Skip to main content
Log in

The dynamic changes of vaginal microecosystem in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a retrospective study of 800 patients

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Vaginal microecological environment is an important factor of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC). This study was undertaken to investigate dynamic changes of vaginal microecosystem in patients with RVVC.

Methods

Four hundred patients with VVC and 400 healthy women of reproductive age who admitted to the hospital from January 2012 to December 2013 were evaluated retrospectively. Vaginal microecological factors were evaluated before and after treatment until no recurrence, including vaginal cleanliness, white blood cells, Lactobacillus, Lactobacillus classification, bacteria density, flora diversity, Nugent scores, etc. The grouping was done according to the recurrence of the disease. Every time after treatment, the relapsing patients were defined as case group and the cured patients without recurrence were defined as control group. The differences in the results between the case and the control groups were analyzed by t test.

Results

With the development of RVVC, the ages of all case groups were lower than the corresponding control groups. In different stages of the disease, the bacteria density of the case groups and their corresponding control groups had no significant difference (P > 0.05). Most of the microecological indicators of the first occurring group were significantly different (P < 0.05) from that of the control group. In the recurrence groups, only a few indicators were significantly different from the control groups. The values of all vaginal microecological indicators (except Lactobacillus) of all case groups were higher than that of the control groups. The values of Lactobacillus of all RVVC case groups were lower than that of the RVVC control groups.

Conclusions

There were vaginal microecological imbalances in all developing stages of RVVC. As for vaginal flora, diverse sorts changed to normal Lactobacillus dominantly with the development of RVVC. In the first occurrence of RVVC, after antifungal treatment, Lactobacillus is suggested to be timely supplemented to restore vaginal microecological balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BV:

Bacterial vaginosis

RVVC:

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis

VVC:

Vulvovaginal candidiasis

OML:

Oil immersion lens

HPL:

High-power lens

H2O2 :

Hydrogen peroxide

WBC:

White blood cells

WCSUH:

West China Second University Hospital

References

  1. Buchta V, Spaček J (2011) Pitfalls of the current laboratory diagnosis and treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek 17:158–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sobel JD, Wiesenfeld HC, Martens M, Danna P, Hooton TM, Rompalo A et al (2004) Maintenance fluconazole therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. N Engl J Med 351:876–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barousse MM, Espinosa T, Dunlap K, Fidel PL (2005) Vaginal epithelial cell anti-Candida albicans activity is associated with protection against symptomatic vaginal candidiasis. Infect Immun 73:7765–7767

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fidel PL (2007) History and update on host defense against vaginal candidiasis. Am J Reprod Immunol 57:2–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raška M, Běláková J, Křupka M, Weigl E (2007) Candidiasis—do we need to fight or to tolerate the Candida fungus? Folia Microbiol (Praha) 52:297–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santoni G, Boccanera M, Adriani D, Lucciarini R, Amantini C, Morrone S et al (2002) Immune cell-mediated protection against vaginal candidiasis: evidence for a major role of vaginal CD4+ T cells and possible participation of other local lymphocyte effectors. Infect Immun 70:4791–4797

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Z, Wang X, Liao Q (2009) Investigate the pathogen flora and the treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Pract Obstet Gynecol 12:013

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosa MI, Silva BR, Pires PS, Silva FR, Silva NC, Souza SL et al (2013) Weekly fluconazole therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 167:132–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Richter SS, Galask RP, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA (2005) Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida species causing vulvovaginitis and epidemiology of recurrent cases. J Clin Microbiol 43:2155–2162

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donders G (1999) Microscopy of the bacterial flora on fresh vaginal smears. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 7:177

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kovachev S (2010) Vaginal ecosystem. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 50:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borges S, Silva J, Teixeira P (2014) The role of Lactobacilli and probiotics in maintaining vaginal health. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:479–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mikić AN, Stojic S (2015) Study results on the use of different therapies for the treatment of vaginitis in hospitalised pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3638-9

  14. Kovachev SM, Vatcheva-Dobrevska RS (2015) Local probiotic therapy for vaginal Candida albicans infections. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 7:38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Osset J, Garcia E, Bartolome R, Andreu A (2001) Role of Lactobacillus as protector against vaginal candidiasis. Med Clin (Barc) 117:285–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Myziuk L, Romanowski B, Johnson SC (2003) BVBlue test for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 41:1925–1928

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier S (1991) Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 29:297–301

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ünlü C, Donders G (2011) Use of Lactobacilli and estriol combination in the treatment of disturbed vaginal ecosystem: a review. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 12:239

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan S, Liao Q, Liu X, Liu Z, Zhang D (2008) Vaginal allergic response in women with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 101:27–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Egan ME, Lipsky MS (2000) Diagnosis of vaginitis. Am Fam Physician 62:1095–1104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Falagas ME, Betsi GI, Athanasiou S (2006) Probiotics for prevention of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a review. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:266–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the staffs of the Department of Laboratory Medicine and the doctors of the outpatient department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, China. This work was funded by the Support Program of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province, China (2013SZ0037).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengqiang Hu.

Additional information

X. Yue and P. Chen contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yue, Xa., Chen, P., Tang, Y. et al. The dynamic changes of vaginal microecosystem in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a retrospective study of 800 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 1285–1294 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3774-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3774-2

Keywords

Navigation