Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hip resurfacing: case closed? A bibliometric analysis of the past 10 years

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Hip resurfacing (HR) was introduced as a potential alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA), indicated predominantly for younger, high demand patients. The modern metal-on-metal implant was popularized in the 1990s and early 2000s and promised greater wear resistance. However, its popularity waned due to increased rates of complications related to metal toxicity including pseudo-tumors as well as the recall of many resurfacing implants. The purpose of this study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis and investigate the current trends in hip resurfacing literature.

Methods

Using the keywords “hip resurfacing,” publications between 2012 and 2022 were identified on Web of Science Core Collection of Clarivate Analytics. Results were screened for relevance by three independent reviewers using title, abstract, and full text. The retrieved data were evaluated by the bibliometric method. Included articles were imported into CiteSpace 5.7.R1, 64-bit (Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA), VOSviewer 1.6.15 (Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands), and the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology to identify trends in publication.

Results

Search terms yielded 1200 results and 724 were included in final analysis. A steady decrease of publications was noted over the past decade with less than 40 articles published in 2020 and 2021. The Journal of Hip Arthroplasty (92), Hip International (74), and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (54) published the most articles. Authors from the United States and the United Kingdom published the most studies. High-frequency keywords in co-occurrence and co-cited cluster analysis were metal-on-metal, metal ions, wear, pseudo-tumor, and revision, demonstrating that long-term concerns have been the focus of most recent studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our bibliometric analysis allowed novel exploration and identification of the current research trends, contributions, and the distribution of publications exploring HR. The understanding of HR and the poor long-term outcomes of some resurfacing implants has improved significantly over the past decade, with the most recent focus on failure rates and long-term complications from metal debris. However, the breadth of literature has steadily declined in the past decade, and ultimately demonstrates the decline of scientific interest and focus on novel areas in hip resurfacing and a potential reached consensus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clough EJ, Clough TM (2020) Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: where are we now? J Orthop 23:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans JT, Evans JP, Walker RW, Blom AW, Whitehouse MR, Sayers A (2019) How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet 393(10172):647–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31665-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF (2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84(2):171–177. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200202000-00002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaillard-Campbell MD, Fowble C, Webb L, Gross TP (2021) Hip resurfacing as an outpatient procedure: a comparison of overall cost and review of safety. Musculoskelet Surg 105(1):111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-020-00637-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall DA, Pykerman K, Werle J et al (2014) Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(7):2217–2230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3556-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Morse KW, Premkumar A, Zhu A, Morgenstern R, Su EP (2021) Return to sport after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop J Sports Med 9(5):23259671211003520. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211003521

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Martinot P, Dartus J, Putman S, Girard J (2020) Return to work after hip resurfacing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(8):1507–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Girard J (2017) Hip resurfacing: international perspectives: review article. HSS J 13(1):7–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Girard J, Lons A, Pommepuy T, Isida R, Benad K, Putman S (2017) High-impact sport after hip resurfacing: the Ironman triathlon. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(5):675–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ben-Shlomo Y, Blom A, Boulton C et al (2020) The National Joint Registry 17th Annual Report 2020. Outcomes after hip replacement. National Joint Registry, London, pp 43–117

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turner T, Connolly K (2022) Hip replacement. Drugwatch. https://www.drugwatch.com/hip-replacement/lawsuits/ (2012). Accessed 9 Aug 2022.

  12. Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Howard PW, Blom AW (2012) National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 380(9855):1759–1766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Der Straeten C, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Calistri A, Campbell P, De Smet KA (2013) The 2012 Otto Aufranc award: the interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(2):377–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin AJ (2012) Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. J Bone Jt Surg Br 94(3):315–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks PJ (2016) Hip resurfacing: a large, US single-surgeon series. Bone Jt J 98-B(1_Supple_A):10–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sershon R, Balkissoon R, Valle CJD (2016) Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 9(1):84–92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cadossi M, Tedesco G, Sambri A, Mazzotti A, Giannini, (2015) Hip resurfacing implants. Orthopedics 38(8):504–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry 2020 Report (2020) AOAANJRR Sahmri. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020. Accessed 9 Aug 2022

  19. Ford MC, Hellman MD, Kazarian GS, Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Barrack RL (2018) Five to ten-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing implant in the US: a single institution’s experience. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100(21):1879–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Su EP, Ho H, Bhal V, Housman LR, Masonis JL, Noble JW Jr et al (2021) Results of the first US FDA-approved hip resurfacing device at 10-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 103(14):1303–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheatham SW (2013) Hip resurfacing. Top Geriatr Rehabilit 29(4):246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pailhé R, Sharma A, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Chiron P, Laffosse J-M (2012) Hip resurfacing: a systematic review of literature. Int Orthop 36(12):2399–2410

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Multani IS, Cunningham IKT, Walter WL (2020) My current indications for hip resurfacing. Ann Jt 5:14–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have no acknowledgment of grant support to disclose as no grants were provided for this study.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA

    Ronit V. Shah, Justin A. Ly & Matthew P. Lorei

  2. Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA

    Justin A. Magnuson

  3. Lewis Katz School of Medicine at, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA

    Megan Thompson

Authors
  1. Ronit V. Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Justin A. Ly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Justin A. Magnuson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Megan Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matthew P. Lorei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronit V. Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

IRB approval

Not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1992 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, R.V., Ly, J.A., Magnuson, J.A. et al. Hip resurfacing: case closed? A bibliometric analysis of the past 10 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 909–916 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05075-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05075-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation