is there a benefit in multiplanar CT-reconstruction? Rhinology 46(3):188–194
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No one of the above-mentioned authors has a conflict of interest regarding this publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sommer, F., Hoffmann, T.K., Harter, L. et al. Incidence of anatomical variations according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and their coincidence with radiological sings of opacification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 3139–3146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05612-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05612-4