Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility and safety of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for early hypopharyngeal cancer: a subset analysis of the Hamburg University TORS-trial

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past 5 years, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has become well established as one of the standard treatment options for T1 and T2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Besides this main indication, TORS can provide with improved access to other subsites of the upper aerodigestive tract as well, such as the supraglottic larynx and the hypopharynx, with superior visibility and maneuverability to that of transoral laser microsurgery (TOLM). Since September 2011, over one hundred TORS procedures have been performed at our institution, predominantly for oropharyngeal cancer. As part of our first 50 transoral robotic cases making up our initial TORS-trial, five patients underwent TORS for early hypopharyngeal carcinoma. The present case series evaluates its feasibility, safety and the completeness of resection in this well-defined subgroup of patients. Main outcome measures were completeness of resection, the presence or lack of postoperative bleeding, number of days intubated, rate of elective tracheotomy, duration of intensive care and/or intermediate care, speech and swallowing function, and duration of nasogastric and/or gastrostomy tube dependency. All patients have been free of recurrence to date. One patient died of other disease. Four patients are alive and free of tumour, three of them did not need adjuvant therapy. Transoral robotic surgery with appropriate neck dissection is a valid primary treatment option for select early hypopharyngeal carcinoma, especially in cases that did not require adjuvant treatment. In contrast to TOLM, TORS allows a multi-planar en bloc resection in the hypopharynx which makes histopathological evaluation more reliable. In addition to this, its faster learning curve makes the results less dependent on the individual surgeons’ capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW (2012) TransOral robotic surgery (TORS). Plural Pub, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  2. O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG (2006) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 116:1465–1472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lörincz BB, Möckelmann N, Busch CJ, Knecht R (2014) Functional outcomes, feasibility, and safety of resection of transoral robotic surgery: single-institution series of 35 consecutive cases of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. doi:10.1002/hed.23809

  4. Lorincz BB, Laban S, Knecht R (2013) The development of TORS in Europe. HNO 61:294–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hans S, Badoual C, Gorphe P, Brasnu D (2012) Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:1979–1984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Snyder W, Hockstein NG (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116:19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mendelsohn AH, Remacle M, Van Der Vorst S, Bachy V, Lawson G (2013) Outcomes following transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 123:208–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kofler B, Laban S, Busch CJ, Lorincz B, Knecht R (2014) New treatment strategies for HPV-positive head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271(7):1861–1867. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2603-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Magnuson JS et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope 122:1701–1707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Remacle M, Matar N, Lawson G, Bachy V (2011) Laryngeal advanced retractor system: a new retractor for transoral robotic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:694–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hockstein NG, O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS (2006) Assessment of intraoperative safety in transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope 116:165–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chi JJ, Mandel JE, Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr (2010) Anesthetic considerations for transoral robotic surgery. Anesthesiol Clin 28:411–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawson G, Matar N, Remacle M, Jamart J, Bachy V (2011) Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck tumors: learning curve. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1795–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawson G, Mendelsohn AH, Van Der Vorst S, Bachy V, Remacle M (2013) Transoral robotic surgery total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 123:193–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Genden EM, O’Malley BW Jr, Weinstein GS et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: role in the management of upper aerodigestive tract tumors. Head Neck 34:886–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hockstein NG, Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr (2005) Maintenance of hemostasis in transoral robotic surgery. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 67:220–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sinclair CF, McColloch NL, Carroll WR, Rosenthal EL, Desmond RA, Magnuson JS (2011) Patient-perceived and objective functional outcomes following transoral robotic surgery for early oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:1112–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hans S, Jouffroy T, Veivers D et al (2013) Transoral robotic-assisted free flap reconstruction after radiation therapy in hypopharyngeal carcinoma: report of two cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:2359–2364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Richmon JD, Quon H, Gourin CG (2014) The effect of transoral robotic surgery on short-term outcomes and cost of care after oropharyngeal cancer surgery. Laryngoscope 124:165–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dziegielewski PT, Teknos TN, Durmus K et al (2013) Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: long-term quality of life and functional outcomes. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:1099–1108

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Iseli TA, Kulbersh BD, Iseli CE, Carroll WR, Rosenthal EL, Magnuson JS (2009) Functional outcomes after transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:166–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park YM, Kim WS, De Virgilio A, Lee SY, Seol JH, Kim SH (2012) Transoral robotic surgery for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: 3-year oncologic and functional analysis. Oral Oncol 48:560–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Quon H, Richmon JD (2012) Treatment deintensification strategies for HPV-associated head and neck carcinomas. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45:845–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. More YI, Tsue TT, Girod DA et al (2013) Functional swallowing outcomes following transoral robotic surgery vs primary chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced-stage oropharynx and supraglottis cancers. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:43–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen NP, Moltz CC, Frank C et al (2004) Dysphagia following chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol 15:383–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainald Knecht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lörincz, B.B., Busch, CJ., Möckelmann, N. et al. Feasibility and safety of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for early hypopharyngeal cancer: a subset analysis of the Hamburg University TORS-trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 2993–2998 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3259-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3259-0

Keywords

Navigation