Skip to main content
Log in

Awareness and daily practices of family physicians and trainees towards laryngopharyngeal reflux

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a type of reflux, seen with complaints of hoarseness, chronic cough, and globus sensation, different from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the awareness, knowledge, and practices of family physicians and trainees who were being trained in medical branches other than ENT and to determine the effective factors on decision making for diagnosis of this disorder. The study was designed as a two-stage study. At the first stage, a data collection tool, involving 29 questions by which the knowledge, awareness, and applications of the physicians about LPR would be determined, was developed with 12 specialists, using Delphi method. At the second stage, 101 family physicians replied the questionnaire online. For 45 trainees other than ENT, the questionnaire was filled face-to-face by one of the investigators. In patients admitted with complaints of hoarseness, lasting longer than 2 weeks, cough, lasting longer than 3 weeks, and globus sensation, the physicians considered LPR as the preliminary diagnosis with rates of 88.4, 82.2, and 62.8 %, respectively. 87.0 % of physicians, participating in the study, started treatment for reflux empirically in patients having complaints of hoarseness, chronic cough, and globus sensation; however, only 29.0 % of physicians prescribed this treatment for periods of 3 or 6 months. 69.9 % of physicians, participating in the study, made a diagnosis of reflux in general during their daily practices; only 6.9 % made the discrimination between LPR and GERD. Of all physicians, 27.9 % prescribed double-dose PPI or H2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karkos PD, Thomas L, Temple RH et al (2005) Awareness of general practitioners towards treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a British survey. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:505–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2002) Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice 16(2):274–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koufman JA (1991) The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope 101(53):1–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamani Tawakir, Penney Susannah, Mitra Indu et al (2012) The prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in the English population. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:2219–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Printza A, Kyrgidis A, Oikonomidou E et al (2011) Assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms with the Reflux Symptom Index: validation and prevalence in the Greek population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145(6):974–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR et al (2002) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Med Surg 127:32–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gooi Z, Ishman SL, Bock JM et al (2014) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: paradigms for evaluation, diagnosis and treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 123(10):677–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson M (2009) Considering the implication of variations within Delphi research. Fam Pract 26:420–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP (2001) A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 38:195–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davids T, Sommer DD, Armstrong D (2008) Survey of current perspectives on laryngopharyngeal reflux among Canadian otolaryngologists. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37(2):196–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruiz R, Jeswani S, Andrews K et al (2014) Hoarseness and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a survey of primary care physician practice patterns. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(3):192–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chorti MS, Prokopakis EP, Lahanas VA et al (2013) Knowledge of primary care doctors about laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. B-ENT 9(1):53–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Turley R, Cohen S (2010) Primary care approach to dysphonia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142(3):310–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Book DT, Rhee JS, Toohill RJ et al (2002) Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: an international survey. Laryngoscope 112(8 Pt 1):1399–1406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rafii B, Taliercio S, Achlatis S et al (2014) Incidence of underlying laryngeal pathology in patients initially diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope 124(6):1420–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Feierabend RH, Shahram MN (2009) Hoarseness in adults. Am Fam Phys 80(4):363–370

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ford CN (2005) Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA 294(12):1534–1540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vaezi MF (2005) Atypical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Gen Med 7(4):25

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fraser AG, Morton RP, Gillibrand J (2000) Presumed laryngo-pharyngeal reflux: investigate or treat? J Laryngol Otol 114(6):441–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosen CA, Anderson D, Murry T (1998) Evaluating hoarseness: keeping your patient’s voice healthy. Am Fam Phys 57(11):2775–2782

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the specialists; Adil Coskun, Emel Ceylan, Guzel Discigil, Cisen Eryigit, Sule Tas Gulen, Funda Goksoy, Can Ozbay, Mustafa Sahin and Yavuz Tokgoz who contributed to the first round.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aylin Eryilmaz.

Ethics declarations

Source of funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed on human participants were by the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eryilmaz, A., Basal, Y., Gunel, C. et al. Awareness and daily practices of family physicians and trainees towards laryngopharyngeal reflux. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 4377–4384 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4180-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4180-5

Keywords

Navigation