Abstract
Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (AsymAD) describes the status of individuals with preserved cognition but identifiable Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain pathology (i.e., beta-amyloid (Aβ) deposits, neuritic plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles) at autopsy. In this study, we investigated the postmortem brains of a cohort of AsymAD subjects to gain insight into the mechanisms underlying resilience to AD pathology and cognitive decline. Our results showed that AsymAD cases exhibit enrichment in core plaques, decreased filamentous plaque accumulation, and increased plaque-surrounding microglia. Less pathological tau aggregation in dystrophic neurites was found in AsymAD brains than in AD brains, and tau seeding activity was comparable to that in healthy brains. We used spatial transcriptomics to characterize the plaque niche further and revealed autophagy, endocytosis, and phagocytosis as the pathways associated with the genes upregulated in the AsymAD plaque niche. Furthermore, the levels of ARP2 and CAP1, which are actin-based motility proteins that participate in the dynamics of actin filaments to allow cell motility, were increased in the microglia surrounding amyloid plaques in AsymAD cases. Our findings suggest that the amyloid-plaque microenvironment in AsymAD cases is characterized by the presence of microglia with highly efficient actin-based cell motility mechanisms and decreased tau seeding compared with that in AD brains. These two mechanisms can potentially protect against the toxic cascade initiated by Aβ, preserving brain health, and slowing AD pathology progression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Beta-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tau tangles (NFTs) have long been known to be causally related to the cognitive manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [19]. However, several studies have revealed the existence of aged individuals harboring a high burden of brain lesions at autopsy while remaining cognitively intact, indicating resilience to AD pathology [3, 7, 21, 22, 56, 57, 68, 76, 78, 96]. These individuals have neuritic plaque and NFTs Braak stages at autopsy comparable to those of AD subjects with dementia, and the literature refers to them as resilient [31], Nondemented with AD Neuropathology (NDAN) [83], or asymptomatic AD (AsymAD) [22, 42]. In the present study, we will refer to them as AsymAD. Several reports have provided insight into the resistance of AsymAD individuals to cognitive decline. Specifically, studies have demonstrated that AsymAD brains exhibit no signs of notorious synaptic or neuronal deterioration [8, 42, 73] and, intriguingly, even show larger nuclei and cellular sizes than age-matched healthy controls [79]. Additionally, unlike in the brains of AD subjects with dementia, no phosphorylated tau accumulation occurs within the synapses of AsymAD brains [73, 83]. AsymAD brains have also been found to exhibit a neuroinflammatory profile distinct from that of AD brains, with decreased numbers of activated microglia and astrocyte cells [73], low levels of proinflammatory cytokines, and increased levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines [5]. Advancements in omics and large cohort dataset analyses have enabled the identification of potential cell signatures and molecular mechanisms of resilience, including high processing of energetic pathways involving mitochondrial metabolism and glycolysis, axonal and dendritic growth, and a general increase in protein processing [11, 90, 91].
Despite studies using whole-brain approaches, bulk proteomics, and transcriptomics have helped understand how synaptic preservation and neuron survival occur in AsymAD brains, the molecular mechanisms underlying resilience in the presence of NFTs and amyloid plaques remain poorly understood. Increasing evidence suggests that investigating AD pathology with a spatial approach is important for understanding the molecular pathways involved in neurodegeneration. Moreover, the microenvironment in Aβ plaques plays a crucial role in Aβ-mediated neuroinflammation and tau pathogenesis in AD mouse models [34, 53, 106]. Previous studies have demonstrated that Aβ plaques create a unique environment that facilitates the rapid amplification of proteopathic tau seeds into large tau aggregates, which initially appear in dystrophic neurites surrounding Aβ plaques (NP-tau), followed by the formation and spread of tau aggregates [34]. Moreover, efficient microglial clustering around Aβ plaques mitigates amyloid-driven tau seeding [32]. In the context of AD resilience, one study showed that the area surrounding NFTs in the hippocampus of AsymAD cases exhibits lower levels of proteins associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, and high energy demands than those in AD cases’ hippocampus [100]. Additionally, the brains of AsymAD cases exhibit significant upregulation of phagocytic microglia, which help remove damaged synapses as a protective mechanism [27]. These data suggest that studying the local milieu of AD pathology is crucial for understanding tau-driven synapse damage in the human brain. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to provide detailed insight into the mechanisms underlying Aβ plaque-associated microglial reactivity and tau pathogenesis in the context of resilience to AD pathology.
Herein, using postmortem brain samples from AsymAD cases, AD cases, and age-matched control individuals, we performed a detailed histological characterization of Aβ amyloid plaques and their cellular microenvironment, including microglia and astrocyte activation and tau pathology. We also performed spatial whole-transcriptome analyses to identify and characterize neuroprotective mechanisms operating in the amyloid plaque microenvironment and their potential contribution to cognitive resilience in AsymAD cases. AsymAD brains were more enriched in core plaques than were AD brains, whereas filamentous plaques were predominant in the latter. We also observed strong engagement of microglia around the filamentous plaques in AsymAD brains with a concomitant strong reduction in NP-tau and tau seeding activity compared with that in AD brains. Using spatial whole transcriptomics, we further demonstrated that microglia exhibit significantly upregulated actin-based motility gene expression in the amyloid plaque microenvironment of AsymAD cases. This upregulation potentially heightens membrane dynamics, facilitating efficient migration toward the vicinity of the plaque and promoting the elongation of microglial branches, enhancing their engagement with the plaque. Understanding the local drivers of resilience to AD pathology may provide valuable insights into disease mechanisms and promote the development of interventions to halt neuronal and synaptic damage, thereby preventing the clinical manifestations of AD.
Materials and methods
Subjects and clinical-neuropathological classification
We examined middle frontal gyrus (MFG) brain tissue from individuals with histopathological findings of AD (i.e., amyloid plaques, hyperphosphorylated tau and NFTs) and healthy aged-matched controls from the Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) and the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). The cognitive status preceding death was obtained from detailed neuropsychological assessments reports, including the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) [25] and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) [63]. The diagnosis of dementia made according to the criteria outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [2], and guidelines established by the National Institute of Neurological and Communication Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders [62]. Expert consultation during clinical conferences enriched the diagnostic process. The Johns Hopkins Brain Resource Center (BRC) provided the cognitive status and neuropathologic data. All subjects received their last clinical evaluation within 15 months before death. The postmortem brains were classified into aged-matched controls individuals, AsymAD cases, and AD cases as described in previously clinical and neuropathological studies [41,42,43, 79].
Tissue processing and neuropathologic evaluations
All brains were examined in the Division of Neuropathology at Johns Hopkins University. The brains were weight and hemisected through the midline, and the right cerebral hemisphere was cut serially into 1-cm coronal slabs. For diagnostic purposes, tissue blocks were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, processed overnight, and embedded in paraffin. The tissue blocks were cut at 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Selected sections were treated with H2O2 and blocked with 3% normal goat serum in Tris-buffered saline for immunostaining with antibodies against phospho-tau (Ser202, Thr205) AT8 (1:200, MN1020, Invitrogen), Aβ-amyloid (1:500, clone 6E10, 803023, BioLegend), α-synuclein (1:500, clone 42, 610787, BD), anti-TDP-43 (phosphorylation independent) (1:1000, rabbit polyclonal, 12782-1-AP, Proteintech) and anti-TDP-43 phosphorylation-dependent at serine 409/410 (1:200, clone 1D3, 829901, BioLegend). For the evaluation of AD pathology, the Hirano-Silver staining method [105] and AT8 immunostaining were used to stage the neuritic plaque density according the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) criteria [80]. Hyperphosphorylated tau pathology was determined using the Braak staging method [1, 9, 10]. Tau pathology progression in cases with Braak stages of V/VI was assessed by identifying hyperphosphorylated tau lesions in the visual cortex (Brodmann’s areas 17 & 18) (Supplementary Fig. 1). Aβ-amyloid distribution was assessed using an anti-Aβ-amyloid antibody according to the Thal phase system [93]. AD neuropathologic changes were staged according to the NIA-AA criteria [40]. Assessment of TDP-43 changes in AD cases was conducted as recommended by Nelson et al. 2019 and 2023 [65, 66]. Alpha-synuclein lesions were evaluated according to the methods of McKeith et al. [61] and primary age-related tauopathy (PART) as described in Crary et al. [16]. AD and AsymAD cases were selected according to age (mean [SD], 82.68 [10.4] years in AD cases and 88.15 [5.5] years in AsymAD cases), NFTs Braak stages (5.32 [0.82] in AD cases and 4.62 [0.76] in AsymAD cases), Thal stage (4.72 [0.75] in AD cases and 4.25[0.45] in AsymAD cases) and TDP43/LATE status (0.94 [0.94] in AD cases and 0.54 [0.82] in AsymAD cases). None of the control individuals or AD or AsymAD cases exhibited Lewy bodies in the examined sections. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) was not reported for any of these cases. The neuropathological and clinical details for each case are provided in Table 1.
Immunofluorescence in postmortem human tissue
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) 5-μm MFG sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in an ethanol gradient (100–30%), and washed with deionized water. Then, the sections were heated to 95 °C in 1X EDTA buffer, pH 8.5, antigen retrieval solution (E1161, Sigma Aldrich) for 20 min in a thermoregulated bath. For ARP2 and CAP1, an additional 15 min step of incubation with 50% methanol and a subsequent 1 min incubation with proteinase K (1 mg/ml) before the antigen retrieval incubation, were performed. After washing twice with TBS for 5 min, the sections were blocked with Animal-free Blocker® and a diluent solution (SP-5035, Vector Laboratories) supplemented with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 h. at RT. The sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (phospho-tau (Ser202, Thr205) AT8 (1:100, MN1020, Invitrogen), Aβ-amyloid (6E10) (1:200, MBS488263, MyBiosource), β-Amyloid 17–24 (4G8) (1:200, SIG-39220, Covance), anti-IBA1 (1:300, 019-19741, Wako), anti-GFAP (1:300, ab1218, Abcam), anti-ARP2 (E-12) (1:100, sc-166103, Santa Cruz) and anti-CAP1 (1:200, 68207-1, ProteinTech). The next day, the sections were quickly washed three times in TBS and incubated for 2 h. with a 1:500 ratio of Alexa Fluor secondary antibodies: goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (A11008, Invitrogen), goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (A32723, Invitrogen), donkey anti-mouse CF647 (SAB4600176, Sigma) and donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 (AB175470, Abcam), diluted in blocking solution followed by three washes with TBS (5 min each). Double immune detection was employed for ARP2 and CAP1 immunoassays utilizing goat anti-mouse 488 to enhance the antibody signal, followed by a 1 h. incubation with donkey anti-goat 488 (AB150129, Abcam). Amyloid structures were stained with 1% thioflavin S (diluted in 50% TBS/ethanol) or NucBlue (1:100, R37605, Invitrogen) for 20 min at RT followed by five 5 min washes with TBS. Finally, the sections were incubated with TrueBlack (23,007, Biotium) for 30 s. and then washed three times with TBS.
Image analysis
Brightfield images were acquired using a BH-2 Olympus microscope. Fluorescence imaging was performed using a Nikon A1-R laser scanning confocal microscope coupled with Nikon AR software v.5.21.03.1 Postprocessing and analyses were conducted using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, v1.53c). Phospho-tau quantification in neurites using brightfield images was conducted as previously described [14]. For plaque classification analyses, 15–20 μm z-stacks were imaged at 60× magnification, and a circularity analysis of thioflavin S plaques was performed using the ‘‘Shape Descriptors’’ plugin in ImageJ. Cut-offs for plaque circularity were defined as previously described [77, 106], where filamentous plaques had a circularity score of 0.00–0.14 and compact plaques had circularities exceeding score of 0.30. Plaques with a circularity score range of 0.15–0.28 were classified as displaying intermediate phenotypes. AT8, IBA1, and GFAP coverage around plaques was quantified as previously described [64] with some modifications; regions-of-interest (ROIs) were traced along 50 μm of plaque perimeter across serial images. Defined ROIs were applied to the AT8/IBA1/GFAP channels, and the percentage of immunoreactivity/signal intensity in the area within the ROI was quantified. Twenty to thirty plaques were quantified per sample.
For the quantification of ARP2 and CAP1, ROIs were traced along 50 μm of the plaque core, and the immunoreactivity/signal intensity was measured within the selected area. IBA1 mask selection was applied to quantify the selected signals exclusively within IBA1-positive areas. Image fields farther than 100 μm from the amyloid plaques were considered “plaque-free areas”.
Western blot analysis
Postmortem MFG tissues were homogenized in TBS buffer at a ratio of 1:10 (wt/vol) with Pierce Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (A32965, ThermoScientific) on ice. The tissue lysate was sonicated and centrifuged at 15,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C. Protein concentrations were measured using a BCA protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Electrophoresis was performed using 20 μg of protein lysates, which were resolved in a 4–12% SDS–PAGE gel (CriterionTM TGXTM, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Immobilon®-P, Millipore) that was blocked with EveryBlot blocking buffer (12010020, Bio-Rad), followed by overnight incubation with the following primary antibodies diluted in 5% BSA TBS 0.1% Tween: HT7 (1:300, MN1000, Thermo Fisher), phospho-tau (Ser202, Thr205) AT8 (1:1000, MN1020, Invitrogen), PHF1 (1:1000, Peter Davies Antibodies) and MC1 (1:1000, Peter Davies Antibodies). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse HRP conjugated (1:10,000, 626820, Invitrogen) were added, and the membranes were incubated for 2 h. at RT. The proteins were detected with Supersignal West Pico (34580, Thermo Scientific). Imaging was conducted using an iBright 1500 (Invitrogen) imager, and the data were analyzed with ImageJ Fiji. Nine cases per group were included in the western blot analyses, comprising three AD and AsymAD cases each with NFTs Braak stages of IV, V and VI.
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC)
SEC was performed as previously described [60]. Briefly, the column was equilibrated, and the samples were clarified by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 10 min. The protein concentrations of the frozen samples were quantified by BCA assay, and 1–5 mg of total protein per supernatant was removed for separation. The supernatant was concentrated with a 0.5 ml 3 K Amicon centrifugal filter (UFC5003, Millipore Sigma) to ~ 200 µl and loaded onto the column via sample loop injection. One ml fractions were collected into tubes containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor (11873580001, Roche) at a flow rate of 0.3 ml min−1. Four cases per group were included in the SEC analyses, comprising two AD and AsymAD cases each with NFTs Braak stages of V and VI.
Human tau ELISA
An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed on total and SEC fractions using the Tau (Total) Human ELISA Kit (KHB0041, Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s directions. Lysates were diluted 1:50,000 in blocking buffer; F7–F14 at a ratio of 1:2000 and F15–F22 at a ratio of 1:20,000.
Tau-seeding assay
The seeding assay was performed as previously described [36, 60]. Briefly, TauRD P301S FRET biosensor cells (CRL-3275, American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)) were plated at 35,000 cells per well in 130 µl of medium in a 96-well plate and incubated at 37 °C overnight. The next day, the cells were transfected with total protein lysates and SEC fractions from control, AD, and AsymAD MFGs (20 µg total protein per well). After harvesting the cells, flow cytometry was conducted with a BD LSR Fortessa X-20 with a high-throughput sampler using BD FACS Diva v8.0 software. FlowJo v10.0 was used for the data analysis. Seeding was quantified by integrated FRET density, defined as the product of the percentage of FRET-positive cells and the median fluorescence intensity of FRET-positive cells.
NanoString GeoMx™ human whole transcriptome atlas (WTA)
Slide preparation was performed following the GeoMx WTA kit manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, FFPE MFG sections from AsymAD and AD brains (highlighted with asterisks in Table 1) were deparaffinized and rehydrated followed by antigen and target retrieval and in situ hybridization at 37 °C for 16–24 h. The next day, the slides were washed and incubated for 1 h. with the following morphology markers: β-Amyloid (D54D2) Alexa Fluor 594 conjugated (1:100, Cell Signaling, 35363) and the nuclear marker Syto 13 (1:50, NanoString, 121301310). Slides were loaded into the GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler (DSP) instrument and scanned to capture fluorescence images used to select ROIs. A 60–100 μm diameter circle was selected surrounding each amyloid plaque. Sixteen to eighteen gray matter ROIs per condition were selected. UV-cleaved oligonucleotides from each spatially resolved ROI were aspirated and collected in a 96-well collection plate for library preparation with Seq Code primers and sequenced on an NextSeq500 sequencer instrument (Illumina). Digital count conversion (DCC) files were obtained using the Illumina DRAGEN Sever v4. Then, DCC files were transferred to the GeoMx DSP Analysis suite v.3.0.0.109 for data quality control (QC) and normalization. The analysis pipeline was conducted using the GeoMx DSP user manual (MAN-10154-01). Differential gene expression (DEG) analyses (p < 0.05 with multiple testing correction, fold-change > 1.5) and pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the DEGs found in AsymAD cases. Cell deconvolution and cell abundance analysis were performed using the NanoString SpatialDecon R library [17]. To run the R library package, cell profile matrices derived from previous datasets were built [47, 59, 69, 88]. The cells were clustered into 13 different clusters for the profile matrix using the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm of Seurat with a resolution of 0.5 [86]
Manipulation of ACTR2 in a human microglia cell line and scratch assay
The human microglial cell line (HMC3) was cultured in a 96 well-plate as previously described [46]. Twenty nanograms per well were used to transfect plasmids containing human ACTR2 cDNA (VB900143-9176fnc, VectorBuilder) and ACTR2-targeting shRNA (VB231025-1394uat, VectorBuilder) with Lipofectamine™ 3000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. An empty vector (VB190731-1138syk, VectorBuilder) and a scrambled RNA (VB010000-9489hhg, VectorBuilder) sequence were used as controls for overexpression and downregulation, respectively. Three days post transfection, ACTR2 RNA was analyzed by qRT-PCR using TaqMan probes (Assay ID: Hs00855199-g1, ThermoFisher). The human GAPDH endogenous control was used as a normalization reference. Twenty-four hours after transfection, a scratch was made in the middle of the wells using the Incucyte® 96-well scratch woundmaker tool (Cat. No. 4563, Sartorius), and the cells were imaged for 72 h with a Leica THUNDER imager system. ImageJ Fiji and the Wound Healing Size plugin were used to calculate the percentage of scratch area, as previously described [87].
Statistical analyses
All the statistical analyses and graph designs were performed using GraphPad Prism v9.5.0 (525). The data were first analyzed for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) followed by statistical tests. The results in column graphs represent the mean ± SEM. For histology, immunofluorescence, and biochemical experiments, the Student’s t-test was used to compare between two groups. One-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons was employed for comparisons of three groups, and two-way ANOVA was used to analyze two variables simultaneously. For all tests, a p value of 0.05 was considered to indicate significance. For GeoMx HuWTA analyses, the p values were adjusted for multiple analyses using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.01. Data collection and analyses were performed by a researcher blinded to the experimental conditions.
Results
Morphologically distinct proportion of amyloid plaques and attenuated tau pathology surrounding amyloid plaques in AsymAD and AD brains
Given that autopsies of AsymAD and AD brains revealed comparable amyloid plaque and NFTs burdens (Supplementary Fig. 2), we investigated whether there were any differences in plaque morphology between these presentations. To do so, we evaluated the amyloid plaque phenotype in the MFG of thioflavin S-stained sections (Fig. 1a). Our analysis of the total number of amyloid plaques within the MFG did not reveal significant differences between AD and AsymAD cases (Fig. 1b). Using previously described plaque classifications [77, 106] and circularity analyses to distinguish compact plaques from plaques with a filamentous or an intermediate morphology (Fig. 1c), we observed that compared with AD cases, AsymAD cases exhibited a significant reduction in the proportion of filamentous plaques, with a concomitant increase in compact plaques (Fig. 1d). Using the 6E10 and 4G8 anti-Aβ-amyloid antibodies, we confirmed that the three previously classified amyloid plaques were positive for Aβ-amyloid (Supplementary Fig. 3). Interestingly, it was previously reported that filamentous plaques are neurotoxic whereas compact dense-core plaques are relatively benign [38, 52]. In the context of AD or aging, the formation of filamentous plaques has been associated with the phosphorylation of tau within dystrophic neuritis [13, 53, 106], which subsequently contributes to the formation of neuritic plaques (a subset of Aβ plaques surrounded by and containing dystrophic neurites) during AD progression [97]. Moreover, amyloid-plaques create a unique molecular environment that facilitates the seeding and spreading of tau pathology. These highly phosphorylated tau species in dystrophic neurites surrounding Aβ plaques (NP-Tau) aggregate faster and spread more widely than tau in NFTs [34]. To investigate whether a reduction in filamentous plaques could impact the formation of NP-tau in the plaque niche of AsymAD MFGs, we performed double-immunofluorescence using thioflavin-S and an AT8 antibody, which recognizes the phospho sites Ser202 and Thr205 within the tau protein (Fig. 1e). Our findings revealed that in the AsymAD MFGs, regardless of the type of plaque, there was a dramatic decrease in NP-tau within the plaque microenvironment in comparison with that in the AD MFGs (Fig. 1f), indicating that although both AsymAD and AD cases exhibit neuritic plaques, the dystrophic neuritic component induced by tau is notably more pronounced in AD cases. Interestingly, in comparison to those in AD MFGs, AsymAD MFGs did not exhibit significant differences in NFTs (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). However, there was a noticeable reduction in AT8-positive neuritic staining in the MFG area (Supplementary Fig. 4c).
The seeding capacity and biochemical characterization of tau in AsymAD cases revealed a lack of pathological tau features
Given the reduced levels of NP-tau surrounding the plaque microenvironment in AsymAD cases, we next investigated whether this phenomenon influences soluble tau pathology. First, we evaluated the tau-seeding activity of TBS-soluble lysates from control, AsymAD, and AD MFGs by transfection into tau RD P301S fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) biosensor cells and quantified the integrated FRET density by flow cytometry as previously described [60, 71]. Although total tau levels among age-matched controls and AsymAD and AD MFGs were similar (Fig. 2a), tau in AsymAD brain lysates produced low levels of seeding activity, unlike that in AD lysates (Fig. 2b). Several groups have demonstrated that tau oligomers, which form prior to and independent of NFTs, are the toxic agents responsible for synaptic dysfunction in AD and drive cognitive decline [26, 49, 50, 58, 95]. To better understand our previous findings, we conducted a biochemical characterization of tau by immunoblotting. Our results indicate that AsymAD brain lysates exhibit significantly lower levels of oligomeric tau species than those observed in AD brain lysates (Fig. 2c, d). Furthermore, tau species in the in AsymAD TBS-soluble fraction demonstrated reduced in the pathological phospho-epitopes PHF1 and AT8 (Supplementary Fig. 5a–d). We also observed an increase in misfolded tau (MC1) levels between control and AD cases, whereas no differences were detected between AsymAD and control individuals (Supplementary Fig. 5e, f). Overall, these data indicate diminished pathological tau features in AsymAD MFGs. Our laboratory has recently demonstrated that the primary source of tau seeding activity in AD cases, corresponds to soluble high molecular weight (HMW) tau species; thus, HMW tau-containing particles are one of the predominant toxic entities [60]. We performed size exclusion chromatography (SEC) on TBS-soluble MFG lysates to gain additional insights into the size distribution of tau-seeding species in AsymAD cases. As we previously reported [60], the tau species with the strongest seeding activity in AD cases was a HMW tau in fraction 9 (> 2000 kDa) (Fig. 2e), representing a small percentage of the total tau in the brain (Fig. 2f). Interestingly, although the levels of total tau in fraction 9 were similar in the AD, AsymAD, and control samples (Fig. 2f, inset), tau in the AsymAD group showed a significant decrease in seeding activity to that in the AD group (Fig. 2e, inset). These results suggest that biochemically, the soluble tau present in AsymAD MFGs is more likely to resemble that in age-matched healthy control brains than in AD brains.
Increased microglia surrounding filamentous amyloid plaques in AsymAD cases
Microglial and astrocytic interactions with Aβ amyloid plaques have been associated with amyloid plaque development and neuritic damage [81]. In this context, microglia appear crucial to the initial appearance and structure of plaques and, following plaque formation, promote a chronic inflammatory state modulating neuronal gene expression changes in response to Aβ during AD pathology [84]. Furthermore, microglia limit diffuse plaques by constructing and maintaining dense compact-like plaque properties in AD mouse models and humans, thereby blocking the progression of neuritic dystrophy and reducing tau phosphorylation in the local plaque environment [12, 38, 106]. To investigate whether the differential proportion of amyloid plaques and decreased NP-tau accumulation found in AsymAD versus AD brains correlate with the dysregulation of plaque-associated microglial and astrocytic responses, we performed immunofluorescence analysis with anti-IBA1 and anti-GFAP to visualize activated microglia and astrocytes associated with Aβ plaques, respectively (Fig. 3a, d). A trend toward increased overall IBA1 and decreased overall GFAP coverage in AsymAD cases was observed, although the difference was not significant (Fig. 3b, e). However, when we measured the percentage of IBA1- and GFAP-positive staining surrounding the three previously classified plaque types, we detected significantly greater levels of IBA1 around the filamentous plaques in AsymAD MFGs than in AD MFGs (Fig. 3c), whereas GFAP levels were decreased in intermediate plaques (Fig. 3f). No significant changes were observed in IBA1 coverage around intermediate or compact plaques; likewise, no significant changes were detected in GFAP coverage around filamentous or compact plaques. Taken together, our observations indicate that there is a difference in the distribution of IBA1 associated with amyloid plaques between AsymAD and AD cases, with greater microglial abundance in the vicinity of filamentous amyloid plaques in AsymAD MFGs. These data suggest the presence of a protective niche in the proximity of plaques in the MFG of AsymAD cases that could prevent pathological tau conversion despite the presence of Aβ plaques.
The genetic landscape of the amyloid plaque microenvironment in AsymAD cases involves increased autophagy-, endocytosis- and phagocytosis-related pathways
To understand the differences observed in the amyloid plaque microenvironment of AsymAD compared to AD MFGs, we performed an explorative GeoMx human WTA to measure over 18,000 protein-coding genes cross-referenced with the HUGO and NCBI RefSeq databases. We selected MFG sections from AsymAD and AD brains and analyzed 16–19 ROIs per sample. Each ROI encompassed a ratio of 30–50 μm from the Aβ plaque core and its immediate microenvironment in the gray matter (Fig. 4a). We identified a total of 1799 DEGs. Among these genes, 813 were upregulated in the Aβ plaque microenvironment of AsymAD (plaque-AsymAD), while 986 were upregulated in AD (plaque-AD) (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Excel 1). Interestingly, within the upregulated genes found in the plaque-AsymAD microenvironment, there were seven DEGs also present in a genome-wide list of significant variants associated with AD and related dementias [6] (Highlighted in Fig. 4b and Supplementary Excel 1—GWAS and AD hit comparisons). Furthermore, 48 DEGs in plaque-AsymAD and 9 DEGs in plaque-AD were previously linked to AD targets through RNA-seq, proteomic, and metabolomic studies. These findings were compiled from a list of nominated targets stemming from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership in AD (AMP–AD) consortium and the broader AD research community (AGORA) [109]. Using the 1799 DEGs, we performed a pathway enrichment analysis using the GeoMx DSP analysis suite. Interestingly, pathways related with endocytosis (clathrin-mediated endocytosis, cargo recognition for clathrin-mediated endocytosis, transferrin endocytosis and recycling), autophagy (autophagy, macroautophagy, selective autophagy, chaperone mediated autophagy) and phagocytosis (regulation of actin dynamics for phagocytic cup formation, response of Mtb to phagocytosis, Fcgamma receptor (FCGR) dependent phagocytosis) were upregulated more than four times in the amyloid plaque microenvironment of plaque-AsymAD MFGs when compare with plaque-AD MFGs (Bold pathways in Supplementary Excel 2). From the 813 upregulated genes in the plaque-AsymAD ROIs, 57 DEGs were in the endocytic-, autophagy- and phagocytic-related pathways. In contrast, only 12 DEGs out of the 986 upregulated genes in plaque-AD ROIs belonged to these pathways (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Excel 2). These findings align with a recent study in which elevated gene expression related to the early stages of autophagy was demonstrated to be responsible for maintaining synaptic integrity through the efficient removal of tau oligomers in the hippocampus of AsymAD subjects [98]. Furthermore, genetic variants linked to autophagy processes may contribute to resistance against amyloid plaques and NFTs in centenarians [107] and previous evidence suggest that phagocytosis and endocytosis might underlie synaptic resilience in AsymAD individuals [92, 98]. These mechanisms has been shown to be impaired in AD brains [45, 55].
We further evaluated the expression of the DEGs upregulated in the plaque-AsymAD microenvironment by plotting the normalized counts in plaque-AsymAD versus plaque-AD ROIs. We observed a consistent and significant upregulation of nine DEGs in plaque-AsymAD versus plaque-AD ROIs (Fig. 4d).
AsymAD microglia exhibit increase levels of actin-based cell motility proteins ARP2 and CAP1 within the amyloid plaque microenvironment
Although our data support previous evidence suggesting that endocytosis and phagocytosis might underlie synaptic resilience in AsymAD individuals [27, 92], the literature also indicates the role of some of these DEGs in actin-based motility (pink highlighted genes in Fig. 4d). Interestingly, a recent study that used mass spectrometry-based proteomics has pointed out the crucial role of actin network proteins in neurons to confer resilience to AD [39]. The ACTR2 (encoding ARP2) and CFL1 (Cofilin 1) genes play significant roles in actin remodeling, enabling both baseline movement (ruffling or branching) and chemotactic motility (migration) [18, 28, 29]. While ARP2 (Actin related protein 2) is part of the Arp2/3 complex, and its role is to engage with actin monomers to start the formation of a new filament branch [75], CFL1, depolymerizes actin filaments to make them available for the formation of new actin structures. While the study of these genes has been focused on their role in regulating spine morphology to preserve synapses [51, 74, 99], the literature also highlights their crucial involvement in microglial motility [18, 20]. Indeed, in human brains, CFL1 is expressed across various cell types, including astrocytes, neurons, and microglia, while ACTR2 is predominately expressed in microglia and macrophages [108]. Given that different microglial phenotypes, characterized by distinct gene signatures, have been identified in response to Aβ amyloid in both human and AD mouse models [47, 59, 69, 88], we also checked the expression levels of CFL1 and ACTR2 using these databases. None of the aforementioned genes were exclusively associated with one specific microglial phenotype. Furthermore, we compared our GeoMx WTA DEGs with gene signatures linked to disease-associated microglia (DAMs) in humans and mice (also known as activated response microglia—ARM—or neurodegenerative microglia -MGnD-), identifying several genes associated with this profile in both, AD (65 DEGs) and AsymAD (306 DEGs) plaque microenvironments (Supplementary Excel 1—Microglia clusters).
Considering the spatial transcriptomics data, the prevailing expression of ACTR2 in microglia, and the emerging role of ACTR2 in microglial motility, we aimed to investigate whether its protein levels were altered in the microenvironment of AsymAD plaques by analyzing a larger number of cases. Additionally, to determine if other components of actin-based motility processes, absent in the previous pathways, are altered in the plaque-AsymAD microenvironment, we assessed the levels of CAP1. CAP1 plays a role in facilitating the release of CFL1 from ADP-actin filaments [29].
First, using antibodies against ARP2 or CAP1(green) and IBA1 (red), we evaluated the levels and distribution of these proteins in the proximity of amyloid plaques (blue) inside and outside microglia (Fig. 5a, d, f, i). Analysis of the overall fluorescence intensity of ARP2 revealed a significant increase in its expression in plaque-AsymAD versus that in plaque-AD (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, the mean of ARP2 immunoreactivity increased when evaluating only the IBA1-positive (IBA1+) area of the AsymAD plaque microenvironment. This indicates elevated ARP2 levels in microglia surrounding the amyloid plaques in AsymAD MFGs compared to AD MFGs (Fig. 5c). We also analyzed ARP2 immunoreactivity in plaque-free areas (Fig. 5d). Although we did not find differences in the ARP2 intensity per IBA1 cell between AsymAD and AD cases, AsymAD MFGs showed significantly higher levels of ARP2 than did control brains (Fig. 5e), suggesting that AsymAD cases may possess higher baseline levels of ARP2. Similar to these findings, we observed an increase in the CAP1 levels within the amyloid plaque microenvironment in AsymAD cases (Fig. 5f–h). This increase in CAP1 levels was not statistically significant between conditions when overall intensity was determined (Fig. 5g); however, a significant increase in CAP1 levels was observed within microglia (Fig. 5h). No differences between conditions were found in plaque-free areas (Fig. 5j). Given the increased microglial ARP2 levels in AsymAD compared to AD and controls cases, and its key role in generating new microglial ramifications and enhancing surveillance [20], we sought to assess the role of ARP2 in microglia direct motility. To do so, we manipulated the ACTR2 gene in the HMC3 human microglial cell line and conducted a scratch-wound assay (Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). The overexpression of ACTR2 resulted in enhanced microglial occupancy within the scratch area, leading to a significant reduction in the wound area compared to that observed in the control by the end of the assay. Conversely, the downregulation of ACTR2 maintained a consistently unaltered wound area from 40 h until the conclusion of the assay (Supplementary Fig. 6c).
Overall, these data suggest that in AsymAD cases, microglia exhibit more efficient actin-based motility mechanisms, which could heighten actin dynamics, facilitating efficient migration toward the vicinity of the plaque, promoting the elongation of microglial branches, and enhancing engagement with the plaque.
Discussion
Our study explored the molecular mechanisms within the microenvironment of amyloid plaques in AsymAD individuals, which may contribute to synapse preservation. These mechanisms were linked to a distinct cell response comprising increased expression of autophagy-related genes, and actin-based cell motility-related genes, such as ARP2 and CAP1. These genes potentially facilitate the deposition of Aβ into dense-core plaques and prevent amyloid-driven tau pathogenesis within the amyloid plaque microenvironment of filamentous plaques.
Substantial evidence suggests that microglia around plaques are key regulators of their morphology in AD mouse models. Initial observations revealed that reactive microglia encircle amyloid plaques and sequester Aβ amyloid within their cytoplasm in vitro [48, 104]. Subsequent studies supported these observations; in the CRND8 and 5xFAD AD mouse models, microglia have been shown to form a tight barrier around plaques, preventing their growth. Moreover, in regions lacking microglial processes, neuritic dystrophy is more severe, and these protective mechanisms are reduced during aging [15]. Casali et al. showed that pharmacological depletion of microglia in ten-month-old 5xFAD mice reduced the plaque burden, and the remaining plaques exhibited increased diffuse-like plaques and fewer compact-like shapes, together with increased dystrophic neuritis [12]. Similarly, Spangenberg et al. observed a reduction in dense-core plaques in the cortex of the same mouse model following chronic administration of an inhibitor of microglial proliferation [84]. Using the APP/PS1 AD mouse model, Huang et al. showed that genetic ablation of tyrosine kinase TAM receptors inhibited microglial phagocytosis and decreased dense-core plaque density in the cortex and hippocampus after 12 months of age; these changes were not due to any changes in the production of Aβ peptides [38]. In another study, exposure to ozone decreased the association of phagocytic microglia with amyloid plaques, impairing their ability to form a protective barrier and exacerbating dystrophic neuritis [33]. These findings suggest that microglia are potentially critical regulators of plaque conformation and that dense-core Aβ plaques do not form spontaneously but are constructed from loosely organized Aβ material produced by phagocytic microglia. Moreover, the importance of microglial plaque association lies in the ability of microglia to prevent amyloid plaques from causing synaptic damage. The variability in microglia and astrocyte distribution according to the plaque phenotype in AsymAD versus AD brains provides insight into the complexity of the amyloid-associated glial response. One study showed that reactive astrocytes and activated microglia respond differently to Aβ plaque formation; while microglia respond directly to the presence of plaques, astrocytes are associated with neuritic damage that occurs when synapses are already dysfunctional [81]. Therefore, a stronger microglial barrier surrounding plaques in the cortices of AsymAD cases may protect against synaptic derangement and neuritic damage, which, in turn, could mitigate the astrocytic response.
Studies in AD mouse models support the importance of the Aβ plaque microenvironment in promoting the pathological conversion of tau. In a mouse model of amyloidosis, it has been observed that Aβ plaques create a unique environment that triggers tau phosphorylation within dystrophic neuritis [53]. Furthermore, He et al. reported that when human AD-derived tau was injected into a plaque-bearing 5xFAD mouse model, Aβ plaques facilitated the conversion and seeding of pathological tau in dystrophic neurites during the early stages of pathology. This tau propagation could occur through axonal transmission to the neuronal soma and dendrites, ultimately leading to NFT formation [34]. However, NFT formation and synaptic deterioration are not entirely dependent on Aβ plaque–mediated tau pathogenesis [34], which could explain why AsymAD subjects still exhibit a considerable quantity of NFTs independent of NP-tau. Consistent with our findings, previous studies have shown that AsymAD cases exhibit an overall deficiency in oligomeric and soluble phospho-tau species, indicating fewer pathological tau species in these cases than in AD cases [8, 73, 83]. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that in addition to NFT deposition, there is a notable increase in tau oligomer-containing synapses within microglia and astrocytes during the early stages of AD but not in AsymAD cases [89]. Interestingly, it has been reported that neuronal degeneration in AD could occur via non-NFT formation in multiple neurons [44]. Given the findings of the studies mentioned above, neurotoxic tau oligomers may be responsible for a secondary pathway of neuronal death independent of NFT formation. Therefore, the evidence provided in the current study suggests that the plaque microenvironment in AsymAD individuals does not facilitate the formation of soluble tau species with strong seeding activity, unlike in neurotoxic tau oligomers formation in AD brains [60].
It is uncertain whether microglia provide beneficial but insufficient support during disease progression or whether they are effective in early disease stages but lose effectiveness and even become harmful later. Extensive evidence shows that autophagy and microglial phagocytosis are impaired in AD and aged brains [24, 30, 94, 103]. However, it has been reported that genetic variants of genes related to autophagy functions are involved in resilience against AD neuropathology [82, 92, 107]. How these processes contribute to AD resilience remains an area of active investigation, and extensive exploration has not yet been conducted. Studies in AD mouse models support the idea that more efficient microglia confer protection against amyloid plaque toxicity through their phagocytic activity. In Trem2 or Dap12 haplodeficient mice and humans carrying the R47H mutation in the TREM2 gene, the microglia demonstrate a markedly reduced ability to envelop amyloid deposits, decreasing compact plaque phenotypes and increasing amyloid fibril exposure to adjacent neurites, which is associated with tau hyperphosphorylation [102, 106]. Moreover, a recent study revealed a high abundance of activated microglia in the cortices of an NDAN patient cohort. The authors also reported higher levels of the microglial phagocytic complex TREM2/DAP12 in Aβ amyloid plaques in NDAN than in those in AD, concluding that microglia surrounding Aβ plaques in NDAN are hyperactive and more effectively recognize damaged synapses with greater phagocytic capacity than microglia in AD [27]. Interestingly, proteomics analyses of neocortex tissues from pathologically diagnosed preclinical AD cases revealed an increase in processes associated with vesicle endocytosis and the secretory pathway [54]. Although these data are not cell specific, they suggest that these processes are efficient in the early stages of pathology. Our GeoMx WTA revealed several genes associated with cell engulfment (endocytosis and phagocytosis) and autophagy within the plaque microenvironment of AsymAD MFGs, similar to the findings in early stages of the pathology in mouse models and preclinical AD cases. Therefore, microglia in AsymAD cases may maintain their ability to cleave Aβ amyloid even years after plaque formation.
Microglial function is highly dependent on baseline motility, which consists of the extension, retraction, and movement of microglial processes [37, 70], allowing membrane ruffling. It has been shown that aging reduces microglial adhesion and migration toward fibrillar Aβ in APP/PS1 mice and even in wild-type mice [23]. At the molecular level, cytoskeleton reorganization is necessary to carry out these processes [29]. In this context, ARP2, CAP1, and CFL1 are proteins related to engulfment processes through actin-based motility mechanisms [28, 29], that were recently associated with AD resilience according to protein coexpression analysis [39]. In the context of AD, an overall reduction in ARP2 has been found in human AD parietal cortex tissue [51]. Although there is no clear evidence of CFL1 and CAP1 changes in AD [28, 72], CFL1 is one of the main components of actin/cofilin rods, which are insoluble aggregates that lead to neurodysfunction [4, 101]. Interestingly, we found that microglia in plaque-free areas exhibited significantly greater levels of ARP2 in AsymAD MFGs than those observed in healthy controls. This finding led us to speculate that AsymAD cases may have a higher basal level of microglial ARP2 and, consequently, enhanced motility, as evidenced by increased microglial motility observed in vitro, potentially occurring even before plaque formation. Furthermore, AsymAD brains may possess the ability to increase ARP2 expression in response to amyloid pathology. Considering a previous study in a transgenic mouse model of AD demonstrating that efficient microglial clustering around Aβ plaques mitigates amyloid-driven tau seeding [32], AsymAD individuals might be characterized by the presence of microglia with enhanced migration and extension toward newly formed amyloid plaques. This ability of microglia to efficiently cluster around plaques could reduce the effect of amyloid in promoting tau seeding and subsequently mitigate synaptic deterioration. It is worth to mention that ARP2 is not expressed solely in microglia; therefore, we cannot rule out effects from other cell types [35, 85]. Our GeoMx WTA also showed enrichment of synaptic and neurotransmission release-related genes (VAMP2, SYT1 and SYT11) and genes encoding microtubule proteins within the axons (TUBA1C and TUBB4A) in plaque-AsymAD versus plaque-AD. It is well established that the absence of dementia in AsymAD individuals is partly due to synaptic preservation and, hence, neuron survival [31, 67].
Finally, this study proposes a potential mechanism by which AsymAD cases may resist or delay the pathological processes contributing to the formation of synaptotoxic soluble tau species with seeding activity within the amyloid plaque niche. This finding highlights the significance of an efficient microglial response to amyloid plaques. While our findings reveal new insights into the resilience to AD pathology involving microglial mechanisms, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to assess sex differences. Furthermore, our findings are limited to the middle frontal gyrus brain area, and this limitation should be considered when interpreting the data. Finally, mechanistic experiments to assess the specific response of microglial ARP2/CAP1 to Aβ amyloid and tau will be necessary to explore their role in synaptic protection and contribution to AD resilience.
Conclusion
Our findings reveal a novel mechanism by which AsymAD cases can maintain normal cognition and achieve resilience against AD. We observed that microglia in AsymAD MFGs exhibit increased expression of proteins involved in a more efficient chemotactic motility than those in AD brains. These could allow microglia to remodel their branches and surround the amyloid plaque, facilitating the engulfment and clearance of toxic Aβ aggregates, which may mitigate Aβ-associated tau pathogenesis and decrease tau seeding. Our discoveries have important implications for the development of interventions to halt synaptic damage in AD patients and forestall subsequent cognitive impairments and dementia.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Synapse.org at https://doi.org/10.7303/syn61908908 and upon request.
References
Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Al-Sarraj S, Bodi I, Bogdanovic N, Braak H et al (2008) Staging of neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: a study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium. Brain Pathol 18:484–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00147.x
American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn. American Psychiatric Press, Washington
Arriagada PV, Marzloff K, Hyman BT (1992) Distribution of Alzheimer-type pathologic changes in nondemented elderly individuals matches the pattern in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 42:1681–1681. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.42.9.1681
Bamburg JR, Bernstein BW, Davis RC, Flynn KC, Goldsbury C, Jensen JR et al (2010) ADF/cofilin-actin rods in neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Alzheimer Res 7:241–250. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720510791050902
Barroeta-Espar I, Weinstock LD, Perez-Nievas BG, Meltzer AC, Siao Tick Chong M, Amaral AC et al (2019) Distinct cytokine profiles in human brains resilient to Alzheimer’s pathology. Neurobiol Dis 121:327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2018.10.009
Bellenguez C, Küçükali F, Jansen IE, Kleineidam L, Moreno-Grau S, Amin N et al (2022) New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat Genet 54:412–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01024-z
Bennett DA, Buchman AS, Boyle PA, Barnes LL, Wilson RS, Schneider JA (2018) Religious orders study and rush memory and aging project. J Alzheimers Dis 64:S161–S189. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-179939
Bjorklund NL, Reese LC, Sadagoparamanujam V-M, Ghirardi V, Woltjer RL, Taglialatela G (2012) Absence of amyloid β oligomers at the postsynapse and regulated synaptic Zn2+ in cognitively intact aged individuals with Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Mol Neurodegener 7:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-7-23
Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K (2006) Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 112:389–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z
Braak H, Braak E (1991) Neuropathological staging of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 82:239–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308809
Carlyle BC, Kandigian SE, Kreuzer J, Das S, Trombetta BA, Kuo Y et al (2021) Synaptic proteins associated with cognitive performance and neuropathology in older humans revealed by multiplexed fractionated proteomics. Neurobiol Aging 105:99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.04.012
Casali BT, MacPherson KP, Reed-Geaghan EG, Landreth GE (2020) Microglia depletion rapidly and reversibly alters amyloid pathology by modification of plaque compaction and morphologies. Neurobiol Dis 142:104956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104956
Chen Y, Zhao S, Fan Z, Li Z, Zhu Y, Shen T et al (2021) Metformin attenuates plaque-associated tau pathology and reduces amyloid-β burden in APP/PS1 mice. Alzheimers Res Ther 13:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00761-9
Christensen KR, Beach TG, Serrano GE, Kanaan NM (2019) Pathogenic tau modifications occur in axons before the somatodendritic compartment in mossy fiber and Schaffer collateral pathways. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0675-9
Condello C, Yuan P, Schain A, Grutzendler J (2015) Microglia constitute a barrier that prevents neurotoxic protofibrillar Aβ42 hotspots around plaques. Nat Commun 6:6176. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7176
Crary JF, Trojanowski JQ, Schneider JA, Abisambra JF, Abner EL, Alafuzoff I et al (2014) Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 128:755–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0
Danaher P, Kim Y, Nelson B, Griswold M, Yang Z, Piazza E et al (2022) Advances in mixed cell deconvolution enable quantification of cell types in spatial transcriptomic data. Nat Commun 13:385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28020-5
Desale SE, Chinnathambi S (2021) Phosphoinositides signaling modulates microglial actin remodeling and phagocytosis in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Commun Signal 19:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-021-00715-0
DeTure MA, Dickson DW (2019) The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 14:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-019-0333-5
Drew J, Arancibia-Carcamo IL, Jolivet R, Lopez-Domenech G, Attwell D, Kittler JT (2020) Control of microglial dynamics by Arp2/3 and the autism and schizophrenia-associated protein Cyfip1. Neuroscience
Driscoll I, Troncoso J (2011) Brain resilience and plasticity in the face of Alzheimer pathology. Curr Alzheimer Res 8:329–329
Driscoll I, Troncoso J (2012) Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease: a prodrome or a state of resilience?
Fang Y, Wang J, Yao L, Li C, Wang J, Liu Y et al (2018) The adhesion and migration of microglia to β-amyloid (Aβ) is decreased with aging and inhibited by Nogo/NgR pathway. J Neuroinflammation 15:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1250-1
Filippone A, Esposito E, Mannino D, Lyssenko N, Praticò D (2022) The contribution of altered neuronal autophagy to neurodegeneration. Pharmacol Ther 238:108178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108178
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Fox LM, William CM, Adamowicz DH, Pitstick R, Carlson GA, Spires-Jones TL et al (2011) Soluble tau species, not neurofibrillary aggregates, disrupt neural system integration in a tau transgenic model. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 70:588–595. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e318220a658
Fracassi A, Marcatti M, Tumurbaatar B, Woltjer R, Moreno S, Taglialatela G (2023) TREM2 -induced activation of microglia contributes to synaptic integrity in cognitively intact aged individuals with Alzheimer’s neuropathology. Brain Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.13108
Franco-Bocanegra DK, George B, Lau LC, Holmes C, Nicoll JAR, Boche D (2019) Microglial motility in Alzheimer’s disease and after Aβ42 immunotherapy: a human post-mortem study. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7:174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0828-x
Franco-Bocanegra McAuley, Nicoll B (2019) Molecular mechanisms of microglial motility: changes in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Cells 8:639. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8060639
Gabandé-Rodríguez E, Keane L, Capasso M (2020) Microglial phagocytosis in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Res 98:284–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24419
Gómez-Isla T, Frosch MP (2022) Lesions without symptoms: understanding resilience to Alzheimer disease neuropathological changes. Nat Rev Neurol 18:323–332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-022-00642-9
Gratuze M, Chen Y, Parhizkar S, Jain N, Strickland MR, Serrano JR et al (2021) Activated microglia mitigate Aβ-associated tau seeding and spreading. J Exp Med 218:e20210542. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20210542
Greve HJ, Dunbar AL, Lombo CG, Ahmed C, Thang M, Messenger EJ et al (2023) The bidirectional lung brain-axis of amyloid-β pathology: ozone dysregulates the peri-plaque microenvironment. Brain 146:991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac113
He Z, Guo JL, McBride JD, Narasimhan S, Kim H, Changolkar L et al (2018) Amyloid-β plaques enhance Alzheimer’s brain tau-seeded pathologies by facilitating neuritic plaque tau aggregation. Nat Med 24:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4443
Heinze A, Schuldt C, Khudayberdiev S, Van Bommel B, Hacker D, Schulz TG et al (2022) Functional interdependence of the actin regulators CAP1 and cofilin1 in control of dendritic spine morphology. Cell Mol Life Sci 79:558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04593-8
Holmes BB, Furman JL, Mahan TE, Yamasaki TR, Mirbaha H, Eades WC et al (2014) Proteopathic tau seeding predicts tauopathy in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411649111
Hristovska I, Pascual O (2016) Deciphering resting microglial morphology and process motility from a synaptic prospect. Front Integr Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2015.00073
Huang Y, Happonen KE, Burrola PG, O’Connor C, Hah N, Huang L et al (2021) Microglia use TAM receptors to detect and engulf amyloid β plaques. Nat Immunol 22:586–594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-021-00913-5
Huang Z, Merrihew GE, Larson EB, Park J, Plubell D, Fox EJ et al (2023) Brain proteomic analysis implicates actin filament processes and injury response in resilience to Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun 14:2747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38376-x
Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Carrillo MC et al (2012) National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007
Iacono D, Markesbery WR, Gross M, Pletnikova O, Rudow G, Zandi P et al (2009) The nun study: clinically silent ad, neuronal hypertrophy, and linguistic skills in early life. Neurology 73:665–673. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b01077
Iacono D, O’Brien R, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Pletnikova O, Rudow G et al (2008) Neuronal hypertrophy In asymptomatic Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 67:578–589. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181772794
Iacono D, Resnick SM, An Y, Pletnikova O, Rudow G, Crain B et al (2014) Mild cognitive impairment and asymptomatic Alzheimer disease subjects: equivalent a-amyloid and tau loads with divergent cognitive outcomes. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 73:295–304
Ihara Y (2001) PHF and PHF-like fibrils–cause or consequence? Neurobiol Aging 22:123–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00200-1
Jaye S, Sandau US, Saugstad JA (2024) Clathrin mediated endocytosis in Alzheimer’s disease: cell type specific involvement in amyloid beta pathology. Front Aging Neurosci 16:1378576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1378576
Karahan H, Smith DC, Kim B, Dabin LC, Al-Amin MM, Wijeratne HRS et al (2021) Deletion of Abi3 gene locus exacerbates neuropathological features of Alzheimer’s disease in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis. Sci Adv 7:eabe3954. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe3954
Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK et al (2017) A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 169:1276-1290.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018
Koenigsknecht-Talboo J, Landreth GE (2005) Microglial phagocytosis induced by fibrillar β-amyloid and IgGs are differentially regulated by proinflammatory cytokines. J Neurosci 25:8240–8249. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1808-05.2005
Lasagna-Reeves CA, Castillo-Carranza DL, Guerrero-Muñoz MJ, Jackson GR, Kayed R (2010) Preparation and characterization of neurotoxic tau oligomers. Biochemistry 49:10039–10041. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi1016233
Lasagna-Reeves CA, Castillo-Carranza DL, Sengupta U, Guerrero-Munoz MJ, Kiritoshi T, Neugebauer V et al (2012) Alzheimer brain-derived tau oligomers propagate pathology from endogenous tau. Sci Rep 2:700. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00700
Lauterborn JC, Cox CD, Chan SW, Vanderklish PW, Lynch G, Gall CM (2020) Synaptic actin stabilization protein loss in Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease. Brain Pathol 30:319–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12779
Lemke G, Huang Y (2022) The dense-core plaques of Alzheimer’s disease are granulomas. J Exp Med 219:e20212477. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20212477
Li T, Braunstein KE, Zhang J, Lau A, Sibener L, Deeble C et al (2016) The neuritic plaque facilitates pathological conversion of tau in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Nat Commun 7:12082. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12082
Li X, Tsolis KC, Koper MJ, Ronisz A, Ospitalieri S, von Arnim CAF et al (2021) Sequence of proteome profiles in preclinical and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 17:946–958. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12345
Litwiniuk A, Juszczak GR, Stankiewicz AM, Urbańska K (2023) The role of glial autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry 28:4528–4539. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02242-5
Lopresti BJ, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, Hoge JA, Ziolko SK, Lu X, Meltzer CC, Schimmel K, Tsopelas ND, DeKosky ST, Price JC. Simplified quantification of Pittsburgh compound B amyloid imaging PET studies: a comparative analysis
Corrada MM, Berlau JD, Kawas HC (2012) A population-based clinicopathological study in the oldest-old: the 90+ study. Curr Alzheimer Res 9:709–717. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720512801322537
Maeda S, Sahara N, Saito Y, Murayama S, Ikai A, Takashima A (2006) Increased levels of granular tau oligomers: an early sign of brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Res 54:197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2005.11.009
Mancuso R, Fattorelli N, Martinez-Muriana A, Davis E, Wolfs L, Van Den Daele J et al (2024) Xenografted human microglia display diverse transcriptomic states in response to Alzheimer’s disease-related amyloid-β pathology. Nat Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01600-y
Martinez P, Patel H, You Y, Jury N, Perkins A, Lee-Gosselin A et al (2022) Bassoon contributes to tau-seed propagation and neurotoxicity. Nat Neurosci 25:1597–1607. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01191-6
McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O’Brien JT, Feldman H et al (2005) Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology 65:1863–1872. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000187889.17253.b1
McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS—ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 77:333–333. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000400650.92875.cf
Morris JC (1993) The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43:2412. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.43.11.2412-a
Moutinho M, Puntambekar SS, Tsai AP, Coronel I, Lin PB, Casali BT et al (2022) The niacin receptor HCAR2 modulates microglial response and limits disease progression in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med 14:eabl7634. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abl7634
Nelson PT, Dickson DW, Trojanowski JQ, Jack CR, Boyle PA, Arfanakis K et al (2019) Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE): consensus working group report. Brain 142:1503–1527. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz099
Nelson PT, Lee EB, Cykowski MD, Alafuzoff I, Arfanakis K, Attems J et al (2023) LATE-NC staging in routine neuropathologic diagnosis: an update. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 145:159–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-022-02524-2
Neuner SM, Telpoukhovskaia M, Menon V, O’Connell KMS, Hohman TJ, Kaczorowski CC (2022) Translational approaches to understanding resilience to Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Neurosci 45:369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.02.005
O’Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L, Crain BJ, Pletnikova O et al (2009) Neuropathologic studies of the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging (BLSA). J Alzheimers Dis 18:665–675. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2009-1179
Olah M, Menon V, Habib N, Taga MF, Ma Y, Yung CJ et al (2020) Single cell RNA sequencing of human microglia uncovers a subset associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun 11:6129. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19737-2
Parkhurst CN, Gan W-B (2010) Microglia dynamics and function in the CNS. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20:595–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.07.002
Patel H, Martinez P, Perkins A, Taylor X, Jury N, McKinzie D et al (2022) Pathological tau and reactive astrogliosis are associated with distinct functional deficits in a mouse model of tauopathy. Neurobiol Aging 109:52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.09.006
Pelucchi S, Vandermeulen L, Pizzamiglio L, Aksan B, Yan J, Konietzny A et al (2020) Cyclase-associated protein 2 dimerization regulates cofilin in synaptic plasticity and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Commun 2:fcaa086. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa086
Perez-Nievas BG, Stein TD, Tai H-C, Dols-Icardo O, Scotton TC, Barroeta-Espar I et al (2013) Dissecting phenotypic traits linked to human resilience to Alzheimer’s pathology. Brain 136:2510–2526. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt171
Pham AQ, Dore K (2023) Novel approaches to increase synaptic resilience as potential treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol 139:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.03.032
Pollard TD, Beltzner CC. Structure and function of the Arp2/3 complex
Price JL, McKeel DW, Buckles VD, Roe CM, Xiong C, Grundman M et al (2009) Neuropathology of nondemented aging: presumptive evidence for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging 30:1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.002
Puntambekar SS, Moutinho M, Lin PB-C, Jadhav V, Tumbleson-Brink D, Balaji A et al (2022) CX3CR1 deficiency aggravates amyloid driven neuronal pathology and cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 17:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-022-00545-9
Riley KP, Snowdon DA, Desrosiers MF, Markesbery WR (2005) Early life linguistic ability, late life cognitive function, and neuropathology: findings from the Nun Study. Neurobiol Aging 26:341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.06.019
Riudavets MA, Iacono D, Resnick SM, O’Brien R, Zonderman AB, Martin LJ et al (2007) Resistance to Alzheimer’s pathology is associated with nuclear hypertrophy in neurons. Neurobiol Aging 28:1484–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.05.005
Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, Sumi SM, Crain BJ, Brownlee LM et al (1991) The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Neurology 41:479. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.41.4.479
Serrano-Pozo A, Muzikansky A, Gómez-Isla T, Growdon JH, Betensky RA, Frosch MP et al (2013) Differential relationships of reactive astrocytes and microglia to fibrillar amyloid deposits in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 72:462–471. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182933788
Seto M, Weiner RL, Dumitrescu L, Hohman TJ (2021) Protective genes and pathways in Alzheimer’s disease: moving towards precision interventions. Mol Neurodegener 16:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-021-00452-5
Singh A, Allen D, Fracassi A, Tumurbaatar B, Natarajan C, Scaduto P et al (2020) Functional integrity of synapses in the central nervous system of cognitively intact individuals with high Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology is associated with absence of synaptic tau oligomers. J Alzheimers Dis 78:1661–1678. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200716
Spangenberg E, Severson PL, Hohsfield LA, Crapser J, Zhang J, Burton EA et al (2019) Sustained microglial depletion with CSF1R inhibitor impairs parenchymal plaque development in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Nat Commun 10:3758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11674-z
Spence EF, Kanak DJ, Carlson BR, Soderling SH (2016) The Arp2/3 complex is essential for distinct stages of spine synapse maturation, including synapse unsilencing. J Neurosci 36:9696–9709. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0876-16.2016
Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, Hafemeister C, Papalexi E, Mauck WM et al (2019) Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177:1888-1902.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031
Suarez-Arnedo A, Torres Figueroa F, Clavijo C, Arbeláez P, Cruz JC, Muñoz-Camargo C (2020) An image J plugin for the high throughput image analysis of in vitro scratch wound healing assays. PLoS ONE 15:e0232565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232565
Sun N, Victor MB, Park YP, Xiong X, Scannail AN, Leary N et al (2023) Human microglial state dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease progression. Cell 186:4386-4403.e29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.037
Taddei RN, Perbet R, Mate De Gerando A, Wiedmer AE, Sanchez-Mico M, Connors Stewart T et al (2023) Tau oligomer-containing synapse elimination by microglia and astrocytes in Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol 80:1209. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3530
Tandon R, Levey AI, Lah JJ, Seyfried NT, Mitchell CS (2023) Machine learning selection of most predictive brain proteins suggests role of sugar metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 92:411–424. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220683
Telpoukhovskaia M, Hadad N, Gurdon B, Dai M, Ouellette AR, Neuner S et al (2022) Conserved cell-type specific signature of resilience to Alzheimer’s disease nominates role for excitatory cortical neurons. Alzheimers Dement. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.069370
Tesi N, Van Der Lee SJ, Hulsman M, Jansen IE, Stringa N, Van Schoor NM et al (2020) Immune response and endocytosis pathways are associated with the resilience against Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Psychiatry 10:332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01018-7
Thal DR, Rüb U, Orantes M, Braak H (2002) Phases of Aβ-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58:1791–1800. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.58.12.1791
Thomas AL, Lehn MA, Janssen EM, Hildeman DA, Chougnet CA (2022) Naturally-aged microglia exhibit phagocytic dysfunction accompanied by gene expression changes reflective of underlying neurologic disease. Sci Rep 12:19471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21920-y
Tian H, Davidowitz E, Lopez P, Emadi S, Moe J, Sierks M (2013) Trimeric tau is toxic to human neuronal cells at low nanomolar concentrations. Int J Cell Biol 2013:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/260787
Tomlinson BE, Blessed G, Roth M (1968) Observations on the brains of non-demented old people. J Neurol Sci 7:331–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(68)90154-8
Tsering W, Hery GP, Phillips JL, Lolo K, Bathe T, Villareal JA et al (2023) Transformation of non-neuritic into neuritic plaques during AD progression drives cortical spread of tau pathology via regenerative failure. Acta Neuropathol Commun 11:190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01688-6
Tumurbaatar B, Fracassi A, Scaduto P, Guptarak J, Woltjer R, Jupiter D et al (2023) Preserved autophagy in cognitively intact non-demented individuals with Alzheimer’s neuropathology. Alzheimers Dement. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.13074
Walker CK, Herskowitz JH (2021) Dendritic spines: mediators of cognitive resilience in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscientist 27:487–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858420945964
Walker JM, Kazempour Dehkordi S, Fracassi A, Vanschoiack A, Pavenko A, Taglialatela G et al (2022) Differential protein expression in the hippocampi of resilient individuals identified by digital spatial profiling. Acta Neuropathol Commun 10:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-022-01324-9
Wang Q, Yuan W, Yang X, Wang Y, Li Y, Qiao H (2020) Role of cofilin in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Cell Dev Biol 8:584898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.584898
Wang Y, Ulland TK, Ulrich JD, Song W, Tzaferis JA, Hole JT et al (2016) TREM2-mediated early microglial response limits diffusion and toxicity of amyloid plaques. J Exp Med 213:667–675. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20151948
Wang Z, Wang Q, Li S, Li X-J, Yang W, He D (2023) Microglial autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 14:1065183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.1065183
Webster SD, Yang AJ, Margol L, Garzon-Rodriguez W, Glabe CG, Tenner AJ (2000) Complement component C1q modulates the phagocytosis of Aβ by microglia. Exp Neurol 161:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.1999.7260
Yamamoto T, Hirano A (1986) A comparative study modified Bielschowsky, Bodian and thioflavin S stains on Alzheimer’s neurofibrillary tangles. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 12:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.1986.tb00677.x
Yuan P, Condello C, Keene CD, Wang Y, Bird TD, Paul SM et al (2016) TREM2 haplodeficiency in mice and humans impairs the microglia barrier function leading to decreased amyloid compaction and severe axonal dystrophy. Neuron 90:724–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.003
Zhang M, Ganz AB, Rohde S, Rozemuller AJM, Bank NB, Reinders MJT et al (2022) Resilience and resistance to the accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in centenarians: an age-continuous perspective. Alzheimers Dement. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12899
Zhang Y, Sloan SA, Clarke LE, Caneda C, Plaza CA, Blumenthal PD et al (2016) Purification and characterization of progenitor and mature human astrocytes reveals transcriptional and functional differences with mouse. Neuron 89:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.013
Agora: an open platform for exploration of Alzheimer’s disease evidence
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge all brain donors and their caregivers and the Johns Hopkins University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (NIH P30AG066507), BIOCARD Study (NIH U19AG033655), and the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). This study was funded by NIH/NINDS 1R01NS119280, NIH/NIA 1RF1AG059639, and AARGD-591887 grants; the Department of Defense Award AZ180006 to C.A.L.-R.; NIH/NIA R21AG075541 to C.A.L.-R. and J.Z.; 1R01GM148970 to T.S.J. and J.Z.; and the Tau Consortium Leadership Award by the Rainwater Foundation to N.J.-G. This publication was also supported by the Sara Roush Memorial Fellowship in Alzheimer’s Disease to N.J.-G., the Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, and the Stark Neurosciences Research Institute and made possible by the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, funded in part by grant # UL1TR002529 from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. This study was funded in part by the Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, NIH. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation. We thank the Biomarker Core at the Stark Neurosciences Research Institute and Dr. Louise Pay for feedback on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.J-G. and C.L-R. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. J.R.-O. and J.T. provided brain samples and performed neuropathology diagnosis. N.J-G. performed the histological, biochemical, and seeding experiments. Y.Y. performed the size exclusion chromatography and seeding experiments on the S.E.C. fractions. N.J-G. and P.M. performed the immunofluorescence and quantitative analyses. N.J-G. and H.K. performed the cell culture experiments. J.T. and S.R. contributed to the interpretation of histopathology data. N.J.-G. performed the whole spatial transcriptomics and analyses. E.C.-J., T.S.J., and J.Z. contributed to the spatial transcriptomic bioinformatic analyses. C.L.-R., J.T. and J.K. critically revised the manuscript and interpreted the data. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jury-Garfe, N., Redding-Ochoa, J., You, Y. et al. Enhanced microglial dynamics and a paucity of tau seeding in the amyloid plaque microenvironment contribute to cognitive resilience in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 148, 15 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-024-02775-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-024-02775-1