Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long term results of the Bicontact D stem in dysplastic osteoarthritis: a 10–15 year follow-up study

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Bicontact D stem with a minimum 10 year follow-up that focused on patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Methods

One hundred five patients with osteoarthritis due to DDH who underwent primary THA were included in this study. The mean final follow-up period was 12.7 ± 1.2 years (range 10–15 years). All cases were evaluated both clinically and radiographically, and Kaplan–Meier survivorship was determined as stem revision for any reason as the end point.

Results

Modified Harris hip score averaged 89.0 ± 1.1 (range 60–98) at the final follow-up. The survivorship was 99.0% (95% confidence interval 93.4–99.9%) at 15.0 years, and only one hip with a well-fixed stem required stem revision due to recurrent dislocations. Cortical hypertrophy (CH) was observed in 40 of 105 hips (38.1%), and stress shielding (SS) progressed to grade 3 or 4 in six hips (6 of 105 hips: 5.7%) during the study period. Among the six hips with progressed SS, Dorr type C proximal femoral geometry was seen in five hips.

Conclusion

This study of 105 THAs using the Bicontact D stem that focused on DDH patients with a minimum 10 year follow-up period achieved satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. Dorr type C proximal femoral geometry could be considered a risk factor for progressed SS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris WH (2009) The first 50 years of total hip arthroplasty: lessons learned. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:28–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zwartele R, Peters A, Brouwers J, Olsthoorn P, Brand R, Doets C (2008) Long-term results of cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with a threaded cup and a tapered, rectangular titanium stem in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Int Orthop 32(5):581–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maheshwari AV, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS (2008) The use of hydroxyapatite on press-fit tapered femoral stems. Orthopedics 31(9):882–884

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiran M, Yadav A (2019) Comparative analysis of different total hip replacement implants used in a single health region of the United Kingdom—minimum 15 years follow-up. Acta orthop Belg 85(2):192–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA (2011) Cementless fenmoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:500–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khanuja HS, Banerjee S, Jain D, Pivec R, Mont MA (2014) Short bone-conserving stems in cementless hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1742–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Badhe NP, Quinnell RC, Howard PW (2002) The uncemented Bi-contact total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(7):896–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ateschrang A, Weise K, Weller S, Stockle U, Zwart P, Ochs BG (2014) Long-term resultsusing the straight tapered femoral cementless hip stem in total hip arthroplasty: a minimum of twenty-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 29:1559–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weller S (2003) Fifteen years of experience with the Bicontact hip endoprosthesis system- the past, the present, the future. What has been achieved? Int Orthop 27(Suppl 1):2–6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eingartner C, Heigele T, Dieter J, Winter E, Weise K (2003) Long-term results with the Bicontact system—aspect to investigate and to learn from. Int Orthop 27(Suppl 1):11–15

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drobniewski M, Borowski A, Synder M, Sibinski M (2014) Cementless total hip arthroplasty with Bicontact stem—good results at long term of follow-up. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 16(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Swamy G, Pace A, Quah C, Howard P (2012) The Bicontact cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: long-term results. Int Orthop 6:915–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsukada S, Wakui M (2016) A case series of total hip arthroplasty using cementless hip stem customized for patients of a specific race: 10- to 15-year results. J Arthroplasty 31(1):190–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Argenson JN, Ryembault E, Flecher X, Brassart N, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM (2005) Three-dimensional anatomy of the hip in osteoarthritis after developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):1192–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wells J, Nepple JJ, Crook K, Ross JR, Bedi A, Schoenecker P, Clohisy JC (2017) Femoral morphology in the dysplastic hip: three-dimensional characterization with CT. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1048–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaffiney BA, Hillen TJ, Nepple JJ, Clohisy JC, Harris MD (2019) Statistical shape modeling of femur shape variability in female patients with hip dysplasia. J Orthop Res 37(3):5665–5673

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoaglund FT, Shiba R, Newberg AH, Leung KY (1985) Disease of the hip. A comparative study of Japanese oriental and American white patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(9):1376–1383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jingushi S, Ohfuji S, Sofue M et al (2011) Osteoarthritis hip joints in Japan: involvement of acetabular dysplasia. J Orthop Sci 16(2):156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanto M, Fukunishi S, Fukui T, Nishio S, Fujihara Y, Okahisa S, Takeda Y, Yoshiya S, Toshiya T (2020) Radiological evaluation of relationship between cortical hypertrophy and stress shielding after total hip arthroplasty sing a cementless stem. Arthroplasty Today 6:894–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS (1979) Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 6:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, GruenTA BB, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gruen T, McNeice M, Amstutz H (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  24. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:45–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE (1990) The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. German arthroplasty registry 2019 report (2019) https://www.eprd.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Dateien/Publikationen/Berichte/EPRD_Jahresbericht_2019_EN_doppelseitig_F_Web-Stand-251120.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2020

  27. Kohler S, Nahmmacher V (2007) 12-year results with the cementless Bicontact SD stem in dysplastic and narrow femoral none conditions. Z Orthop Unfall 145:S13–S19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ritter MA, Fechtman RW (1988) Distal cortical hypertrophy following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(2):117–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cho YJ, Chun YS, Rhyu KH, Baek JH, Liang H (2016) Distal femoral cortical hyper- trophy after hip arthroplasty using a cementless doubletapered femoral stem. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 4(3):317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Katsimihas M, Katsimihas G, Lee MB, Learmonth ID (2006) Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy: predisposing factors and their effect on clinical outcome. Hip Int 16(1):18–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lewis JL, Askew MJ, Wixson RL, Kramer GM, Tarr RR (1984) The influence of prosthetic stem stiffness and of a calcar collar on stresses in the proximal end of the femur with a cemented femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Huiskes R (1990) The various stress patterns of pressfit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:27–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Decking R, Puhl W, Simon U, Claes LE (2006) Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21(5):495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lanyon LE, Paul IL, Rubin CT, Thrasher EL, DeLaura R, Rose RM, Radin EL (1981) In vivo strain measurements from bone and prosthesis following total hip replacement. An experimental study in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Miss. Rebecca Imaizumi for her assistance in editing the English manuscript.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeo Fukunishi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukunishi, S., Takeda, Y., Fukui, T. et al. Long term results of the Bicontact D stem in dysplastic osteoarthritis: a 10–15 year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 3987–3993 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04262-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04262-8

Keywords

Navigation