Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of subspecialty training on management of laryngopharyngeal reflux: results of a worldwide survey

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To study the management of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) among the subspecialties of practicing otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons and their trainees.

Methods

A survey was sent to over 8000 otolaryngologists (OTOHNS) over 65 countries, utilizing membership lists of participating otolaryngological societies. The outcomes were answers to questions regarding LPR knowledge and practice patterns, and included queries about its definition, prevalence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.

Results

Of the 824 respondents, 658 practiced in one specific otolaryngologic subspecialty. The symptoms and findings thought to be the most related to LPR varied significantly between subspecialists. Extra-laryngeal findings were considered less by laryngologists while more experienced OTOHNS did not often consider digestive complaints. Compared with colleagues, otologists, rhinologists and laryngologists were less aware of the involvement of LPR in otological, rhinological and laryngological disorders, respectively. Irrespective of subspecialty, OTOHNS consider symptoms and signs and a positive response to empirical therapeutic trial to establish a LPR diagnosis. Awareness regarding the usefulness of impedance pH-studies is low in all groups. The therapeutic approach significantly varies between groups, although all were in agreement for the treatment duration. The management of non-responder patients demonstrated significant differences among laryngologists who performed additional examinations. The majority of participants (37.1%) admitted to being less than knowledgeable about LPR management.

Conclusions

LPR knowledge and management vary significantly across otolaryngology subspecialties. International guidelines on LPR management appear necessary to improve knowledge and management of LPR across all subspecialties of otolaryngology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lechien JR, Akst LM, Hamdan AL et al (2019) Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: state of the art review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 160(5):762–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819827488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamani T, Penney S, Mitra I, Pothula V (2012) The prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in the English population. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(10):2219–2225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2028-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M (2000) Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):385–388. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2000.109935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lechien JR, Saussez S, Nacci A et al (2019) Association between laryngopharyngeal reflux and benign vocal folds lesions: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 129(9):E329–E341. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lechien JR, Akst LM, Saussez S, Crevier-Buchman L, Hans S, Barillari MR, Calvo-Henriquez C, Bock JM, Carroll TL (2020) Involvement of laryngopharyngeal reflux in select nonfunctional laryngeal diseases: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820933209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coca-Pelaz A, Rodrigo JP, Takes RP et al (2013) Relationship between reflux and laryngeal cancer. Head Neck 35(12):1814–1818. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lechien JR, Calvo-Henriquez C, Chiesa-Estomba CM et al (2020) Reflux and dental disorders in the pediatric population: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 136:110166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ren JJ, Zhao Y, Wang J, Ren X, Xu Y, Tang W, He Z (2017) PepsinA as a marker of laryngopharyngeal reflux detected in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 156(5):893–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817697055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdel-aziz MM, El-Fattah AMA, Abdalla AF (2013) Clinical evaluation of pepsin for laryngopharyngeal reflux in children with otitis media with effusion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 77(10):1765–1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.08.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sone M, Katayama N, Kato T, Izawa K, Wada M, Hamajima N, Nakashima T (2012) Prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms: comparison between health checkup examinees and patients with otitis media. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146(4):562–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811434049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V et al (2019) Gastroesophageal reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: clinical features and therapeutic response. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JS, Jung AR, Park JM, Park MJ, Lee YC, Eun YG (2018) Comparison of characteristics according to reflux type in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 11(2):141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lechien JR, Allen J, Mouawad F et al (2020) Do laryngologists and general otolaryngologists manage laryngopharyngeal reflux differently? Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28484

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lechien JR, Bobin F, Muls V et al (2020) Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom score. Laryngoscope 130(3):E98–E107. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DelGaudio JM, Naseri I, Wise JC (2008) Proximal pharyngeal reflux correlates with increasing severity of lingual tonsil hypertrophy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(4):473–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.12.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kislig K, Wilder-Smith CH, Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Seemann R (2013) Halitosis and tongue coating in patients with erosive gastroesophageal refluxdisease versus nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Oral Investig 17(1):159–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0705-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lechien JR, Rodriguez Ruiz A, Dequanter D et al (2020) Validity and reliability of the reflux sign assessment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 129(4):313–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419888947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Saab F, Manoukian JJ, Al-Sabah B et al (2008) Linking laryngopharyngeal reflux to otitis media with effusion: pepsinogen study of adenoid tissue and middle ear fluid. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37(4):565–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Reilly RC, Soundar S, Tonb D et al (2015) The role of gastric pepsin in the inflammatory cascade of pediatric otitismedia. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(4):350–357. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.3581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo HN, Yang QM, Sheng Y et al (2014) Role of pepsin and pepsinogen: linking laryngopharyngeal reflux with otitismedia with effusion in children. Laryngoscope 124(7):E294-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miura MS, Mascaro M, Rosenfeld RM (2012) Association between otitis media and gastroesophageal reflux: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146(3):345–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811430809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klimara MJ, Johnston N, Samuels TL, Visotcky AM, Poetker DM, Loehrl TA, Blumin JH, Bock JM (2020) Correlation of salivary and nasal lavage pepsin with MII-pH testing. Laryngoscope 130(4):961–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28182 (Epub 2019 Jul 22)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cumpston EC, Blumin JH, Bock JM (2016) Dual pH with multichannel intraluminal impedance testing in the evaluation of subjective laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 155(6):1014–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816665819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lechien JR, Carroll TL, Saussez S (2020) How could technology revolutionize the management of laryngopharyngeal reflux? J Voice S0892–1997(20):30068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Park W, Hicks DM, Khandwala F, Richter JE, Abelson TI, Milstein C, Vaezi MF (2005) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: prospective cohort study evaluating optimal dose of proton-pump inhibitor therapy and pretherapy predictors of response. Laryngoscope 115(7):1230–1238. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLG.0000163746.81766.45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carroll TL, Werner A, Nahikian K, Dezube A, Roth DF (2017) Rethinking the laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment algorithm: evaluating an alternate empiric dosing regimen and considering up-front, pH-impedance, and manometry testing to minimize cost in treating suspect laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Laryngoscope 127(Suppl 6):S1–S13. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Savarino E, Marabotto E, Bodini G, Pellegatta G, Coppo C, Giambruno E, Brunacci M, Zentilin P, Savarino V (2017) Epidemiology and natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 63(3):175–183. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1121-421X.17.02383-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pisegna JM, Yang S, Purcell A, Rubio A (2017) A mixed-methods study of patient views on reflux symptoms and medication routines. J Voice 31(3):381.e15-381.e25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lechien JR, Muls V, Dapri G et al (2019) The management of suspected or confirmed laryngopharyngeal reflux patients with recalcitrant symptoms: a contemporary review. Clin Otolaryngol 44(5):784–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E et al (2018) Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut 67(7):1351–1362. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The YO-IFOS Staff and all persons that had spread the survey. All scientific societies that contributed to spread the survey.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome R. Lechien.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

IRB approved the study protocol (CHUB2020-12).

Informed consent

Electronic informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lechien, J.R., Carroll, T.L., Allen, J.E. et al. Impact of subspecialty training on management of laryngopharyngeal reflux: results of a worldwide survey. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 1933–1943 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06710-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06710-y

Keywords

Navigation