Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Altered patient perceptions and preferences regarding male and female gynecologists: a comparison between 1997 and 2018

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this investigation was to explore changes in patient preference regarding gynecologist’s gender.

Methods

Using a standardized questionnaire, distributed in 1997 and 2018, a total of 1000 women were interviewed about preferences in terms of their choice of gynecologist and perceptions regarding gender-dependency of gynecologist’s qualifications, strengths and weaknesses. Data was correlated with sociodemographics and possible influencing factors.

Results

Based on their own experience, an increasing majority did not express a preference for their gynecologist’s gender (58–71%). However, the minority that still favors one gender demonstrated a significant decrease in preference of male gynecologists (14–5%), while about a quarter still generally prefer treatment by female physicians. Sub-analyses of emotional and technical treatment aspects generally confirm these trends in that more of today’s patients are indifferent to their gynecologist’s sex and that the remaining minority shifts towards favoring female doctors. If asked to definitely choose between female and male physicians based solely on the aspect of trust a significant change can be noted (69–30%) in favor of female doctors in 2018 as opposed to 1997 when patients were split in this regard (52%/48%). Overall bad personal experience regarding gynecological treatment has significantly decreased (36% reduction).

Conclusion

Over the last decades, patient preference and perception of the importance of their gynecologist’s gender has changed. While an increasing majority attributes equal competence in emotional, professional and interpersonal aspects to both genders, the remaining proportion of patients demonstrates a significant shift towards favoring female doctors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DGGG:

German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

gyn.:

Gynecological

RG:

Respective gender

m:

Male

f:

Female

UHW:

University Hospital Würzburg

UMM:

University Medical Centre Mannheim

References

  1. Lukesch B (2015) Frauenärzte—Plötzlich ein Exot. DIE ZEIT vol Nr. 3/2015, 15.01.2015 edn. https://www.zeit.de/2015/03/gynaekologie-schweiz-frauen-aerzte/komplettansicht

  2. Bundesärztekammer (2017) Census of medical professionals in Germany 2017. https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/ueber-uns/aerztestatistik/aerztestatistik-2017/. Accessed 6 Sep 2019

  3. Say RE, Thomson R (2003) The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions—challenges for doctors. BMJ 327(7414):542–545. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.542

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Holmes-Rovner M, Barry M, Jones J (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ 319(7212):731–734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Robinson MB, Lilleyman J, MacIntosh M, Maule AJ, Michie S, Pearman AD (1999) Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 3(1):1–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ballinger TJ, Kassem N, Shen F, Jiang G, Smith ML, Railey E, Howell J, White CB, Schneider BP (2017) Discerning the clinical relevance of biomarkers in early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164(1):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4238-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Preston-Whyte ME, Fraser RC, Beckett JL (1983) Effect of a principal's gender on consultation patterns. J R Coll General Pract 33(255):654–658

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly JM (1980) Sex preference in patient selection of a family physician. J Family Pract 11(3):427–433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Young JW (1979) Symptom disclosure to male and female physicians: effects of sex, physical attractiveness, and symptom type. J Behav Med 2(2):159–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heaton CJ, Marquez JT (1990) Patient preferences for physician gender in the male genital/rectal exam. Family Pract Res J 10(2):105–115

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Amir H, Tibi Y, Groutz A, Amit A, Azem F (2012) Unpredicted gender preference of obstetricians and gynecologists by Muslim Israeli-Arab women. Patient Educ Couns 86(2):259–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Amir H, Gophen R, Amir Levy Y, Hasson J, Gordon D, Amit A, Azem F (2015) Obstetricians and gynecologists: which characteristics do Israeli lesbians prefer? J Obstet Gynaecol Res 41(2):283–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amer-Alshiek J, Alshiek T, Amir Levy Y, Azem F, Amit A, Amir H (2015) Israeli Druze women’s sex preferences when choosing obstetricians and gynecologists. Israel J Health Policy Res 4:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-015-0013-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Janssen SM, Lagro-Janssen AL (2012) Physician’s gender, communication style, patient preferences and patient satisfaction in gynecology and obstetrics: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 89(2):221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Makam A, Mallappa Saroja CS, Edwards G (2010) Do women seeking care from obstetrician-gynaecologists prefer to see a female or a male doctor? Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(3):443–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1199-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lund JD, Rohrer JE, Goldfarb S (2005) Patient gender preferences in a large military teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):747–750. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000156297.25395.e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson AM, Schnatz PF, Kelsey AM, Ohannessian CM (2005) Do women prefer care from female or male obstetrician-gynecologists? A study of patient gender preference. J Am Osteopath Assoc 105(8):369–379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher WA, Bryan A, Dervaitis KL, Silcox J, Kohn H (2002) It ain't necessarily so: most women do not strongly prefer female obstetrician-gynaecologists. J Obstetr Gynaecol Canada 24(11):885–888

  19. Howell EA, Gardiner B, Concato J (2002) Do women prefer female obstetricians? Obstet Gynecol 99(6):1031–1035

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma RR, Sharma NP (2015) Opening the gender diversity black box: causality of perceived gender equity and locus of control and mediation of work engagement in employee well-being. Front Psychol 6:1371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01371

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer M, Cimpian A, Leslie SJ (2015) Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance. Front Psychol 6:235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00235

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hardacre SL, Subasic E (2018) Whose issue is it anyway? The effects of leader gender and equality message framing on men's and women's mobilization toward workplace gender equality. Front Psychol 9:2497. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02497

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. van den Brink-Muinen A, de Bakker DH, Bensing JM (1994) Consultations for women's health problems: factors influencing women's choice of sex of general practitioner. Br J Gen Pract 44(382):205–210

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Patton DD, Bodtke S, Horner RD (1990) Patient perceptions of the need for chaperones during pelvic exams. Fam Med 22(3):215–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haar E, Halitsky V, Stricker G (1975) Factors related to the preference for a female gynecologist. Med Care 13(9):782–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fennema K, Meyer DL, Owen N (1990) Sex of physician: patients' preferences and stereotypes. J Family Pract 30(4):441–446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hall JA, Irish JT, Roter DL, Ehrlich CM, Miller LH (1994) Gender in medical encounters: an analysis of physician and patient communication in a primary care setting. Health Psychol 13(5):384–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany

    Saskia Spaich & Marc Sütterlin

  2. Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany

    Christel Weiss

Authors
  1. Saskia Spaich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christel Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc Sütterlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SS: project development, data collection, data management, data analysis, provision of study patients, Manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript. CW: data analysis, final approval of manuscript. MS: data collection, project development, data analysis, administrative support, provision of study patients, final approval of manuscript, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saskia Spaich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The ethical approval for this study was obtained through Ethics Committee II, Heidelberg University, Medical Faculty Mannheim (2018-572N-MA).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spaich, S., Weiss, C. & Sütterlin, M. Altered patient perceptions and preferences regarding male and female gynecologists: a comparison between 1997 and 2018. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300, 1331–1341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05315-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05315-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation