Abstract
Introduction
In structural thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves, lowest instrumented vertebra is selected mostly as the lower end vertebra (LEV). To save more lumbar mobile segments, fusion may be stopped one level proximal. This study aimed to compare the radiologic and functional outcomes of Lenke type 3C and 6C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients according to distal fusion level.
Materials and methods
109 patients with Lenke 3C and 6C AIS, which had L4 as LEV and underwent posterior fusion were retrospectively evaluated. Lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was selected intraoperatively either as L3 or L4 depending on the disc alignment below LIV. In 49 patiens LIV was L3, while 60 patients were fused to L4. Two groups were compared according to radiologic and clinical outcomes preoperatively and two years postoperatively. Operation times were recorded.
Results
Preoperative values of both groups were similar. Regarding postoperative radiographic values, only LIV disc angle was different between groups, which was significantly higher in L3 group at two years follow-up. Coronal or sagittal imbalance was not observed. Surgical times and postoperative clinical outcomes were also similar.
Conclusions
In TL/L curves which have L4 as LEV, satisfactory results can be achieved with stopping the fusion at L3, if a proper disc alignment below LIV can be obtained intraoperatively. Higher amount of LIV disc angle in L3 group did not cause coronal and sagittal imbalance. Although clinical outcomes are similar with stopping at L3 or L4, fusion to L3 may be prefered to save one more mobile disc.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [HSY], upon reasonable request.
References
Trobisch PD, Ducoffe AR, Lonner BS, Errico TJ (2013) Choosing fusion levels in Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:519–528. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-519
Lee CS, Park KB, Hwang CJ, Cho JH, Lee DH, Park S (2022) Prediction of long-term postoperative results of disc wedge and vertebral tilt with intraoperative prone radiograph in posterior correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine J 22:463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.09.002
Jakkepally S, Viswanathan VK, Shetty AP, Hajare S, Kanna RM, Rajasekaran S (2022) The analysis of progression of disc degeneration in distal unfused segments and evaluation of long-term functional outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing long-segment instrumented fusion. Spine Deform 10:343–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00428-x
Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Buchowski JM, Daubs MD, Kim Y et al (2007) Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2253–2257. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d8e
Wang Y, Bünger CE, Zhang Y, Hansen ES (2012) Lowest instrumented vertebra selection in Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: what if we choose lumbar apical vertebra as distal fusion end? Eur Spine J 21(6):1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2058-1
Lee CS, Ha JK, Hwang CJ, Lee DH, Kim TH, Cho JH (2016) Is it enough to stop distal fusion at L3 in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with major thoracolumbar/lumbar curves? Eur Spine J 25(10):3256–3264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4373-4
Ding R, Liang J, Qiu G, Shen J, Li Z (2014) Evaluation of quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with different distal fusion level: a comparison of L3 versus L4. J Spinal Disord Tech 27(5):E155–E161. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000073
Perdriolle R, Vidal J (1981) A study of scoliotic curve. The importance of extension and vertebral rotation (author’s transl). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 67:25–34
Sanchez-Raya J, Bago J, Pellise F, Cuxart A, Villanueva C (2012) Does the lower instrumented vertebra have an effect on lumbar mobility, subjective perception of trunk flexibility, and quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated by spinal fusion? J Spinal Disord Tech 25:437–442. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182318622
Rose PS, Lenke LG (2007) Classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment guidelines. Orthop Clin North Am 38:521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2007.06.001
Erdem MN, Karaca S, Korkmaz MF, Enercan M, Tezer M, Kara AN et al (2018) Criteria for ending the distal fusion at the L3 vertebra vs. L4 in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with Lenke type 3C, 5C, and 6C curves: results after ten years of follow-up. Cureus 10(5):e2564. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2564
Wang Y, Bünger CE, Zhang Y, Wu C, Li H, Dahl B et al (2013) Lowest instrumented vertebra selection for lenke 5C scoliosis: a minimum 2-year radiographical followup. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E894-900. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829537be
Li J, Hwang SW, Shi Z, Yan N, Yang C, Wang C et al (2011) Analysis of radiographic parameters relevant to the lowest instrumented vertebrae and postoperative coronal balance in Lenke 5C patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1673–1678. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182091fba
Lee CS, Ha JK, Kim DG, Hwang CJ, Lee DH, Cho JH (2015) The clinical importance of lumbosacral transitional vertebra in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(17):E964–E970. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000945
Lee CS, Ha JK, Kim DG, Kim H, Hwang CJ, Lee DH et al (2015) The clinical importance of sacral slanting in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing surgery. Spine J 15(5):834–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.023
Marks M, Newton PO, Petcharaporn M, Bastrom TP, Shah S, Betz R et al (2012) Postoperative segmental motion of the unfused spine distal to the fusion in 100 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:826–832. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b4eab
Funding
No funding was received for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of ınterest
The authors declare they have no confict of interest related to this work.
Ethical approval
The study is done under the permission of Haydarpaşa Numune Education and Research Hospital Ethics Committee.
Informed consent
All patients were informed and they approved to take part in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yanik, H.S., Ketenci, I.E. & Erdem, S. Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection in posterior fusion of Lenke 3C/6C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: L3 versus L4, when LEV is L4. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 5583–5588 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04872-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04872-4