Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to use the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index to assess fecal incontinence after fistulotomy and to correlate the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score with quality-of-life measures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on consecutive patients undergoing fistulotomy by a single colon and rectal surgeon at a university hospital from 1991 to 1999. Demographics, fistula anatomy, surgical technique, and length of follow-up were recorded. Mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews were conducted to determine the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score, pad usage, lifestyle restriction, and psychosocial factors. A linear regression model was used to determine the relationship of clinical factors with Fecal Incontinence Severity Index. One-way ANOVA was used to correlate Fecal Incontinence Severity Index with quality-of-life measures. RESULTS: Of 110 patients who underwent fistulotomy, 96 (88 percent) had complete follow-up. Mean age was 48 (range, 17–84) years, and 68 percent were male. Follow-up was less than two years in 26 percent, two to five years in 39 percent, and more than five years in 35 percent. Of these patients, 41 percent had intersphincteric fistulas, whereas 59 percent had transsphincteric fistulas. Median Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score was 6, with a mean of 13 (maximum Fecal Incontinence Severity Index = 61); 36 percent had a Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score of zero. Linear regression revealed that only the amount of external sphincter divided correlated with Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score (P = 0.05). Quality-of-life measures strongly correlated with Fecal Incontinence Severity Index by analysis of variance (P < 0.01 for pad usage, lifestyle restriction, depression, and embarrassment), with substantial quality-of-life drop-off documented with Fecal Incontinence Severity Index >30. CONCLUSION: The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index is an excellent tool to gauge quality of life after fistulotomy. Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores >30 predict a detrimental effect on quality of life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
TH Rockwood JM Church JW Fleshman et al. (1999) ArticleTitlePatient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: Dis Colon Rectum 42 1525–1532
AG Parks PH Gordon JD Hardcastle (1976) ArticleTitleA classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63 1–12
NH Hyman (1999) ArticleTitleAnorectal abscess and fistula. Prim Care 26 69–80
NH Hyman (1999) ArticleTitleEndoanal advancement flap repair for complex anorectal fistulas. Am J Surg 178 337–340
JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97
J Garcia-Aguilar C Belmonte WD Wong et al. (1996) ArticleTitleAnal fistula surgery: Dis Colon Rectum 39 723–729
JJ Tjandra CL Tang (1998) ArticleTitleTreatment of anal abscesses and low anal fistula. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 9 172–176
J Garcia-Aguilar KS Wong DA Rothenberger (1998) ArticleTitleManagement of recurrent anal fistula. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 9 183–191
TH Rockwood JM Church JW Fleshman et al. (2000) ArticleTitleFecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: Dis Colon Rectum 43 9–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Cavanaugh, M., Hyman, N. & Osler, T. Fecal Incontinence Severity Index After Fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 349–353 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6181-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6181-5