Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative planned distance between the skin surface and the guide rod provides accurate posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although sagittal tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important, no landmark exists to achieve reproducible slope. It is theoretically demonstrated that the preoperative planned distance between the skin surface and the rod can be a useful guide for the tibial slope in the previous imaging study. We conducted this retrospective study to confirm whether the results of the study are repeatable in an intra-operative situation.

Methods

Fifty-five consecutive TKAs using the distance from the extramedullary cutting guide rod to the skin surface as a reference guide for the tibial slope were performed and tibial component positioning was compared with 55 knees performed using the accelerometer-based portable navigation. The tibial component alignment was evaluated with a computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) software.

Results

The absolute mean deviation from the targeted slope in the proposed method was significantly smaller than the portable navigation (1.0° and 1.7°, respectively, p = 0.0025). The outlier rate beyond 3° was 0% in the proposed technique (16.4% in the portable navigation, p = 0.0014).

Conclusions

The preoperative planned distance between the skin surface and the guide rod is a useful technique to provide accurate posterior tibial slope in TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop 173:178.

  2. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73B:709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59A:77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Whiteside LA, Amador DD (1988) The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee stability after Ortholoc total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(Suppl 1):51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellemans J, Robijns F, Duerinckx J, Banks S, Vandenneucker H (2005) The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:193–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Massin P, Gournay A (2006) Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21:889–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh G, Tan JH, Sng BY, Awiszus F, Lohmann CH, Nathan SS (2013) Restoring the anatomical tibial slope and limb axis may maximise post-operative flexion in posterior-stabilised total knee replacements. Bone Joint J 95(10):1354–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty RM, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG (1994) T Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jojima H, Whiteside LA, Ogata K (2004) Effect of tibial slope or posterior cruciate ligament release on knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:194–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennis DA, Channer M, Susman MH, Stringer EA (1993) Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 8:43–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Erdem M, Gulabi D, Cecen GS, Avci CC, Asci M, Saglam F (2015) Using fibula as a reference can be beneficial for the tibial component alignment after total knee arthroplasty, a retrospective study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(7):2068–2073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajadhyaksha AD, Mehta H, Zelicof SB (2009) Use of tibialis anterior tendon as distal landmark for extramedllary tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: an anatomical study. Am J Orthop 38:E68–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider M, Heisel C, Aldinger PR (2007) Breusch SJ (2007) Use of palpable tendons for extramedullary tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsukeoka T, Lee TH, Tsuneizumi Y, Suzuki M (2014) The tibial crest as a practical useful landmark in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(1):283–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsukeoka T, Tsuneizumi Y, Lee TH (2014) Accuracy of the second metatarsal as a landmark for the extramedullary tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(12):2969–2974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C, Ragone V (2005) Computer-assisted technique versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems in total knee replacement: a radiological comparison. Acta Orthop Belg. 71(6):703–709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manzotti A, Pullen C, Confalonieri N (2008) Computer-assisted alignment system for tibial component placement in total knee replacement: a radiological study. Chir Organi Mov. 91(1):7–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pang CH, Chan WL, Yen CH, Cheng SC, Woo SB, Choi ST et al (2009) Comparison of total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation versus conventional guiding systems: a prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 17(2):170–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X (2012) Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(7):1307–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nam D, Weeks KD, Reinhardt KR, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, Mayman DJ (2013) Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of radiographic results. J Arthroplast 28(2):255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nam D, Cody EA, Nguyen JT, Figgie MP, Mayman DJ (2014) Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplast 29(2):288–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsukeoka T, Tsuneizumi Y (2016) The distance from the extramedullary cutting guide rod to the skin surface as a reference guide for the tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 23(2):314–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2004) An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nam D, Cross M, Deshmane P, Jerabek S, Kang M, Mayman DJ (2011) Radiographic results of an accelerometer-based, handheld surgical navigation system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 34(10):e615–e621

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bugbee WD, Kermanshahi AY, Munro MM, McCauley JC, Copp SN (2014) Accuracy of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(6):1225–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Iorio R, Mazza D, Drogo P, Bolle G, Conteduca F, Redler A, Valeo L, Conteduca J, Ferretti A (2015) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of an accelerometer-based system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39(3):461–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang EH, Copp SN, Bugbee WD (2015) Accuracy of a handheld accelerometer-based navigation system for femoral and tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30(11):1906–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steinhaus ME, McLawhorn AS, Richardson SS, Maher P, Mayman DJ (2016) Handheld navigation device and patient-specific cutting guides result in similar coronal alignment for primary total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective matched cohort study. HSS J 12(3):224–234

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fujimoto E, Sasashige Y, Nakata K, Yokota G, Omoto T, Ochi M (2017) Technical considerations and accuracy improvement of accelerometer-based portable computer navigation for performing distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(1):53–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gharaibeh MA, Solayar GN, Harris IA, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2017) Accelerometer-based, portable navigation (KneeAlign) vs conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized comparative trial. J Arthroplasty 32(3):777–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsukeoka T, Tsuneizumi Y, Yoshino K (2019) An accelerometer-based navigation did not improve the femoral component positioning compared to a modified conventional technique of pre-operatively planned placement of intramedullary rod in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 139(4):561–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadashi Tsukeoka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsukeoka, T., Tsuneizumi, Y. & Yoshino, K. Preoperative planned distance between the skin surface and the guide rod provides accurate posterior tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139, 1133–1139 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03212-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03212-9

Keywords

Navigation