Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Injectable autologous chondrocyte transplantation for full thickness acetabular cartilage defects: early clinical results

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Acetabular cartilage lesions are frequently seen in young patients with hip pain and have been identified as an important prognostic factor. New therapies have complemented abrasion and microfracture procedures. The aim of the study is to evaluate the early outcome of patients with arthroscopic injectable autologous chondrocyte transplantations (ACT) for full thickness acetabular cartilage defects.

Methods

A two-step procedure ACT was performed in patients with full thickness acetabular cartilage defects measuring ≥2 cm2. The patients were closely followed with clinical examination, pre- and postoperative scores until the latest available follow-up of 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

20 consecutive cases (4 female, 16 male, mean age 33 years) were included. No patients were lost at final follow-up. The average defect size was 5.05 (range 2–6) cm2. The average follow-up was 12.05 (range 6–24) months. Three months postoperatively the preoperative scores improved significantly from a mean mHHS of 63–81 points (p = 0.009), iHOT33 of 44–66 % (p = 0.028) and subjective hip assessment (Subjective Hip Value, SHV) of 60–87 % (p = 0.007). After 12 months the results improved significantly to a mean mHHS of 93 points (p = 0.017), an iHOT33 of 79 % (p = 0.007) and an SHV of 82 % (p = 0.048) compared with the preoperative scores.

Discussion

The injectable matrix associated ACT is a reliable procedure, yielding promising early results with a significant increase of all scores evaluated in patients with full thickness acetabular cartilage defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Byrd JW, Jones KS (2009) Arthroscopic femoroplasty in the management of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3):739–746. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0659-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckwalter JA (1998) Articular cartilage: injuries and potential for healing. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28(4):192–202. doi:10.2519/jospt.1998.28.4.192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Suzuki C, Harada Y, Mitsuhashi S, Yamashita K, Watanabe H, Tsuchiya A, Moriya H (2005) Repair of cartilage defects and torn acetabular labrum in hip joints after conventional osteotomy: evaluation by follow-up arthroscopy. J Orthop Sci 10(2):127–132. doi:10.1007/s00776-004-0871-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Egerton T, Hinman RS, Takla A, Bennell KL, O’Donnell J (2013) Intraoperative cartilage degeneration predicts outcome 12 months after hip arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(2):593–599. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2594-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Yen YM, Kuppersmith DA (2009) Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):16–23. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.21329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Farjo LA, Glick JM, Sampson TG (1999) Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy 15(2):132–137. doi:10.1053/ar.1999.v15.015013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haviv B, Singh PJ, Takla A, O’Donnell J (2010) Arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty for cam lesions with isolated acetabular chondral damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(5):629–633. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B5.23667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yen YM, Kocher MS (2010) Chondral lesions of the hip: microfracture and chondroplasty. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 18(2):83–89. doi:10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181de1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crawford K, Philippon MJ, Sekiya JK, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR (2006) Microfracture of the hip in athletes. Clin Sports Med 25(2):327–335. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2005.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Philippon MJ, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Maxwell RB (2008) Can microfracture produce repair tissue in acetabular chondral defects? Arthroscopy 24(1):46–50. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright TM, Maher SA (2009) Current and novel approaches to treating chondral lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 1):120–125. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karthikeyan S, Roberts S, Griffin D (2012) Microfracture for acetabular chondral defects in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: results at second-look arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2725–2730. doi:10.1177/0363546512465400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fu FH, Zurakowski D, Browne JE, Mandelbaum B, Erggelet C, Moseley JB Jr, Anderson AF, Micheli LJ (2005) Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus debridement for treatment of full-thickness chondral defects of the knee: an observational cohort study with 3-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 33(11):1658–1666. doi:10.1177/0363546505275148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, Almqvist KF, Verdonk R, Bellemans J, Luyten FP, Tig/Act, Group EXTS (2009) Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med 37(Suppl 1):10S–19S. doi:10.1177/0363546509350694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, Haspl M, Bohnsack M, Fortems Y, Vandekerckhove B, Almqvist KF, Claes T, Handelberg F, Lagae K, van der Bauwhede J, Vandenneucker H, Yang KG, Jelic M, Verdonk R, Veulemans N, Bellemans J, Luyten FP (2008) Characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better structural repair when treating symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee in a randomized controlled trial versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 36(2):235–246. doi:10.1177/0363546507311095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kon E, Filardo G, Berruto M, Benazzo F, Zanon G, Della Villa S, Marcacci M (2011) Articular cartilage treatment in high-level male soccer players: a prospective comparative study of arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 39(12):2549–2557. doi:10.1177/0363546511420688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mancini D, Fontana A (2014) Five-year results of arthroscopic techniques for the treatment of acetabular chondral lesions in femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2403-1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fontana A, Bistolfi A, Crova M, Rosso F, Massazza G (2012) Arthroscopic treatment of hip chondral defects: autologous chondrocyte transplantation versus simple debridement–a pilot study. Arthroscopy 28(3):322–329. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thorey F, Budde S, Ezechieli M, Albrecht UV, Ettinger M (2013) Feasibility of arthroscopic placement of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis grafts in the cadaver hip joint. Orthop Rev 5(3):e26. doi:10.4081/or.2013.e26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Libera J, Ruhnau K, Baum P, Lüthi U, Schreyer T, Meyer U, Wiesmann HP, Herrmann A, Korte T, Pullig O, Siodla V (2009) Cartilage engineering. In: Meyer U, Handschel J, Wiesmann HP, Meyer T (eds) Fundamentals of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 233–242. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77755-7_18

  21. Libera J, Luethi U, Alasevic O (2006) co. don chondrosphere®(co. don® AG): autologous matrix-induced engineered cartilage transplantation. Basic Sci Clin Repair Reconstr Articul Cartil defects Curr Status Prospects 1:591–600

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beaule PE, Zaragoza EJ (2003) Surgical images: musculoskeletal acetabular cartilage delamination demonstrated by magnetic resonance arthrography: inverted “Oreo” cookie sign. Can J Surg 46(6):463–464

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Dienst M, Seil R, Kohn DM (2005) Safe arthroscopic access to the central compartment of the hip. Arthroscopy 21(12):1510–1514. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jackson TJ, Hanypsiak B, Stake CE, Lindner D, El Bitar YF, Domb BG (2014) Arthroscopic labral base repair in the hip: clinical results of a described technique. Arthroscopy 30(2):208–213. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fry R, Domb B (2010) Labral base refixation in the hip: rationale and technique for an anatomic approach to labral repair. Arthroscopy 26(9 Suppl):S81–S89. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohtadi NG, Griffin DR, Pedersen ME, Chan D, Safran MR, Parsons N, Sekiya JK, Kelly BT, Werle JR, Leunig M, McCarthy JC, Martin HD, Byrd JW, Philippon MJ, Martin RL, Guanche CA, Clohisy JC, Sampson TG, Kocher MS, Larson CM, Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research N (2012) The Development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Arthroscopy 28(5):595–605. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.013 (quiz 606-510 e591)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilbart MK, Gerber C (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(6):717–721. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bogunovic L, Gottlieb M, Pashos G, Baca G, Clohisy JC (2013) Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(8):2523–2529. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3015-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh PJ, O’Donnell JM (2010) The outcome of hip arthroscopy in Australian football league players: a review of 27 hips. Arthroscopy 26(6):743–749. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McCarthy JC, Jarrett BT, Ojeifo O, Lee JA, Bragdon CR (2011) What factors influence long-term survivorship after hip arthroscopy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(2):362–371. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1559-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fickert S, Schattenberg T, Niks M, Weiss C, Thier S (2014) Feasibility of arthroscopic 3-dimensional, purely autologous chondrocyte transplantation for chondral defects of the hip: a case series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(7):971–978. doi:10.1007/s00402-014-1997-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aprato A, Jayasekera N, Villar RN (2012) Does the modified Harris hip score reflect patient satisfaction after hip arthroscopy? Am J Sports Med 40(11):2557–2560. doi:10.1177/0363546512460650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nepple JJ, Riggs CN, Ross JR, Clohisy JC (2014) Clinical presentation and disease characteristics of femoroacetabular impingement are sex-dependent. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(20):1683–1689. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.01320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Domb BG, Linder D, Finley Z, Botser IB, Chen A, Williamson J, Gupta A (2015) Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients aged 50 years or older compared with a matched-pair control of patients aged 30 years or younger. Arthroscopy 31(2):231–238. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bozic KJ, Chan V, Valone FH 3rd, Feeley BT, Vail TP (2013) Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty 28(8 Suppl):140–143. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Montgomery SR, Ngo SS, Hobson T, Nguyen S, Alluri R, Wang JC, Hame SL (2013) Trends and demographics in hip arthroscopy in the United States. Arthroscopy 29(4):661–665. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Joerg H. Schroeder, Martin Hufeland, Michael Schütz, Norbert P. Haas, Carsten Perka & David R. Krueger

Authors
  1. Joerg H. Schroeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Hufeland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Schütz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Norbert P. Haas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carsten Perka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David R. Krueger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joerg H. Schroeder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schroeder, J.H., Hufeland, M., Schütz, M. et al. Injectable autologous chondrocyte transplantation for full thickness acetabular cartilage defects: early clinical results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 1445–1451 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2510-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2510-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation