Abstract
In general, the optical determination of static and advancing contact angle is made on drops applied or extended, respectively, onto a substrate through the use of thin solid needles. Although this method is used extensively, this way of dosing can be time consuming, cumbersome and if not performed meticulously can lead to erroneous results. Herein, we present an alternative way of applying drops onto substrates using a liquid jet produced by a liquid pressure dosing system acting as a “liquid needle”. We performed a comparative static contact angle study on 14 different surfaces with two different liquids (water and diiodomethane) utilizing two different ways of dosing: the conventional solid and a novel liquid needle-based technique. We found, for all but one sample, that the obtained results on μl size drops were comparable within the experimental error bars provided the liquid needle is thin enough. Observed differences are explained by the special characteristics of either way of dosing. In addition, we demonstrate how the liquid pressure-based dosing system facilitates high-speed optical advancing contact angle measurement by expanding a drop from 0.1 to 22 μl within less than 1.2 s but yet providing constant contact angle versus drop base diameter curves. The obtained results were compared with data from tensiometric dynamic Wilhelmy contact angle measurements. These data, in conjunction with sequences of live images of the dosing process of the liquid pressure dosing system, illustrate how this system can replace the solid needle by a liquid needle.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Young T (1805) Phil Trans R Soc Lond:65–87
Cheng P, Li D, Boruvka L, Rotenberg Y, Neumann A (1990) Colloids Surf 43(2):151. doi:10.1016/0166-6622(90)80286-D
Eral H, ’t Mannetje D, Oh J (2013) Collied Polym Sci 291(2):247. doi:10.1007/s00396-012-2796-6
Kwon HM, Paxson AT, Varanasi KK, Patankar NA (2011) Phys Rev Lett 106:036102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.036102
Waghmare PR, Das S, Mitra SK (2013) Soft Matter 9:7437. doi:10.1039/C3SM50981H
Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M, Mabry JM, Mazzella SA, Rutledge GC, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2007) Science 318(5856):1618. doi:10.1126/science.1148326
Liu T, Kim CJ (2014) Science 346(6213):1096. doi:10.1126/science.1254787
Taylor M, Urquhart AJ, Zelzer M, Davies MC, Alexander MR (2007) Langmuir 23(13):6875. doi:10.1021/la070100j
Deng X, Mammen L, Butt HJ, Vollmer D (2012) Science 335(6064):67. doi:10.1126/science.1207115
Rioboo R, Marengo M, Tropea C (2002) Exp Fluids 33(1):112. doi:10.1007/s00348-002-0431-x
Vadillo D, Soucemarianadin A, Delattre C, Roux DCD (2009) Phys Fluids 21(122002):122002
Ukiwe C, Kwok DY (2005) Langmuir 21(2):666. doi:10.1021/la0481288
Pasandideh-Fard M, Qiao Y, Chandra S, Mostaghimi J (1996) Phys Fluids 8(3):650
Butt HJ, Roisman IV, Brinkmann M, Papadopoulos P, Vollmer D, Semprebon C (2014) Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science 19(4):343. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2014.04.009
Weser F, Scheithauer C, Friedrich B (2015) Contact angle measurement apparatus. https://www.google.de/patents/EP2899528A1?cl=en. EP Patent App. EP20,140,152,563
Collet P, De Coninck J, Drouiche K, Dunlop F (2013) Collied Polym Sci 291(2):291. doi:10.1007/s00396-012-2839-z
Bormashenko E (2013) Collied Polym Sci 291(2):339. doi:10.1007/s00396-012-2778-8
Tavana H, Yang G, Yip CM, Appelhans D, Zschoche S, Grundke K, Hair ML, Neumann AW (2006) Langmuir 22(2):628. doi:10.1021/la051715o
Ashurst W, Yau C, Carraro C, Maboudian R, Dugger M (2001) J Microelectromech Syst 10 (1):41. doi:10.1109/84.911090
Wang A, Tang H, Cao T, Salley SO, Ng KS (2005) J Colloid Interface Sci 291(2):438. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2005.05.008
Bonn D, Eggers J, Indekeu J, Meunier J, Rolley E (2009) Rev Mod Phys 81:739. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.739
Blake TD (2006) J Colloid Interface Sci 299(1):1. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.051
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Igor Kogut and Prashant R. Waghmare for fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
The authors are employed by KRÜSS GmbH.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, M., Sanedrin, R., Frese, D. et al. Replacing the solid needle by a liquid one when measuring static and advancing contact angles. Colloid Polym Sci 294, 657–665 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-015-3823-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-015-3823-1